Open main menu

Megasthenes (/mɪˈɡæsθɪnz/ mi-GAS-thi-neez; Ancient Greek: Μεγασθένης, c. 350 – c. 290 BC) was an ancient Greek historian, diplomat and Indian ethnographer and explorer in the Hellenistic period. He described India in his book Indika, which is now lost, but has been partially reconstructed from the writings of the later authors.

Bornc. 350 BCE
Diedc. 290 BCE
OccupationHistorian and diplomat

Megasthenes was born in Asia Minor and became an ambassador of Seleucus I Nicator of the Seleucid dynasty to Chandragupta Maurya in Pataliputra, India.[1] However, the exact date of his embassy is uncertain. Scholars such as Kaushik Roy place him in the Maurya court between 302 and 298 BCE, prior to Chandragupta's voluntary death in 297.[2] Other Greek envoys to the Indian court are known after Megasthenes: Deimachus as ambassador to Bindusara, and Dionysius, as ambassador to Ashoka.[3][4]


Life and travelEdit

According to Arrian, Megasthenes lived in Arachosia and travelled to Pataliputra.

Megasthenes was a Greek ambassador of Seleucus I Nicator in the court of Chandragupta Maurya.[5] Arrian explains that Megasthenes lived in Arachosia, with the satrap Sibyrtius, from where he visited India:

Megasthenes lived with Sibyrtius, satrap of Arachosia, and often speaks of his visiting Sandracottus, the king of the Indians." Arrian, Anabasis Alexandri [6]

We have more definite information regarding the parts of India Megasthenes visited. He entered the subcontinent through the district of the Pentapotamia ("The five rivers", modern day Punjab region[7]), providing a full account of the rivers found there (thought to be the five affluents of the Indus that form the Punjab region), and proceeded from there by the royal road to Pataliputra. There are accounts of Megasthenes having visited Madurai, in Tamil Nadu[8][9], but he appears not to have visited any other parts of India.


The Indo-Gangetic Plain (grey area). The region to which Megasthenes was ambassador is the north-central region on the Ganges at the location of today's Patna. The western side is the Punjab region, which he also described. The Seleucid kingdom is out of the grey area to the west. The Seleucids were unable to retain territory in today's Pakistani Punjab after the death of Alexander.

Indika (Greek: Ἰνδικά; Latin: Indica) is an account of Mauryan India by Megasthenes. The original book is now lost, but its fragments have survived in later Greek and Latin works. The earliest of these works are those by Diodorus Siculus, Strabo (Geographica), Pliny, and Arrian (Indica).[10][11]


Megasthenes' Indica can be reconstructed using the portions preserved by later writers as direct quotations or paraphrase. The parts that belonged to the original text can be identified from the later works based on similar content, vocabulary and phrasing, even when the content has not been explicitly attributed to Megasthenes. Felix Jacoby's Fragmente der griechischen Historiker contains 36 pages of content traced to Megasthenes.[12]

Schwanbeck's Fragment XXVII includes four paragraphs from Strabo, and Schwanbeck attributes these entire paragraphs to Megasthenes. However, Strabo cites Megasthenes as his source only for three isolated statements in three different paragraphs. It is likely that Strabo sourced the rest of the text from sources other than Megasthenes: that's why he attributes only three statements specifically to Megasthenes.[13]

Another example is the earliest confirmed description of Gangaridai, which appears in the writings of Diodorus. McCrindle believed that Diodorus' source for this description was the now-lost book of Megasthenes. However, according to A. B. Bosworth (1996), Diodorus obtained this information from Hieronymus of Cardia: Diodorus described Ganges as 30 stadia wide; it is well-attested by other sources that Megasthenes described the median or minimum width of Ganges as 100 stadia.[14]

India according to the reconstructed textEdit

According to the text reconstructed by J. W. McCrindle, Megasthenes' Indica describes India as follows:


India is a quadrilateral-shaped country, bounded by the ocean on the southern and the eastern side.[15] The Indus river forms the western and the north-western boundary of the country, as far as the ocean.[16] India's northern border reaches the extremities of Tauros. From Ariana to the Eastern Sea, it is bound by mountains that are called Kaukasos by the Macedonians.

At the southern tip of India, the gnomon of the sundial often casts no shadow, and the Ursa Major is invisible at night. In the remotest parts, the shadows fall southward, and even Arcturus is not visible.[17]

India has many large and navigable rivers, which arise in the mountains on its northern border. Many merge into Ganges, which is 30 stadia wide at its source, and runs from north to south. The Ganges empties into the ocean that forms the eastern boundary of Gangaridai.[18] Other nations feared Gangaridai's huge force of the biggest elephants, and therefore, Gangaridai had never been conquered by any foreign king.[19]

Indus also runs from north to south, and has several navigable tributaries.[20] In addition, there are a large number of other rivers, supplying abundant water for agriculture. According to the native philosophers and natural scientists, the reason for this is that the bordering countries are more elevated than India, so their waters run down to India, resulting in such a large number of rivers.[21]


Pataliputra capital, showing Greek and Persian influence, early Mauryan Empire period, 4th–3rd century BC.

In the primitive times, the Indians lived on fruits and wore clothes made of animal skin, just like the Greeks. The most learned Indian scholars say that Dionysus invaded India, and taught Indians several things including how to grow plants, make wine and worship. He founded several large cities, introduced laws and established courts. For this reason, he was regarded as a deity by the Indians. He ruled entire India for 52 years, before dying of old age. His descendants ruled India for several generations, before being dethroned and replaced by democratic city-states.[22]

The Indians who inhabit the hill country also claim that Herakles was one of them. Like the Greeks, they characterize him with the club and the lion's skin. According to them, Herakles was a powerful man who subjugated evil beasts. He had several sons and one daughter, who became rulers in different parts of his dominion. He founded several cities, the greatest of which was Palibothra (Pataliputra). Herakles built several places in this city, fortified it with water-filled trenches and settled a number of people in the city. His descendants ruled India for several generations, but never launched an expedition beyond India. After several years, the royal rule was replaced by democratic city states, although there existed a few kings when Alexander invaded India.[23]

Flora and faunaEdit

India has several mountains with fruit trees of every kind.[17] There are a large number of animal species in India. The Indian elephants are far stronger than the Libyan elephants, because of the abundance of food on the Indian soil. The elephants are domesticated in large numbers, and trained for war.[24] The gestation period of the elephants ranges from 16 to 18 months, and the oldest of the elephants live up to 200 years.[25]


Gold, silver, copper and iron are abundant on Indian soil. Tin and other metals are used for making a number of tools, weapons, ornaments, and other articles.[24]

India has very fertile plains, and irrigation is practised widely.[24] The main crops include rice, millet, a crop called bosporum, other cereals, pulses and other food plants.[26] There are two crop cycles per year, since rain falls in both summer and winter. At the time of summer solstice, rice, millet, bosporum and sesamum are sown. During winter, wheat is sown.[26]


Because of its large size, India is inhabited by many diverse races, all of which are indigenous. India has no foreign colony, and Indians have not established any colonies outside India.[27] The Indians are of above average stature, because of abundant food, fine water and pure air. They are well-skilled in art.[24]

A law, prescribed by ancient Indian philosophers, bans slavery. The law treats everyone equally, but allows the property to be unevenly distributed.[28]

The population of India is divided into 7 endogamous and hereditary castes:[29]

  1. Philosophers
  2. Farmers
  3. Herders
  4. Artisans
  5. Military
  6. Overseers
  7. Councillors and Assessors


The foreigners are treated well. Special officers are appointed to ensure that no foreigner is harmed, and judges hand out harsh punishment to those who take unfair advantage of the foreigners. Sick foreigners are attended by physicians and taken care of. Foreigners who die in India are buried, and their property is delivered to their relatives.[30]

Historical reliabilityEdit

Later writers such as Arrian, Strabo, Diodorus, and Pliny refer to Indika in their works. Of these writers, Arrian speaks most highly of Megasthenes, while Strabo and Pliny treat him with less respect.

The first century Greek writer Strabo called both Megasthenes and his succeeding ambassador Deimachus liars, and stated that "no faith whatever" could be placed in their writings.[31] The Indika itself contained numerous fantastical stories of people with backwards feet, ears large enough to sleep in, no mouths, or other strange features. Strabo directly contradicted these descriptions, assuring his readers that Megasthenes' stories, along with his recounting of India’s founding by Hercules and Dionysus, were mythical with little to no basis in reality.[32]

According to Paul J. Kosmin, Indica depicts contemporary India as an unconquerable territory, in order to justify Seleucus's retreat from India. Megasthenes tries to argue that Dionysus was able to conquer India, because before his invasion, India was a primitive rural society. Dionysus' urbanization of India makes India a powerful, impregnable nation. The later ruler — the Indian Herakles — is presented as a native of India, despite similarities with the Greek Heracles. This, according to Kosmin, is because now India is shown as unconquerable.[33] Megasthenes emphasizes that no foreign army had been able to conquer India (since Dionysus) and Indians had not invaded a foreign country either. This representation of India as an isolated, invincible country is an attempt to vindicate Seleucus' peace treaty with the Indian emperor.[34]

Megasthenes states that there were no slaves in India, but the Arthashastra attests to the existence of slavery in contemporary India;[35] Strabo also counters Megasthenes's claim based on a report from Onesicritus.[36] Historian Shireen Moosvi theorizes that slaves were outcastes, and were not considered members of the society at all.[36] According to historian Romila Thapar, the lack of sharp distinction between slaves and others in the Indian society (unlike the Greek society) may have confused Megasthenes: Indians did not use large-scale slavery as a means of production, and slaves in India could buy back their freedom or be released by their master.[37]

Megasthenes mentions seven castes in India, while the Indian texts mention only four social classes (varnas). According to Thapar, Megasthenes' categorization appears to be based on economic divisions rather than the social divisions; this is understandable because the varnas originated as economic divisions. Thapar also speculates that he wrote his account some years after his visit to India, and at this time, he "arrived at the number seven, forgetting the facts as given to him". Alternatively, it is possible that the later authors misquoted him, trying to find similarities with the Egyptian society, which according to Herodotus, was divided into seven social classes.[38]


Megasthenes' Indica, along with Ctesias' book of the same name, is among the earliest well-known Western accounts of India and he is regarded as one of the founders of the study of Indian history in the West. He is also the first foreign Ambassador to be mentioned in Indian history.[citation needed]

Megasthenes also comments on the presence of pre-Socratic views among the Brahmans and Jews. Five centuries later Clement of Alexandria, in his Stromateis, may have misunderstood Megasthenes to be responding to claims of Greek primacy by admitting Greek views of physics were preceded by those of Jews and Indians. Megasthenes, like Numenius of Apamea, was simply comparing the ideas of the different ancient cultures.[39]

See alsoEdit


  1. ^ Radha Kumud Mookerji 1988, p. 38.
  2. ^ Kaushik Roy 2012, pp. 61-62.
  3. ^ "Three Greek ambassadors are known by name: Megasthenes, ambassador to Chandragupta; Deimachus, ambassador to Chandragupta's son Bindusara; and Dyonisius, whom Ptolemy Philadelphus sent to the court of Ashoka, Bindusara's son", McEvilley, p.367
  4. ^ Burjor Avari 2007, pp. 108-109.
  5. ^ Paul J. Kosmin 2014, p. 38.
  6. ^ Arrian. "Book 5". Anabasis.
  7. ^ "History of West Punjab (Pakistan)". World History at KMLA.
  8. ^ "BBC - History - Ancient History in depth: The Story of India: South India". Retrieved 29 June 2017.
  9. ^ Mallady, Shastry V. ""I am overwhelmed by this great city"". Retrieved 29 June 2017.
  10. ^ Upinder Singh (2008). A History of Ancient and Early Medieval India. Pearson Education India. p. 324. ISBN 9788131711200.
  11. ^ Christopher I. Beckwith (2015). Greek Buddha: Pyrrho's Encounter with Early Buddhism in Central Asia. Princeton University Press. p. 62. ISBN 9781400866328.
  12. ^ Paul J. Kosmin 2013, p. 99.
  13. ^ Sandhya Jain 2011, p. 22.
  14. ^ A. B. Bosworth 1996, pp. 188-189.
  15. ^ J. W. McCrindle 1877, p. 49.
  16. ^ J. W. McCrindle 1877, p. 46.
  17. ^ a b J. W. McCrindle 1877, p. 30.
  18. ^ J. W. McCrindle 1877, p. 33.
  19. ^ J. W. McCrindle 1877, p. 33-34.
  20. ^ J. W. McCrindle 1877, p. 34.
  21. ^ J. W. McCrindle 1877, p. 34-35.
  22. ^ J. W. McCrindle 1877, p. 35-38.
  23. ^ J. W. McCrindle 1877, p. 39-40.
  24. ^ a b c d J. W. McCrindle 1877, p. 31.
  25. ^ J. W. McCrindle 1877, p. 44.
  26. ^ a b J. W. McCrindle 1877, p. 32.
  27. ^ J. W. McCrindle 1877, p. 35.
  28. ^ J. W. McCrindle 1877, p. 40.
  29. ^ J. W. McCrindle 1877, p. 40-44.
  30. ^ J. W. McCrindle 1877, p. 44-45.
  31. ^ Allan Dahlaquist 1996, p. 28.
  32. ^ Strabo, Geography, Book XV, Chapter 1
  33. ^ Paul J. Kosmin 2013, p. 98-100.
  34. ^ Paul J. Kosmin 2013, p. 103-104.
  35. ^ Romila Thapar 1990, p. 89.
  36. ^ a b Antoinette Fauve-Chamoux 2004, p. 548.
  37. ^ Romila Thapar 1990, pp. 89-90.
  38. ^ Romila Thapar 2012, p. 118.
  39. ^ Bezalel Bar-Kochva 2010, p. 157: "He does not respond to the implied claim of Greek primacy, presumably because he did not have, and could not have had, hard information about the beginnings of "parallel" opinions among the Brahmans."


External linksEdit