Open main menu
Genetic distance map by Cavalli-Sforza et al. (1994) [1]

Genetic distance is a measure of the genetic divergence between species or between populations within a species, whether the distance measures time from common ancestor or degree of differentiation.[2] Populations with many similar alleles have small genetic distances. This indicates that they are closely related and have a recent common ancestor.

Genetic distance is useful for reconstructing the history of populations. For example, evidence from genetic distance suggests that Sub-Saharan African and Eurasian people diverged about 100,000 years ago.[3] Genetic distance is also used for understanding the origin of biodiversity. For example, the genetic distances between different breeds of domesticated animals are often investigated in order to determine which breeds should be protected to maintain genetic diversity.[4]

Biological foundationEdit

In the genome of an organism, each gene is located at a specific place called the locus for that gene. Allelic variations at these loci cause phenotypic variation within species (e.g. hair colour, eye colour). However, most alleles do not have an observable impact on the phenotype. Within a population new alleles generated by mutation either die out or spread throughout the population. When a population is split into different isolated populations (by either geographical or ecological factors), mutations that occur after the split will be present only in the isolated population. Random fluctuation of allele frequencies also produces genetic differentiation between populations. This process is known as genetic drift. By examining the differences between allele frequencies between the populations and computing genetic distance, we can estimate how long ago the two populations were separated.[5]

Measures of genetic distanceEdit

Although it is simple to define genetic distance as a measure of genetic divergence, there are several different statistical measures that have been proposed. This has happened because different authors considered different evolutionary models. The most commonly used are Nei's genetic distance,[5] Cavalli-Sforza and Edwards measure,[6] and Reynolds, Weir and Cockerham's genetic distance,[7] listed below.

In all the formulae in this section,   and   represent two different populations for which   loci have been studied. Let   represent the  th allele frequency at the  th locus.

Nei's standard genetic distanceEdit

In 1972, Masatoshi Nei published what came to be known as Nei's standard genetic distance. This distance has the nice property that if the rate of genetic change (amino acid substitution) is constant per year or generation then Nei's standard genetic distance (D) increases in proportion to divergence time. This measure assumes that genetic differences are caused by mutation and genetic drift.[5]


This distance can also be expressed in terms of the arithmetic mean of gene identity. Let   be the probability for the two members of population   having the same allele at a particular locus and   be the corresponding probability in population  . Also, let   be the probability for a member of   and a member of   having the same allele. Now let  ,   and   represent the arithmetic mean of  ,   and   over all loci, respectively. In other words,


where   is the total number of loci examined.[8]

Nei's standard distance can then be written as[5]


Cavalli-Sforza chord distanceEdit

In 1967 Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza and A. W. F. Edwards published this measure. It assumes that genetic differences arise due to genetic drift only. One major advantage of this measure is that the populations are represented in a hypersphere, the scale of which is one unit per gene substitution. The chord distance in the hyperdimensional sphere is given by[2][6]


Some authors drop the factor   to simplify the formula at the cost of losing the property that the scale is one unit per gene substitution.

Reynolds, Weir, and Cockerham's genetic distanceEdit

In 1983, this measure was published by John Reynolds, Bruce Weir and C. Clark Cockerham. This measure assumes that genetic differentiation occurs only by genetic drift without mutations. It estimates the coancestry coefficient   which provides a measure of the genetic divergence by:[7]


Other measures of genetic distanceEdit

Many other measures of genetic distance have been proposed with varying success.

Nei's DA distance 1983Edit

This distance assumes that genetic differences arise due to mutation and genetic drift, but this distance measure is known to give more reliable population trees than other distances particularly for microsatellite DNA data.[9][10]


Euclidean distanceEdit


Goldstein distance 1995Edit

It was specifically developed for microsatellite markers and is based on the stepwise-mutation model (SMM).   and   are the means of the allele sizes in population X and Y.[11]


Nei's minimum genetic distance 1973Edit

This measure assumes that genetic differences arise due to mutation and genetic drift.[3]


Roger's distance 1972Edit


Fixation indexEdit

A commonly used measure of genetic distance is the fixation index which varies between 0 and 1. A value of 0 indicates that two populations are genetically identical (minimal or no genetic diversity between the two populations) whereas a value of 1 indicates that two populations are genetically different (maximum genetic diversity between the two populations). No mutation is assumed. Large populations between which there is much migration, for example, tend to be little differentiated whereas small populations between which there is little migration tend to be greatly differentiated. Fst is a convenient measure of this differentiation, and as a result Fst and related statistics are among the most widely used descriptive statistics in population and evolutionary genetics. But Fst is more than a descriptive statistic and measure of genetic differentiation. Fst is directly related to the Variance in allele frequency among populations and conversely to the degree of resemblance among individuals within populations. If Fst is small, it means that allele frequencies within each population are very similar; if it is large, it means that allele frequencies are very different.


    • Nei's standard genetic distance 1972
    • Cavalli-Sforza and Edwards 1967
    • Reynolds, Weir, and Cockerham's 1983
    • Nei's standard genetic distance (original and unbiased)
    • Nei's minimum genetic distance (original and unbiased)
    • Wright's (1978) modification of Roger's (1972) distance
    • Reynolds, Weir, and Cockerham's 1983
  • GDA
  • POPTREE2 Takezaki, Nei, and Tamura (2010, 2014)
    • Commonly used genetic distances and gene diversity analysis
    • Nei's standard genetic distance 1972
    • Nei's DA distance between populations 1983

See alsoEdit


  1. ^ Cavalli-Sforza, L.L., Menozzi, P. & Piazza, A. (1994). The History and Geography of Human Genes. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  2. ^ a b c Nei, M. (1987). Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. (Chapter 9). New York: Columbia University Press.
  3. ^ a b Nei, M.; A. K. Roychoudhury (1974). "Genic variation within and between the three major races of man, Caucasoids, Negroids, and Mongoloids". The American Journal of Human Genetics. 26: 421–443. PMC 1762596. PMID 4841634.
  4. ^ Ruane, J. (1999). A critical review of the value of genetic distance studies in conservation of animal genetic resources. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 116(5), 317-323. Chicago.
  5. ^ a b c d Nei, M. (1972). "Genetic distance between populations". Am. Nat. 106: 283–292. doi:10.1086/282771.
  6. ^ a b L.L. Cavalli-Sforza; A.W.F. Edwards (1967). "Phylogenetic Analysis -Models and Estimation Procedures". The American Journal of Human Genetics. 19 (3 Part I (May)).
  7. ^ a b John Reynolds; B.S. Weir; C. Clark Cockerham (November 1983). "Estimation of the coancestry coefficient: Basis for a short-term genetic distance". Genetics. 105: 767–779.
  8. ^ Nei, M. (1987) Genetic distance and molecular phylogeny. In: Population Genetics and Fishery Management (N. Ryman and F. Utter, eds.), University of Washington Press, Seattle, WA, pp. 193-223.
  9. ^ Nei, M., F. Tajima, & Y. Tateno (1983) Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. II. Gene frequency data. J. Mol. Evol. 19:153-170.
  10. ^ Takezaki, N. and Nei, M. (1996) Genetic distances and reconstruction of phylogenetic trees from microsatellite DNA. Genetics 144:389-399.
  11. ^ Gillian Cooper; William Amos; Richard Bellamy; Mahveen Ruby Siddiqui; Angela Frodsham; Adrian V. S. Hill; David C. Rubinsztein (1999). "An Empirical Exploration of the   Genetic Distance for 213 Human Microsatellite Markers". The American Journal of Human Genetics. 65: 1125–1133. doi:10.1086/302574. PMC 1288246.
  12. ^ Rogers, J. S. (1972). Measures of similarity and genetic distance. In Studies in Genetics VII. pp. 145−153. University of Texas Publication 7213. Austin, Texas.

External linksEdit