Summa Technologiae (the Latin-language title translates as "Summa (Compendium) of Technology") is a 1964 book by Polish author Stanisław Lem. Summa is one of the first collections of philosophical essays by Lem. The book exhibits depth of insight and irony usual for Lem's creations.[citation needed] Its name alludes to Summa Theologiae by Thomas Aquinas.[1]
 First edition | |
| Author | Stanisław Lem |
|---|---|
| Cover artist | Daniel Mróz |
| Country | Poland |
| Language | Polish |
| Publisher | Wydawnictwo Literackie |
Publication date | 1964 |
Published in English | 2013 |
| Pages | 448 |
| ISBN | 978-0816675777 |
Description edit
Paraphrasing the author, the book tries to "examine the thorns of roses that have not flowered yet"—in other words, to deal with problems of the remote (and in some cases, not so remote) future. The primary question Lem treats in the book is that of civilization in the absence of limitations, both technological and material. He also looks at moral-ethical and philosophical consequences of future technologies.
Despite its age and a number of inaccuracies in specific domains (e.g., mathematics, biology, sociology), the book has lost no momentum in the past years.[2] Among the themes that Lem discusses in the book and that were completely in the realm of science fiction then, but are gaining importance today, are virtual reality (Lem calls it "phantomatics"), theory of search engines ("ariadnology", after Ariadne's thread), technological singularity,[3] molecular nanotechnology ("molectronics"), cognitive enhancement ("cerebromatics"), artificial intelligence ("intellectronics").[2]
In the preface to the first edition Lem mentions the crucial role of Iosif Shklovsky's popular science monograph Вселенная, жизнь, разум (English: Universe, Life, Intelligence, Moscow, USSR Academy of Sciences Publisher, 1962) in shaping the Summae.
In 1996 the book received the award of the Czech Academy of Science Fiction, Fantasy and Horror (Akademie science fiction, fantasy a hororu) in the category "Nonfiction titles" ("Titul mimo beletrii").[4]
Contents edit
The book has eight chapters, each dealing with far-fetched implications of a certain concept:
- 1. Dilemmas
- Lem starts by presenting his views on future prognostication and motivations in writing the book.
- 2. Two Evolutions
- This chapter considers similarities between several evolutions: biological, technological and social.
- 3. Space Civilizations
- An overview of contemporary (to the book) SETI efforts and theories is given, with their criticism.
- 4. Intellectronics
- A word coined by Lem to speculate on the field that is known today as artificial intelligence: The day will come when machine intelligence will rival or surpass the human one. Moreover, problems facing humankind may surpass the intellectual abilities of flesh and blood researchers. What shall we expect (or fear) in this conception of the future?
- 5. Prolegomena to Omnipotence
- Technological evolution gives us more and more abilities—in fact, sometime in the future we should be able to do everything at all! Or maybe not?
- 6. Phantomology
- Another term invented by Lem for what is known now as virtual reality. Human perception is limited by biology—so maybe we can bypass the real omnipotence in favor of an imitated one? Even in this case, Lem finds many surprising problems.
- Lem revisited this section in 1991 in his essay "Thirty Years Later", translated in the book A Stanislaw Lem Reader. Many of the predictions from this section are coming to reality.[5]
- 7. Creation of the Worlds
- May it be that instead of painstaking research we can "grow" new information from available information in an automatic way? Starting with this question Lem evolves the concept to the creation of whole new Universes, including (as a special treat) the construction of a heaven/hell/afterlife enabled one.
- 8. Pasquinade on Evolution
- Biological evolution did a rather lousy job designing humans and other animals. Can engineers do better?
The first edition also contained:
- 9. Art and Technology
- (Polish: Sztuka i technologia.) After Leszek Kołakowski severely criticised the chapter, it was removed in later editions, both Polish and foreign. In 1988 Lem remarked that during the time past the subject had gained it its actuality.[6]
The 4th, expanded edition (1984) contains an additional essay:
- Afterword. 20 Years Later.
In 1991 Lem wrote a yet another afterword, Thirty Years Later, published separately and translated in A Stanislaw Lem Reader.
English translations edit
The book was originally published in Polish.
- Lem, Stanisław (2013). Summa technologiae. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. ISBN 0816675767., first complete English translation; translated by Joanna Zylinska[3]
- Chapter I "Dilemmas" and fragments of chapters II "Two Evolutions", IV "Intellectronics" and VI "Pasquil on the Evolution" had earlier been translated by Frank Prengel.[2]
See also edit
- Science Fiction and Futurology, another Lem book on the topic.
References edit
- ^ Joanna Zylinska, translator's introduction, in: Summa Technologiae, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis-London, 2013, ISBN 978-0816675777 - "With a title that is a pastiche of Thomas Aquinas's Summa Theologiae, Lem erects a secular edifice of knowledge aimed at rivaling that of his scholastic predecessor."
- ^ a b c "The Book No One Read", by Lee Billings, September 10, 2015
- ^ a b "A brilliant trip back to the technological future", New Scientist, May 15, 2013
- ^ Laureáti Cen Akademie 1995 – 2017 (Retrieved April 22, 2019)
- ^ "Fantomowe wszechświaty Lema stają się rzeczywistością", Olaf Szewczyk, Polityka, March 29, 2016 (retrieved October 16, 2019)
- ^ Stanisław Lem, Filozofia przypadku, 3rd edition, 1988, chapter XI.
External links edit
- Partial translation into English (by Dr. Frank Prengel) at the Wayback Machine (archived October 12, 2004)
- Lem's short description of the book, in English
- The rise of data and the death of politics (2014-07-19), Evgeny Morozov, The Guardian.
- Searle, Rick (22 November 2014). "Summa Technologiae, or why the trouble with science is religion". Utopia or Dystopia. Retrieved 29 March 2017.