Open main menu

KwaZulu-Natal Elimination and Prevention of Re-emergence of Slums Act, 2007

The KwaZulu-Natal Elimination and Prevention of Re-emergence of Slums Act, 2007 (the "KZN Slums Act") was a provincial law dealing with land tenure and evictions in the province of KwaZulu-Natal in South Africa.[1]

KwaZulu-Natal Elimination and Prevention of Re-emergence of Slums Act, 2007
KwaZulu-Natal Parliament building, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.jpg
Act to provide for the progressive elimination of slums in the Province of KwaZulu-Natal; to provide for measures for the prevention of the re-emergence of slums; to provide for the upgrading and control of existing slums; and to provide for matters connected therewith.
CitationProvincial Act No. 6 of 2007
Territorial extentKwaZulu-Natal
Enacted byKwaZulu-Natal Legislature
Assented to18 July 2007
Commenced2 August 2007
Section 16 invalidated in Abahlali baseMjondolo v Premier of KwaZulu-Natal
Status: In force

The ActEdit

The Slums Act was a highly controversial Act supported by the Provincial Government of KwaZulu-Natal as a response to housing conditions. Its stated purpose was to eliminate substandard housing conditions by giving the provincial Housing MEC authority to prescribe a time in which it would be compulsory for municipalities to evict unlawful occupiers of slums when landowners failed to do so.[2][3] It also forced private landowners to evict shack dwellers.[4] It was meant to be replicated in all other South African provinces.[5]

The Act was widely criticised by civil society organisations and academics who said it was in conflict with the South African Constitution and PIE Act and who considered it to be repressive and anti-poor legislation.[5][6][7][8][9]

Constitutional Court of South Africa judgmentEdit

The road to the Constitutional CourtEdit

Abahlali baseMjondolo Protest the Slums Act at the Constitutional Court

The squatters' movement Abahlali baseMjondolo took the government to court to have the Act declared unconstitutional. It lost in the KwaZulu-Natal High Court, Durban but then appealed directly to the Constitutional Court.[10]

Abahlali baseMjondolo argued that the province was mandated to deal with housing rather than land tenure and that the act dealt with evictions and slum eradication rather than the provision of housing. They also argued that the act was vague and gave too much power to the provincial government that was in conflict with section 26 of the constitution that deals with housing and eviction rights.[11][12]

The Act judged unconstitutionalEdit

On 14 October 2009, the South African Constitutional Court found the law to be in conflict with the Constitution and struck it down. Costs were awarded to Abahlali baseMjondolo. According to the judgement, the legislation would have allowed for the possibility of mass evictions without the possibility of suitable alternative accommodation and would have therefore violated the Prevention of Illegal Evictions Act (PIE Act) and South Africa's Constitution.[1][3][13][14]

Intimidation and violence following the judgmentEdit

It was reported that following the judgment members of the movement were publicly threatened for their comments criticising the Slums Act.[15] It has also been argued that the judgment was a key factor in the armed attack on Abahlali baseMjondolo in the Kennedy Road shack settlement in Durban in September 2009.[16]

Significance of the judgmentEdit

The Slums Act is one of the best known judgments by the Constitutional Court in South Africa.[17] It has been argued that after the judgment the state abandoned its plans to eradicate shack settlements by 2014.[18]

See alsoEdit


  1. ^ a b ‘From shack to the Constitutional Court’: The litigious disruption of governing global cities, by Anna Selmeczi, Utrecht Law Review, April 2011
  2. ^ Concourt to rule on Slums Act, SAPA, 13 October 2009
  3. ^ a b Slum law evictions ruled to be unlawful, Business Day, 15 October 2009
  4. ^ Why 2010 Could Be An Own Goal for the Rainbow Nation, Jonathan Steele, The Guardian, 30 December 2009
  5. ^ a b So what difference does it make? Socio-economic rights and democratising development in South Africa Archived 30 April 2011 at the Wayback Machine, Peris Jones, Norwegian Institute for Urban and Regional Research, 27 April 2011
  6. ^ Comment on KwaZulu-Natal Elimination and Prevention of Re-Emergence of Slums Bill, 2006, 13 May 2007
  7. ^ "COHRE letter to the KwaZulu-Natal Premier urging him to refer the KZN Elimination and Prevention of Re-Emergence of Slums Bill to the KZN Legislature for reconsideration" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 January 2009. Retrieved 15 October 2009. Cite uses deprecated parameter |dead-url= (help)
  8. ^ The KwaZulu Natal Slums Act: Bloody legislation against the expropriated Archived 23 February 2012 at the Wayback Machine, Richard Pithouse, Pambazuka
  9. ^ Why Ramatlhodi promotes an autocratic kleptocracy, Pierre de Vos, 1 September 2011
  10. ^ Shack dwellers' victory bus, Mail & Guardian, 24 May 2009
  11. ^ Constitutional Court Media Summary: Abahlali baseMjondolo Movement SA v Premier KZN and Others, 14 May 2009
  12. ^ Eliminate the Slums Act – Original press statement and digital archive
  13. ^ Shack dwellers’ victory, The Witness, 15 October 2009
  14. ^ Shack dwellers celebrate Concourt victory, The Times, 15 October 2009
  15. ^ Ruling in Abahlali case lays solid foundation to build on, Marie Huchzermeyer, 4 November 2009
  16. ^ Marie Huchzermeyer, (2011).Cities with ‘Slums’: From Informal Settlement Eradication to a Right To The City In Africa University of Cape Town Press, Cape Town
  17. ^ Clarion call for a better way Imraan Buccus, The Mercury, 19 May 2010
  18. ^ Tokyo Sexwale's Failed Apprenticeship, SACSIS, 2010