This article needs attention from an expert in Medicine or Physics. The specific problem is: The article content is very technical, and needs clarification before normal editors are able to confidently make changes..(November 2020)
The Starling equation describes the net flow of fluid across a semipermeable membrane. It is named after Ernest Starling. It describes the balance between capillary pressure, interstitial pressure, and osmotic pressure. The classic Starling equation has in recent years been revised. The Starling principle of fluid exchange is key to understanding how plasma fluid (solvent) within the bloodstream (intravascular fluid) moves to the space outside the bloodstream (extravascular space).
Transendothelial fluid exchange occurs predominantly in the capillaries, and is a process of plasma ultrafiltration across a semi-permeable membrane. It is now appreciated that the ultrafilter is the glycocalyx of the plasma membrane of the endothelium, whose interpolymer spaces function as a system of small pores, radius circa 5 nm. Where the endothelial glycocalyx overlies an inter endothelial cell cleft, the plasma ultrafiltrate may pass to the interstitial space. Some continuous capillaries may feature fenestrations that provide an additional subglycocalyx pathway for solvent and small solutes. Discontinuous capillaries as found in sinusoidal tissues of bone marrow, liver and spleen have little or no filter function.
The rate at which fluid is filtered across vascular endothelium (transendothelial filtration) is determined by the sum of two outward forces, capillary pressure () and interstitial protein osmotic pressure (), and two absorptive forces, plasma protein osmotic pressure () and interstitial pressure (). The Starling equation describes these forces in mathematical terms. It is one of the Kedem–Katchalski equations which bring nonsteady state thermodynamics to the theory of osmotic pressure across membranes that are at least partly permeable to the solute responsible for the osmotic pressure difference. The second Kedem–Katchalsky equation explains the trans endothelial transport of solutes, .
The classic Starling equation reads as follows:
- is the trans endothelial solvent filtration volume per second (SI units of m3·s−1).
- is the net driving force (SI units of Pa = kg·m−1·s−2, often expressed as mmHg),
- is the capillary hydrostatic pressure
- is the interstitial hydrostatic pressure
- is the plasma protein oncotic pressure
- is the interstitial oncotic pressure
- is the hydraulic conductivity of the membrane (SI units of m2·s·kg−1, equivalent to m·s−1·mmHg−1)
- is the surface area for filtration (SI units of m2)
- the product · is defined as the filtration coefficient (SI units of m4·s·kg−1, or equivalently in m3·s−1·mmHg−1)
- is Staverman's reflection coefficient (adimensional)
By convention, outward force is defined as positive, and inward force is defined as negative. If Jv is positive, solvent is leaving the capillary (filtration). If negative, solvent is entering the capillary (absorption).
Applying the classic Starling equation, it had long been taught that continuous capillaries filter out fluid in their arteriolar section and reabsorb most of it in their venular section, as shown by the diagram.
However, empirical evidence shows that, in most tissues, the flux of the intraluminal fluid of capillaries is continuous and, primarily, effluent. Efflux occurs along the whole length of a capillary. Fluid filtered to the space outside a capillary is mostly returned to the circulation via lymph nodes and the thoracic duct.
A mechanism for this phenomenon is the Michel-Weinbaum model, in honour of two scientists who, independently, described the filtration function of the glycocalyx. Briefly, the colloid osmotic pressure πi of the interstitial fluid has been found to have no effect on Jv and the colloid osmotic pressure difference that opposes filtration is now known to be π'p minus the subglycocalyx π, which is close to zero while there is adequate filtration to flush interstitial proteins out of the interendothelial cleft. Consequently, Jv is much less than previously calculated, and the unopposed diffusion of interstitial proteins to the subglycocalyx space if and when filtration falls wipes out the colloid osmotic pressure difference necessary for reabsorption of fluid to the capillary.
The revised Starling equation is compatible with the steady-state Starling principle:
- is the trans endothelial solvent filtration volume per second.
- is the net driving force,
Pressures are often measured in millimetres of mercury (mmHg), and the filtration coefficient in millilitres per minute per millimetre of mercury (ml·min−1·mmHg−1).
In some texts the product of hydraulic conductivity and surface area is called the filtration co-efficient Kfc.
Staverman's reflection coefficient, σ, is a unitless constant that is specific to the permeability of a membrane to a given solute.
The Starling equation, written without σ, describes the flow of a solvent across a membrane that is impermeable to the solutes contained within the solution.
σn corrects for the partial permeability of a semipermeable membrane to a solute n.
Where σ is close to 1, the plasma membrane is less permeable to the denotated species (for example, larger molecules such as albumin and other plasma proteins), which may flow across the endothelial lining, from higher to lower concentrations, more slowly, while allowing water and smaller solutes through the glycocalyx filter to the extravascular space.
- Glomerular capillaries have a reflection coefficient close to 1 as normally no protein crosses into the glomerular filtrate.
- In contrast, hepatic sinusoids have no reflection coefficient as they are fully permeable to protein. Hepatic interstitial fluid within the Space of Diss has the same colloid osmotic pressure as plasma and so hepatocyte synthesis of albumin can be regulated. Albumin and other proteins in the interstitial spaces return to the circulation via lymph.
Following are typically quoted values for the variables in the classic Starling equation:
|Location||Pc (mmHg)||Pi (mmHg)||σπc (mmHg)||σπi (mmHg)|
|arteriolar end of capillary||+35||−2||+28||+0.1|
|venular end of capillary||+15||−2||+28||+3|
It is reasoned that some albumin escapes from the capillaries and enters the interstitial fluid where it would produce a flow of water equivalent to that produced by a hydrostatic pressure of +3 mmHg. Thus, the difference in protein concentration would produce a flow of fluid into the vessel at the venous end equivalent to 28 − 3 = 25 mmHg of hydrostatic pressure. The total oncotic pressure present at the venous end could be considered as +25 mmHg.
In the beginning (arteriolar end) of a capillary, there is a net driving force ( ) outwards from the capillary of +9 mmHg. In the end (venular end), on the other hand, there is a net driving force of −8 mmHg.
Assuming that the net driving force declines linearly, then there is a mean net driving force outwards from the capillary as a whole, which also results in that more fluid exits a capillary than re-enters it. The lymphatic system drains this excess.
J. Rodney Levick argues in his textbook that the interstitial force is often underestimated, and measurements used to populate the revised Starling equation show the absorbing forces to be consistently less than capillary or venular pressures.
Glomerular capillaries have a continuous glycocalyx layer in health and the total transendothelial filtration rate of solvent ( ) to the renal tubules is normally around 125 ml/ min (about 180 litres/ day). Glomerular capillary is more familiarly known as the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). In the rest of the body's capillaries, is typically 5 ml/ min (around 8 litres/ day), and the fluid is returned to the circulation via afferent and efferent lymphatics.
Woodcock and Woodcock showed in 2012 that the revised Starling equation (steady-state Starling principle) provides scientific explanations for clinical observations concerning intravenous fluid therapy.
The Starling equation is named for the British physiologist Ernest Starling, who is also recognised for the Frank–Starling law of the heart. Starling can be credited with identifying that the "absorption of isotonic salt solutions (from the extravascular space) by the blood vessels is determined by this osmotic pressure of the serum proteins" in 1896.
- Matthay, M. A.; Quinn, T. E. (2006-01-01), "PULMONARY EDEMA", in Laurent, Geoffrey J.; Shapiro, Steven D. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Respiratory Medicine, Oxford: Academic Press, pp. 544–550, doi:10.1016/b0-12-370879-6/00509-3, ISBN 978-0-12-370879-3, retrieved 2020-11-28
- Starling, Ernest H. (1896-05-05). "On the Absorption of Fluids from the Connective Tissue Spaces". The Journal of Physiology. 19 (4): 312–326. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1896.sp000596. PMC 1512609. PMID 16992325.
- Pal, Pramod K.; Chen, Robert (2014-01-01), Aminoff, Michael J.; Josephson, S. Andrew (eds.), "Chapter 1 - Breathing and the Nervous System", Aminoff's Neurology and General Medicine (Fifth Edition), Boston: Academic Press, pp. 3–23, doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-407710-2.00001-1, ISBN 978-0-12-407710-2, retrieved 2020-11-28
- Kradin, Richard L. (2017-01-01), Kradin, Richard L. (ed.), "Chapter 14 - Sundry Disorders", Understanding Pulmonary Pathology, Boston: Academic Press, pp. 297–308, doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-801304-5.00014-9, ISBN 978-0-12-801304-5, retrieved 2020-11-28
- Nadon, A. S.; Schmidt, E. P. (2014-01-01), McManus, Linda M.; Mitchell, Richard N. (eds.), "Pathobiology of the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome", Pathobiology of Human Disease, San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 2665–2676, doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-386456-7.05309-0, ISBN 978-0-12-386457-4, retrieved 2020-11-28
- Levick, J (2010). Introduction to Cardiovascular Physiology. 5th edition. London: Hodder Arnold. p. 190. ISBN 978-0340-942-048.
- Staverman, A. J. (1951). "The theory of measurement of osmotic pressure". Recueil des Travaux Chimiques des Pays-Bas. 70 (4): 344–352. doi:10.1002/recl.19510700409. ISSN 0165-0513.
- Kedem, O.; Katchalsky, A. (February 1958). "Thermodynamic analysis of the permeability of biological membranes to non-electrolytes". Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 27 (2): 229–246. doi:10.1016/0006-3002(58)90330-5. ISSN 0006-3002. PMID 13522722.
- Levick, J R (2004-06-15). "Revision of the Starling principle: new views of tissue fluid balance". The Journal of Physiology. 557 (Pt 3): 704. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2004.066118. ISSN 0022-3751. PMC 1665155. PMID 15131237.
- Levick, J.R.; Michel, C.C. (2010). "Microvascular fluid exchange and the revised Starling principle". Cardiovasc Res. 87 (2): 198–210. doi:10.1093/cvr/cvq062. PMID 20200043.
- Zelman, A. (1972-04-01). "Membrane Permeability: Generalization of the Reflection Coefficient Method of Describing Volume and Solute Flows". Biophysical Journal. 12 (4): 414–419. doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(72)86093-4. ISSN 0006-3495. PMC 1484119. PMID 5019478.
- Michel, C. Charles; Woodcock, Thomas E.; Curry, Fitz-Roy E. (2020). "Understanding and extending the Starling principle". Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 64 (8): 1032–1037. doi:10.1111/aas.13603. ISSN 1399-6576. PMID 32270491.
- Lautt, W. Wayne (April 7, 2009). Fluid Exchange. Morgan & Claypool Life Sciences – via www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.
- Boron, Walter F. (2005). Medical Physiology: A Cellular And Molecular Approaoch. Elsevier/Saunders. ISBN 978-1-4160-2328-9.
- Woodcock, T. E.; Woodcock, T. M. (29 January 2012). "Revised Starling equation and the glycocalyx model of transvascular fluid exchange: an improved paradigm for prescribing intravenous fluid therapy". British Journal of Anaesthesia. 108 (3): 384–394. doi:10.1093/bja/aer515. PMID 22290457.
- Derangedphysiology.com: Starling's Principle of Transvascular Fluid Dynamics Starling's principle of transvascular fluid dynamics | Deranged Physiology