File:Intel Optane 900p Sequential Steady-state mixed performance graph, from a review by Tom's Hardware.png

No higher resolution available.

Intel_Optane_900p_Sequential_Steady-state_mixed_performance_graph,_from_a_review_by_Tom's_Hardware.png ‎(369 × 269 pixels, file size: 64 KB, MIME type: image/png)

Summary edit

Media data and Non-free use rationale
Description	The graph shows the performance from 100% read and 0% write, to 100% write and 0% read, for Optane versus many competing reputable SSDs. Every graph except the dramatically for all mixes except the extremes. The Optane demonstrates sustained high performance at all mixes, around 2200 - 2400 MB/sec in the middle 70% of the chart, whereas all others are around 500 - 700 MB/sec.
Author or copyright owner	Tom's Hardware
Source (WP:NFCC#4)	Original publication: Online, review and benchmarks of Optane 900p (the main brand name used for 3D XPoint) Immediate source: https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-optane-ssd-900p-3d-xpoint,5292-2.html
Use in article (WP:NFCC#7)	3D XPoint
Purpose of use in article (WP:NFCC#8)	3D XPoint is the first of a new type of NV RA, and gives rise to a new type of SSD technology. The most pronounced and commented on feature of the 3D XPoint ("Optane") SSD devices is their remarkable performance as fast SSDs, often multiples of the speed of the best that preceded them, and unaffected by workload mixture or device state. Compared to traditional SSDs, their performance graphs are frequently described as having to be seen to be believed (cited in article). This graph illustrates this reason for their acclaim and attention, which would be hard to appreciate from words alone, by illustrating why the Optane in benchmarks by reputable technology reviewers, is so often seen as in a class of its own.
Not replaceable with free media because (WP:NFCC#1)	While any private individual could grab a few SSDs and produce a graph, the only graphs that carry any credibility - and hence educational and encyclopedic value - would be those produced and published by a reputable body - and those will all be non-free.
Minimal use (WP:NFCC#3)	The graph as explained is minimal in the most important sense - it is a selection of one item from dozens, all of which must be reviewed and interpreted to learn much. It is low resolution, without much detail or comment, so the only point it is capable of making is the one that is needed in the article - a visualisation of how different in kind this device is from every one of its predecessors.
Respect for commercial opportunities (WP:NFCC#2)	The graph is one of a great many of graphs from a long and detailed review. A person interested in this topic will quickly perceive that a single one of those graphs, in isolation, has almost no value or utility - only taken as a whole with the dozens of other types of test result graphs, and the extensive analysis in the accompanying text, is it possible to conclude much or anything about the item. In addition the graph is bare, showing the minimum that could make the point, with low levels of detail to get the "gist" only
Fair useFair use of copyrighted material in the context of 3D XPoint//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Intel_Optane_900p_Sequential_Steady-state_mixed_performance_graph,_from_a_review_by_Tom%27s_Hardware.pngtrue

Licensing edit

This image is a screenshot of a copyrighted web page, and the copyright for it is most likely held by the owner of the website. It may also contain trademarked logos, which are likely not affiliated with Wikipedia. It is believed that the use of a limited number of such screenshots

for identification and critical commentary relating to the website in question
on the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation,

qualifies as fair use under the copyright law of the United States. Any other uses of this image, on Wikipedia or elsewhere, may be copyright infringement. See Wikipedia:Non-free content for more information.

To the uploader:

Please add a detailed non-free use rationale for each article the image is used in, which must also declare compliance with the other parts of the non-free content criteria, as well as the source of the work and copyright information.
For example non-free use rationales, see Wikipedia:Use rationale examples.
This tag is not appropriate for images and media found on websites; it should be used for screenshots of websites only. In other words, it should only be used when the subject of the image, not the source of the image, is a website.
Template:Website screenshot rationale may be helpful for stating the rationale.

To patrollers and administrators: If this image has an appropriate rationale please append |image has rationale=yes as a parameter to the license template.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

	Date/Time	Thumbnail	Dimensions	User	Comment
current	00:05, 9 March 2019		369 × 269 (64 KB)	DatBot (talk \| contribs)	Reduce size of non-free image (BOT - disable)
	06:13, 8 March 2019	No thumbnail	412 × 301 (68 KB)	FT2 (talk \| contribs)	Uploading a non-free file using File Upload Wizard

You cannot overwrite this file.

File usage

The following pages on the English Wikipedia use this file (pages on other projects are not listed):

3D XPoint

Metadata

This file contains additional information, probably added from the digital camera or scanner used to create or digitize it.

If the file has been modified from its original state, some details may not fully reflect the modified file.

Horizontal resolution	37.8 dpc
Vertical resolution	37.8 dpc