Men in feminism
This article or section possibly contains synthesis of material which does not verifiably mention or relate to the main topic. (August 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
Since the 19th century, men have taken part in significant cultural and political responses to feminism within each "wave" of the movement. This includes seeking to establish equal opportunities for women in a range of social relations, generally done through a "strategic leveraging" of male privilege. Feminist men have also argued alongside writers like bell hooks, however, that men's liberation from the socio-cultural constraints of sexism and gender roles is a necessary part of feminist activism and scholarship.
Pillsbury helped to draft the constitution of the feminist American Equal Rights Association in 1865, he served as vice-president of the New Hampshire Woman Suffrage Association. In 1868 and 1869 Parker edited Revolution with Elizabeth Cady Stanton.
Throughout the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, the majority of pro-feminist authors emerged from France, including François Poullain de La Barre, Denis Diderot, Paul Henri Thiry d'Holbach, and Charles Louis de Montesquieu. Montesquieu introduced female characters, like Roxana in Persian Letters, who subverted patriarchal systems, and represented his arguments against despotism. The 18th century saw male philosophers attracted to issues of human rights, and men such as the Marquis de Condorcet championed women's education. Liberals, such as the utilitarian Jeremy Bentham, demanded equal rights for women in every sense, as people increasingly came to believe that women were treated unfairly under the law.
In the 19th century, there was also an awareness of women's struggle. The British legal historian, Sir Henry Maine, criticized the inevitability of patriarchy in his Ancient Law (1861). In 1866, John Stuart Mill, author of The Subjection of Women, presented a women's petition to the British parliament, and supported an amendment to the 1867 Reform Bill. Although his efforts focused on the problems of married women, it was an acknowledgment that marriage for Victorian women was predicated upon a sacrifice of liberty, rights, and property. His involvement in the women's movement stemmed from his long-standing friendship with Harriet Taylor, whom he eventually married.
In 1840, women were refused the right to participate at the World Anti-Slavery Convention in London. Supporters of the women attending argued that it was hypocritical to forbid women and men from sitting together at this convention to end slavery; they cited similar segregationist arguments in the United States that were used to separate whites and blacks. When women were still denied to join in the proceedings, abolitionists William Lloyd Garrison, Charles Lenox Remond, Nathaniel Peabody Rogers, and Henry Stanton, all elected to sit silently with the women.
One argument against female participation, both at the World Anti-Slavery Convention, and commonly in the nineteenth century, was the suggestion that women were ill-constituted to assume male responsibilities. Abolitionist Thomas Wentworth Higginson argued against this, stating:
I do not see how any woman can avoid a thrill of indignation when she first opens her eyes to the fact that it is really contempt, not reverence, that has so long kept her sex from an equal share of legal, political, and educational rights...[a woman needs equal rights] not because she is man's better half, but because she is his other half. She needs them, not as an angel, but as a fraction of humanity.
American sociologist Michael Kimmel categorized American male responses to feminism at the turn of the twentieth century into three categories: pro-feminist, masculinist, and antifeminist. Pro-feminist men, believing that changes would also benefit men, generally welcomed women's increased participation in the public sphere, and changes in the division of labour in the home; in contrast anti-feminists opposed women's suffrage and participation in public life, supporting a traditional patriarchal family model. Finally, the masculinist movement was characterized by men's groups, and developed as an indirect reaction to the perceived femininization of manhood.
Men's liberation movementEdit
The men's liberation movement began in the early 1970s as consciousness-raising groups to help men free themselves from the limits of sex roles. Proponents of men's liberation argued that male bonding is a mechanism to conform men's identities to a single sense of masculinity, which reinforces patriarchy. In lieu of such bonding, the men's liberation movement called for open acknowledgment of the costs of masculinity: men's entrapment in their fixed role as the breadwinner of the nuclear family and the taboo against men expressing emotions. Most significantly, this movement intended to make it acceptable for men to be open about their emotions while maintaining their masculinity.
The link between the biological male sex and the social construction of masculinity was seen by some scholars as a limitation on men's collaboration with the feminist movement. This sharply contrasted with sex role theory which viewed gender as something determined by biological differences between the sexes. Other key elements of the men's liberation movement were the ideas that genders are relational and each cannot exist without the other, and that gender as a whole is a social construction and not a biological imperative. Thus, second-wave profeminist writers were able to explore the interactions between social practices and institutions, and ideas of gender.
Men's rights movementEdit
In the early 1980s, the men's rights campaign emerged in America in response to the feminist movement. Men's rights activists refer to themselves as "masculinists" or are labeled as such. The men's rights movement and mythopoetic men's movement is considered part of an antifeminist response by some feminists. 
Masculinists claim that feminist advances have not been balanced by elimination of traditional feminine privileges, and that they should empower themselves by revitalizing their masculinity. This argument was also echoed in religious circles with the Muscular Christianity movement.
A uniting principle was the belief that men's problems were awarded less attention than women's and that any previous oppression of women had turned, or was about to turn, into oppression of men. Men's rights activists cite men's economic burden of the traditionally male breadwinner role, men's shorter average life expectancy, and inequalities favoring women in divorce issues, custody laws, and abortion rights as evidence of men's suffering.
The campaign has generally had the most success achieving legal reform in family law, particularly regarding child custody. Activists argue that the American judicial system discriminates against fathers in child custody hearings since mothers are typically viewed as the main caregivers. They claim that the economic burden of the breadwinner role has made it more difficult for men to take part in child rearing, and that court decisions rarely account for this obstacle.
Some organizations, such as the National Coalition of Free Men (NCFM), have made efforts to examine how sex discrimination affects men. For instance, this group argues that custody rights in favor of women discriminate against men because they are based on the belief that women are naturally more nurturing and better caregivers than men. Thus, groups such as NCFM promote awareness, resources, support, and openings for discussion for these issues.
Male feminism and pro-feminismEdit
As feminist writer Shira Tarrant has argued, a number of men have engaged with and contributed to feminist movements throughout history. Today, academics like Michael Flood, Michael Messner, and Michael Kimmel are involved with men's studies and pro-feminism.
There is debate within feminism over whether or not men can be feminists. Some feminists, like Simone de Beauvoir in her seminal text The Second Sex, argue that men cannot be feminists because of the intrinsic differences between the sexes, Separatist feminists also hold this view, arguing that only by rejecting the masculine perspective entirely can feminism allow women to define themselves on their own terms, and that the involvement of men in the feminist movement will inculcate the values of patriarchy into any social change. Some writers hold that men do not suffer the same oppression as women, and as such cannot comprehend women's experience, and as such cannot constructively contribute to feminist movements or concepts.
Others argue that men's identification with the feminist movement is necessary for furthering the feminist causes. A number of feminist writers maintain that identifying as a feminist is the strongest stand men can take in the struggle against sexism against women. They have argued that men should be allowed, or even encouraged, to participate in the feminist movement. For some, the participation of men in the feminist movement is seen as part of a process of the universalization of the feminist movement, necessary for its continued relevance. One challenge of motivating men to participate, or promoting their inclusion, in feminism has been linked to the disconnect between gender and intersecting components of identity. One example of this is that some African American men have been unable to carry over the fundamental principles and lessons of the struggle for civil rights into a meaningful contribution to the struggle to end sexist oppression. However, at a more primary level, the bonds formed in the civil rights movement established valuable solidarity among African American women and men. This is an approach that may be transferable and equally useful to the feminist movement. Making these important connections understood by women and men might greatly benefit feminism. As described in the theory of strategic intersectionality, utilizing the experiences of one part of our identity that intersects with another provides insightful tools to further improve the available tactics of the feminist movement. Other female feminists argue that men cannot be feminists simply because they are not women, cannot understand women's issues, and are collectively members of the class of oppressors against women. They assert that men are granted inherent privileges that prevent them from fundamentally identifying with feminist struggles and thus make it impossible for them to identify with feminists.
One idea supporting men's inclusion as "feminists" is that excluding men from the feminist movement labels it as solely a female task, which could be argued to be sexist in itself. This idea asserts that until men share equal responsibility for struggling to end sexism against women, the feminist movement will reflect the very sexist contradiction it wishes to eradicate. The term "profeminist" occupies the middle ground in this semantic debate, because it offers a degree of closeness to feminism without using the term itself. Also, the prefix "pro" characterizes the term as more proactive and positive. There has been some debate regarding the use of the hyphen (identifying as a "pro-feminist" as opposed to a profeminist), claiming that it distances the term too much from feminism proper.
Feminist men in popular cultureEdit
In 2014, several high-profile events led to the continued presence of feminist issues in the media. These included Bring Back Our Girls, HeForShe campaign, the Gamergate controversy, Malala Yousafzai winning the Nobel Peace Prize, and sexual assault allegations being made against Jian Ghomeshi and Bill Cosby.
In 2015 Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau made international headlines for establishing the first gender-balanced cabinet in Canada. In response to a media question asking his reason for doing so, Trudeau said, "Because it's 2015." At the World Economic Forum in 2016, Trudeau again made headlines when he spoke about raising his sons to be feminists and urged men not to be afraid of using the word "feminist". A few months later at a United Nations conference, Trudeau said "I'm going to keep saying, loud and clearly, that I am a feminist. Until it is met with a shrug." He explained further what that meant for him:
It shouldn’t be something that creates a reaction. It’s simply saying that I believe in the equality of men and women and that we still have an awful lot of work to do to get there. That’s like saying the sky is blue and the grass is green.— Justin Trudeau, United Nations conference, March 16th 2016
Many canadians are not impressed with Trudeau's selection of cabinet, arguing that Trudeau's actions were clearly politically motivated, selecting for gender over competence.
If Trudeau had appointed women proportionately based on the pool of MPs, there would be eight female cabinet members, not 15.
That means seven women were promoted based solely on their gender. And a casual observer of federal politics might be able to pick out which seven female cabinet ministers were appointed above their level of competency.
This is what a feminist looks likeEdit
In October 2014 ElleUk created a shirt with the slogan "This Is What a Feminist Looks Like" with The Fawcett Society. A photo series featuring many A-list stars wearing the shirts was released. The production of the shirts was criticized for being anti-feminist due to sweat-shop labour. In spite of this criticism, the phrase became popular. It was quoted by President Barack Obama in a speech at the United State of Women Summit in 2016. In 2017 two photographers, Carey Lynne Fruth and Sophie Spinelle, launched a photo series with subjects holding signs bearing the slogan.
Equal pay support in HollywoodEdit
Five original stars from The Big Bang Theory including four men (Jim Parsons, Johnny Galecki, Kunal Nayyar and Simon Helberg) decided to take a pay cut so that their two female co-stars who joined later could earn a higher wage for seasons 11 and 12. The current wage gap sits at $900,000, with the original cast making one million dollars per episode, while Mayim Bialik and Melissa Rauch earn $100,000 per episode.
Emmy Rossum from Shameless put production of season 8 on hold when she was renegotiating her contract for equal pay as her co-star William H. Macy. She also requested a little more money to make up for the years of work where she was making less. When confronted by TMZ with this reality, William H. Macy responded, "It's about f--king time, don’t you think?” and “She works as hard as I do, she deserves everything."
Bradley Cooper responded to his frequent co-star Jennifer Lawrence’s “Why Do These Dudes Make More Than Me?” essay by vowing to share his salary information with his female co-stars during the preproduction negotiation stage in an effort to reduce the gender gap.
Men supporting the Women's March 2017Edit
John Legend attended the Women's March on Main Street Park City in Utah on January 21, 2017. In an interview he revealed that he joined the march to show solidarity with everyone marching all around the world, and to raise awareness on equality to ensure that all the progress that women and people of colour have made over the past century is not diminished under President Donald Trump's administration.
Many male liberal leaders and politicians took part in the march as well. Among them, Bernie Sanders took the stage at the Vermont Women's March on January 21, 2017. He spoke in support of equal work for equal pay, health care, Planned Parenthood and unifying the country. Former Secretary of State John Kerry also joined the Women's March in Washington, D.C.
There is also the United Nations' women's solidarity movement for gender equality, which encourages boys and men to become equal partners with women. The HeForShe campaign aims to enlist everyone to do their part to reimagine a society through gender equality. Since the launch of HeForShe campaign in 2014, UN Women ambassadors alongside Emma Watson and thousands of men across the globe are committed to the goal of gender equality. Overall, bell hooks concludes that gender issues are not just for women as some men may believe, but it is for everyone. Therefore, the more we work together, the better our society will be. Emma Watson’s moving speech at the United Nations about gender equality for the UN's HeForShe campaign demonstrates the first look at the notion "HeForShe".
Masculinity scholars seek to broaden the academic discourse of gender through men's studies. While some feminists argue that most academic disciplines, except women's studies, can be considered "men's studies" because they claim that the content of the curriculum consists of primarily male subjects, masculinity scholars assert that men's studies specifically analyzes men's gendered experiences. Central to men's studies is the understanding that "gender" does not mean "female," the same way "race" does not mean "black." Men's studies are typically interdisciplinary, and incorporate the feminist conception that "the personal is political." Masculinity scholars strive to contribute to the existing dialogue about gender created through women's studies.
There are various arguments and movements that support the cause for gender equality as it relates to feminism. Jackson Katz suggests that we have a responsibility to help youths to create a society that will prevent future generations from experiencing the current issues regarding gender equality. Gender studies is often referred to as women's issues. Women's issues are sometimes viewed as issues that men contribute to. Katz argues that women's issues should be men's issues as well. Katz believes that when both genders work together, there is a change that the next generation can use to avoid suffering similar tragedies.
We owe it to young men. These boys didn't make the choice to be a man in a culture that tells them that manhood is a certain way. We, that have a choice, have an opportunity and a responsibility to them.— Jackson Katz, TEDxFiDiWomen conference, November 2012
In 2001 a Gallup poll found that 20% of American men considered themselves feminists, with 75% saying they were not. A 2005 CBS poll found that 24% of men in the United States claim the term "feminist" is an insult. Four in five men refused to identify themselves as feminist, but when a specific definition is given the number fell to two in five. An increasing number of men said that feminism had improved their lives, in comparison to polls taken in 1983 and 1999, with an unprecedented, but marginal plurality of 47% agreeing. 60% believed that a strong women's movement is no longer needed.  However, a YouGov Poll of Britain in 2010 found that only 16% of men described themselves as feminist with 54% stating they were not and 8% specifically claiming to be antifeminist.
In 2001, a qualitative study of men's perception of feminism showed pervasive patterns of linear reasoning. Researchers found that the participants identified two genres of feminism and two strains of feminists, and dubbed it the 'Jekyll and Hyde' binary. The participants would classify feminism and feminists as either "good" or "monstrous". In 2016 the study was repeated by a new team of researchers to find that the binary persisted, as "unreasonable feminism" and "fair feminism".
- Robertson, Stacey (2000). Parker Pillsbury : radical abolitionist, male feminist. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press. ISBN 9780801436345.
- DuBois, Ellen (1999) . Feminism and suffrage: the emergence of an independent women's movement in America, 1848-1869. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press. p. 102. ISBN 9780801486418.
- "Parker Pillsbury". americanabolitionist.liberalarts.iupui.edu. American Abolitionism. Retrieved 15 December 2013.
- Murphy, Peter F., ed. (2004). Feminism and masculinities. Oxford New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780199267248.
- Campos Boralevi, Lea (1984). Bentham and the oppressed. Berlin New York: Walter De Gruyter Inc. ISBN 9783110099744.
- Sumner Maine, Henry (1861). Ancient law. London Toronto: J.M. Dent. OCLC 70417123.
- Kimmel, Michael S. (1992), "Introduction", in Kimmel, Michael S. (ed.), Against the tide: pro-feminist men in the United States, 1776-1990: a documentary history, Boston, Massachusetts: Beacon Press, pp. 1–51, ISBN 9780807067604.
- Messner, Michael (1997), "Men and masculinities", in Messner, Michael, ed. (1997-03-20). Politics of masculinities: men in movements. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage. p. 9. ISBN 9780803955776.
- Pelak, Cynthia Fabrizio; Taylor, Verta; Whittier, Nancy (2006), "Gender movements", in Saltzman Chafetz, Janet, ed. (2006-11-22). Handbook of the sociology of gender. New York: Springer. p. 168. ISBN 9780387362182.
- Mirsky, Seth (1996), "Three arguments for the elimination of masculinity", in Krondorfer, Björn, ed. (1996). Men's bodies, men's gods: male identities in a (post- ) Christian culture. New York: New York University Press. pp. 27–39. ISBN 9780814746691.
- Carrigan, Tim; Connell, Bob; Lee, John (September 1985). "Toward a new sociology of masculinity". Theory & Society. 14 (5): 551–604. doi:10.1007/BF00160017. JSTOR 657315.
- Men's rights activists referred to as "masculinists":
- Wood, Julia T. (2011), "The rhetorical shaping of gender: men's movements in the United States", in Wood, Julia T., ed. (2010-01-01). Gendered lives: communication, gender, and culture. Australia Boston, Massachusetts: Wadsworth Cengage Learning. p. 104. ISBN 9780495794165. Note 1
- Flood, Michael; et al. (2007), "Men's movement", in Flood, Michael; et al., eds. (2007). International encyclopedia of men and masculinities. London New York: Routledge. p. 421. ISBN 9780415333436.
- Kahn, Jack S. (2009), "The crisis in masculinity: essentialist perspective", in Kahn, Jack S., ed. (2009-03-23). An introduction to masculinities. Chichester, U.K. Malden, Massachusetts: Wiley-Blackwell. p. 202. ISBN 9781405181792. Note 2
- Clatterbaugh, Kenneth (2004), "Men's movement", in Kimmel, Michael S.; Aronson, Amy, eds. (2004). Men and masculinities: a social, cultural, and historical encyclopedia: volume 1. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO. pp. 529–531. ISBN 9781576077740.
- Dragiewicz, Molly (2011), "Key contexts", in Dragiewicz, Molly (ed.). Equality with a vengeance: men's rights groups, battered women, and antifeminist backlash. Boston, Massachusetts: Northeastern University Press. pp. 13–18. ISBN 9781555537388.
- Messner, Michael (1997), "Essentialist retreats", in Messner, Michael, ed. (1997-03-20). Politics of masculinities: men in movements. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage. p. 20. ISBN 9780803955776.
- Messner, Michael (2002). Taking the field: women, men, and sports. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. ISBN 9780816634491.
- Tarrant, Shira (2009). Men and feminism. Berkeley, California: Seal Press. ISBN 9781580052580.
- Flood, Michael (2004), "Backlash: Angry men's movements", in Rossi, Stacey Ellen (ed.). The battle and backlash rage on: why feminism cannot be obsolete. New York, N.Y.: Xlibris Corporation. pp. 261–278. ISBN 9781413459340.[self-published source]
- Kimmel, Michael S. (2013) , "Who's afraid of men doing feminism?", in Digby, Tom, ed. (2013-10-28). Men doing feminism. New York: Routledge. pp. 57–68. ISBN 9781135772154.
- Messner, Michael (1992). Power at play: sports and the problem of masculinity. Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 9780807041055.
- de Beauvoir, Simone (2015) . Borde, Constance; Malovany-Chevallier, Sheila (eds.). The second sex. London: Vintage Books. ISBN 9780099595731.
For example Paul Smith and Alice Jardine:
- Smith, Paul (2012) , "Men in feminism: men in feminist theory", in Smith, Paul; Jardine, Alice (eds.). Men in feminism. London: Routledge. pp. 33–40. ISBN 9780415754217. Pdf of original text.
- Jardine, Alice (2012) , "Men in feminism: odor di uomo or compagnons de route?", in Smith, Paul; Jardine, Alice (eds.). Men in feminism. London: Routledge. pp. 54–61. ISBN 9780415754217. Pdf of original text.
- Carbado, Devon (1999). Black men on race, gender, and sexuality: a critical reader. New York: New York University Press. ISBN 9780814790427.
- Heath, Stephen (2012) , "Men in feminism: men and feminist theory", in Smith, Paul; Jardine, Alice (eds.). Men in feminism. London: Routledge. pp. 41–46. ISBN 9780415754217. Pdf of original text.
- Brod, Harry (2013) , "To be a man, or not to be a man — that is the feminist question", in Digby, Tom, ed. (2013-10-28). Men doing feminism. New York: Routledge. pp. 197–212. ISBN 9781135772154.
- hooks, bell (2015) , "Men: comrades in struggle", in hooks, bell (ed.). Feminist theory: from margin to center. New York: Routledge. pp. 68–83. ISBN 9781138821668.
- Owens, Lisa Lucile (2013). "Coerced parenthood as family Policy: Feminism, the moral agency of women, and men's 'right to choose'". Alabama Civil Rights & Civil Liberties Law Review. University of Alabama School of Law. 5 (1): 1–34. SSRN 2439294. Pdf.
- hooks, bell (2015) . Feminist theory: from margin to center. New York: Routledge. ISBN 9781138821668.
- Belleau, Marie-Claire (2007), "L'intersectionnalité: feminisms in a divided world; Québec-Canada", in Orr, Deborah, ed. (2007). Feminist politics: identity, difference, and agency. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. pp. 51–63. ISBN 9780742547780.
- Ervin Funk, Russ (1997). "The power of naming: men in feminism". Feminista!: The Journal of Feminist Construction. 1 (4). Archived from the original on 2006-10-21. Cite uses deprecated parameter
|deadurl=(help)CS1 maint: BOT: original-url status unknown (link)
- Murphy, Jessica (4 November 2015). "Trudeau gives Canada first cabinet with equal number of men and women". The Guardian. Retrieved 20 March 2017.
- Browne, Rachel (4 November 2015). "'Because It's 2015': why Justin Trudeau pushed for gender parity in his cabinet". VICE News. Retrieved 20 March 2017.
- Staff writer (22 January 2016). "Justin Trudeau talks about raising sons 'to be a feminist, just like dad' at World Economic Forum". National Post. Retrieved 20 March 2017.
- Panetta, Alexander (16 March 2016). "'I am a feminist,' Trudeau tells UN crowd". Toronto Star. Retrieved 20 March 2017.
- "MALCOLM: Real women aren't fooled by Trudeau's fake feminism". Toronto Sun. 28 March 2018. Retrieved 21 November 2018.
- Brog, Annabel (30 October 2014). "Call yourself a feminist?". Elle (UK). Retrieved 19 March 2017.
- Katebi, Hoda. "This Is What A Feminist Looks Like: the feminist shirt controversy". Conscious magazine. Retrieved 19 March 2017.
- Lim, Clarissa-Jan (15 June 2016). "Obama reveals something about himself he's never shared before, but many have suspected". A Plus. Retrieved 19 March 2017.
- Lim, Clarissa-Jan (8 March 2017). "It's 2017, and this is what feminists look like". A Plus. Retrieved 19 March 2017.
- "This is what a feminist looks like". shamelessphoto.com. Shameless Photography. Retrieved 19 March 2017.
- Carey Purcell, Mic (3 March 2017). "Here's how much money the cast of the 'Big Bang Theory' makes per episode". INSIDER. Retrieved 19 March 2017.
- Brunner, Jeryl (31 December 2016). "Why Emmy Rossum was wise to demand pay equality on 'Shameless' - and the real issue for TV actresses". Forbes. Retrieved 19 March 2017.
- William H. Macy (13 December 2016). William H. Macy says Emmy Rossum deserves equal pay (Video). TMZ. Retrieved 19 March 2017.
- Ruiz, Michelle (19 October 2015). "The Bradley Cooper effect: why women should share their salary information". Vogue. Retrieved 19 March 2017.
- "Celebrities attend Women's Marches around the world". CBS News. 23 January 2017. Retrieved 19 March 2017.
- John Legend (22 January 2017). John Legend at Women's March (Video). The Red Carpet Awards via YouTube. Retrieved 19 March 2017.
- Bernie Sanders (22 January 2017). Bernie Sanders - Women's March Speech in Vermont (01/21/17) (Video). spreadthebern via YouTube. Retrieved 23 March 2017.
- Reilly, Katie (21 January 2017). "John Kerry joins Women's March on Washington while walking his dog". Time. Retrieved 19 March 2017.
- Macleod, Duncan (26 September 2014). "Emma Watson launches He For She movement". theinspirationroom.com. The Inspiration Room. Retrieved 10 April 2017.
- "Our Mission". heforshe.org. HeforShe. Retrieved 10 April 2017.
- hooks, bell; Watson, Emma (18 February 2016). "Emma Watson and bell hooks talk feminism, confidence and the importance of reading". Paper. Retrieved 10 April 2017.
- Brod, Harry (2002), "Studying masculinities as superordinate studies", in Gardiner, Judith, ed. (2002). Masculinity studies & feminist theory: new directions. New York: Columbia University Press. pp. 161–175. ISBN 9780231122795.
- Lindsey, T. M. (3 June 2008). "Jackson Katz: Violence against women is a men's issue". Rewire. Retrieved 9 April 2017.
- Jackson Katz (30 November 2012). Violence against women—it's a men's issue (Video and transcript). TEDxFiDiWomen Conference. Retrieved 10 April 2017.
- Gallup, Jr., George (2002), "Job equity for women", in Gallup, Jr., George, ed. (2002). The Gallup poll: public opinion 2001. Wilmington, Delaware: Scholarly Resources Inc. p. 152. ISBN 9780842050012.
- Alfano, Sean (October 22, 2005). "Poll: Women's Movement Worthwhile". CBS News. Retrieved February 27, 2012.
- "YouGov Survey Results: Women + equality" (PDF). YouGov. October 4, 2010. Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 November 2017. Retrieved February 27, 2012.
- Edley, Nigel; Wetherell, Margaret (November 2001). "Jekyll and Hyde: men's constructions of feminism and feminists" (PDF). Feminism & Psychology. 11 (4): 439–457. doi:10.1177/0959353501011004002.
- Calder-Dawe, Octavia; Gavey, Nicola (November 2016). "Jekyll and Hyde revisited: Young people's constructions of feminism, feminists and the practice of "reasonable feminism"". Feminism & Psychology. 26 (4): 487–507. doi:10.1177/0959353516660993.
- Note 1 Men's rights activists cited by Wood, J.T. (2011) include:
- Farrell, Warren (May–June 1991). "Men as success objects". Utne Reader. pp. 81–84.
- Fiebert, Martin S. (1987). "Some persepectives on the men's movement". Men's Studies Review. American Men’s Studies Association. 4 (4): 8–10.
- Gross, Michael (June 2000). "The lethal politics of beauty". George. 5 (5): Front cover, 52–59, 99–100.
- Mansfield, Harvey C. (2006). Manliness. New Haven: Yale University Press. ISBN 9780300122541.
- Note 2 Men's rights activists cited by Khan, J.S. (2009) include:
- Clatterbaugh, Kenneth C. (1997). Contemporary perspectives on masculinity: men, women, and politics in modern society (2nd ed.). Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press. ISBN 9780813327013.
- Fox, John (March 2004). "How men's movement participants view each other". The Journal of Men's Studies. 12 (2): 103–118. doi:10.3149/jms.1202.103.
- Lingard, Bob; Douglas, Peter (1999). Men engaging feminisms: pro-feminism, backlashes and schooling. Buckingham England Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Open University Press. ISBN 9780335198177.
- Mann, Ruth M. (January 2008). "Men's rights and feminist advocacy in Canadian domestic violence policy arenas: Contexts, dynamics, and outcomes of antifeminist backlash". Feminist Criminology. 3 (1): 44–75. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.413.6328. doi:10.1177/1557085107311067.
- Rickabaugh, Cheryl A. (March 1994). "Just who is this guy, anyway? Stereotypes of the men's movement". Sex Roles. 30 (5–6): 459–470. doi:10.1007/BF01420603.