18 February 2018
10 February 2018
1 February 2018
30 January 2018
→Highlights and controversies: added the BuzzFeed and Candappa controversy, as well as the raid and confiscation of computer servers
21 January 2018
Undid revision 821611705 by Special:Contributions/2600:1000:B121:5648:302F:A966:FAFA:BFCD Unsourced
no edit summary
18 January 2018
Reverted 1 edit by 126.96.36.199 (talk) to last revision by BeenAroundAWhile. (TW)m
update on newsweek IRS case
12 January 2018
→Spin-off to IBT Media, return to print and profitability (2013–present): Old news. Makes WP look silly.
→Spin-off to IBT Media, return to print and profitability (2013–present): Add info from the source cited.
→Merger with The Daily Beast (2010): Source sought since May 2011. Challenge and delete.
11 January 2018
4 January 2018
Reverted edits by Trumpdumb (talk) to last version by Simplexity22m
Reverted edits by 188.8.131.52 (talk) to last version by Salientunpluggedm
no edit summary
29 December 2017
10 December 2017
4 December 2017
27 November 2017
3 November 2017
29 October 2017
26 October 2017
25 October 2017
→Contributors and reporters: Might as well make this clear.
→Contributors and reporters: Alphabetize.
Moving "History" section higher; it is more important than the section that was previously there.
→Quran desecration controversy: A separate section about a single article done many years ago does not belong here.
Not valid any more, but it could be put in the "History" section if it is not already there.
Undid revision 807066869 by 184.108.40.206 (talk) Take to the Talk page and gain consensus
Undid revision 807066309 by Doug Weller (talk) to readers like me it is. helps explain why it collapsed and sold for $1.
Undid revision 807064382 by 220.127.116.11 (talk) same reason - it's not even of historical interest on its own
Undid revision 807054636 by Objective3000 (talk)
Undid revision 807051229 by 18.104.22.168 (talk)
Undid revision 806501402 by Doug Weller (talk) It is direct, relevant (historically if you insist) and cited.
24 October 2017
22 October 2017
→Claims of bias: unless we want to change this to say "21 years ago an employee said Newsweek was a little bit liberal, I think this is trivial and the section heading badly worded
19 October 2017
Reverted 1 edit by 22.214.171.124 (talk) to last revision by 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63. (TW)m
→Claims of bias
18 October 2017
again, WP:SYNTHESIS; Undid revision 805856899 by Z100thousand (talk)
Undid revision 805856577 by Special:Contributions/2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 An anonymous user is randomly removing edits. Reported to Wikipedia.m
per previous explanation--nothing to do with bias section, nor is this especially significant in the publication's history; Undid revision 805856288 by Z100thousand (talk)
Undid revision 805748990 by Objective3000 (talk) Newsweek stated " nurses saying people are dying because of Trump" when actually he ordered a hospital ship. Please read verified sources.m
17 October 2017
Undid revision 805716809 by Z100thousand (talk) What does this have to do with claims of bias, or Newsweek at all?
Newsweek editor Linley Sanders wrote an article without regarding the USNS Mercy hospital ship.
10 October 2017
→Claims of bias: Removed an annoying, roundabout, contentious paragraph that led nowhere and was only going to be confuse uninformed readers.
→Claims of bias