Working in a coordinate chart with coordinates labelled 1 to 4 respectively, we begin with the metric in its most general form (10 independent components, each of which is a smooth function of 4 variables). The solution is assumed to be spherically symmetric, static and vacuum. For the purposes of this article, these assumptions may be stated as follows (see the relevant links for precise definitions):
The first simplification to be made is to diagonalise the metric. Under the coordinate transformation, , all metric components should remain the same. The metric components () change under this transformation as:
But, as we expect (metric components remain the same), this means that:
Similarly, the coordinate transformations and respectively give:
Putting all these together gives:
and hence the metric must be of the form:
where the four metric components are independent of the time coordinate (by the static assumption).
On each hypersurface of constant , constant and constant (i.e., on each radial line), should only depend on (by spherical symmetry). Hence is a function of a single variable:
A similar argument applied to shows that:
On the hypersurfaces of constant and constant , it is required that the metric be that of a 2-sphere:
Choosing one of these hypersurfaces (the one with radius , say), the metric components restricted to this hypersurface (which we denote by and ) should be unchanged under rotations through and (again, by spherical symmetry). Comparing the forms of the metric on this hypersurface gives:
which immediately yields:
But this is required to hold on each hypersurface; hence,
An alternative intuitive way to see that and must be the same as for a flat spacetime is that stretching or compressing an elastic material in a spherically symmetric manner (radially) will not change the angular distance between two points.
Thus, the metric can be put in the form:
with and as yet undetermined functions of . Note that if or is equal to zero at some point, the metric would be singular at that point.
Using the weak-field approximation to find K and SEdit
This diagram gives the route to find the Schwarzschild solution by using weak field approximation. The equality on the second row gives g44 = -c2 + 2GM/r, assuming the desired solution degenerates to Minkowski metric when the motion happens far away from the blackhole (r approaches to positive infinity).
The geodesics of the metric (obtained where is extremised) must, in some limit (e.g., toward infinite speed of light), agree with the solutions of Newtonian motion (e.g., obtained by Lagrange equations). (The metric must also limit to Minkowski space when the mass it represents vanishes.)
(where is the kinetic energy and is the Potential Energy due to gravity) The constants and are fully determined by some variant of this approach; from the weak-field approximation one arrives at the result:
where is the gravitational constant, is the mass of the gravitational source and is the speed of light. It is found that:
So, the Schwarzschild metric may finally be written in the form:
is the definition of the Schwarzschild radius for an object of mass , so the Schwarzschild metric may be rewritten in the alternative form:
which shows that the metric becomes singular approaching the event horizon (that is, ). The metric singularity is not a physical one (although there is a real physical singularity at ), as can be shown by using a suitable coordinate transformation (e.g. the Kruskal–Szekeres coordinate system).
Alternate derivation using known physics in special casesEdit
The Schwarzschild metric can also be derived using the known physics for a circular orbit and a temporarily stationary point mass. Start with the metric with coefficients that are unknown coefficients of :
Now apply the Euler-Lagrange equation to the arc length integral Since is constant, the integrand can be replaced with because the E-L equation is exactly the same if the integrand is multiplied by any constant. Applying the E-L equation to with the modified integrand yields:
where dot denotes differentiation with respect to
In a circular orbit so the first E-L equation above is equivalent to
since the point mass is negligible compared to the mass of the central body So and integrating this yields where is an unknown constant of integration. can be determined by setting in which case the space-time is flat and So and
When the point mass is temporarily stationary, and The original metric equation becomes and the first E-L equation above becomes When the point mass is temporarily stationary, is the acceleration of gravity, So
The original formulation of the metric uses anisotropic coordinates in which the velocity of light is not the same in the radial and transverse directions. Arthur Eddington gave alternative forms in isotropic coordinates. For isotropic spherical coordinates , , , coordinates and are unchanged, and then (provided )
, , and
Then for isotropic rectangular coordinates , , ,
The metric then becomes, in isotropic rectangular coordinates:
Dispensing with the static assumption - Birkhoff's theoremEdit
In deriving the Schwarzschild metric, it was assumed that the metric was vacuum, spherically symmetric and static. In fact, the static assumption is stronger than required, as Birkhoff's theorem states that any spherically symmetric vacuum solution of Einstein's field equations is stationary; then one obtains the Schwarzschild solution. Birkhoff's theorem has the consequence that any pulsating star which remains spherically symmetric cannot generate gravitational waves (as the region exterior to the star must remain static).
^A S Eddington, "Mathematical Theory of Relativity", Cambridge UP 1922 (2nd ed.1924, repr.1960), at page 85 and page 93. Symbol usage in the Eddington source for interval s and time-like coordinate t has been converted for compatibility with the usage in the derivation above.