Open main menu

Wikipedia β

Meredith Chivers

Meredith L. Chivers is a Canadian sexologist noted for her research on female sexuality, sexual orientation, paraphilias, sex differences, gender identity, and the physiology of sexual arousal.[1][2] She is a professor of psychology at Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

Meredith Chivers
Nationality Canada
Fields Sexology, Psychology
Institutions Queen’s University
Alma mater University of Guelph (BSc hon), Northwestern University (PhD)
Doctoral advisor J. Michael Bailey
Known for Female sexuality
Influences Ray Blanchard, Kurt Freund
Website
Sage Laboratory, Queen's University

Contents

Education and careerEdit

Chivers attended the University of Guelph, the received her MA and PhD from Northwestern University[3]

She is an elected member of the International Academy of Sex Research is on the Board of Directors for the Sex Information and Education Council of Canada (SIECCAN) and a member of the Association for Psychological Science.[3]

She is an Associate Editor for the Journal of Sexual Medicine, and an editorial boardmember for the Archives of Sexual Behavior, The Journal of Sex Research, and the Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality.[3]

FindingsEdit

She is interested in female sexuality, sexual orientation, paraphilias, gender identity, and the physiology of sexual arousal.[4]

Chivers measures the biological and sexual responses of men and women to different types of pornography to analyze human sexual response patterns. By testing both heterosexual and homosexual men and women, Chivers found that men (both heterosexual and gay) respond with "category specificity" whereas women (heterosexual and lesbian) respond more broadly.[1] In 2005, Chivers co-authored a study of bisexual men, in which the men's responses to heterosexual and homosexual photos were shown. Despite that the men reported being bisexual, most of them showed a substantially stronger response either one of the two sexes instead of roughly equal responses to both.[5][6]

After reports that women respond with vaginal lubrication even to stimuli depicting rape, Chivers hypothesized that the lubrication might not relate only to female sexual desire, that it is also a separate system, an evolutionary adaptive one, that protect females from damage in sexual violence.[7]

Selected worksEdit

  • Seto, M. C., Lalumière, M. L., Harris, G. T., & Chivers, M. L. (2012). The sexual responses of sexual sadists. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121, 739–753. DOI: 10.1037/a0028714
  • Chivers, M. L., Pittini, R., Villegas, L., Grigoriadis, S., Ross, L. E. (2011). The relationship between sexual function and depressive symptomatology in postpartum women: A pilot study. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 8, 792–799.
  • Chivers, M. L. (2010). A brief update on the specificity of sexual arousal. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 25, 407–414.
  • Salonia, A., Giraldi, A., Chivers, M. L., Georgiadis, J., Levin, R., Maravilla, K., & McCarthy, M. (2010). Physiology of women’s sexual function: Basic knowledge and new findings. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 7, 2637–2660.
  • Chivers, M. L., & Rosen. R. (2010). PDE-5 Inhibitors and female sexual response: Faulty protocols or paradigms? Journal of Sexual Medicine, 7, 858–872.
  • Chivers, M. L., Seto, M. C., Lalumière, M. L, Laan, E., & Grimbos, T. (2010). Agreement of genital and subjective measures of sexual arousal in men and women: A meta-analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 5–56.
  • Chivers, M. L., Seto, M. C., & Blanchard, R. (2007). Gender and sexual orientation differences in sexual response to the sexual activities versus the gender of actors in sexual films. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 1108–1121.
  • Chivers, M. L., & Bailey, J. M. (2005). A sex difference in features that elicit genital response. Biological Psychology, 70, 115–120.
  • Rieger, G., Chivers, M. L., & Bailey, J. M. (2005). Sexual arousal patterns of bisexual men. Psychological Science, 16, 579–584.
  • Lawrence, A., Latty, E., Chivers, M. L., & Bailey, J. M. (2005). Measurement of sexual arousal in postoperative male-to-female transsexuals using vaginal photoplethysmography. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 34, 135–145.
  • Chivers, M. L., Rieger, G., Latty, E., & Bailey, J. M. (2004). A sex difference in the specificity of sexual arousal. Psychological Science, 15, 736–744.
  • Chivers, M. L., & Blanchard, R. (1996). Prostitution advertisements suggest association of transvestism and masochism. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 22, 97–102.

ReferencesEdit

External linksEdit

Other sourcesEdit

  • Birds Do It. Bees Do It. People Seek the Keys to It. (2007, April 10). The New York Times.
  • Bryner, M. (2005, July/August). For women, a world of turn-ons. Psychology Today, 38, p. 26. Yeoman, B. (2004, August). Forbidden Science. Discover Magazine, 25.
  • In sex, brain studies show, 'la Différence' still holds. (2004, March 16). The New York Times. Lemonick, M. D. (2004, Jan. 19). Chemistry of desire. Time Magazine, 163, 69-73.
  • Complex picture of female sexuality hinders magic pill. (2003, Aug. 30). The Boston Globe.
  • Benson, E. (2003, April). Study finds sex differences in relationship between arousal and orientation. APA Monitor, 34, p. 51.
  • The Charlie Rose Show (aired March 27, 2009)
  • The Agenda with Steve Paikin (aired April 22, 2009)