Open main menu

In physics, Langevin equation (named after Paul Langevin) is a stochastic differential equation describing the time evolution of a subset of the degrees of freedom. These degrees of freedom typically are collective (macroscopic) variables changing only slowly in comparison to the other (microscopic) variables of the system. The fast (microscopic) variables are responsible for the stochastic nature of the Langevin equation.

Brownian motion as a prototypeEdit

The original Langevin equation[1] describes Brownian motion, the apparently random movement of a particle in a fluid due to collisions with the molecules of the fluid,


The degree of freedom of interest here is the position   of the particle,   denotes the particle's mass. The force acting on the particle is written as a sum of a viscous force proportional to the particle's velocity (Stokes' law), and a noise term   (the name given in physical contexts to terms in stochastic differential equations which are stochastic processes) representing the effect of the collisions with the molecules of the fluid. The force   has a Gaussian probability distribution with correlation function


where   is Boltzmann's constant,   is the temperature and   is the i-th component of the vector  . The δ-function form of the correlations in time means that the force at a time   is assumed to be completely uncorrelated with it at any other time. This is an approximation; the actual random force has a nonzero correlation time corresponding to the collision time of the molecules. However, the Langevin equation is used to describe the motion of a "macroscopic" particle at a much longer time scale, and in this limit the  -correlation and the Langevin equation become exact.

Another prototypical feature of the Langevin equation is the occurrence of the damping coefficient   in the correlation function of the random force, a fact also known as Einstein relation.

Trajectories of free Brownian particlesEdit

Consider a free particle of mass   with equation of motion described by


where   is the particle velocity,   is the particle mobility, and   is a rapidly fluctuating force whose time-average vanishes over a characteristic timescale   of particle collisions, i.e.  . The general solution to the equation of motion is


where   is the relaxation time of the Brownian motion. As expected from the random nature of Brownian motion, the average drift velocity   quickly decays to zero at  . It can also be shown that the autocorrelation function of the particle velocity   is given by[2]

Simulated squared displacements of free Brownian particles (semi-transparent wiggly lines) as a function of time, for three selected choices of initial squared velocity which are 0, 3kT/m, and 6kT/m respectively, with 3kT/m being the equipartition value in thermal equilibrium. The colored solid curves denote the mean squared displacements for the corresponding parameter choices.

where we have used the property that the variables   and   become uncorrelated for time separations  . Besides, the value of   is set to be equal to   such that it obeys the equipartition theorem. Note that if the system is initially at thermal equilibrium already with  , then   for all  , meaning that the system remains at equilibrium at all times.

The velocity   of the Brownian particle can be integrated to yield its trajectory (assuming it is initially at the origin)


Hence, the resultant average displacement   asymptotes to   as the system relaxes and randomness takes over. In addition, the mean squared displacement can be determined similarly to the preceding calculation to be


It can be seen that  , indicating that the motion of Brownian particles at timescales much shorter than the relaxation time   of the system is (approximately) time-reversal invariant. On the other hand,  , which suggests that the long-term random motion of Brownian particles is an irreversible dissipative process. Here we have made use of the Einstein–Smoluchowski relation  , where   is the diffusion coefficient of the fluid.

Mathematical aspectsEdit

A strictly  -correlated fluctuating force   isn't a function in the usual mathematical sense and even the derivative   isn't defined in this limit. The Langevin equation as it stands requires an interpretation in this case, see Itō calculus.

Generic Langevin equationEdit

There is a formal derivation of a generic Langevin equation from classical mechanics.[3][4] This generic equation plays a central role in the theory of critical dynamics,[5] and other areas of nonequilibrium statistical mechanics. The equation for Brownian motion above is a special case.

An essential condition of the derivation is a criterion dividing the degrees of freedom into the categories slow and fast. For example, local thermodynamic equilibrium in a liquid is reached within a few collision times. But it takes much longer for densities of conserved quantities like mass and energy to relax to equilibrium. Densities of conserved quantities, and in particular their long wavelength components, thus are slow variable candidates. Technically this division is realized with the Zwanzig projection operator,[6] the essential tool in the derivation. The derivation is not completely rigorous because it relies on (plausible) assumptions akin to assumptions required elsewhere in basic statistical mechanics.

Let   denote the slow variables. The generic Langevin equation then reads


The fluctuating force   obeys a Gaussian probability distribution with correlation function


This implies the Onsager reciprocity relation   for the damping coefficients  . The dependence   of   on   is negligible in most cases. The symbol   denotes the Hamiltonian of the system, where   is the equilibrium probability distribution of the variables  . Finally,   is the projection of the Poisson bracket of the slow variables   and   onto the space of slow variables.

In the Brownian motion case one would have  ,   or   and  . The equation of motion   for   is exact, there is no fluctuating force   and no damping coefficient  .


This plot corresponds to solutions of the complete Langevin equation obtained using the Euler-Maruyama method. The left panel shows the time evolution of the phase portrait of a harmonic oscillator at different temperatures. The right panel captures the corresponding equilibrium probability distributions. At zero temperature, the velocity rapidly decays from its initial value (the red dot) to zero due to damping. For non zero temperatures, the velocity can be kicked to values higher than the initial value due to thermal fluctuations. At long times, the velocity remains non zero, and the position and velocity distributions correspond to that of thermal equilibrium.

Harmonic oscillator in a fluidEdit


A particle in a fluid is also described by the Langevin equation with a potential, a damping force and thermal fluctuations given by the fluctuation dissipation theorem. If the potential is a harmonic oscillator potential then the constant energy curves are ellipses as shown in Figure 1 below. However, in the presence of a dissipation force a particle keeps losing energy to the environment. On the other hand, the thermal fluctuation randomly adds energy to the particle. In the absence of the thermal fluctuations the particle continuously loses kinetic energy and the phase portrait of the time evolution of the velocity vs. position looks like an ellipse that is spiraling in until it reaches zero velocity. Conversely, the thermal fluctuations provide kicks to the particles that do not allow the particle to lose all its energy. So, at long times, the initial ensemble of stochastic oscillators to spread out, eventually reaching thermal equilibrium, for whom the distribution of velocity and position is given by the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution. In the plot below (Figure 2), the long time velocity distribution (orange) and position distributions (blue) in a harmonic potential (  ) is plotted with the Boltzmann probabilities for velocity (red) and position (green). We see that the late time behavior depicts thermal equilibrium.


An electric circuit consisting of a resistor and a capacitor.

Thermal noise in an electrical resistorEdit

There is a close analogy between the paradigmatic Brownian particle discussed above and Johnson noise, the electric voltage generated by thermal fluctuations in every resistor.[7] The diagram at the right shows an electric circuit consisting of a resistance R and a capacitance C. The slow variable is the voltage U between the ends of the resistor. The Hamiltonian reads  , and the Langevin equation becomes


This equation may be used to determine the correlation function


which becomes a white noise (Johnson noise) when the capacitance C becomes negligibly small.

Critical dynamicsEdit

The dynamics of the order parameter   of a second order phase transition slows down near the critical point and can be described with a Langevin equation.[5] The simplest case is the universality class "model A" with a non-conserved scalar order parameter, realized for instance in axial ferromagnets,


Other universality classes (the nomenclature is "model A",..., "model J") contain a diffusing order parameter, order parameters with several components, other critical variables and/or contributions from Poisson brackets.[5]

Recovering Boltzmann statisticsEdit

Langevin equations must reproduce the Boltzmann distribution. 1-dimensional overdamped Brownian motion is an instructive example. The overdamped case is realized when the inertia of the particle is negligible in comparison to the damping force. The trajectory   of the particle in a potential   is described by the Langevin equation


where the noise is characterized by   and   is the damping constant. We would like to compute the distribution   of the particle's position in the course of time. A direct way to determine this distribution is to introduce a test function  , and to look at the average of this function over all realizations (ensemble average)


If   remains finite then this quantity is null. Moreover, using the Stratonovich interpretation, we are able to get rid of the eta in the second term so that we end up with


where we make use of the probability density function  . This is done by explicitly computing the average,


where the second term was integrated by parts (hence the negative sign). Since this is true for arbitrary functions  , we must have:


thus recovering the Boltzmann distribution


Equivalent techniquesEdit

A solution of a Langevin equation for a particular realization of the fluctuating force is of no interest by itself, what is of interest are correlation functions of the slow variables after averaging over the fluctuating force. Such correlation functions also may be determined with other (equivalent) techniques.

Fokker Planck equationEdit

A Fokker–Planck equation is a deterministic equation for the time dependent probability density   of stochastic variables  . The Fokker–Planck equation corresponding to the generic Langevin equation above may be derived with standard techniques (see for instance ref.[8]),


The equilibrium distribution   is a stationary solution.

Path integralEdit

A path integral equivalent to a Langevin equation may be obtained from the corresponding Fokker–Planck equation or by transforming the Gaussian probability distribution   of the fluctuating force   to a probability distribution of the slow variables, schematically  . The functional determinant and associated mathematical subtleties drop out if the Langevin equation is discretized in the natural (causal) way, where   depends on   but not on  . It turns out to be convenient to introduce auxiliary response variables  . The path integral equivalent to the generic Langevin equation then reads [9]


where   is a normalization factor and


The path integral formulation doesn't add anything new, but it does allow for the use of tools from quantum field theory; for example perturbation and renormalization group methods (if these make sense).

See alsoEdit


  1. ^ Langevin, P. (1908). "Sur la théorie du mouvement brownien [On the Theory of Brownian Motion]". C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris. 146: 530–533.; reviewed by D. S. Lemons & A. Gythiel: Paul Langevin’s 1908 paper "On the Theory of Brownian Motion" [...], Am. J. Phys. 65, 1079 (1997), doi:10.1119/1.18725
  2. ^ Pathria RK (1972). Statistical Mechanics. Oxford: Pergamon Press. pp. 443, 474–477. ISBN 0-08-018994-6.
  3. ^ Kawasaki, K. (1973). "Simple derivations of generalized linear and nonlinear Langevin equations". J. Phys. A: Math. Nucl. Gen. 6: 1289. Bibcode:1973JPhA....6.1289K. doi:10.1088/0305-4470/6/9/004.
  4. ^ Dengler, R. (2015). "Another derivation of generalized Langevin equations". arXiv:1506.02650v2.
  5. ^ a b c Hohenberg, P. C.; Halperin, B. I. (1977). "Theory of dynamic critical phenomena". Reviews of Modern Physics. 49 (3): 435–479. Bibcode:1977RvMP...49..435H. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.49.435.
  6. ^ Zwanzig, R. (1961). "Memory effects in irreversible thermodynamics". Phys. Rev. 124 (4): 983–992. Bibcode:1961PhRv..124..983Z. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.124.983.
  7. ^ Johnson, J. (1928). "Thermal Agitation of Electricity in Conductors". Phys. Rev. 32: 97. Bibcode:1928PhRv...32...97J. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.32.97.
  8. ^ Ichimaru, S. (1973), Basic Principles of Plasma Physics (1st. ed.), USA: Benjamin, p. 231, ISBN 0805387536
  9. ^ Janssen, H. K. (1976). "Lagrangean for Classical Field Dynamics and Renormalization Group Calculations of Dynamical Critical Properties". Z. Phys. B. 23: 377. Bibcode:1976ZPhyB..23..377J. doi:10.1007/BF01316547.

Further readingEdit

  • W. T. Coffey (Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland) and Yu P. Kalmykov (Université de Perpignan, France, The Langevin Equation: With Applications to Stochastic Problems in Physics, Chemistry and Electrical Engineering (Third edition), World Scientific Series in Contemporary Chemical Physics - Vol 27.
  • Reif, F. Fundamentals of Statistical and Thermal Physics, McGraw Hill New York, 1965. See section 15.5 Langevin Equation
  • R. Friedrich, J. Peinke and Ch. Renner. How to Quantify Deterministic and Random Influences on the Statistics of the Foreign Exchange Market, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5224 - 5227 (2000)
  • L.C.G. Rogers and D. Williams. Diffusions, Markov Processes, and Martingales, Cambridge Mathematical Library, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, reprint of 2nd (1994) edition, 2000.