For this article, we will say that such a graph has arboricity t or is t-arboric. (The actual definition of arboricity is slightly different and applies to forests rather than trees.)
Related tree-packing propertiesEdit
A k-arboric graph is necessarily k-edge connected. The converse is not true.
As a corollary of NW, every 2k-edge connected graph is k-arboric.
Both NW and Menger's theorem characterize when a graph has k edge-disjoint paths between two vertices.
Nash-Williams theorem for forestsEdit
NW (1964) generalized the above result to forests:
G can be partitioned into t edge-disjoint forests iff for every , the induced subgraph G[U] has size .
This is how people usually define what it means for a graph to be t-aboric.
In other words, for every subgraph S = G[U], we have . It is tight in that there is a subgraph S that saturates the inequality (or else we can choose a smaller t). This leads to the following formula
also referred to as the NW formula.
The general problem is to ask when a graph can be covered by edge-disjoint subgraphs.
- Diestel, Reinhard, 1959– Verfasser. (2017-06-30). Graph theory. ISBN 9783662536216. OCLC 1048203362.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
- Chen, Boliong; Matsumoto, Makoto; Wang, Jianfang; Zhang, Zhongfu; Zhang, Jianxun (1994-03-01). "A short proof of Nash-Williams' theorem for the arboricity of a graph". Graphs and Combinatorics. 10 (1): 27–28. doi:10.1007/BF01202467. ISSN 1435-5914.