File:Kilgallengarage.jpg

Licensing edit

This image represents a two-dimensional work of art, such as a drawing, painting, print, or similar creation. The copyright for this image is likely owned by either the artist who created it, the individual who commissioned the work, or their legal heirs. It is believed that the use of low-resolution images of artworks: for purposes of critical commentary on: the specific work in question, the artistic genre or technique employed in the artwork, or the artistic school or tradition to which the artist is associated, as applied within the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers located in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation, qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law. Any other use of this image, whether on Wikipedia or elsewhere, could potentially constitute a copyright infringement. For further information, please refer to Wikipedia's guidelines on non-free content. Fair use //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Kilgallengarage.jpg true

To the uploader: Please add a detailed non-free use rationale for each article the image is used in, which must also declare compliance with the other parts of the non-free content criteria, as well as the source of the work and copyright information. For example non-free use rationales, see Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. To patrollers and administrators: If this image has an appropriate rationale please append |image has rationale=yes as a parameter to the license template.

This is a piece of public art that I took the picture of and as such is considered a fair-use derivative for copyright purposes.

Fair Use for Margaret Kilgallen article includes:

1. This is a significant artwork that could not be conveyed in words.
2. This notable example is typical of significant artist's work.
3. There is no alternative, public domain or free-copyrighted replacement available.
4. Inclusion is for information, education and analysis only.
5. Its inclusion in the article adds significantly to the article because it shows the work of the subject of the article.
6. The image is a low resolution copy of the original work of such low quality that it would be unlikely to impact sales of the work.
7. The original has since been destroyed.

Fair Use for Mission School article includes:

1. This is a significant artwork that could not be conveyed in words.
2. This notable example is typical of "artistic genre or technique" for commentary.
3. There is no alternative, public domain or free-copyrighted replacement available.
4. Inclusion is for information, education and analysis only.
5. Its inclusion in the article adds significantly to the article because it shows the work of the subject of the article.
6. The image is a low resolution copy of the original work of such low quality that it would be unlikely to impact sales of the work.
7. The original has since been destroyed.

Fair Use for Los Angeles County Museum of Art article includes:

1. This is a significant artwork that could not be conveyed in words.
2. This notable example of the Museum's relationship with contemporary artists involved in significant local art movement (Mission School), recognized by peers and mainstream media.
3. There is no alternative, public domain or free-copyrighted replacement available.
4. Inclusion is for information, education and analysis only.
5. Its inclusion in the article adds significantly to the article because it shows the work of the subject of the article.
6. The image is a low resolution copy of the original work of such low quality that it would be unlikely to impact sales of the work.
7. The original has since been destroyed, by the museum for renovation.