This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. The specific problem is: No clear structure that meets the requirements of Wikipedia, different senses of a single word referring to multiple notable subjects need to be disambiguated and placed in separate articles as they are not related topics, needs to show why the geographical definition of Pacificism needs to have a different article from Pacific, and needs to show why the philosophical definition of pacificism needs to have a different article from pacifism. (May 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
Pacificism is the general term for ethical opposition to violence or war, except in cases where force is deemed absolutely necessary to advance the cause of peace. Together with pacifism, it is born from the Western tradition or attitude that calls for peace. The former involves the unconditional refusal to support war or absolute pacifism, while pacificism views the prevention of war as its duty but recognizes the controlled use of armed force to achieve such objective. According to Martin Caedel, pacificism or a pacificist conduct is driven by a certain political position or ideology such as liberalism, socialism or feminism.
Pacifism falls between pacifism, which usually states that killing, violence or war is unconditionally wrong in all cases, and defensivism, which accepts all defensive wars and acts of deterrence as morally just. Pacificism states that war can only ever be considered as a firm "last resort", condemning both aggression and militarism. In the 1940s, the two terms were not conceptually distinguished and pacificism was considered merely as an archaic spelling, although less 'barbarous' than the more common and shorter form.
The term pacificism was first used in 1910 by William James. The distinct theory was later developed by A. J. P. Taylor in The Trouble-Makers (1957) and was subsequently defined by Ceadel in his 1987 book, Thinking About Peace and War. It was also discussed in detail in Richard Norman's book: Ethics, Killing and War. The concept came to mean "the advocacy of a peaceful policy."
The largest national peace association in history, the British League of Nations Union, was pacificist rather than pacifist in orientation. Historically, the majority of peace activists have been pacificists rather than strict pacifists.
This section possibly contains original research. (May 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
This section does not cite any sources. (May 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
- Yamamoto, Mari (2004-11-04). Grassroots Pacifism in Post-War Japan: The Rebirth of a Nation. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781134308170.
- Nishikawa, Yukiko (2018). Political Sociology of Japanese Pacifism. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781351672955.
- Western Herald - Pacifism cannot hold up under scrutiny Archived 2008-06-29 at the Wayback Machine
- "Pacificist or Pacifism ?". The Spectator. 5 September 1940. p. 13.
- Fiala, Andrew (2018-02-02). The Routledge Handbook of Pacifism and Nonviolence. Routledge. ISBN 9781317271970.
- ‘By ‘pacificism’ I mean the advocacy of a peaceful policy; by ‘pacifism’ (a word invented only in the twentieth century) the doctrine of non-resistance. The latter is the negation of policy, not an alternative, and therefore irrelevant to my theme. Hence my disregard for the Peace Societies.’ AJP Taylor, The Trouble-Makers, London: H Hamilton, 1957, p. 51
- Pacifism - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
- Pledge Peace Union - Debating Peace and War
- Trovato, Sara (2016). Mainstreaming Pacifism: Conflict, Success, and Ethics. London: Lexington Books. p. 12. ISBN 9780739187180.
- Donald Birn, The League of Nations Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981
- Martin Ceadel, Semi Detached Idealists: The British Peace Movement and International Relations, 1854-1945, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000, p. 7
- Lyons, Paul (2006). American Pacificism: Oceania in the U.S. Imagination. Routledge Research in Postcolonial Literatures. Routledge. ISBN 9781134264148.
|This philosophy-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.|