Federal pardons in the United States
The neutrality of this article is disputed. (January 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
A federal pardon in the United States is the action of the President of the United States that completely sets aside the punishment for a federal crime. The authority to take such action is granted to the president by Article II, Section 2, Clause 1 of the U.S. Constitution. A pardon is one form of the clemency power of the president, the others being commutation of sentence, remission of fine or restitution, and reprieve. A person may decide not to accept a pardon, in which case it does not take effect; according to a Supreme Court majority opinion a pardon "carries an imputation of guilt; acceptance a confession of it".
Under the Constitution, the president's clemency power extends to all federal criminal offenses. All requests for executive clemency for federal offenses are normally directed to the Office of the Pardon Attorney in the U.S. Department of Justice for investigation and review, but the president is free to bypass that office.
The president's pardon power is limited to federal offenses; the Constitution only grants the president the power to pardon "[o]ffenses against the United States." An offense that violates state law, but not federal law, is an offense against that state rather than an offense against the United States.
The full extent of a president's power to pardon has not been fully resolved. Pardons have been used for presumptive cases, such as when President Gerald Ford pardoned Richard Nixon, who had not been charged with anything, over any possible crimes connected with the Watergate scandal, but the Supreme Court has never considered the legal effectiveness of such pardons. There is disagreement about how the pardon power applies to cases involving obstructions of an impeachment. Also, the ability of a president to pardon themselves (self-pardon) has never been tested in the courts, because, to date, no president has ever taken that action.
The pardon power of the President is based on Article Two of the United States Constitution (Section 2, Clause 1), which provides:
The President ... shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of impeachment.
The U.S. Supreme Court has interpreted the provision to include the power to grant pardons, conditional pardons, commutations of sentence, conditional commutations of sentence, remissions of fines and forfeitures, respites and amnesties.
- A pardon is an executive order granting clemency for a conviction. It may be granted "at any time" after the commission of the crime. As per Justice Department regulations, convicted persons may only apply five or more years after their sentence has been completed. However, the President's power to pardon is not restricted by any temporal constraints except that the crime must have been committed. A pardon is an expression of the President's forgiveness and ordinarily is granted in recognition of the applicant's acceptance of responsibility for the crime and established good conduct for a significant period of time after conviction or completion of sentence. It does not signify innocence. Its practical effect is the restoration of civil rights and statutory disabilities (e.g., firearm rights, occupational licensing) associated with a past criminal conviction. In rarer cases, such as the pardon of Richard Nixon, a pardon can also halt criminal proceedings and prevent an indictment, though this has not been tested in court.
- A reprieve is a temporary postponement of a punishment (refer to pardon/related concepts).
- A commutation is the mitigation of the sentence of someone currently serving a sentence for a crime pursuant to a conviction, without cancelling the conviction itself.
At the Virginia Ratifying Convention, the delegate George Mason argued against ratification partly on the grounds that "the President ought not to have the power of pardoning, because he may frequently pardon crimes which were advised by himself."
Pardons granted by presidents from George Washington until Grover Cleveland's first term (1885–1889) were hand written by the president. After typewriters came to be used for regular White House business, pardons were prepared for the president by administrative staff requiring only that the president sign them.
All federal pardon petitions are addressed to the President, who grants or denies the request. Typically, applications for pardons are referred for review and non-binding recommendation by the Office of the Pardon Attorney, an official of the United States Department of Justice. The number of pardons and reprieves granted has varied from administration to administration. Fewer pardons have been granted since World War II.
A federal pardon can be issued prior to the start of a legal case or inquiry, prior to any indictments being issued, for unspecified offenses, and prior to or after a conviction for a federal crime. Ford's broad federal pardon of former president Richard M. Nixon in 1974 for "all offenses against the United States which he, Richard Nixon, has committed or may have committed or taken part in during the period from January 20, 1969 through August 9, 1974" is a notable example of a fixed-period federal pardon that came prior to any indictments being issued and that covered unspecified federal offenses that may or may not have been committed.
The Justice Department normally requires that anyone filing a petition for a pardon wait five years after conviction or release prior to receiving a pardon. The constitutionality of open pardons, such as Ford's pardon of Nixon, has never been judicially tested in the Supreme Court and is open to question.
While clemency may be granted without the filing of a formal request, in most cases the Office of the Pardon Attorney will consider only petitions from persons who have completed their sentences and, in addition, have demonstrated their ability to lead a responsible and productive life for a significant period after conviction or release from confinement.
The Supreme Court ruled in United States v. Wilson (1833) that a pardon could be rejected by the convict. In Burdick v. United States (1915), the court specifically said: "Circumstances may be made to bring innocence under the penalties of the law. If so brought, escape by confession of guilt implied in the acceptance of a pardon may be rejected, preferring to be the victim of the law rather than its acknowledged transgressor, preferring death even to such certain infamy." Commutations (reduction in prison sentence), unlike pardons (restoration of civil rights after prison sentence had been served) may not be refused. In Biddle v. Perovich 274 U.S. 480 (1927), the subject of the commutation did not want to accept life in prison but wanted the death penalty restored. The Supreme Court said, "Just as the original punishment would be imposed without regard to the prisoner's consent and in the teeth of his will, whether he liked it or not, the public welfare, not his consent, determines what shall be done."
Federal pardons issued by the president apply only to federal law; they do not apply to civil, state, or local offenses. Federal pardons also do not apply to cases of impeachment. Pardons for state crimes are handled by governors or a state pardon board.
One limitation to the president's power to grant pardons is "in cases of impeachment." This means that the president cannot use a pardon to stop an officeholder from being impeached, or to undo the effects of an impeachment and conviction.
Acceptance by the recipientEdit
A pardon can be rejected by the intended recipient and must be affirmatively accepted to be officially recognized by the courts. George Wilson was convicted of robbing the US Mail in Pennsylvania and sentenced to death. Due to his friends' influence, Wilson was pardoned by President Andrew Jackson. Wilson refused the pardon and in 1833, the United States Supreme Court held in United States v. Wilson that his rejection—and consequently the pardon not being introduced to the court by "plea, motion, or otherwise" as a point of fact and evidence—was valid and the court could not force a pardon upon him.
According to Associate Justice Joseph McKenna, writing the majority opinion in the U.S. Supreme Court case Burdick v. United States, a pardon "carries an imputation of guilt; acceptance a confession of it." The federal courts have yet to make it clear how this logic applies to persons who are deceased (such as Henry Ossian Flipper, who was pardoned by Bill Clinton), those who are relieved from penalties as a result of general amnesties, and those whose punishments are relieved via a commutation of sentence (which cannot be rejected in any sense of the language). Brian Kalt, a law professor at Michigan State University, states that presidents sometimes (albeit rarely) grant pardons on the basis of innocence, and argues that if a president issues a pardon because they think an individual is innocent, then accepting that pardon would not be an admission of guilt.
Residual effects of convictionsEdit
A presidential pardon restores various rights lost as a result of the pardoned offense and may lessen to some extent the stigma arising from a conviction, but does not erase or expunge the record of the conviction itself. Therefore, a person who is granted a pardon must still disclose their conviction(s) on any form where such information is required, although the person may also disclose the fact that they received a pardon. Also, as most civil disabilities arising from a criminal conviction, such as loss of the right to vote and hold state public office, are imposed by state rather than federal law, they may be removed only by state action.
The legal and constitutional ability of a president to pardon himself (self-pardon) is an unresolved issue. During the Watergate scandal, President Nixon's lawyer suggested that a self-pardon would be legal, while the Department of Justice issued a memorandum opinion on August 5, 1974, stating that a president cannot pardon himself. The 1974 memo laid out a scenario in which, under the Twenty-fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, the president could declare himself unable to perform his duties and could appoint the vice president as acting president. The acting president could then pardon the president and "thereafter the president could either resign or resume the duties of his office." The Nixon memo only address the presidential self-pardon in 69 words with no citations, and thus lacking legal analysis, is no more authoritative than a memo from President Trump’s assistant attorney general stating, with no evidence to support the claim, that a president can issue a self-pardon.
On July 22, 2017, President Donald Trump tweeted, "While all agree the U.S. President has the complete power to pardon, why think of that when only crime so far is LEAKS against us. FAKE NEWS", prompting a series of news article and online commentary regarding the president's ability to pardon relatives, aides, and possibly even himself in relation to the 2017 Special Counsel investigation, which ultimately concluded President Donald Trump could not be indicted at the time.
Arguments against self-pardons include constitutional themes of self-judging and self-dealing, however this is flawed as constitutionally, a president is not barred from pardoning partners-of-crime and as the chief law enforcement officer, has prosecutorial discretion to make decisions against himself, which do not violate the Constitution on the grounds of self-dealing, and likewise a self-pardon. Calder v. Bull is the Supreme Court case most often used to establish that one cannot be a judge in his own case. However, the case has nothing to do with a president’s constitutional pardon power. Furthermore, a pardon is an executive action, not a judicial one, and so a self-pardon is not an act of self-judging.
Anti-self-pardon arguments such as the unjust nature of the president being above the law as violations of the public trust, are also flawed in the fact that pardons are part of the legal system, and by definition every pardon would be a violation of public trust as it serves to stop the consequences of the execution of laws. Additionally, as the Constitution's pardon clause allows a self-pardon, a president who pardons himself cannot accurately be said of not faithfully executing the law.
The pardon power was controversial from the outset; many Anti-Federalists remembered examples of royal abuses of the pardon power in Europe, and warned that the same would happen in the new republic. Critics such as the Anti-Federalists have argued that pardons have been used more often for the sake of political expediency than to correct judicial error.
In the 19th century, Andrew Johnson controversially issued sweeping pardons of thousands of former Confederate officials and military personnel after the American Civil War.
In the 20th century, Gerald Ford pardoned former President Richard Nixon on September 8, 1974, for official misconduct which gave rise to the Watergate scandal. Polls showed a majority of Americans disapproved of the pardon, and Ford's public-approval ratings tumbled afterward. Other publicly controversial uses of the pardon power include Jimmy Carter's grant of amnesty to Vietnam-era draft dodgers on his second day in office, January 21, 1977; George H. W. Bush's pardons of 75 people, including six Reagan administration officials accused or convicted in connection with the Iran–Contra affair; and Bill Clinton's commutation of sentences for 16 members of FALN in 1999.
President Donald Trump issued his first pardon to former Arizona sheriff Joe Arpaio on August 25, 2017; Arpaio had been convicted of criminal contempt in federal court. The pardon of Arpaio was relatively unusual in being issued early in Trump's presidency. It was met with widespread criticism from political opponents. On November 25, 2020, Trump announced, via Twitter, that he had pardoned former General and Trump National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Flynn had pleaded guilty to one count of making false statements to the FBI, an offense which prompted Trump to fire Flynn as his national security advisor 23 days after taking office. On December 23, 2020, Trump pardoned 26 friends and allies, including his longtime ally Roger Stone, former campaign chairman Paul Manafort, and Charles Kushner, his son-in-law's father.
A symbolic use of the presidential pardon is the National Thanksgiving Turkey Presentation in November, in which a domestic turkey is pardoned from being killed for Thanksgiving dinner, and is allowed to live out its life on a farm.
- "Office of the Pardon Attorney". US Department of Justice. Archived from the original on January 5, 2015. Retrieved January 12, 2021.
- "United States v. Wilson: 32 U.S. 150 (1833)". Justia.com. Retrieved July 24, 2017.
- "Frequently Asked Questions". Department of Justice - Office of the Pardon Attorney. January 8, 2021. Archived from the original on November 28, 2017.
- "Pardon Information and Instructions". US Department of Justice - Office of the Pardon Attorney. November 23, 2018.
- Reinhard, Beth; Gearan, Anne. "Most Trump clemency grants bypass Justice Dept. and go to well-connected offenders". Washington Post. Retrieved February 22, 2020.
- "Presidential Pardons – ABA Legal Fact Check – American Bar Association". www.abalegalfactcheck.com. Retrieved August 30, 2017.
- Duker, William F. (1976). "The President's Power to Pardon: A Constitutional History". Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 18: 475–537.
The Supreme Court never has been called upon to judge the validity of an open pardon like the Nixon pardon. If it must do so in the future and if it continues to view Article II, section 2 in light of the meaning the framers intended it to have, the evidence raises a reasonable doubt of the constitutionality of the Nixon pardon.
- Martin H. Redish, "The President’s Pardon Power May Be Weaker Than It Seems", The New York Times, Dec. 5, 2019, Accessed 12/16/2019
- Conklin, Michael (April 28, 2020). "Please Allow Myself to Pardon . . . Myself: The Constitutionality of a Presidential Self-Pardon". University of Detroit Mercy Law Review. 97. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3587921. ISSN 1556-5068.
- Ruckman, P. S. Jr. (1997). "Executive Clemency in the United States: Origins, Development, and Analysis (1900–1993)". Presidential Studies Quarterly. 27 (2): 251–271. JSTOR 27551729.
- "Ex Parte Garland". LII / Legal Information Institute. Retrieved February 6, 2017.
The power thus conferred is unlimited, with the exception stated. It extends to every offence known to the law, and may be exercised at any time after its commission, either before legal proceedings are taken or during their pendency or after conviction and judgment.
- "The Traditional Interpretation of the Pardon Power Is Wrong". The Atlantic. Retrieved July 13, 2020.
- Ruckman Jr., P. S. (November 4, 1995). "Federal Executive Clemency in United States". Archived from the original on March 26, 2011. Retrieved March 19, 2011.
- Ruckman, P. S. Jr. "Presidential Pardons by Administration, 1789–2001". Rock Valley College. Retrieved July 22, 2017.
- Kalt, Brian (May 19, 2017). "Can Trump Pardon Himself?". Foreign Policy. Retrieved August 27, 2017.
- "28 C.F.R. § 1.2 Eligibility for filing petition for pardon". Retrieved September 5, 2017.
- Biddle v. Perovich 274 U.S. 480 (1927), at 486
- Amar, Akhil (2005). America's Constitution: A Biography. New York: Random House. p. 187. ISBN 978-0812972726.
- "How the Nixon Pardon Strained a Presidential Friendship". December 13, 2011. Retrieved August 10, 2017.
- see Chapman v. Scott (C.C.A.) 10 F.(2d) 690)
- Kalt, Brian. "Five myths about presidential pardons". The Washington Post. Washington Post. Retrieved April 2, 2019.
- "Presidential or Legislative Pardon of the President" (PDF). August 5, 1974. Retrieved July 24, 2017.
- "Can President Clinton Pardon Himself?". December 30, 1998. Retrieved December 25, 2020.
- Baker, Peter (July 22, 2017). "Trump Says He Has 'Complete Power' to Pardon". New York Times.
- Trickey, Erick (April 21, 2019). "'The President himself may be guilty': Why pardons were hotly debated by the Founding Fathers". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved November 28, 2020.
- Crouch, Jeffrey (December 2008). "The Law: Presidential Misuse of the Pardon Power". Presidential Studies Quarterly. 38 (4): 722–734. doi:10.1111/j.1741-5705.2008.02674.x. ISSN 0360-4918. JSTOR 41219712.
- "Whiskey Rebellion | Definition, History, & Significance". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved November 15, 2017.
- Johnson, Andrew. (December 25, 1868). Proclamation 179 – Granting Full Pardon and Amnesty for the Offense of Treason Against the United States During the Late Civil War. presidency.ucsb.edu. Retrieved February 2, 2017.
- "Ford Gives Pardon To Nixon, Who Regrets 'My Mistakes'". The New York Times. September 9, 1974. Archived from the original on June 12, 2013.CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
- Inc., Gallup. "Gerald Ford Retrospective".
- GLASS, ANDREW (January 21, 2008). "Carter pardons draft dodgers Jan. 21, 1977". POLITICO.
- Chris Black (September 5, 1999). "First lady opposes presidential clemency for Puerto Rican Nationalists". CNN. Archived from the original on March 3, 2006. Retrieved June 9, 2007.
- Liptak, Kevin; Diaz, Daniella; Tatum, Sophie (August 27, 2017). "Trump pardons former Sheriff Joe Arpaio". CNN. Retrieved August 27, 2017.
- Megan Cassidy, Former Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio found guilty of criminal contempt of court, The Arizona Republic (July 31, 2017).
- "Michael Flynn: Trump pardons ex-national security adviser". November 26, 2020 – via www.bbc.co.uk.
- Herb, Jeremy; Polantz, Katelyn; Perez, Evan; Cohen, Marshall (December 1, 2017). "Flynn pleads guilty to lying to FBI, is cooperating with Mueller". CNN. Retrieved February 18, 2019.
- Brown, Pamela; LeBlanc, Paul; Polantz, Katelyn; Liptak, Kevin (December 24, 2020). "Trump issues 26 new pardons, including for Stone, Manafort and Charles Kushner". CNN.
- "Eight years of Obama's turkey pardons". Reuters. November 23, 2016.