The sultans of the Ottoman Empire (Turkish: Osmanlı padişahları), who were all members of the Ottoman dynasty (House of Osman), ruled over the transcontinental empire from its perceived inception in 1299 to its dissolution in 1922. At its height, the Ottoman Empire spanned an area from Hungary in the north to Yemen in the south and from Algeria in the west to Iraq in the east. Administered at first from the city of Söğüt since before 1280 and then from the city of Bursa since 1323 or 1324, the empire's capital was moved to Adrianople (now known as Edirne in English) in 1363 following its conquest by Murad I and then to Constantinople (present-day Istanbul) in 1453 following its conquest by Mehmed II.
|Sultan of Ottoman Empire|
|Style||His Imperial Majesty|
|First monarch||Osman I (c. 1299–1323/4)|
|Last monarch||Mehmed VI (1918–1922)|
|Abolition||1 November 1922|
|Residence||Palaces in Istanbul:|
The Ottoman Empire's early years have been the subject of varying narratives, due to the difficulty of discerning fact from legend. The empire came into existence at the end of the 13th century, and its first ruler (and the namesake of the Empire) was Osman I. According to later, often unreliable Ottoman tradition, Osman was a descendant of the Kayı tribe of the Oghuz Turks. The eponymous Ottoman dynasty he founded endured for six centuries through the reigns of 36 sultans. The Ottoman Empire disappeared as a result of the defeat of the Central Powers, with whom it had allied itself during World War I. The partitioning of the Empire by the victorious Allies and the ensuing Turkish War of Independence led to the abolition of the sultanate in 1922 and the birth of the modern Republic of Turkey in 1922.
The sultan was also referred to as the Padishah (Ottoman Turkish: پادشاه, romanized: pâdişâh, French: Padichah). In Ottoman usage the word "Padisha" was usually used except "sultan" was used when he was directly named. In several European languages, he was referred to as the Grand Turk, as the ruler of the Turks, or simply the "Great Lord" (il Gran Signore, le grand seigneur) especially in the 16th century.
- Arabic: In some documents "Padishah" was replaced by "malik" ("king")
- Bulgarian: In earlier periods Bulgarian people called him the "tsar". The translation of the Ottoman Constitution of 1876 instead used direct translations of "sultan" (Sultan) and "padishah" (Padišax)
- Greek: In earlier periods the Greeks used the Byzantine Empire-style name "basileus". The translation of the Ottoman Constitution of 1876 instead used a direct transliterations of "sultan" (Σουλτάνος Soultanos) and "padishah" (ΠΑΔΙΣΑΧ padisach).
- Judaeo-Spanish: Especially in older documents, El Rey ("the king") was used. In addition some Ladino documents used sultan (in Hebrew characters: שולטן and סולטן).
State organisation of the Ottoman EmpireEdit
The Ottoman Empire was an absolute monarchy during much of its existence. By the second half of the fifteenth century, the sultan sat at the apex of a hierarchical system and acted in political, military, judicial, social, and religious capacities under a variety of titles.[a] He was theoretically responsible only to God and God's law (the Islamic شریعت şeriat, known in Arabic as شريعة sharia), of which he was the chief executor. His heavenly mandate (Kut) was reflected in Islamic titles such as "shadow of God on Earth" (ظل الله في العالم ẓıll Allāh fī'l-ʿalem) and "caliph of the face of the earth" (خلیفه روی زمین Ḫalife-i rū-yi zemīn). All offices were filled by his authority, and every law was issued by him in the form of a decree called firman (فرمان). He was the supreme military commander and had the official title to all land. Osman (died 1323–4) son of Ertuğrul was the first ruler of the Ottoman state, which during his reign constituted a small principality (beylik) in the region of Bithynia on the frontier of the Byzantine Empire.
After the conquest of Constantinople in 1453 by Mehmed II, Ottoman sultans came to regard themselves as the successors of the Roman Empire, hence their occasional use of the titles caesar (قیصر qayser) of Rûm, and emperor, as well as the caliph of Islam.[b] Newly enthroned Ottoman rulers were girded with the Sword of Osman, an important ceremony that served as the equivalent of European monarchs' coronation. A non-girded sultan was not eligible to have his children included in the line of succession.
Although absolute in theory and in principle, the sultan's powers were limited in practice. Political decisions had to take into account the opinions and attitudes of important members of the dynasty, the bureaucratic and military establishments, as well as religious leaders. Beginning in the last decades of the sixteenth century, the role of the Ottoman sultans in the government of the empire began to decrease, in a period known as the Transformation of the Ottoman Empire. Despite being barred from inheriting the throne, women of the imperial harem—especially the reigning sultan's mother, known as the valide sultan—also played an important behind-the-scenes political role, effectively ruling the empire during the period known as the Sultanate of Women.
Constitutionalism was established during the reign Abdul Hamid II, who thus became the empire's last absolute ruler and its reluctant first constitutional monarch. Although Abdul Hamid II abolished the parliament and the constitution to return to personal rule in 1878, he was again forced in 1908 to reinstall constitutionalism and was deposed. Since 2021, the head of the House of Osman has been Harun Osman, a great-grandson of Abdul Hamid II.
List of sultansEdit
The table below lists Ottoman sultans, as well as the last Ottoman caliph, in chronological order. The tughras were the calligraphic seals or signatures used by Ottoman sultans. They were displayed on all official documents as well as on coins, and were far more important in identifying a sultan than his portrait. The "Notes" column contains information on each sultan's parentage and fate. Early Ottomans practiced what historian Quataert has described as "survival of the fittest, not eldest, son": when a sultan died, his sons had to fight each other for the throne until a victor emerged. Because of the infighting and numerous fratricides that occurred, there was often a time gap between a sultan's death date and the accession date of his successor. In 1617, the law of succession changed from survival of the fittest to a system based on agnatic seniority (اکبریت ekberiyet), whereby the throne went to the oldest male of the family. This in turn explains why from the 17th century onwards a deceased sultan was rarely succeeded by his own son, but usually by an uncle or brother. Agnatic seniority was retained until the abolition of the sultanate, despite unsuccessful attempts in the 19th century to replace it with primogeniture. Note that pretenders and co-claimants during the Ottoman Interregnum are also listed here, but they are not included in the formal numbering of sultans.
|Rise of the Ottoman Empire|
(1299 – 1453)
|1||Osman I||c. 1299 – c. 1324
|2||Orhan||c. 1324 – March 1362
|3||Murad I[b]||March 1362 – 15 June 1389
(27 years, 3 months)
|4||Bayezid I||15 June 1389 – 20 July 1402
(13 years, 35 days)
(20 July 1402 – 5 July 1413)
|—||İsa Çelebi||January – May 1403
|—||Süleyman Çelebi||20 July 1402 –
17 February 1411
(8 years, 212 days)
|—||Musa Çelebi||18 February 1411 –
5 July 1413
(2 years, 137 days)
|—||Mehmed Çelebi||1403 – 5 July 1413
|5||Mehmed I||5 July 1413 – 26 May 1421
(7 years, 325 days)
|—||Mustafa Çelebi||—||January 1419 – May 1422
(3 years, 4 months)
|6||Murad II||25 June 1421 –
(23 years, 2 months)
|7||Mehmed II||August 1444 –
(2 years, 1 month)
|(6)||Murad II||September 1446 –
3 February 1451
(4 years, 5 months)
|Growth of the Ottoman Empire|
|(7)||Mehmed II||3 February 1451 –
3 May 1481
(30 years, 89 days)
|8||Bayezid II||19 May 1481 –
25 April 1512
(30 years, 342 days)
|—||Cem Sultan||28 May – 20 June 1481
|9||Selim I||25 April 1512 –
21 September 1520
(8 years, 149 days)
|10||Suleiman I||30 September 1520 –
6 September 1566
(45 years, 341 days)
|Transformation of the Ottoman Empire|
|11||Selim II||29 September 1566 –
15 December 1574
(8 years, 77 days)
|12||Murad III||27 December 1574 –
16 January 1595
(20 years, 20 days)
|13||Mehmed III||16 January 1595 –
22 December 1603
(8 years, 340 days)
|14||Ahmed I||22 December 1603 –
22 November 1617
(13 years, 335 days)
|15||Mustafa I||22 November 1617 –
26 February 1618
|16||Osman II||26 February 1618 –
19 May 1622
(4 years, 82 days)
|(15)||Mustafa I||20 May 1622 –
10 September 1623
(1 year, 113 days)
|17||Murad IV||10 September 1623 –
8 February 1640
(16 years, 151 days)
|18||Ibrahim||9 February 1640 –
8 August 1648
(8 years, 181 days)
|19||Mehmed IV||8 August 1648 –
8 November 1687
(39 years, 92 days)
|20||Suleiman II||8 November 1687 –
22 June 1691
(3 years, 226 days)
|21||Ahmed II||22 June 1691 –
6 February 1695
(3 years, 229 days)
|22||Mustafa II||6 February 1695 –
22 August 1703
(8 years, 197 days)
|Stagnation and reform of the Ottoman Empire|
|23||Ahmed III||22 August 1703 –
1 October 1730
(27 years, 40 days)
|24||Mahmud I||2 October 1730 –
13 December 1754
(24 years, 72 days)
|25||Osman III||13 December 1754 –
30 October 1757
(2 years, 321 days)
|26||Mustafa III||30 October 1757 –
21 January 1774
(16 years, 83 days)
|27||Abdul Hamid I||21 January 1774 –
7 April 1789
(15 years, 76 days)
|28||Selim III||7 April 1789 –
29 May 1807
(18 years, 52 days)
|29||Mustafa IV||29 May 1807 –
28 July 1808
(1 year, 60 days)
|Modernization of the Ottoman Empire|
|30||Mahmud II||28 July 1808 –
1 July 1839
(30 years, 338 days)
|31||Abdulmejid I||1 July 1839 –
25 June 1861
(21 years, 359 days)
|32||Abdulaziz||25 June 1861 –
30 May 1876
(14 years, 340 days)
|33||Murad V||30 May – 31 August 1876
|34||Abdul Hamid II||31 August 1876 –
27 April 1909
(32 years, 239 days)
|35||Mehmed V||27 April 1909 –
3 July 1918
(9 years, 67 days)
|36||Mehmed VI||4 July 1918 –
1 November 1922
(4 years, 120 days)
|Caliph under the Republic|
(1 November 1922 – 3 March 1924)
|—||Abdulmejid II||18 November 1922 –
3 March 1924
(1 year, 106 days)
- a1 2 : The full style of the Ottoman ruler was complex, as it was composed of several titles and evolved over the centuries. The title of sultan was used continuously by all rulers almost from the beginning. However, because it was widespread in the Muslim world, the Ottomans quickly adopted variations of it to dissociate themselves from other Muslim rulers of lesser status. Murad I, the third Ottoman monarch, styled himself sultân-ı âzam (سلطان اعظم, the most exalted sultan) and hüdavendigar (خداوندگار, emperor), titles used by the Anatolian Seljuqs and the Mongol Ilkhanids respectively. His son Bayezid I adopted the style Sultan of Rûm, Rûm being an old Islamic name for the Roman Empire. The combining of the Islamic and Central Asian heritages of the Ottomans led to the adoption of the title that became the standard designation of the Ottoman ruler: Sultan [Name] Khan. Ironically, although the title of sultan is most often associated in the Western world with the Ottomans, people within Turkey generally use the title of padishah far more frequently when referring to rulers of the Ottoman Dynasty.
- b1 2 3 : The Ottoman Caliphate symbolized their spiritual power, whereas the sultanate represented their temporal power. According to Ottoman historiography, Murad I adopted the title of caliph during his reign (1362 to 1389), and Selim I later strengthened the caliphal authority during his conquest of Egypt in 1516-1517. However, the general consensus among modern scholars is that Ottoman rulers had used the title of caliph before the conquest of Egypt, as early as during the reign of Murad I (1362–1389), who brought most of the Balkans under Ottoman rule and established the title of sultan in 1383. It is currently agreed that the caliphate "disappeared" for two-and-a-half centuries, before being revived with the Treaty of Küçük Kaynarca, signed between the Ottoman Empire and Catherine II of Russia in 1774. The treaty was highly symbolic, since it marked the first international recognition of the Ottomans' claim to the caliphate. Although the treaty made official the Ottoman Empire's loss of the Crimean Khanate, it acknowledged the Ottoman caliph's continuing religious authority over Muslims in Russia. From the 18th century onwards, Ottoman sultans increasingly emphasized their status as caliphs in order to stir Pan-Islamist sentiments among the empire's Muslims in the face of encroaching European imperialism. When World War I broke out, the sultan/caliph issued a call for jihad in 1914 against the Ottoman Empire's Allied enemies, unsuccessfully attempting to incite the subjects of the French, British and Russian empires to revolt. Abdul Hamid II was by far the Ottoman Sultan who made the most use of his caliphal position, and was recognized as Caliph by many Muslim heads of state, even as far away as Sumatra. He had his claim to the title inserted into the 1876 Constitution (Article 4).
- c1 2 : Tughras were used by 35 out of 36 Ottoman sultans, starting with Orhan in the 14th century, whose tughra has been found on two different documents. No tughra bearing the name of Osman I, the founder of the empire, has ever been discovered, although a coin with the inscription "Osman bin Ertuğrul" has been identified. Abdulmejid II, the last Ottoman Caliph, also lacked a tughra of his own, since he did not serve as head of state (that position being held by Mustafa Kemal, President of the newly founded Republic of Turkey) but as a religious and royal figurehead.
- d^ : The Ottoman Interregnum, also known as the Ottoman Triumvirate (Turkish: Fetret Devri), was a period of chaos in the Ottoman Empire which lasted from 1402 to 1413. It started following the defeat and capture of Bayezid I by the Turco-Mongol warlord Tamerlane at the Battle of Ankara, which was fought on 20 July 1402. Bayezid's sons fought each other for over a decade, until Mehmed I emerged as the undisputed victor in 1413.
- e^ : The dissolution of the Ottoman Empire was a gradual process which started with the abolition of the sultanate and ended with that of the caliphate 16 months later. The sultanate was formally abolished on 1 November 1922. Sultan Mehmed VI fled to Malta on 17 November aboard the British warship Malaya. This event marked the end of the Ottoman Dynasty, not of the Ottoman State nor of the Ottoman Caliphate. On 18 November, the Grand National Assembly (TBMM) elected Mehmed VI's cousin Abdulmejid II, the then crown prince, as caliph. The official end of the Ottoman State was declared through the Treaty of Lausanne (24 July 1923), which recognized the new "Ankara government," and not the old Istanbul-based Ottoman government, as representing the rightful owner and successor state. The Republic of Turkey was proclaimed by the TBMM on 29 October 1923, with Mustafa Kemal as its first President. Although Abdulmejid II was a figurehead lacking any political power, he remained in his position of Caliph until the office of the Caliphate was abolished by the TBMM on 3 March 1924. Mehmed VI later tried unsuccessfully to reinstall himself as caliph in the Hejaz.
- Stavrides 2001, p. 21
- Kafadar 1995, p. 122. "That they hailed from the Kayı branch of the Oğuz confederacy seems to be a creative "rediscovery" in the genealogical concoction of the fifteenth century. It is missing not only in Ahmedi but also, and more importantly, in the Yahşi Fakih-Aşıkpaşazade narrative, which gives its own version of an elaborate genealogical family tree going back to Noah. If there was a particularly significant claim to Kayı lineage, it is hard to imagine that Yahşi Fakih would not have heard of it."
Lowry 2003, p. 78. "Based on these charters, all of which were drawn up between 1324 and 1360 (almost one hundred fifty years prior to the emergence of the Ottoman dynastic myth identifying them as members of the Kayı branch of the Oguz federation of Turkish tribes), we may posit that..."
Lindner 1983, p. 10. "In fact, no matter how one were to try, the sources simply do not allow the recovery of a family tree linking the antecedents of Osman to the Kayı of the Oğuz tribe. Without a proven genealogy, or even without evidence of sufficient care to produce a single genealogy to be presented to all the court chroniclers, there obviously could be no tribe; thus, the tribe was not a factor in early Ottoman history."
- Glazer 1996, "War of Independence"
- Strauss 2010, pp. 21-51.
- Miller, William (1908). The Latins in the Levant: A History of Frankish Greece (1204–1566). London: John Murray. OCLC 563022439.
- Findley 2005, p. 115
- Glazer 1996, "Ottoman Institutions"
- Toynbee 1974, pp. 22–23
- Stavrides 2001, p. 20
- Quataert 2005, p. 93
- d'Osman Han 2001, "Ottoman Padishah Succession"
- Quataert 2005, p. 90
- Peirce, Leslie. "The sultanate of women". Channel 4. Archived from the original on 2007-12-03. Retrieved 2009-04-18.
- Glazer 1996, "External Threats and Internal Transformations"
- "Last heir to Ottoman throne passes away at 90". Daily Sabah. 19 January 2021.
- Quataert 2005, p. 91
- Quataert 2005, p. 92
- Karateke 2005, pp. 37–54
- Finkel 2007, p. 33.
- Kafadar 1995, pp. 60, 122.
- Lowry 2003, p. 153.
- Jorga 2009, p. 314.
- von Hammer, pp. 58-60.
- Prof. Yaşar Yüce-Prof. Ali Sevim: Türkiye tarihi Cilt II, AKDTYKTTK Yayınları, İstanbul, 1991 p 74-75
- Kafadar 1995, p. xix
- Turkish Language Association, (1960), Belleten, p. 467 (in Turkish)
- Ágoston, Gábor (2009). "Süleyman I". In Ágoston, Gábor; Masters, Bruce (eds.). Encyclopedia of the Ottoman Empire.
- Aşiroğlu 1992, p. 13
- Aşiroğlu 1992, p. 17
- Aşiroğlu 1992, p. 14
- Peirce 1993, pp. 158–159
- M'Gregor, J. (July 1854). "The Race, Religions, and Government of the Ottoman Empire". The Eclectic Magazine of Foreign Literature, Science, and Art. Vol. 32. New York: Leavitt, Trow, & Co. p. 376. OCLC 6298914. Retrieved 2009-04-25.
- Glassé 2003, pp. 349–351.
- Quataert 2005, pp. 83–85
- Toprak 1981, pp. 44–45
- Mensiz, Ercan. "About Tugra". Tugra.org. Archived from the original on 2007-10-25. Retrieved 2009-02-06.
- Sugar 1993, pp. 23–27
- Aşiroğlu 1992, p. 54
- Glazer 1996, "Table A. Chronology of Major Kemalist Reforms"
- Steffen, Dirk (2005). "Mehmed VI, Sultan". In Tucker, Spencer (ed.). World War I: Encyclopedia. Volume. Vol. III: M–R. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO. p. 779. ISBN 978-1-85109-420-2. OCLC 162287003. Retrieved 2009-05-02.
- Aşiroğlu, Orhan Gâzi (1992). Son halife, Abdülmecid. Tarihin şahitleri dizisi (in Turkish). Istanbul: Burak Yayınevi. ISBN 978-9757645177. OCLC 32085609.
- Findley, Carter V. (2005). The Turks in World History. New York: Oxford University Press US. ISBN 978-0-19-517726-8. OCLC 54529318. Retrieved 2009-04-29.
- Finkel, Caroline (2007). Osman's Dream: The History of the Ottoman Empire. Basic Books. ISBN 9780465008506.
- Glassé, Cyril, ed. (2003). "Ottomans". The New Encyclopedia of Islam. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press. ISBN 978-0-7591-0190-6. OCLC 52611080. Retrieved 2009-05-02.
- Glazer, Steven A. (1996) [Research completed January 1995]. "Chapter 1: Historical Setting". In Metz, Helen Chapin (ed.). A Country Study: Turkey. Country Studies (5th ed.). Washington, D.C.: Federal Research Division of the Library of Congress. ISBN 978-0-8444-0864-4. OCLC 33898522. Retrieved 2009-04-22.
- Jorga, Nicholae (2009). Geschishte des Osmanichen. Vol. 1. Translated by Nilüfer Epçeli. Istanbul: Yeditepe yayınları. ISBN 975-6480 17 3.
- Kafadar, Cemal (1995). Between Two Worlds: The Construction of the Ottoman State. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-20600-7. OCLC 55849447. Retrieved 2009-04-18.
- Karateke, Hakan T. (2005). "Who is the Next Ottoman Sultan? Attempts to Change the Rule of Succession during the Nineteenth Century". In Weismann, Itzchak; Zachs, Fruma (eds.). Ottoman Reform and Muslim Regeneration: Studies in Honour of Butrus Abu-Manneb. London: I. B. Tauris. ISBN 978-1-85043-757-4. OCLC 60416792. Retrieved 2009-05-02.
- Lindner, Rudi Paul (1983). Nomads and Ottomans in Medieval Anatolia. Indiana University Press.
- Lowry, Heath (2003). The Nature of the Early Ottoman State. SUNY Press. ISBN 0-7914-5636-6.
- d'Osman Han, Nadine Sultana (2001). The Legacy of Sultan Abdulhamid II: Memoirs and Biography of Sultan Selim bin Hamid Han. Foreword by Manoutchehr M. Eskandari-Qajar. Santa Fe, NM: Sultana Pub. OCLC 70659193. Archived from the original on 2009-01-05. Retrieved 2009-05-02.
- Peirce, Leslie P. (1993). The Imperial Harem: Women and Sovereignty in the Ottoman Empire. New York: Oxford University Press US. ISBN 978-0-19-508677-5. OCLC 243767445. Retrieved 2009-04-19.
- Quataert, Donald (2005). The Ottoman Empire, 1700–1922 (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-83910-5. OCLC 59280221. Retrieved 2009-04-18.
- Stavrides, Theoharis (2001). The Sultan of Vezirs: The Life and Times of the Ottoman Grand Vezir Mahmud Pasha Angelović (1453–1474). Leiden: Brill Publishers. ISBN 978-90-04-12106-5. OCLC 46640850. Retrieved 2009-04-18.
- Strauss, Johann (2010). "A Constitution for a Multilingual Empire: Translations of the Kanun-ı Esasi and Other Official Texts into Minority Languages". In Herzog, Christoph; Malek Sharif (eds.). The First Ottoman Experiment in Democracy. Würzburg: Orient-Institut Istanbul.} (info page on book at Martin Luther University) // CITED: p. 43-44 (PDF p. 45-46/338).
- Sugar, Peter F. (1993). Southeastern Europe under Ottoman Rule, 1354–1804 (3rd ed.). Seattle: University of Washington Press. ISBN 978-0-295-96033-3. OCLC 34219399. Retrieved 2009-04-18.
- Toprak, Binnaz (1981). Islam and Political Development in Turkey. Leiden: Brill Publishers. ISBN 978-90-04-06471-3. OCLC 8258992. Retrieved 2009-04-19.
- Toynbee, Arnold J. (1974). "The Ottoman Empire's Place in World History". In Karpat, Kemal H. (ed.). The Ottoman State and Its Place in World History. Social, Economic and Political Studies of the Middle East. Vol. 11. Leiden: Brill Publishers. ISBN 978-90-04-03945-2. OCLC 1318483. Retrieved 2009-05-02.
- Uğur, Ali (2007). Mavi Emperyalizm [Blue Imperialism] (in Turkish). Istanbul: Çatı Publishing. ISBN 978-975-8845-87-3. OCLC 221203375. Retrieved 2009-04-19.
- von Hammer, Joseph. Osmanlı Tarihi cilt I. condensed by Abdülkadir Karahan. Istanbul: Milliyet yayınları.