Sahelanthropus tchadensis is an extinct homininae species and is probably the ancestor to Orrorin that is dated to about , during the Miocene epoch, possibly very close to the time of the chimpanzee–human divergence. Few specimens other than the partial skull nicknamed Toumaï ("hope of life") are known.
Temporal range: Late Miocene, 7-6.2 Ma
|Cast of a Sahelanthropus tchadensis skull (Toumaï)|
Brunet et al., 2002
Brunet et al., 2002
Existing fossils include a relatively small cranium named Toumaï ("hope of life" in the local Daza language of Chad in central Africa), five pieces of jaw, and some teeth, making up a head that has a mixture of derived and primitive features. The braincase, being only 320 cm³ to 380 cm³ in volume, is similar to that of extant chimpanzees and is notably less than the approximate human volume of 1350 cm³.
The teeth, brow ridges, and facial structure differ markedly from those found in Homo sapiens. Cranial features show a flatter face, u-shaped dental arcade, small canines, an anterior foramen magnum, and heavy brow ridges. No postcranial remains have been recovered. The only known skull suffered a large amount of distortion during the time of fossilisation and discovery, as the cranium is dorsoventrally flattened, and the right side is depressed.
Sahelanthropus tchadensis may have walked on two legs. However, because no postcranial remains (i.e., bones below the skull) have been discovered, it is not known definitively whether Sahelanthropus was indeed bipedal, although claims for an anteriorly placed foramen magnum suggests that this may have been the case. Upon examination of the foramen magnum in the primary study, the lead author speculated that a bipedal gait "would not be unreasonable" based on basicranial morphology similar to more recent hominins. Some palaeontologists have disputed this interpretation, stating that the basicranium, as well as dentition and facial features, do not represent adaptations unique to the hominin clade, nor indicative of bipedalism; and stating that canine wear is similar to other Miocene apes. Further, according to recent information, what might be a femur of a hominid was also discovered near the cranium—but which has not been published nor accounted for.
Polemic around Toumai's femurEdit
Fifteen years after the discovery of the fossil, the anthropologist Roberto Macchiarelli , professor at the University of Poitiers and the Museum of Natural History of Paris, suspects Michel Brunet and his laboratory in Poitiers to block information about a femur, potentially primate, found close to the skull , but that the laboratory would have delayed identifying as such, this bone may question the biped of Toumaï  ·  ·  ·  · .
The fossils were discovered in the Djurab Desert of Chad by a team of four led by a Frenchman, Alain Beauvilain, and three Chadians, Adoum Mahamat, Djimdoumalbaye Ahounta, and Gongdibé Fanoné, members of the Mission paleoanthropologique Franco-tchadienne led by Michel Brunet. All known material of Sahelanthropus was found between July 2001 and March 2002 at three sites: TM 247, TM 266, which yielded most of the material, including a cranium and a femur, and TM 292. The discoverers claimed that S. tchadensis is the oldest known human ancestor after the split of the human line from that of chimpanzees.
The bones were found far from most previous hominin fossil finds, which are from Eastern and Southern Africa. However, an Australopithecus bahrelghazali mandible was found in Chad by Mamelbaye Tomalta, Najia and Alain Beauvilain, Michel Brunet and Aladji H.E. Moutaye as early as 1995. With the sexual dimorphism known to have existed in early hominins, the difference between Ardipithecus and Sahelanthropus may not be large enough to warrant a separate species for the latter.
Relationship to humans and chimpanzeesEdit
Sahelanthropus may represent a common ancestor of humans and chimpanzees, though no consensus has been reached yet by the scientific community. The original placement of this species as a human ancestor but not a chimpanzee ancestor would complicate the picture of human phylogeny. In particular, if Toumaï is indeed a direct human ancestor, then its facial features bring into doubt the status of Australopithecus whose thickened brow ridges were reported to be similar to those of some later fossil hominins (notably Homo erectus), and where the brow ridge morphology of Sahelanthropus differs from that observed in all australopithecines, most fossil hominins and extant humans.
Another possibility is that Toumaï is related to both humans and chimpanzees, but is the ancestor of neither. Brigitte Senut and Martin Pickford, the discoverers of Orrorin tugenensis, suggested that the features of S. tchadensis are consistent with a female proto-gorilla. Even if this claim is upheld the find would lose none of its significance, because at present, very few chimpanzee or gorilla ancestors have been found anywhere in Africa. Thus if S. tchadensis is an ancestral relative of the chimpanzees or gorillas, then it represents the earliest known member of their lineage. And S. tchadensis does indicate that the last common ancestor of humans and chimpanzees is unlikely to closely resemble extant chimpanzees, as had been previously supposed by some paleontologists.
A further possibility, highlighted by research published in 2012, is that the human–chimpanzee split is earlier than previously thought, with a possible range of 7 to 13 million years ago (with the more recent end of this range being favoured by most researchers), based on slower than previously thought changes between generations in human DNA. Indeed, some researchers (such as Tim D. White, University of California) consider suggestions that Sahelanthropus is too early to be a human ancestor to have evaporated.
Sediment isotope analysis of cosmogenic atoms in the fossil yielded an age of about 7 million years. In this case, however, the fossils were found exposed in loose sand; co-discoverer Beauvilain cautions that such sediment can be easily moved by the wind, unlike packed earth, making the date of 7 million years less certain.
In fact, Toumaï may have been reburied in the recent past. Taphonomic analysis reveals the likelihood of one, perhaps two, burial(s). Two other hominid fossils (a left femur and a mandible) were in the same "grave" along with various mammal remains. The sediment surrounding the fossils might thus not be the material in which the bones were originally deposited, making it necessary to corroborate the fossil's age by some other means. The fauna found at the site – namely the anthracotheriid Libycosaurus petrochii and the suid Nyanzachoerus syrticus – suggests an age of more than 6 million years, as these species were probably already extinct by that time.
- Brunet, M.; Guy, F.; Pilbeam, D.; Mackaye, H.T.; Likius, A.; Ahounta, D.; Beauvilain, A.; Blondel, C.; Bocherens, H.; Boisserie, J.R.; de Bonis, L.; Coppens, Y.; Dejax, J.; Denys, C.; Duringer, P.; Eisenmann, V.; Gongdibé, F.; Fronty, P.; Geraads, D.; Lehmann, T.; Lihoreau, F.; Louchart, A.; Mahamat, A.; Merceron, G.; Mouchelin, G.; Otero, O.; Pelaez Campomanes, P.; Ponce; de León, M.; Rage, J.-C.; Sapanet, M.; Schuster, M.; Sudre, J.; Tassy, P.; Valentin, X.; Vignaud, P.; Viriot, L.; Zazzo, A.; Zollikofer, C. (2002). "A new hominid from the Upper Miocene of Chad, Central Africa" (PDF). Nature. 418 (6894): 145–151. doi:10.1038/nature00879. PMID 12110880.
- Staff (August 14, 2016). "What Does It Mean To Be Human? - Walking Upright". Smithsonian Institution. Retrieved August 14, 2016.
- Wolpoff, Milford H.; Senut, Brigitte; Pickford, Martin; Hawks, John (2002). "Palaeoanthropology (communication arising): Sahelanthropus or 'Sahelpithecus'?". Nature. 419: 581–582. doi:10.1038/419581a. PMID 12374970.
- John D. Hawks (2009). "Sahelanthropus: The femur of Toumaï?"
- Roberto Macchiarelli Professor Roberto Macchiarelli
- Beauvilain A. et Watté J.-P., 2009. « Was Toumaï (Sahelanthropus tchadensis) buried ? »
- Callaway E. Controversial femur could belong to ancient human relative. Few scientists have had access to a thigh bone kept in a French collection for over a decade. Nature, 22 janvier 2018.
- Beauvilain A. Chronicle of Toumaï’s femur rediscovery
- Constans N. The history of Toumai's thighbone.
- Constans N. The troubled history of Toumai's thighbone Le Monde, 29 janvier 2018
- Hartenberger J.L.Toumaï Aïe Aïe Aïe: sad story of an unworthy femur
- Beauvilain, Alain (5 October 2006). "Toumaï : "Histoire des Sciences et Histoire d'Hommes"". Tchad Actuel (in French). Archived from the original on 8 March 2012. Retrieved 1 May 2018.
- Chad, cradle of humanity. Toumaï, the Human Adventure
- Michel Brunet, Alain Beauvilain, Yves Coppens, Émile Heintz, Aladji H. E. Moutaye et David Pilbeam (1995) – The first australopithecine 2,500 kilometres west of the Rift Valley (Chad), Nature, 378, pp. 273–275.
- Chad, cradle of humanity. Participants in sahara scientific mission
- Haile-Selassie, Yohannes; Suwa, Gen; White, Tim D. (2004). "Late Miocene Teeth from Middle Awash, Ethiopia, and Early Hominid Dental Evolution". Science. 303 (5663): 1503–1505. doi:10.1126/science.1092978. PMID 15001775.
- Guy F., Lieberman D. E., Pilbeam D., Ponce de Leon M. S., Likius A., Mackaye H. T., Vignaud P., Zollikofer C. P. E. and Brunet M., (27 December 2005). "Morphological affinities of the Sahelanthropus tchadensis (Late Miocene hominid from Chad) cranium" PNAS, 102 (52) : 18836–18841.
- Wolpoff, M. H.; Hawks, J.; Senut, B.; Pickford, M.; Ahern, J. (2006). "An Ape or the Ape : Is the Toumaï Cranium TM 266 a Hominid?" (PDF). PaleoAnthropology. 2006: 36–50.
- Catherine Brahic (24 Nov 2012). "Our True Dawn". New Scientist. Reed Business Information (2892): 34–7. ISSN 0262-4079., citing research by Augustine Kong (Decode Genetics, Reykjavik), David Reich (Harvard) and others
- Lebatard, A.-E.; Bourles, D. L.; Duringer, P.; Jolivet, M.; Braucher, R.; Carcaillet, J.; Schuster, M.; Arnaud, N.; Monie, P.; Lihoreau, F.; Likius, A.; Mackaye, H. T.; Vignaud, P.; Brunet, M. (2008). "Cosmogenic nuclide dating of Sahelanthropus tchadensis and Australopithecus bahrelghazali: Mio-Pliocene hominids from Chad" (PDF). PNAS. 105 (9): 3226–3231. doi:10.1073/pnas.0708015105. PMC . PMID 18305174.
- Beauvilain, Alain (2008). "The contexts of discovery of Australopithecus bahrelghazali and of Sahelanthropus tchadensis (Toumaï) : unearthed, embedded in sandstone or surface collected?". South African Journal of Science. 104 (3): 165–168.
- Brunet, M.; Guy, F.; Pilbeam, D.; Lieberman, D. E.; Likius, A.; Mackaye, H. T.; Ponce; de Leon, M. S.; Zollikofer, C. P. E.; Vignaud, P. (2005). "New material of the earliest hominid from the Upper Miocene of Chad" (PDF). Nature. 434 (7034): 752–755. doi:10.1038/nature03392. PMID 15815627.
- Beauvilain Alain, 2003. Toumaï, l'aventure humaine. La Table Ronde, Paris, 239 p. ISBN 2-7103-2592-6.
- Brunet Michel, 2006. D'Abel à Toumaï : Nomade, chercheur d'os. Odile Jacob, Paris, 254 p. ISBN 978-2-7381-1738-0.
- Gibbons Ann, 2006. The first human.. Doubleday, New York, 306 p. ISBN 978-0385512268.
- Reader John, 2011. Missing links : in search of human origins. Oxford University Press, New York, 538 p. ISBN 978-0-19-927685-1.
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Sahelanthropus.|
|Wikispecies has information related to Sahelanthropus|
- Fossil Hominids: Toumai
- National Geographic: Skull Fossil Opens Window Into Early Period of Human Origins
- New Findings Bolster Case for Ancient Human Ancestor
- Sahelanthropus tchadensis, Toumaï, Detailed composition of the Franco-Chadian palaeoanthropological Mission, the sahara scientific missions, the discovery’s context, controversy about the misplacement of a molar, the minimum number of individuals, the geology of the site, was Toumaï buried ? and research to date the skull,…
- Sahelanthropus news reporting by John Hawks
- Sahelanthropus tchadensis - The Smithsonian Institution's Human Origins Program
- S. tchadensis reconstruction
- Sahelanthropus tchadensis Origins - Exploring the Fossil Record - Bradshaw Foundation
- Human Timeline (Interactive) – Smithsonian, National Museum of Natural History (August 2016).