Nomophobia is a proposed name for the phobia of being out of cellular phone contact. It has been considered as a symptom or syndrome of problematic digital media use in mental health, the definitions of which are not standardised.
Although nomophobia does not appear in the current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), it has been proposed as a "specific phobia", based on definitions given in the DSM-IV.[dubious ] According to Bianchi and Philips (2005) psychological factors are involved in the overuse of a mobile phone. These could include low self-esteem (when individuals looking for reassurance use the mobile phone in inappropriate ways) and extroverted personality (when naturally social individuals use the mobile phone to excess). It is also highly possible that nomophobic symptoms may be caused by other underlying and preexisting mental disorders, with likely candidates including social phobia or social anxiety disorder, social anxiety, and panic disorder.
The term, an abbreviation for "no-mobile-phone phobia", was coined during a 2008 study by the UK Post Office who commissioned YouGov, a UK-based research organization, to evaluate anxieties suffered by mobile phone users. The study found that nearly 53% of mobile phone users in Britain tend to be anxious when they "lose their mobile phone, run out of battery or credit, or have no network coverage". The study, sampled 2,163 people, found that about 58% of men and 47% of women suffer from the phobia, and an additional 9% feel stressed when their mobile phones are off. 55% of those surveyed cited keeping in touch with friends or family as the main reason that they got anxious when they could not use their mobile phones. The study compared stress levels induced by the average case of nomophobia to be on-par with those of "wedding day jitters" and trips to the dentist.
Another study found that out of 547 male, undergraduate students in Health Services, 23% of the students were classified as nomophobic, while an additional 64% were at risk of developing nomophobia. Of these students, approximately 77% checked their mobile phones 35 or more times a day.
More than one in two nomophobes never switch off their mobile phones. The study and subsequent coverage of the phobia resulted in two editorial columns authored by individuals who minimized their mobile phone use or chose not to own one at all. These authors appeared to treat the condition with light undertones of mockery, or outright disbelief and amusement.
Language classicists do not like this word or approve of it, because of its inherent confusion with the existing, though rare, nomophobia, a fear of laws, rules or regulations. The latter derives from the Greek nomos (a law, rule or regulation) seen in such other words as astronomy (rules about the stars), gastronomy (rules about food and eating), autonomy (ruling oneself), economy (rules governing the finances of the state or household), antinomy (a law contrary to another law), metronome (a device to regulate metre or beat), nomocracy (the rule of law in society), nomography (the law in written form), nomology (the study or science of law), nomothete (a lawgiver), and the archaic anomy (lawlessness). The neologistic meaning, relating to mobile phones, seems to have been adopted by the younger generations, and by those without a deeper understanding of the Oxford guidelines on word construction, in which typically Greek words are attached to Greek words (and Latin to Latin, etc.).
With the changes of technologies, new challenges are coming up on a daily basis. New kinds of phobias have emerged (the so-called techno-phobias). Since the first mobile phone was introduced to the consumer market in 1983, these devices have become significantly mainstream in the majority of societies.
Shambare, Rugimbana & Zhowa (2012) claimed that cell phones are "possibly the biggest non-drug addiction of the 21st century", and that colleges students may spend up to nine hours every day on their phones, which can lead to dependence on such technologies as a driver of modern life and an example of "a paradox of technology". that is both freeing and enslaving.
A survey conducted by SecurEnvoy showed that young adults and adolescents are more likely to suffer from nomophobia. The same survey reported that 77% of the teens reported anxiety and worries when they were without their mobile phones, followed by the 25-34 age group and people over 55 years old. Some psychological predictors to look for in a person who might be suffering of this phobia are "self negative views, younger age, low esteem and self-efficacy, high extroversion or introversion, impulsiveness and sense of urgency and sensation seeking".
Among students, frequent cell phone usage has been correlated with decreases in grade point average (GPA) and increased anxiety that negatively impacts self-reported life satisfaction (well-being and happiness) in comparison to students with less frequent usage. GPA decreases may be due to the over-use of cell phone or computer usage consuming time and focus during studying, attending class, working on assignments, and the distraction of cell phones during class. Over-usage of cell phones may increase anxiety due to the pressure to be continually connected to social networks and could rob chances of perceived solitude, relieving daily stress, that has been linked as a component of well-being.
According to one study, the first thing that 61% of people do after waking up in the morning is check their smartphones. Further, 77% of the teens reported anxiety when they are without mobile phones.
In Australia 946 adolescents and emerging adults between ages 15 and 24 participated in a mobile phone research study (387 males, 557 females, and two chose not to report a gender). The study focused on the relationship between the participants' frequency of mobile phone use and psychological involvement with their mobile phone. Researchers assessed several psychological factors that might influence participants' mobile phone use with the following questionnaires: Mobile Phone Involvement Questionnaire (MPIQ), Frequency of Mobile Phone Use, Self Identity, and Validation from others. The MPIQ assessed behavioral addictions using a seven-point Likert scale (1 – strongly agree) and (7 – strongly disagree) that included statements such as: "I often think about my mobile phone when I am not using it. ... I feel connected to others when I use my mobile phone."
The results demonstrated moderate difference between the participants' mobile phone use and their psychological relationships with the mobile phones. No pathological conditions were found, but there was an excessive use of mobile phone indicating signs of attachment. Participants who demonstrated signs of excessive mobile phone use were more likely to increase their use when receiving validation from others. Other factors considered, the population studied was focused on adolescents and emerging adults are more likely to develop mobile phone dependency because they may be going through a self-identity, self-esteem, and social identity.
Sufferers of panic disorders and anxiety disorders are prone to mobile phone dependency. A study in Brazil compared the symptoms experienced due to mobile phone use by heterosexual participants with panic disorders and a control group of healthy participants. Group 1 consisted of 50 participants with panic disorder and agoraphobia with an average age of 43, and group 2 consisted of 70 healthy participants with no disorders and an average age of 35. During the experiment participants were given a self-report mobile phone questionnaire which assessed the mobile phone use and symptoms reported by both groups.
About 44% of group 1 reported that they felt "secure" when they had their mobile phones versus 46% of group 2 reported they would not feel the same without their mobile phone. The results demonstrated that 68% of all participants reported mobile phone dependency, but overall the participants with panic disorder and agoraphobia reported significantly more emotional symptoms and dependency on mobile phones when compared to the control group when access to the mobile phone was prohibited.
Symptoms and signsEdit
Nomophobia occurs in situations when an individual experiences anxiety due to the fear of not having access to a mobile phone. The "over-connection syndrome" occurs when mobile phone use reduces the amount of face-to-face interactions thereby interfering significantly with an individual’s social and family interactions. The term "techno-stress" is another way to describe an individual who avoids face-to-face interactions by engaging in isolation including psychological mood disorders such as depression.
Anxiety is provoked by several factors, such as the loss of a mobile phone, loss of reception, and a dead mobile phone battery. Some clinical characteristics of nomophobia include using the device impulsively, as a protection from social communication, or as a transitional object. Observed behaviors include having one or more devices with access to internet, always carrying a charger, and experiencing feelings of anxiety when thinking about losing the mobile.
Other clinical characteristics of nomophobia are a considerably decreased number of face-to-face interactions with humans, replaced by a growing preference for communication through technological interfaces, keeping the device in reach when sleeping and never turned off, and looking at the phone screen frequently to avoid missing any message, phone call, or notification (also called ringxiety). Nomophobia can also lead to an increase of debt due to the excessive use of data and the different devices the person can have. Nomophobia may also lead to physical issues such as sore elbows, hands, and necks due to repetitive use.
Irrational reactions and extreme reactions due to anxiety and stress may be experienced by the individual in public settings where mobile phone use is restricted, such as in airports, academic institutions, hospitals and work. Overusing a mobile phone for day-to-day activities such as purchasing items can cause the individual financial problems. Signs of distress and depression occur when the individual does not receive any contact through a mobile phone. Attachment signs of a mobile phone also include the urge to sleep with a mobile phone. The ability to communicate through a mobile phone gives the individual peace of mind and security.
Nomophobia may act as a proxy to other disorders. Those suffering from an underlying social disorder are likely to experience nervousness, anxiety, anguish, perspiration, and trembling when separated or unable to use their digital devices due to low battery, out of service area, no connection, etc. Such people will often insist on keeping their devices on hand at all times, typically returning to their homes to retrieve forgotten cell phones.
Nomophobic behavior may reinforce social anxiety tendencies and dependency on using virtual and digital communications as a method of reducing stress generated by social anxiety and social phobia. Those suffering from panic disorders may also show nomophobic behavior, however, they will probably report feelings of rejection, loneliness, insecurity, and low self-esteem in regard to their cell phones, especially when times with little to no contact (few incoming calls and messages). Those with panic disorder will probably feel significantly more anxious and depressed with their cellphone use. Despite this, those suffering from panic disorder were significantly less likely to place voice calls.
- low self-esteem
Currently, scholarly accepted and empirically proven treatments are very limited due to its relatively new concept. However, promising treatments include cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy, EMDR, and combined with pharmacological interventions. Treatments using tranylcypromine and clonazepam were successful in reducing the effects of nomophobia.
Cognitive behavioral therapy seems to be effective by reinforcing autonomous behavior independent from technological influences, however, this form of treatment lacks randomized trials. Another possible treatment is "Reality Approach," or Reality therapy asking patient to focus behaviors away from cell phones. In extreme or severe cases, neuropsychopharmacology may be advantageous, ranging from benzodiazepines to antidepressants in usual doses. Patients were also successfully treated using tranylcypromine combined with clonazepam. However, it is important to note that these medications were designed to treat social anxiety disorder and not nomophobia directly. It may be rather difficult to treat nomophobia directly, but more plausible to investigate, identify, and treat any underlying mental disorders if any exist.
Even though nomophobia is a fairly new concept, there are validated psychometric scales available to help in the diagnostic, an example of one of these scales is the "Questionnaire of Dependence of Mobile Phone/Test of Mobile Phone Dependence (QDMP/TMPD)".
- Charlie D'Agata Nomophobia: Fear of being without your cell phone. CBS News. April 3, 2008.
- Archana Jayakumar (April 3, 2008). "Break free from Nomophobia, drunkorexia". Mid-day.com. Archived from the original on April 4, 2008. Retrieved 2011-08-10.
- Aboujaoude, Elias (2018-10-29). "Problematic Internet use two decades later: apps to wean us off apps". CNS spectrums: 1–3. doi:10.1017/S109285291800127X. ISSN 1092-8529. PMID 30507371.
- Brandless Support (28 June 2012). "Nomophobia: The Fear of Being Without a Gnome...er, Phone". SocialTechPop. Retrieved 15 June 2016.
- Bragazzi, N. L., & G. D. Puenete (2014). A proposal for including nomophobia in the new DSM-V. Psychology Research and Behavior Management 7. 155-160.
- Adriana Bianchi and James G. Philips (February 2005). "Psychological Predictors of Problem Mobile Phone Use". CyberPsychology & Behavior. 8 (1): 39–51. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.563.385. doi:10.1089/cpb.2005.8.39. PMID 15738692.CS1 maint: Uses authors parameter (link)
- King, A. L. S., A. M. Valenca, A. C. O. Silva, T. Baczysnki, M. R. Carvalho & A. E. Nardi (2013). "Nomophobia: Dependency on virtual environments or social phobia?". Computers in Human Behavior. 29: 140–144. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.025.CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list (link)
- King, A. L. S., A. M. Valença & A. E. Nardi (2010). "Nomophobia: the mobile phone in panic disorder with agoraphobia: reducing phobias or worsening of dependence?". Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology. 23 (1): 52–54. doi:10.1097/wnn.0b013e3181b7eabc. PMID 20299865.CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list (link)
- "Nomophobia is the fear of being out of mobile phone contact - and it's the plague of our 24/7 age". Evening Standard. April 1, 2008. Archived from the original on July 6, 2008. Retrieved 2011-08-10.
- Dixit, Sanjay; Shukla, Harish; Bhagwat, AK; Bindal, Arpita; Goyal, Abhilasha; Zaidi, Aliak; Shrivastava, Akansha (2010). "A Study to Evaluate Mobile Phone Dependence Among Students of a Medical College and Associated Hospital of Central India". Indian Journal of Community Medicine. 35 (2): 339–41. doi:10.4103/0970-0218.66878. PMC 2940198. PMID 20922119.
- "13m Britons have 'no mobile phobia'". Metro. 2008-03-30. Retrieved 2011-08-10.
- Bivin, J. B.; Mathew, P.; Thulasi, P. C.; Philip, J. (2013). "Nomophobia - Do We Really Need to Worry About?". Reviews of Progress. 1 (1).
- My Name Is Mo R., And I Am A Nomophobe, CBSnews.com. February 11, 2009. Retrieved August 2011
- Peter Seabrook (2008-04-01). "I refuse to carry a mobile phone". The Sun. Retrieved 2012-01-05.
- Column: Nomophobia: "No more phobia". siude.com. March 4, 2008.
- Australian Mobile, Telecommunications Association (2003). AMTA 2003 Annual Report. Australia: Canberra, Australian Capital Territory.
- Mick, D. G., & S. Fournier (25 September 1998). "Paradoxes of technology: Consumer cognizance, emotions, and coping strategies". Journal of Consumer Research. 25 (2): 123–143. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.538.1542. doi:10.1086/209531.CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list (link)
- Roberts, J. A., L. H. P. Yaya & C. Manolis (2014). "The invisible addiction: Cell-phone activities and addiction among male and female college students". Journal of Behavioral Addictions. 3 (4): 254–265. doi:10.1556/jba.3.2014.015. PMC 4291831. PMID 25595966.CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list (link)
- Lepp, A., J. E. Barkley, A. C. Karpinski (2014). "The relationship between cell phone use, academic performance, anxiety, and satisfaction with life in college students". Computers in Human Behavior. 31: 31, 343–350. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.049.CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list (link)
- "8 Ways To Not Get Distracted By Mobile Phone - LoveUMarketing". LoveUMarketing. 2017-12-17. Retrieved 2018-05-13.
- Walsh, S. P., K. M. White, R. McD Young (2010). "Needing to connect: The effect of self and others on young people's involvement with their mobile phones". Australian Journal of Psychology. 62 (4): 194–203. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.652.1122. doi:10.1080/00049530903567229.CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list (link)
- King, Anna Lucia Spear; Valença, Alexandre Martins; Silva, Adriana Cardoso; Sancassiani, Federica; Machado, Sergio; Nardi, Antonio Egidio (2014). "'Nomophobia': Impact of Cell Phone Use Interfering with Symptoms and Emotions of Individuals with Panic Disorder Compared with a Control Group". Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health (CP & EMH). 10: 28–35. doi:10.2174/1745017901410010028. PMC 3962983. PMID 24669231.
- Malcore, Paul (2016-05-16). "Teen Smartphone Addiction: It's Physical". www.rawhide.org. Retrieved 14 February 2017.
- Chóliz, M. (2012). "Mobile Phone Addiction in Adolescence: The Test of Mobile Phone Dependence (TMD)" (PDF). Progress in Health Science.