Open main menu

Wikipedia β

Figure 1. Schematic representation of a Sagnac interferometer.

The Sagnac effect, also called Sagnac interference, named after French physicist Georges Sagnac, is a phenomenon encountered in interferometry that is elicited by rotation. The Sagnac effect manifests itself in a setup called a ring interferometer. A beam of light is split and the two beams are made to follow the same path but in opposite directions. On return to the point of entry the two light beams are allowed to exit the ring and undergo interference. The relative phases of the two exiting beams, and thus the position of the interference fringes, are shifted according to the angular velocity of the apparatus. In other words, when the interferometer is at rest with respect to the earth, the light travels at a constant speed. However, when the interferometer system is spun, one beam of light will slow with respect to the other beam of light. This arrangement is also called a Sagnac interferometer. Georges Sagnac set up this experiment to prove the existence of the aether that Einstein's theory of special relativity had discarded.[1][2]

A gimbal mounted mechanical gyroscope remains pointing in the same direction after spinning up, and thus can be used as a rotational reference for an inertial navigation system. With the development of so-called laser gyroscopes and fiber optic gyroscopes based on the Sagnac effect, the bulky mechanical gyroscope is replaced by one having no moving parts in many modern inertial navigation systems. The principles behind the two devices are different, however. A conventional gyroscope relies on the principle of conservation of angular momentum whereas the sensitivity of the ring interferometer to rotation arises from the invariance of the speed of light for all inertial frames of reference.

Contents

Description and operationEdit

 
Figure 2. A guided wave Sagnac interferometer, or fibre optic gyroscope, can be realized using an optical fiber in a single or multiple loops.

Typically three or more mirrors are used, so that counter-propagating light beams follow a closed path such as a triangle or square.(Fig. 1) Alternatively fiber optics can be employed to guide the light through a closed path.(Fig. 2) If the platform on which the ring interferometer is mounted is rotating, the interference fringes are displaced compared to their position when the platform is not rotating. The amount of displacement is proportional to the angular velocity of the rotating platform. The axis of rotation does not have to be inside the enclosed area. The shift of the interference fringes is proportional to the platform's angular velocity   and is given by a formula originally derived by Sagnac:

 
where   is the area of the loop and   the wavelength of light.

The effect is a consequence of the different times it takes a right and left moving light beams to complete a full round trip in the interferometer ring. The difference in travel times, when multiplied by the optical frequency, determines the phase difference.

The rotation thus measured is an absolute rotation, that is, the platform's rotation with respect to an inertial reference frame.

History of aether experimentsEdit

Early suggestions to build a giant ring interferometer to measure the rotation of the Earth were made by Oliver Lodge in 1897, and then by Albert Abraham Michelson in 1904. They hoped that with such an interferometer, it would be possible to decide between the idea of a stationary aether, and an aether which is completely dragged by the Earth. That is, if the hypothetical aether were carried along by the Earth (or by the interferometer) the result would be negative, while a stationary aether would give a positive result.[3][4][5]

An experiment conducted in 1911 by Franz Harress, aimed at making measurements of the Fresnel drag of light propagating through moving glass, was in 1920 recognized by Laue as actually constituting a Sagnac experiment. Not aware of the Sagnac effect, Harress had realized the presence of an "unexpected bias" in his measurements, but was unable to explain its cause.[6]

The first description of the Sagnac effect in the framework of special relativity was done by Max von Laue in 1911,[7][8] two years before Sagnac conducted his experiment. By continuing the theoretical work of Michelson (1904), von Laue confined himself to an inertial frames of reference (which he called a "valid" reference frame), and in a footnote he wrote "a system which rotates in respect to a valid system   is not valid".[7] Assuming constant light speed  , and setting the rotational velocity as  , he computed the propagation time   of one ray and   of the counter-propagating ray, and consequently obtained the time difference  . He concluded that this interferometer experiment would indeed produce (when restricted to terms of first order in  ) the same positive result for both special relativity and the stationary aether (the latter he called "absolute theory" in reference to the 1895-theory of Lorentz). He also concluded that only complete-aether-drag models (such as the ones of Stokes or Hertz) would give a negative result.[7]

In practice, the first interferometry experiment aimed at observing the correlation of angular velocity and phase-shift was performed by the French scientist Georges Sagnac in 1913. Its purpose was to detect "the effect of the relative motion of the ether".[1][2] Sagnac believed that his results constituted proof of the existence of a stationary aether. However, as explained above, Max von Laue already showed in 1911 that this effect is consistent with special relativity.[7][8] Unlike the carefully prepared Michelson–Morley experiment which was set up to prove an aether wind caused by earth drag, the Sagnac experiment could not prove this type of aether wind because a universal aether would affect all parts of the rotating light equally.

Einstein was fully aware of the phenomenon of the Sagnac effect through the earlier experimentation of Franz Harress, mathematically analyzed in an article by Paul Harzer, entitled "Dragging of Light in Glass and Aberration" in 1914.[9] This was rebutted by Einstein in his articles "Observation on P. Harzer's Article: Dragging of Light in Glass and Aberration"[10] and "Answer to P. Harzer's Reply."[11] After Einstein's mathematical argument in the first article, Einstein replied, "As I have shown, the frequency of the light relative to the medium through which it is applied is decisive for the magnitude k; because this determines the speed of the light relative to the medium. In our case, it is a light process which, in relation to the rotating prism system, is to be understood as a stationary process. From this it follows that the frequency of the light relative to the moving prisms, and also the magnitude k, is the same for all prisms. This repudiates Mr Harzer's reply." (1914)

In 1920 von Laue continued his own theoretical work of 1911, describing the Harress experiment and showing the role of the Sagnac effect in this experiment.[6] Laue said that in the Harress experiment (in which light traverses glass) there was a calculable difference in time due to both the dragging of light (which follows from the relativistic velocity addition in moving media, i.e. in moving glass) and "the fact that every part of the rotating apparatus runs away from one ray, while it approaches the other one", i.e. the Sagnac effect. He acknowledged that this latter effect alone could cause the time variance and, therefore, "the accelerations connected with the rotation in no way influence the speed of light."[6]

While Laue's explanation is based on inertial frames, Paul Langevin (1921, 1937) and others described the same effect when viewed from rotating reference frames (in both special and general relativity, see Born coordinates). So when the Sagnac effect should be described from the viewpoint of a corotating frame, one can use ordinary rotating cylindrical coordinates and apply them to the Minkowski metric, which results into the so-called Born metric or Langevin metric.[12][13][14] From these coordinates, one can derive the different arrival times of counter-propagating rays, which was shown by Paul Langevin (1921).[15] Or when these coordinate are used do compute the global speed of light in rotating frames, different apparent light speeds are derived depending on the orientation, which was shown by Langevin in another paper (1937).[16]

It should be noted that this does not contradict special relativity and the above explanation of von Laue that the speed of light is not affected by accelerations. Because this apparent variable light speed in rotating frames only arises if rotating coordinates are used, whereas if the Sagnac effect is described from the viewpoint of an external inertial coordinate frame the speed of light of course remains constant – so the Sagnac effect arises no matter whether one uses inertial coordinates (see the formulas in section #Theories below) of rotating coordinates (see the formulas in section #Reference frames below). That is, special relativity in its original formulation was adapted to inertial coordinate frames, not rotating frames. Einstein in his paper introducing special relativity stated, "light is always propagated in empty space with a definite velocity c which is independent of the state of motion of the emitting body."[17] Einstein specifically stated that light speed is only constant in the vacuum of empty space, using equations that only held in linear and parallel inertial frames. However, when Einstein started to investigate accelerated reference frames, he noticed that “the principle of the constancy of light must be modified” for accelerating frames of reference.[18]

Max von Laue in his 1920 paper gave serious consideration to the effect of General Relativity on the Sagnac effect stating, "General relativity would of course be capable of giving some statements about it, and we want to show at first that no noticeable influences of acceleration are expected according to it." He makes a footnote regarding discussions with German physicist, Wilhelm Wien.[6] The reason for looking at General Relativity is because Einstein's Theory of General Relativity predicted that light would slow down in a gravitational field which is why it could predict the curvature of light around a massive body. Under General Relativity, there is the equivalence principle which states that gravity and acceleration are equivalent. Spinning or accelerating an interferometer creates a gravitational effect. "There are, however, two different types of such [non-inertial] motion; it may for instance be acceleration in a straight line, or circular motion with constant speed."[19] Also, Irwin Shapiro in 1964 explained General Relativity saying, "the speed of a light wave depends on the strength of the gravitational potential along its path." This is called the Shapiro delay.[20] However, since the gravitational field would have to be significant, Laue (1920) concluded it is more likely that the effect is a result of changing the distance of the path by its movement through space.[6] "The beam traveling around the loop in the direction of rotation will have farther to go than the beam traveling counter to the direction of rotation, because during the period of travel the mirrors and detector will all move (slightly) toward the counter-rotating beam and away from the co-rotating beam. Consequently the beams will reach the detector at slightly different times, and slightly out of phase, producing optical interference 'fringes' that can be observed and measured."[21]

In 1926, an ambitious ring interferometry experiment was set up by Albert Michelson and Henry Gale. The aim was to find out whether the rotation of the Earth has an effect on the propagation of light in the vicinity of the Earth. The Michelson–Gale–Pearson experiment was a very large ring interferometer, (a perimeter of 1.9 kilometer), large enough to detect the angular velocity of the Earth. The outcome of the experiment was that the angular velocity of the Earth as measured by astronomy was confirmed to within measuring accuracy. The ring interferometer of the Michelson–Gale experiment was not calibrated by comparison with an outside reference (which was not possible, because the setup was fixed to the Earth). From its design it could be deduced where the central interference fringe ought to be if there would be zero shift. The measured shift was 230 parts in 1000, with an accuracy of 5 parts in 1000. The predicted shift was 237 parts in 1000.[22]

 The Wang experimentEdit

Modified versions of the Sganac experiment have been made by Wang et al.[23] in configurations similar to those shown in Fig. 3.

 
Figure 3. A rigid Sagnac interferometer, shown on the left, versus a deformable Wang interferometer shown on the right.

The Wang interferometer does not move like a rigid body and Sagnac original formula does not apply as the angular frequency of rotation   is not defined. Wang et al. verified experimentally that a generalized Sagnac formula applies

 

Relativistic derivation of Sagnac formulaEdit

 
Fig. 4: A closed optical fiber moving arbitrarily in space without stretching.

Consider a ring interferometer where two counter-propagating light beams share a common optical path determined by a loop of an optical fiber, see Figure 4. The loop may have an arbitrary shape, and can move arbitrarily in space. The only restriction is that it is not allowed to stretch. (The case of a circular ring interferometer rotating about its center in free space is recovered by taking the index of refraction of the fiber to be 1.)

Consider a small segment of the fiber, whose length in its rest frame is  . The time intervals,  , it takes the left and right moving light rays to traverse the segment in the rest frame coincide and are given by

 
Let   be the length of this small segment in the lab frame. By the relativistic length contraction formula,   correct to first order in the velocity   of the segment. The time intervals   for traversing the segment in the lab frame are given by Lorentz transformation as:
 
correct to first order in the velocity  . In general, the two beams will visit a given segment at slightly different times, but, in the absence of stretching, the length   is the same for both beams.

It follows that the time difference for completing a cycle for the two beams is

 
Remarkably, the time difference is independent of the refraction index   and the velocity of light in the fiber.

Imagine a screen for viewing fringes placed at the light source (alternatively, use a beamsplitter to send light from the source point to the screen). Given a steady light source, interference fringes will form on the screen with a fringe displacement given by   where the first factor is the frequency of light. This gives the generalized Sagnac formula [24]

 
In the special case that the fiber moves like a rigid body with angular frequency  , the velocity is   and the line integral can be computed in terms of the area of the lop:
 
This gives Sagnac formula for ring interferometers of arbitrary shape and geometry
 
If one also allows for stretching one recovers the Fizeau interference formula.[24]

The Sagnac effect has stimulated a century long debate on its meaning and interpretation,[25][26][27] much of this debate being surprising since the effect is perfectly well understood in the context of special relativity

Other generalizationsEdit

A relay of pulses that circumnavigates the Earth, verifying precise synchronization, is also recognized as a case requiring correction for the Sagnac effect. In 1984 a verification was set up that involved three ground stations and several GPS satellites, with relays of signals both going eastward and westward around the world.[28] In the case of a Sagnac interferometer a measure of difference in arrival time is obtained by producing interference fringes, and observing the fringe shift. In the case of a relay of pulses around the world the difference in arrival time is obtained directly from the actual arrival time of the pulses. In both cases the mechanism of the difference in arrival time is the same: the Sagnac effect.

The Hafele–Keating experiment is also recognized as a counterpart to Sagnac effect physics.[28] In the actual Hafele–Keating experiment[29] the mode of transport (long-distance flights) gave rise to time dilation effects of its own, and calculations were needed to separate the various contributions. For the (theoretical) case of clocks that are transported so slowly that time dilation effects arising from the transport are negligible the amount of time difference between the clocks when they arrive back at the starting point will be equal to the time difference that is found for a relay of pulses that travels around the world: 207 nanoseconds.

Practical usesEdit

The Sagnac effect is employed in current technology. One use is in inertial guidance systems. Ring laser gyroscopes are extremely sensitive to rotations, which need to be accounted for if an inertial guidance system is to return accurate results. The ring laser also can detect the sidereal day, which can also be termed "mode 1". Global navigation systems, such as GPS, GLONASS, COMPASS or Galileo, need to take the rotation of the Earth into account in the procedures of using radio signals to synchronize clocks.

Ring lasersEdit

 
Figure 6. Schematic representation of a ring laser setup.

Fibre optic gyroscopes are sometimes referred to as 'passive ring interferometers'. A passive ring interferometer uses light entering the setup from outside. The interference pattern that is obtained is a fringe pattern, and what is measured is a phase shift.

It is also possible to construct a ring interferometer that is self-contained, based on a completely different arrangement. This is called a ring laser or ring laser gyroscope. The light is generated and sustained by incorporating laser excitation in the path of the light.

To understand what happens in a ring laser cavity, it is helpful to discuss the physics of the laser process in a laser setup with continuous generation of light. As the laser excitation is started, the molecules inside the cavity emit photons, but since the molecules have a thermal velocity, the light inside the laser cavity is at first a range of frequencies, corresponding to the statistical distribution of velocities. The process of stimulated emission makes one frequency quickly outcompete other frequencies, and after that the light is very close to monochromatic.

 
Figure 7. Schematic representation of the frequency shift when a ring laser interferometer is rotating. Both the counterpropagating light and the co-propagating light go through 12 cycles of their frequency.

For the sake of simplicity, assume that all emitted photons are emitted in a direction parallel to the ring. Fig. 7 illustrates the effect of the ring laser's rotation. In a linear laser, an integer multiple of the wavelength fits the length of the laser cavity. This means that in traveling back and forth the laser light goes through an integer number of cycles of its frequency. In the case of a ring laser the same applies: the number of cycles of the laser light's frequency is the same in both directions. This quality of the same number of cycles in both directions is preserved when the ring laser setup is rotating. The image illustrates that there is wavelength shift (hence a frequency shift) in such a way that the number of cycles is the same in both directions of propagation.

By bringing the two frequencies of laser light to interference a beat frequency can be obtained; the beat frequency is the difference between the two frequencies. This beat frequency can be thought of as an interference pattern in time. (The more familiar interference fringes of interferometry are a spatial pattern). The period of this beat frequency is linearly proportional to the angular velocity of the ring laser with respect to inertial space. This is the principle of the ring laser gyroscope, widely used in modern inertial navigation systems.

Zero point calibrationEdit

 
Figure 8. The red and blue dots represent counter-propagating photons, the grey dots represent molecules in the laser cavity.

In passive ring interferometers, the fringe displacement is proportional to the first derivative of angular position; careful calibration is required to determine the fringe displacement that corresponds to zero angular velocity of the ring interferometer setup. On the other hand, ring laser interferometers do not require calibration to determine the output that corresponds to zero angular velocity. Ring laser interferometers are self-calibrating. The beat frequency will be zero if and only if the ring laser setup is non-rotating with respect to inertial space.

Fig. 8 illustrates the physical property that makes the ring laser interferometer self-calibrating. The grey dots represent molecules in the laser cavity that act as resonators. Along every section of the ring cavity, the speed of light is the same in both directions. When the ring laser device is rotating, then it rotates with respect to that background. In other words: invariance of the speed of light provides the reference for the self-calibrating property of the ring laser interferometer.

Lock-inEdit

Ring laser gyroscopes suffer from an effect known as "lock-in" at low rotation rates (less than 100°/h). At very low rotation rates, the frequencies of the counter-propagating laser modes become almost identical. In this case, crosstalk between the counter-propagating beams can result in injection locking, so that the standing wave "gets stuck" in a preferred phase, locking the frequency of each beam to each other rather than responding to gradual rotation. By rotationally dithering the laser cavity back and forth through a small angle at a rapid rate (hundreds of hertz), lock-in will only occur during the brief instances where the rotational velocity is close to zero; the errors thereby induced approximately cancel each other between alternating dead periods.

Fibre optic gyroscopes versus ring laser gyroscopesEdit

Fibre optic gyros (FOGs) and ring laser gyros (RLGs) both operate by monitoring the difference in propagation time between beams of light traveling in clockwise and counterclockwise directions about a closed optical path. They differ considerably in various cost, reliability, size, weight, power, and other performance characteristics that need to be considered when evaluating these distinct technologies for a particular application.

RLGs require accurate machining, use of precision mirrors, and assembly under clean room conditions. Their mechanical dithering assemblies add somewhat to their weight but not appreciably.[citation needed] RLGs are capable of logging in excess of 100,000 hours of operation in near-room temperature conditions.[citation needed] Their lasers have relatively high power requirements.[30]

Interferometric FOGs are purely solid-state, require no mechanical dithering components, do not require precision machining, are not subject to lock-in, have a flexible geometry, and can be made very small. They use many standard components from the telecom industry. In addition, the major optical components of FOGs have proven performance in the telecom industry, with lifespans measured in decades.[31] However, the assembly of multiple optical components into a precision gyro instrument is costly. Analog FOGs offer the lowest possible cost but are limited in performance; digital FOGs offer the wide dynamic ranges and accurate scale factor corrections required for stringent applications.[32] Use of longer and larger coils increases sensitivity at the cost of greater sensitivity to temperature variations and vibrations.

Zero-area Sagnac interferometer and gravitational wave detectionEdit

The Sagnac topology was actually first described by Michelson in 1886,[33] who employed an even-reflection variant of this interferometer in a repetition of the Fizeau experiment.[34] Michelson noted the extreme stability of the fringes produced by this form of interferometer: White-light fringes were observed immediately upon alignment of the mirrors. In dual-path interferometers, white-light fringes are difficult to obtain since the two path lengths must be matched to within a couple of micrometers (the coherence length of the white light). However, being a common path interferometer, the Sagnac configuration inherently matches the two path lengths. Likewise Michelson observed that the fringe pattern would remain stable even while holding a lighted match below the optical path; in most interferometers the fringes would shift wildly due to the refractive index fluctuations from the warm air above the match. Sagnac interferometers are almost completely insensitive to displacements of the mirrors or beam-splitter.[35] This characteristic of the Sagnac topology has led to their use in applications requiring exceptionally high stability.

 
Figure 9. Zero-area Sagnac interferometer

The fringe shift in a Sagnac interferometer due to rotation has a magnitude proportional to the enclosed area of the light path, and this area must be specified in relation to the axis of rotation. Thus the sign of the area of a loop is reversed when the loop is wound in the opposite direction (clockwise or anti-clockwise). A light path that includes loops in both directions, therefore, has a net area given by the difference between the areas of the clockwise and anti-clockwise loops. The special case of two equal but opposite loops is called a zero-area Sagnac interferometer. The result is an interferometer that exhibits the stability of the Sagnac topology while being insensitive to rotation.[36]

The Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) consisted of two 4-km Michelson–Fabry–Pérot interferometers, and operated at a power level of about 100 watts of laser power at the beam splitter. After an upgrade to Advanced LIGO several kilowatts of laser power are required.

A variety of competing optical systems are being explored for third generation enhancements beyond Advanced LIGO.[37] One of these competing proposals is based on the zero-area Sagnac design. With a light path consisting of two loops of the same area, but in opposite directions, an effective area of zero is obtained thus canceling the Sagnac effect in its usual sense. Although insensitive to low frequency mirror drift, laser frequency variation, reflectivity imbalance between the arms, and thermally induced birefringence, this configuration is nevertheless sensitive to passing gravitational waves at frequencies of astronomical interest.[36] However, many considerations are involved in the choice of an optical system, and despite the zero-area Sagnac's superiority in certain areas, there is as yet no consensus choice of optical system for third generation LIGO.[38][39]

See alsoEdit

ReferencesEdit

  1. ^ a b Sagnac, Georges (1913), "L'éther lumineux démontré par l'effet du vent relatif d'éther dans un interféromètre en rotation uniforme" [The demonstration of the luminiferous aether by an interferometer in uniform rotation], Comptes Rendus, 157: 708–710 
  2. ^ a b Sagnac, Georges (1913), "Sur la preuve de la réalité de l'éther lumineux par l'expérience de l'interférographe tournant" [On the proof of the reality of the luminiferous aether by the experiment with a rotating interferometer], Comptes Rendus, 157: 1410–1413 
  3. ^ Anderson, R.; Bilger, H.R.; Stedman, G.E. (1994). "Sagnac effect: A century of Earth-rotated interferometers". Am. J. Phys. 62 (11): 975–985. Bibcode:1994AmJPh..62..975A. doi:10.1119/1.17656. 
  4. ^ Lodge, Oliver (1897). "Experiments on the Absence of Mechanical Connexion between Ether and Matter". Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. 189: 149–166. Bibcode:1897RSPTA.189..149L. doi:10.1098/rsta.1897.0006. 
  5. ^ Michelson, A.A. (1904). "Relative Motion of Earth and Aether". Philosophical Magazine. 8 (48): 716–719. doi:10.1080/14786440409463244. 
  6. ^ a b c d e Laue, Max von (1920). "Zum Versuch von F. Harress". Annalen der Physik. 367 (13): 448–463. Bibcode:1920AnP...367..448L. doi:10.1002/andp.19203671303.  English translation: On the Experiment of F. Harress
  7. ^ a b c d Laue, Max von (1911). "Über einen Versuch zur Optik der bewegten Körper". Münchener Sitzungsberichte: 405–412.  English translation: On an Experiment on the Optics of Moving Bodies
  8. ^ a b Pauli, Wolfgang (1981). Theory of Relativity. New York: Dover. ISBN 0-486-64152-X. 
  9. ^ List of scientific publications by Albert Einstein
  10. ^ Astronomische Nachrichten, 199, 8–10
  11. ^ Astronomische Nachrichten, 199, 47–48
  12. ^ Guido Rizzi; Matteo Luca Ruggiero (2003). "The relativistic Sagnac Effect: two derivations". In G. Rizzi; M.L. Ruggiero. Relativity in Rotating Frames. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Bibcode:2003gr.qc.....5084R. ISBN 0-486-64152-X. arXiv:gr-qc/0305084 . 
  13. ^ Ashby, N. (2003). "Relativity in the Global Positioning System". Living Rev. Relativ. 6. Bibcode:2003LRR.....6....1A. doi:10.12942/lrr-2003-1.  (Open access)
  14. ^ L.D. Landau, E.M. Lifshitz, (1962). "The Classical Theory of Fields". 2nd edition, Pergamon Press, pp. 296–297.
  15. ^ Langevin, Paul (1921). "Sur la théorie de la relativité et l'expérience de M. Sagnac". Comptes Rendus. 173: 831–834. 
  16. ^ Langevin, Paul (1937). "Sur l'expérience de M. Sagnac". Comptes Rendus. 205: 304–306. 
  17. ^ Albert Einstein, 1905, "On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies." http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/
  18. ^ A. Einstein, ‘Generalized theory of relativity’, 94; the anthology ‘The Principle of Relativity’, A. Einstein and H. Minkowski, University of Calcutta, 1920. as quoted in http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_1214.pdf
  19. ^ "General Relativity", Lewis Ryder, Cambridge University Press (2009). P.7
  20. ^ http://www.physicsdiscussionforum.org/download/file.php?id=250
  21. ^ http://www.mathpages.com/rr/s2-07/2-07.htm
  22. ^ Michelson, Albert Abraham; Gale, Henry G. (1925). "The Effect of the Earths Rotation on the Velocity of Light, II.". The Astrophysical Journal. 61: 140–145. Bibcode:1925ApJ....61..140M. doi:10.1086/142879. 
  23. ^ Wang, R.; Zheng, Y.; Yao, A.; Langley, D (2006). "Modified Sagnac experiment for measuring travel-time difference between counter-propagating light beams in a uniformly moving fiber". Physics Letters A. 312: 7–10. Bibcode:2003PhLA..312....7W. arXiv:physics/0609222 . doi:10.1016/S0375-9601(03)00575-9. 
  24. ^ a b Ori, A. (2016). "Generalized Sagnac-Wang-Fizeau formula". Physical Review A. 94 (6). doi:10.1103/physreva.94.063837. 
  25. ^ Stedman, G. E. (1997). "Ring-laser tests of fundamental physics and geophysics". Rep. Prog. Phys. 60: 615–688. Bibcode:1997RPPh...60..615S. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.128.191 . doi:10.1088/0034-4885/60/6/001. 
  26. ^ Malykin, G. B. (2002). "Sagnac effect in a rotating frame of reference. Relativistic Zeno paradox" (PDF). Physics-Uspekhi. 45 (8): 907–909. Bibcode:2002PhyU...45..907M. doi:10.1070/pu2002v045n08abeh001225. Retrieved 15 February 2013. 
  27. ^ Tartaglia, A.; Ruggiero, M. L. (2004). "Sagnac effect and pure geometry". arXiv:gr-qc/0401005 . 
  28. ^ a b Allan, D. W., Weiss, M. A., & Ashby, N. (1985). "Around-the-World Relativistic Sagnac Experiment". Science. 228 (4695): 69–71. Bibcode:1985Sci...228...69A. doi:10.1126/science.228.4695.69. 
  29. ^ Hafele J., Keating, R. (1972-07-14). "Around the world atomic clocks:predicted relativistic time gains". Science. 177 (4044): 166–168. Bibcode:1972Sci...177..166H. PMID 17779917. doi:10.1126/science.177.4044.166. Retrieved 2006-09-18. 
  30. ^ Juang, J.-N.; Radharamanan, R. "Evaluation of Ring Laser and Fiber Optic Gyroscope Technology" (PDF). Retrieved 15 February 2013. 
  31. ^ Napolitano, F. "Fiber-Optic Gyroscopes Key Technological Advantages" (PDF). iXSea. Retrieved 15 February 2013. 
  32. ^ Udd, E.; Watanabe, S. F.; Cahill, R. F. "Comparison of ring laser and fiber-optic gyro technology". McDonnell-Douglas. Bibcode:1986gosm.agar.....U. Retrieved 15 February 2013. 
  33. ^ Hariharan, P. (1975). "Sagnac or Michelson–Sagnac interferometer?". Applied Optics. 14 (10): 2319_1–2321. Bibcode:1975ApOpt..14.2319H. doi:10.1364/AO.14.2319_1. 
  34. ^ Michelson, A. A. & Morley, E.W. (1886). "Influence of Motion of the Medium on the Velocity of Light". Am. J. Sci. 31: 377–386. 
  35. ^ Hariharan, P. (2003). Optical Interferometry (Second ed.). Academic Press. pp. 28–29. ISBN 0-12-311630-9. 
  36. ^ a b Sun, K-X.; Fejer, M.M.; Gustafson, E.; Byer R.L. (1996). "Sagnac Interferometer for Gravitational-Wave Detection" (PDF). Physical Review Letters. 76 (17): 3053–3056. Bibcode:1996PhRvL..76.3053S. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.3053. Retrieved 31 March 2012. 
  37. ^ Punturo, M.; Abernathy, M.; Acernese, F.; Allen, B.; Andersson, N.; Arun, K.; Barone, F.; Barr, B.; Barsuglia, M.; Beker, M.; Beveridge, N.; Birindelli, S.; Bose, S.; Bosi, L.; Braccini, S.; Bradaschia, C.; Bulik, T.; Calloni, E.; Cella, G.; Chassande Mottin, E.; Chelkowski, S.; Chincarini, A.; Clark, J.; Coccia, E.; Colacino, C.; Colas, J.; Cumming, A.; Cunningham, L.; Cuoco, E.; Danilishin, S. (2010). "The third generation of gravitational wave observatories and their science reach". Classical and Quantum Gravity. 27 (8): 084007. Bibcode:2010CQGra..27h4007P. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/27/8/084007. 
  38. ^ Freise, A.; Chelkowski, S.; Hild, S.; Pozzo, W. D.; Perreca, A.; Vecchio, A. (2009). "Triple Michelson interferometer for a third-generation gravitational wave detector". Classical and Quantum Gravity. 26 (8): 085012. Bibcode:2009CQGra..26h5012F. arXiv:0804.1036 . doi:10.1088/0264-9381/26/8/085012. 
  39. ^ Eberle, T.; Steinlechner, S.; Bauchrowitz, J. R.; Händchen, V.; Vahlbruch, H.; Mehmet, M.; Müller-Ebhardt, H.; Schnabel, R. (2010). "Quantum Enhancement of the Zero-Area Sagnac Interferometer Topology for Gravitational Wave Detection". Physical Review Letters. 104 (25): 251102. Bibcode:2010PhRvL.104y1102E. PMID 20867358. arXiv:1007.0574 . doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.251102. 

External linksEdit