Right of abode in Hong Kong
Right of abode in Hong Kong entitles a person to live and work in the territory without any restrictions or conditions of stay. Someone who has that right is a Hong Kong permanent resident. Foreign nationals may acquire the right of abode after meeting a seven-year residency requirement and are given most rights usually associated with citizenship, including the right to vote in regional elections. However, they are not entitled to hold territorial passports or stand for office in most Legislative Council constituencies, unless they also naturalise as Chinese citizens.
As a special administrative region of China, Hong Kong does not have its own nationality law and natural-born residents are generally Chinese citizens. Prior to 1997, the territory was a colony of the United Kingdom and right of abode was tied to British nationality law. Although Hong Kong, mainland China, and Macau constitute a single country, local residents with Chinese citizenship do not have automatic residence rights in either of the other two jurisdictions, which both control immigration separately. Conversely, mainland Chinese and Macanese residents do not automatically have residence or employment rights in Hong Kong.
Colonial era policyEdit
Hong Kong was a British colony from 1842 until its transfer to China in 1997. Accordingly, regulations on local residence rights were closely tied to British nationality law during colonial rule. All British subjects previously had unrestricted access to live and work in any British territory. Parliament gradually restricted this from 1962 to 1971, when subjects originating from outside of the British Islands first had immigration controls imposed on them when entering the United Kingdom. Hong Kong followed suit and imposed greater restrictions on subjects from outside the territory. British subjects born in the colony were given belonger status, to indicate their possession of right of abode in Hong Kong. Nationality law reform in 1981 reclassified the vast majority of Hong Kong belongers as British Dependent Territories citizens (BDTCs).
The border between Hong Kong and mainland China was not regulated for over 100 years after establishment of the colony. Border controls did not exist until 1950, after communist victory in the Chinese Civil War. Although the border was guarded, the Hong Kong government was relatively lax in deporting illegal immigrants due to a shortage of unskilled labour within the territory, allowing large numbers of them to register as residents. Still, colonial authorities held almost unlimited discretionary deportation powers over Chinese migrants until 1971, when those resident in the territory for more than seven years were given the right to land. This exempted them from immigration control, though they could still be deported for serious crimes. Immigration became more restricted in 1974 at the start of the Touch Base Policy. Under this system, illegal immigrants captured by law enforcement were immediately deported but those who had managed to reach urban areas of Hong Kong and found housing accommodation were given legal status. This policy ended in 1980, after which all free migration was stopped.
Chinese migrants moving to Hong Kong forfeited their hukou in mainland China and became ineligible for Chinese passports. These individuals were treated as if they were stateless. The colonial government issued Documents of Identity as travel documents to those who could not obtain passports. After seven years of residence, they were issued Certificates of Identity (CIs).
The British and Chinese governments entered negotiations over the future of Hong Kong in the early 1980s and agreed on the Sino-British Joint Declaration in 1984. The basic principles for the right of abode are set as part of this treaty and further defined in the Hong Kong Basic Law, which encompass the right to land with the added entitlement that a bearer cannot be deported. Belonger status was renamed permanent resident status in 1987, when landed Chinese residents were given the right of abode along with Hong Kong BDTCs. All BDTCs who did not have a connection with a remaining British Dependent Territory other than Hong Kong lost BDTC status on 1 July 1997. Former ethnic Chinese BDTCs became Chinese nationals and could only retain British nationality if they had registered as British Nationals (Overseas) prior to the transfer of sovereignty. Individuals who were not ethnically Chinese, had not registered as BN(O)s, and would have been stateless at that date automatically became British Overseas citizens. Holders of CIs were able to replace them with Hong Kong Special Administrative Region passports after the handover.
Acquisition and lossEdit
Becoming a Hong Kong permanent resident has slightly different requirements depending on an individual's nationality. Acquisition by birth operates on a modified jus soli basis; Chinese nationals born in Hong Kong are automatically permanent residents, while foreign nationals must have at least one parent who possesses right of abode. Children born outside of Hong Kong acquire right of abode if they are also Chinese nationals at birth. Chinese nationality is usually conferred by descent to children born abroad, unless the parents have obtained permanent residency in another country or foreign citizenship. However, while Chinese nationals born in mainland China to Hong Kong permanent resident parents do have right of abode, they must first be approved for One-way Permits by mainland authorities before claiming permanent residency. Residents of Macau also do not have automatic right of entry into Hong Kong.
Nonresidents seeking to become permanent residents must be ordinarily resident in Hong Kong for a continuous period of at least seven years before becoming eligible for the status. Ordinarily resident in this context excludes certain classes of people, including central government officials, foreign domestic helpers, and incarcerated individuals. Chinese nationals may qualify using any seven-year residence period, while foreigners are only eligible on the basis of the seven years immediately preceding their applications. Individuals from mainland China seeking to settle in Hong Kong are additionally subject to emigration control by the central government.
Permanent residents who are not Chinese nationals automatically lose the right of abode if they are absent from Hong Kong for more than three years. These individuals are then given the right to land, which also allows them unrestricted access to live and work in the territory. Foreign permanent residents can naturalise as Chinese nationals and become exempt from automatic loss, but are required to renounce their previous nationality on successful application. Children with foreign nationality who were born in Hong Kong and have permanent residency by descent also automatically lose right of abode at age 21 and are given the right to land. They may subsequently reapply for right of abode on the basis of a seven-year residence period. Chinese nationals with right of abode may only be deprived of the status if they lose their Chinese nationality.
Prior to 1997, acquisition of the right of abode was dependent on British nationality. Individuals born overseas to Hong Kong-connected BDTCs also became BDTCs and Hong Kong permanent residents by descent. After the transfer of sovereignty, if these individuals did not also acquire Chinese nationality or return to Hong Kong within three years, they would be nonpermanent residents with the right to land.
Individuals who lost permanent resident status before 1997 can immediately resume the right of abode under limited circumstances. Those who returned to settle in Hong Kong within 18 months after the transfer of sovereignty were automatically regranted the status, while former residents who return after that period can only immediately regain the right of abode if they have not been absent from the territory for any period longer than three years.
Rights and restrictionsEdit
Permanent residents have the unrestricted right to live and work in Hong Kong and cannot be deported from the territory, regardless of their nationality. They are required to register for Hong Kong permanent identity cards (as opposed to standard identity cards which are issued to any person admitted to the territory for more than 180 days), eligible for welfare benefits, and able to vote in regional elections. Chinese nationals with territorial right of abode are eligible to hold Hong Kong Special Administrative Region passports, which are different from those issued to mainland residents. Those who additionally do not possess right of abode in foreign countries may stand for office in geographical constituencies of the Legislative Council and can serve as principal officials of the government. A limited number of residents with foreign nationality or right of abode in other countries may be elected to functional constituency seats in the legislature.
Hong Kong permanent residents do not have automatic residence or employment rights in mainland China. The central government issues Home Return Permits to residents who are Chinese citizens for travel purposes and Residence Permits if they intend to reside or work in the mainland for longer than six months. Hong Kong permanent residents are also subject to immigration controls in Macau, and must obtain residence permits if living there for more than one year.
Legal challenges to eligibility requirementsEdit
The eligibility criteria for right of abode has been a contentious issue and repeatedly challenged in court since the transfer of sovereignty. Because constitutional issues require central government review, litigation on right of abode issues has highlighted conflicting differences between the legal systems of the territory and mainland and xenophobic sentiment among local residents.
Children born in mainland ChinaEdit
In 1999, the Court of Final Appeal (CFA) issued two judgements that granted right of abode in Hong Kong to children born in mainland China with at least one parent who had the right of abode, including those whose parents had become a permanent resident after the time of birth. The regional government expected that 1.67 million new immigrants from the mainland would seek to acquire the right of abode on these terms over the next decade, and projected that Hong Kong would not be able to absorb such a sudden population increase. Although the CFA is the highest territorial court, the Court clarified that its authority to interpret the Basic Law derives from the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress (NPCSC). The government subsequently asked the Standing Committee to provide a new interpretation of Basic Law Article 24, which defines right of abode eligibility, and Article 22, which stipulates that people from other parts of China are required to seek central government approval before entering Hong Kong. The NPCSC duly issued an interpretation that reinforced requirements for mainland exit procedures and restricted eligibility for right of abode to the criteria as it was before the CFA rulings. The CFA confirmed its effect in local law in Lau Kong Yung v Director of Immigration.
While the interpretation resolved the immediate immigration crisis, the constitutionality and legality of bypassing the Court of Final Appeal was widely debated. Many legislators, especially the pro-democracy camp, and the Hong Kong Bar Association believed that amending the Basic Law would have been the appropriate course of remedy. They argued that arbitrary NPCSC interpretations without formal requests for them from the CFA would weaken the principle of "one country, two systems", damage the rule of law, and erode the authority of the CFA as the territory's final appellate court. Although constitutional judicial review is routine in common law systems, Beijing viewed the process as a limit to its authority as the sovereign power and preferred more flexible interpretation of the law. Additionally, the regional government believed that revising the Basic Law would delay resolving the issue for too long since amendments require review by the entire National People's Congress, which only meets once each spring.
Children of mainland visitorsEdit
The Court of Final Appeal issued a further ruling in 2001 that all Chinese nationals born in Hong Kong would have right of abode in the region, even if neither parent was a permanent resident. This change directly led to a growing trend of birth tourism; increasing numbers of expectant mothers from the mainland entered Hong Kong to give birth with the express purpose of exploiting the healthcare system and giving their children permanent residency in the territory. Overcrowding in hospital maternity wards became a major factor in contributing to growing consternation among residents and the emergence of a hostile environment against mainland tourists.
Foreign domestic helpersEdit
Foreign domestic helpers (FDHs), live-in female household workers mostly from the Philippines or Indonesia, constitute the largest non-Chinese minority group in Hong Kong. They are not considered ordinarily resident in the territory and cannot claim permanent residency. Racial tension between these workers and local residents, pervasive perceptions of FDHs as being lower class, and a general public unwillingness to integrate them led some FDHs to more actively protest their disadvantaged legal status. However, in 2013, the Court of Final Appeal upheld existing government exclusion of FDHs from right of abode eligibility in Vallejos v Commissioner of Registration. A majority of Hongkongers did not support the extension of residency rights to this minority group, fearing an increase in government spending to accommodate them. The current regulatory environment for FDHs, including the lack of access to right of abode, continues to be criticised for making this class of minorities particularly vulnerable to domestic exploitation and abuse.
- Carroll 2007, p. 1.
- Chen 1988, pp. 670.
- Hansen 1999, p. 71.
- Evans 1972, pp. 508–509.
- Chen 1988, pp. 647–648.
- Chen 1988, pp. 670–671.
- 1996 Population By-Census, p. 31.
- Law & Lee 2006, p. 219.
- Chen 1988, p. 640.
- Law & Lee 2006, p. 220.
- Chen 1988, p. 644.
- Lau 2009, p. 5.
- Carroll 2007, pp. 178, 181.
- Sino-British Joint Declaration Annex 1, section XIV.
- Basic Law Chapter III Article 24.
- Chen 1988, pp. 673–674.
- The Hong Kong (British Nationality) Order 1986, section 3.
- "British National (Overseas) and British Dependent Territories Citizens" (PDF). Government of the United Kingdom. Archived (PDF) from the original on 11 December 2018. Retrieved 8 January 2019.
- "Country Advice – Hong Kong" (PDF). Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal. pp. 1–2. Retrieved 4 June 2020.
- Immigration Ordinance Schedule 1, para. 2.
- "Frequently Asked Questions - Right of Abode". Immigration Department. Archived from the original on 25 October 2018. Retrieved 6 March 2019.
- Standing Committee Interpretation Regarding Article 22(4) and Article 24(2)(3) of the Hong Kong Basic Law.
- "Entry Arrangements for Mainland, Macao, Taiwan & Overseas Chinese Residents". Immigration Department. Archived from the original on 27 October 2019. Retrieved 18 January 2020.
- Immigration Ordinance Schedule 1, para. 1.
- Immigration Ordinance Section 2(4).
- Basic Law Chapter II Article 22.
- "Loss of Hong Kong Permanent Resident Status" (PDF). Immigration Department. November 2018. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 October 2019. Retrieved 28 November 2019.
- "Naturalisation as a Chinese National" (PDF). Immigration Department. March 2015. Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 October 2018. Retrieved 6 March 2019.
- "Can Hong Kong permanent resident status be lost?". University of Hong Kong. Archived from the original on 25 January 2017. Retrieved 3 June 2020.
- White 1988, pp. 235–236.
- Immigration Ordinance Schedule 1, para. 6.
- Immigration Ordinance Section 2A.
- Registration of Persons Ordinance Section 3.
- "What types of identity card are there?". University of Hong Kong. Archived from the original on 28 May 2020. Retrieved 28 May 2020.
- Chia 2012, p. 10.
- Guidelines on the Legislative Council Election 2016, pp. 9–11.
- "Guidance Notes on Local Application for HKSAR Passport for applicants aged 16 or above" (PDF). Immigration Department. February 2018. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 October 2019. Retrieved 2 December 2019.
- Guidelines on the Legislative Council Election 2016, p. 42.
- Basic Law Chapter IV Articles 44, 55, 61, 71, 90, 101.
- Guidelines on the Legislative Council Election 2016, pp. 43–44.
- Basic Law Chapter IV Article 67.
- Leung 2013.
- Su 2018.
- Administrative Regulation No. 5/2003, Entry, stay and residence permit regulation, Article 10(2).
- Basic Law Chapter VIII.
- Chan 2016.
- Butler & Suntikul 2017, p. 59.
- Ng Ka Ling and Another v the Director of Immigration, at para. 108–112.
- Chan Kam Nga v the Director of Immigration, at para. 32.
- Six-monthly Report on Hong Kong January–June 1999, p. 4.
- "Interpretation: A "legal and constitutional" option" (Press release). Hong Kong Government. 18 May 1999. Archived from the original on 3 March 2016. Retrieved 8 March 2019.
- Six-monthly Report on Hong Kong January–June 1999, p. 5.
- Six-monthly Report on Hong Kong January–June 1999, p. 6.
- Lau Kong Yung v Director of Immigration, at para. 74.
- Tong, Ronny K.W. (5 May 1999). "Open Letter to the Chief Executive on the Right of Abode Case". Letter to Tung Chee-hwa. Archived from the original on 21 February 2011. Retrieved 8 March 2019.
- Kam 2002, p. 634.
- Director of Immigration v Chong Fung Yuen, at para. 8.3.
- LaFraniere 2012.
- Chia 2012, p. 5.
- Chia 2012, pp. 5–6.
- Chia 2012, p. 9.
- Chia 2012, p. 7.
- Chia 2012, pp. 10–11.
- Vallejos v Commissioner of Registration, at para. 89.
- Bradsher 2013.
- Ewing 2018.
- Heifetz 2017.
- Branigan 2014.
- Butler, Richard; Suntikul, Wantanee (2017). Tourism and Political Change. Oxford: Goodfellow Publishers. ISBN 978-1-910158-83-8.
- Carroll, John (2007). A Concise History of Hong Kong. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-0-7425-3422-3.
- Chen, Albert H.Y. (1988). "The Development of Immigration Law and Policy: The Hong Kong Experience" (PDF). McGill Law Journal. 33 (4): 631–675. Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 November 2019. Retrieved 1 November 2019.
- Chia, Galvin (2012). "Focussing the Familiar? Locating the Foreign Domestic Worker in Postcolonial Hong Kong Discourse" (PDF). Cross-sections, the Bruce Hall Academic Journal. 8: 1–18. ISSN 1834-7983. Archived (PDF) from the original on 8 August 2019. Retrieved 9 March 2019.
- Evans, J. M. (1972). "Immigration Act 1971". The Modern Law Review. 35 (5): 508–524. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.1972.tb02363.x. JSTOR 1094478.
- Guidelines on the Legislative Council Election (PDF) (Report). Electoral Affairs Commission. 2016. Archived (PDF) from the original on 22 May 2020. Retrieved 28 May 2020.
- Hansen, Randall (1999). "The Politics of Citizenship in 1940s Britain: The British Nationality Act". Twentieth Century British History. 10 (1): 67–95. doi:10.1093/tcbh/10.1.67.
- Kam, Karmen (2002). "Right of Abode Cases: The Judicial Independence of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region v. The Sovereignty Interests of China". Brooklyn Journal of International Law. 27 (2): 611–637. OCLC 773242624.
- Law, Kam-yee; Lee, Kim-ming (2006). "Citizenship, economy and social exclusion of mainland Chinese immigrants in Hong Kong". Journal of Contemporary Asia. 36 (2): 217–242. doi:10.1080/00472330680000131. S2CID 154437658.
- Lau, K.L. Alex (2009). "Immigration and Nationality Anomalies of Hong Kong". LEWI Working Paper Series (93): 1–16. Archived from the original on 19 March 2020. Retrieved 4 June 2020.
- Leung, Nancy Ling Sze (30 August 2013). A new population policy challenge towards the cross border birth issue in Hong Kong (PDF). IUSSP International Population Conference. Busan. Archived (PDF) from the original on 8 August 2017. Retrieved 7 March 2019.
- Main Report (PDF). 1996 Population By-Census (Report). Census and Statistics Department. December 1996. Archived (PDF) from the original on 13 October 2018. Retrieved 10 January 2019.
- Six-monthly Report on Hong Kong January–June 1999 (PDF) (Report). Foreign and Commonwealth Office. July 1999. Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 July 2019. Retrieved 28 May 2020.
- White, Robin (1988). "Nationality Aspects of the Hong Kong Settlement". Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law. 20 (1): 225–251.
Legislation and case lawEdit
- Basic Law Chapter II
- Basic Law Chapter III
- Basic Law Chapter IV
- Basic Law Chapter VIII
- Chan Kam Nga v the Director of Immigration, FACV 13/1998 (29 January 1999), at para. 32; judgment text also available from HKLII
- Director of Immigration v Chong Fung Yuen, FACV 26/2001 (20 July 2001), at para. 8.3; judgment text also available from HKLII
- Immigration Ordinance (Cap. 115) § 2(4)
- Immigration Ordinance (Cap. 115) § 2A
- Immigration Ordinance (Cap. 115) Schedule 1
- Lau Kong Yung v Director of Immigration, FACV 10/1999 (3 December 1999), at para. 74; judgment text also available from HKLII
- Ng Ka Ling and Another v the Director of Immigration, FACV 14/1998 (29 January 1999); judgment text also available from HKLII
- Registration of Persons Ordinance (Cap. 177) § 3
- "Regulamento sobre a entrada, permanência e autorização de residência" [Entry, stay and residence permit regulation]. Administrative Regulation No. 5 of 2003 (PDF) (in Portuguese). Archived (PDF) from the original on 5 February 2018. Retrieved 3 December 2019.
- Sino-British Joint Declaration (Instrument A301) Annex 1
- Standing Committee Interpretation Regarding Article 22(4) and Article 24(2)(3) of the Hong Kong Basic Law (Instrument A106)
- "The Hong Kong (British Nationality) Order 1986: Section 3", legislation.gov.uk, The National Archives, SI 1986/948 (s. 3)
- Vallejos v Commissioner of Registration, FACV 19/2013 (16 July 2013), at para. 89; judgment text also available from HKLII
- Bradsher, Keith (25 March 2013). "Hong Kong Court Denies Foreign Domestic Helpers Right to Permanent Residency". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 4 June 2019. Retrieved 18 January 2020.
- Branigan, Tania (28 February 2014). "Foreign domestic workers across Asia rise up over exploitation". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 22 December 2019. Retrieved 18 January 2020.
- Chan, Cora (9 November 2016). "How Hong Kong's courts interpret Beijing's interpretation of the Basic Law may yet surprise". South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 16 February 2018. Retrieved 8 March 2019.
- Ewing, Kent (4 March 2018). "High Court ruling on 'live-in' rule guarantees further abuse of Hong Kong's domestic workers". Hong Kong Free Press. Archived from the original on 16 August 2019. Retrieved 18 January 2020.
- Heifetz, Justin (4 April 2017). "Foreign Domestic Worker Abuse Is Rampant in Hong Kong". Vice. Archived from the original on 14 December 2019. Retrieved 18 January 2020.
- LaFraniere, Sharon (22 February 2012). "Mainland Chinese Flock to Hong Kong to Give Birth". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 12 June 2018. Retrieved 8 March 2019.
- Su, Xinqi (16 August 2018). "New ID card will give Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan residents same access to public services as mainland Chinese counterparts". South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 15 March 2019. Retrieved 11 January 2019.