Poisson's ratio(Redirected from Poisson ratio)
Poisson's ratio, denoted by the Greek letter 'nu', , and named after Siméon Poisson, is the negative of the ratio of (signed) transverse strain to (signed) axial strain. For small values of these changes, is the amount of transversal expansion divided by the amount of axial compression.
Poisson's ratio is a measure of the Poisson effect, the phenomenon in which a material tends to expand in directions perpendicular to the direction of compression. Conversely, if the material is stretched rather than compressed, it usually tends to contract in the directions transverse to the direction of stretching. It is a common observation when a rubber band is stretched, it becomes noticeably thinner. Again, the Poisson ratio will be the ratio of relative contraction to relative expansion and will have the same value as above. In certain rare cases, a material will actually shrink in the transverse direction when compressed (or expand when stretched) which will yield a negative value of the Poisson ratio.
The Poisson's ratio of a stable, isotropic, linear elastic material will be greater than −1.0 or less than 0.5 because of the requirement for Young's modulus, the shear modulus and bulk modulus to have positive values. Most materials have Poisson's ratio values ranging between 0.0 and 0.5. A perfectly incompressible material deformed elastically at small strains would have a Poisson's ratio of exactly 0.5. Most steels and rigid polymers when used within their design limits (before yield) exhibit values of about 0.3, increasing to 0.5 for post-yield deformation which occurs largely at constant volume. Rubber has a Poisson ratio of nearly 0.5. Cork's Poisson ratio is close to 0, showing very little lateral expansion when compressed. Some materials, e.g. some polymer foams, origami folds, and certain cells can exhibit negative Poisson's ratio, and are referred to as auxetic materials. If these auxetic materials are stretched in one direction, they become thicker in the perpendicular direction. In contrast, some anisotropic materials, such as carbon nanotubes, zigzag-based folded sheet materials, and honeycomb auxetic metamaterials to name a few, can exhibit one or more Poisson's ratios above 0.5 in certain directions.
Assuming that the material is stretched or compressed along the axial direction (the x axis in the diagram below):
- is the resulting Poisson's ratio,
- is transverse strain (negative for axial tension (stretching), positive for axial compression)
- is axial strain (positive for axial tension, negative for axial compression).
For a cube stretched in the x-direction (see Figure 1) with a length increase of in the x direction, and a length decrease of in the y and z directions, the infinitesimal diagonal strains are given by
If Poisson's ratio is constant through deformation, integrating these expressions and using the definition of Poisson's ratio gives
Solving and exponentiating, the relationship between and is then
For very small values of and , the first-order approximation yields:
The relative change of volume ΔV/V of a cube due to the stretch of the material can now be calculated. Using and :
Using the above derived relationship between and :
and for very small values of and , the first-order approximation yields:
Note that isotropic materials must have a Poisson's ratio of . Typical isotropic engineering materials have a Poisson's ratio of .
If a rod with diameter (or width, or thickness) d and length L is subject to tension so that its length will change by ΔL then its diameter d will change by:
The above formula is true only in the case of small deformations; if deformations are large then the following (more precise) formula can be used:
- is original diameter
- is rod diameter change
- is Poisson's ratio
- is original length, before stretch
- is the change of length.
The value is negative because it decreases with increase of length
For a linear isotropic material subjected only to compressive (i.e. normal) forces, the deformation of a material in the direction of one axis will produce a deformation of the material along the other axis in three dimensions. Thus it is possible to generalize Hooke's Law (for compressive forces) into three dimensions:
- , and are strain in the direction of , and axis
- , and are stress in the direction of , and axis
- is Young's modulus (the same in all directions: , and for isotropic materials)
- is Poisson's ratio (the same in all directions: , and for isotropic materials)
these equations can be all synthesized in the following:
In the most general case, also shear stresses will hold as well as normal stresses, and the full generalization of Hooke's law is given by:
where is the Kronecker delta. The Einstein sum convention is usually adopted:
In this case the equation is simply written:
- is the Young's modulus along axis
- is the shear modulus in direction on the plane whose normal is in direction
- is the Poisson's ratio that corresponds to a contraction in direction when an extension is applied in direction .
The Poisson's ratio of an orthotropic material is different in each direction (x, y and z). However, the symmetry of the stress and strain tensors implies that not all the six Poisson's ratios in the equation are independent. There are only nine independent material properties: three elastic moduli, three shear moduli, and three Poisson's ratios. The remaining three Poisson's ratios can be obtained from the relations
From the above relations we can see that if then . The larger Poisson's ratio (in this case ) is called the major Poisson's ratio while the smaller one (in this case ) is called the minor Poisson's ratio. We can find similar relations between the other Poisson's ratios.
Transversely isotropic materialsEdit
where we have used the plane of isotropy to reduce the number of constants, i.e., .
The symmetry of the stress and strain tensors implies that
This leaves us with six independent constants . However, transverse isotropy gives rise to a further constraint between and which is
Therefore, there are five independent elastic material properties two of which are Poisson's ratios. For the assumed plane of symmetry, the larger of and is the major Poisson's ratio. The other major and minor Poisson's ratios are equal.
Poisson's ratio values for different materialsEdit
|metallic glasses||0.276–0.409 |
|Material||Plane of symmetry|
|Nomex honeycomb core||, = ribbon direction||0.49||0.69||0.01||2.75||3.88||0.01|
|glass fiber-epoxy resin||0.29||0.32||0.06||0.06||0.32|
Negative Poisson's ratio materialsEdit
Some materials known as auxetic materials display a negative Poisson’s ratio. When subjected to positive strain in a longitudinal axis, the transverse strain in the material will actually be positive (i.e. it would increase the cross sectional area). For these materials, it is usually due to uniquely oriented, hinged molecular bonds. In order for these bonds to stretch in the longitudinal direction, the hinges must ‘open’ in the transverse direction, effectively exhibiting a positive strain. This can also be done in a structured way and lead to new aspects in material design as for mechanical metamaterials.
Applications of Poisson's effectEdit
One area in which Poisson's effect has a considerable influence is in pressurized pipe flow. When the air or liquid inside a pipe is highly pressurized it exerts a uniform force on the inside of the pipe, resulting in a hoop stress within the pipe material. Due to Poisson's effect, this hoop stress will cause the pipe to increase in diameter and slightly decrease in length. The decrease in length, in particular, can have a noticeable effect upon the pipe joints, as the effect will accumulate for each section of pipe joined in series. A restrained joint may be pulled apart or otherwise prone to failure.
Another area of application for Poisson's effect is in the realm of structural geology. Rocks, like most materials, are subject to Poisson's effect while under stress. In a geological timescale, excessive erosion or sedimentation of Earth's crust can either create or remove large vertical stresses upon the underlying rock. This rock will expand or contract in the vertical direction as a direct result of the applied stress, and it will also deform in the horizontal direction as a result of Poisson's effect. This change in strain in the horizontal direction can affect or form joints and dormant stresses in the rock.
Although cork was historically chosen to seal wine bottle for other reasons (including its inert nature, impermeability, flexibility, sealing ability, and resilience), cork's poisson's ratio of zero provides another advantage. As the cork is inserted into the bottle, the upper part which is not yet inserted does not expand in diameter as it is compressed axially. The force needed to insert a cork into a bottle arises only from the friction between the cork and the bottle due to the radial compression of the cork. If the stopper were made of rubber, for example, (with a Poisson ratio of about 1/2), there would be a relatively large additional force required to overcome the radial expansion of the upper part of the rubber stopper.
Most car mechanics are aware that it is hard to pull a rubber hose (e.g. a coolant hose) off a metal pipe stub, as the tension of pulling causes the diameter of the hose to shrink, gripping the stub tightly. Hoses can more easily be pushed off stubs instead using a wide flat blade.
- Gercek, H. (2007). "Poisson's ratio values for rocks". International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences. 44 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.ijrmms.2006.04.011.
- Park, RJT. Seismic Performance of Steel-Encased Concrete Piles
- Mark, Schenk (2011). Folded Shell Structures, PhD Thesis (PDF). University of Cambridge, Clare College.
- Wei, Z. Y.; Guo, Z. V.; Dudte, L.; Liang, H. Y.; Mahadevan, L. (2013-05-21). "Geometric Mechanics of Periodic Pleated Origami". Physical Review Letters. 110 (21): 215501. arXiv:1211.6396. Bibcode:2013PhRvL.110u5501W. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.215501. PMID 23745895.
- Eidini, Maryam; Paulino, Glaucio H. (2015). "Unraveling metamaterial properties in zigzag-base folded sheets". Science Advances. 1 (8): e1500224. arXiv:1502.05977. Bibcode:2015SciA....1E0224E. doi:10.1126/sciadv.1500224. ISSN 2375-2548. PMC 4643767. PMID 26601253. Archived from the original on 2015-11-21.
- Eidini, Maryam. "Zigzag-base folded sheet cellular mechanical metamaterials". Extreme Mechanics Letters. 6: 96–102. arXiv:1509.08104. doi:10.1016/j.eml.2015.12.006.
- Mousanezhad, Davood; Babaee, Sahab; Ebrahimi, Hamid; Ghosh, Ranajay; Hamouda, Abdelmagid Salem; Bertoldi, Katia; Vaziri, Ashkan (2015-12-16). "Hierarchical honeycomb auxetic metamaterials". Scientific Reports. 5: 18306. Bibcode:2015NatSR...518306M. doi:10.1038/srep18306. ISSN 2045-2322. PMC 4680941. PMID 26670417. Archived from the original on 2016-09-10.
- https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1204/1204.3859.pdf - Limits to Poisson’s ratio in isotropic materials – general result for arbitrary deformation.
- "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2014-10-31. Retrieved 2014-09-24.
- Boresi, A. P, Schmidt, R. J. and Sidebottom, O. M., 1993, Advanced Mechanics of Materials, Wiley.
- Lekhnitskii, SG., (1963), Theory of elasticity of an anisotropic elastic body, Holden-Day Inc.
- Tan, S. C., 1994, Stress Concentrations in Laminated Composites, Technomic Publishing Company, Lancaster, PA.
- Fluegel, Alexander. "Poisson's Ratio Calculation for Glasses". www.glassproperties.com. Archived from the original on 23 October 2017. Retrieved 28 April 2018.
- Journal of Applied Physics 110, 053521 (2011)
- Lakes, Rod. "Negative Poisson's ratio". silver.neep.wisc.edu. Archived from the original on 16 February 2018. Retrieved 28 April 2018.
- "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2008-10-12. Retrieved 2008-05-15.
- Silva, et al. "Cork: properties, capabilities and applications" Archived 2017-08-09 at the Wayback Machine., Retrieved May 4, 2017
- Meaning of Poisson's ratio
- Negative Poisson's ratio materials
- More on negative Poisson's ratio materials (auxetic)
|Homogeneous isotropic linear elastic materials have their elastic properties uniquely determined by any two moduli among these; thus, given any two, any other of the elastic moduli can be calculated according to these formulas.|
There are two valid solutions.
|Cannot be used when|