Insubordination is the act of willfully disobeying an order of one's superior.

Insubordination is generally a punishable offense in hierarchical organizations which depend on people lower in the chain of command doing what they are expected to do.


Sixteen blindfolded partisan youth await execution by German forces in Serbia, August 1941. Allegedly, German soldier Josef Schulz refused to take part in the action and was executed along with the youth.

Insubordination is when a service member willfully disobeys the lawful orders of a superior officer. If a military officer disobeys the lawful orders of their civilian superiors, this also counts. For example, the head of state in many countries, is also the most superior officer of the military as the Commander in Chief. (see Civilian control of the military)[1][2][3][4] Generally, an officer or soldier may be insubordinate to the point of mutiny if given an unlawful order, however (see Nuremberg defense).

In the U.S. military, insubordination is covered under Article 91 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice.[5] It covers disobeying lawful orders as well as disrespectful language or even striking a superior. The article for insubordination should not be confused with the article for contempt. While Article 91 of the UCMJ deals predominantly with disobeying or disrespecting a superior and applies to enlisted members and warrant officers, Article 88 involves the use of contemptuous words against certain appointed or elected officials and only applies to commissioned officers.[6]

Private SectorEdit

Other types of hierarchical structures, especially corporations, may use insubordination as a reason for dismissal or censure of an employee.

There have been court cases in the United States which have involved charges of insubordination from the employer with counter charges of infringement of First Amendment rights from the employee. A number of these cases have reached the U.S. Supreme Court usually involving a conflict between an institution of higher education and a faculty member.[7][8]

In the modern workplace in the Western world, hierarchical power relationships are usually sufficiently internalized so that the issue of formal charges of insubordination are rare. In his book Disciplined Minds, American physicist and writer Jeff Schmidt points out that professionals are trusted to run organizations in the interests of their employers. Because employers cannot be on hand to manage every decision, professionals are trained "to make sure that the subtext of each and every detail of their work advances the right interests—or skewers the disfavored ones" in the absence of overt control.[9]


There have been a number of famous and notorious people who have committed insubordination or publicly objected to an organizational practice.

See alsoEdit


  1. ^ Article 90—Assaulting or willfully disobeying superior commissioned officer. Accessed December 9, 2010.
  2. ^ 91—Insubordinate conduct toward warrant officer, NCO, or PO. Accessed December 9, 2010.
  3. ^ 92—Failure to obey order or regulation. Accessed December 9, 2010.
  4. ^ 94—Mutiny and sedition. Accessed December 9, 2010.
  5. ^ 91—Insubordinate conduct toward warrant officer, NCO, or PO. Accessed November 25, 2013.
  6. ^ 88—Contempt toward officials. Accessed December 9, 2010.
  7. ^ Imber, Michael and Tyll Van Geel (2001). A Teacher's Guide to Education Law. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. p. 196. ISBN 0-8058-3754-X. Google Book Search. Retrieved on December 10, 2010.
  8. ^ Kaplin, William A. and Barbar A. Lee (2007). The Law of Higher Education. Jossey-Bass, John Wiley & Sons. p. 234. ISBN 978-0-7879-7095-6. Google Book Search. Retrieved on December 10, 2010.
  9. ^ Schmidt, Jeff (2001). Disciplined Minds: A Critical Look at Salaried Professionals and the Soul-battering System That Shapes Their Lives. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. p. 41. ISBN 0-7425-1685-7. Google Book Search. Retrieved on December 10, 2010.

External linksEdit