Constantine Samuel Rafinesque

Constantine Samuel Rafinesque-Schmaltz (French pronunciation: [kɔ̃stɑ̃tin samɥɛl ʁafinɛsk(ə)ʃmalts]; 22 October 1783 – 18 September 1840) was a French early 19th-century polymath born near Constantinople in the Ottoman Empire and self-educated in France. He traveled as a young man in the United States, ultimately settling in Ohio in 1815, where he made notable contributions to botany, zoology, and the study of prehistoric earthworks in North America. He also contributed to the study of ancient Mesoamerican linguistics, in addition to work he had already completed in Europe.

Constantine Samuel Rafinesque
Constantine Samuel Rafinesque-Schmaltz

(1783-10-22)22 October 1783
Galata, Constantinople, Ottoman Empire
Died18 September 1840(1840-09-18) (aged 56)
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US
Scientific career
Author abbrev. (botany)Raf.

Rafinesque was an eccentric and erratic genius.[1] He was an autodidact, who excelled in various fields of knowledge, as a zoologist, botanist, writer and polyglot. He wrote prolifically on such diverse topics as anthropology, biology, geology, and linguistics, but was honored in none of these fields during his lifetime. Indeed, he was an outcast in the American scientific community and his submissions were automatically rejected by leading journals. Among his theories were that ancestors of Native Americans had migrated by the Bering Sea from Asia to North America,[2][3] and that the Americas were populated by black indigenous peoples at the time of European contact.[4]

Biography edit

Rafinesque was born on 22 October 1783,[5] in Galata, a suburb of Constantinople.[6][7] His father, F. G. Rafinesque, was a French merchant from Marseilles; his mother, M. Schmaltz, was of German descent and born in Constantinople.[6] His father died in Philadelphia about 1793.[8] Rafinesque spent his youth in Marseilles,[6] and was mostly self-educated; he never attended university.[9][10] By the age of 12, he had begun collecting plants for an herbarium.[11] By 14, he had taught himself Greek and Latin because he needed to follow footnotes in the books he was reading in his paternal grandmother's libraries. In 1802, at the age of 19, Rafinesque sailed to Philadelphia in the United States with his younger brother. They traveled through Pennsylvania and Delaware,[7] where he made the acquaintance of most of the young nation's few botanists.[12]

In 1805, Rafinesque returned to Europe with his collection of botanical specimens, and settled in Palermo, Sicily, where he learned Italian.[7][13] He became so successful in trade that he retired by age 25 and devoted his time entirely to natural history. For a time Rafinesque also worked as secretary to the American consul.[13] During his stay in Sicily, he studied plants and fishes,[5] naming many newly discovered species of each. He was elected a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 1808.[14]

Career in the United States edit

Rafinesque had a common-law wife. After their son died in 1815, he left her and returned to the United States. When his ship Union foundered near the coast of Connecticut, he lost all his books (50 boxes) and all his specimens (including more than 60,000 shells).[15] Settling in New York, Rafinesque became a founding member of the newly established Lyceum of Natural History.[16] In 1817, his book Florula Ludoviciana [es] or A Flora of the State of Louisiana was strongly criticized by fellow botanists, which caused his writings to be ignored. By 1818, he had collected and named more than 250 new species of plants and animals. Slowly, he was rebuilding his collection of objects from nature.[citation needed]

In the summer of 1818, in Henderson, Kentucky, Rafinesque made the acquaintance of fellow naturalist John James Audubon, and stayed in Audubon's home for some three weeks. Audubon, although enjoying Rafinesque's company, took advantage of him by practical jokes involving fantastic, made-up species.[17]

In 1819, Rafinesque became professor of botany at Transylvania University in Lexington, Kentucky, where he also gave private lessons in French, Italian, and Spanish.[18] He was loosely associated with John D. Clifford, a merchant who was also interested in the ancient earthworks that remained throughout the Ohio Valley. Clifford conducted archival research, seeking the origins of these mounds, and Rafinesque measured and mapped them. Some had already been lost to American development.[citation needed]

He was elected a member of the American Antiquarian Society in 1820.[19]

Rafinesque started recording all the new species of plants and animals he encountered in travels throughout the state. He was considered an erratic student of higher plants. In the spring of 1826, he left the university[20] after quarreling with its president.[citation needed]

He traveled and lectured in various places, and endeavored to establish a magazine and a botanic garden, but without success. He moved to Philadelphia, a center of publishing and research, without employment. He published The Atlantic Journal and Friend of Knowledge, a Cyclopædic Journal and Review,[21] of which only eight issues were printed (1832–1833). He also gave public lectures and continued publishing, mostly at his own expense.[citation needed]

Death edit

Rafinesque died of stomach and liver cancer in Philadelphia on 18 September 1840.[22] The cancer may have been induced by Rafinesque's self-medication years before with a mixture containing maidenhair fern.[23] He was buried in a plot in what is now Ronaldson's Cemetery.[22] In March 1924, what were thought to be his remains were transported to Transylvania University and reinterred in a tomb under a stone inscribed, "Honor to whom honor is overdue."[24][25]

Work edit

Biology edit

Rafinesque published 6,700 binomial names of plants, many of which have priority over more familiar names.[26] The quantity of new taxa he produced, both plants and animals, has made Rafinesque memorable or even notorious among biologists.[27][28]

The mule deer is one of many species first named by Rafinesque.

Rafinesque applied to join the Lewis and Clark Expedition, but was twice turned down by Thomas Jefferson.[29] After studying the specimens collected by the expedition, he assigned scientific names to the black-tailed prairie dog (Cynomys ludovicianus), the white-footed mouse (Peromyscus leucopus), and the mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus'’).[citation needed]

Evolution edit

Rafinesque was one of the first to use the term "evolution" in the context of biological speciation.[30]

Rafinesque proposed a theory of evolution before Charles Darwin.[31][32] In a letter in 1832, Rafinesque wrote:

The truth is that Species and perhaps Genera also, are forming in organized beings by gradual deviations of shapes, forms and organs, taking place in the lapse of time. There is a tendency to deviations and mutations through plants and animals by gradual steps at remote irregular periods. This is a part of the great universal law of perpetual mutability in everything. Thus it is needless to dispute and differ about new genera, species and varieties. Every variety is a deviation which becomes a species as soon as it is permanent by reproduction. Deviations in essential organs may thus gradually become new genera.[33]

In the third edition of On the Origin of Species published in 1861, Charles Darwin added a Historical Sketch that acknowledged the ideas of Rafinesque.[34][35]

Rafinesque's evolutionary theory appears in a two-page article in the 1833 spring issue of the Atlantic Journal and Friend of Knowledge (a journal founded by himself).[36] Rafinesque held that species are not fixed; they gradually change through time. He used the term "mutations". He believed that evolution had occurred "by gradual steps at remote irregular periods." This has been compared to the concept of punctuated equilibrium.[37] He also held that the same processes apply to humans.[38]

Walam Olum edit

In 1836, Rafinesque published his first volume of The American Nations. This included Walam Olum, a purported migration and creation narrative of the Lenape (also known by English speakers as the Delaware Indians). It told of their migration to the lands around the Delaware River. Rafinesque claimed he had obtained wooden tablets engraved and painted with indigenous pictographs, together with a transcription in the Lenape language. Based on this, he produced an English translation of the tablets' contents. Rafinesque claimed the original tablets and transcription were later lost, leaving his notes and transcribed copy as the only record of evidence.[citation needed]

For over a century after Rafinesque's publication, the Walam Olum was widely accepted by ethnohistorians as authentically Native American in origin, but as early as 1849, when the document was republished by Ephraim G. Squier, Henry Rowe Schoolcraft, an ethnologist who had worked extensively in Michigan and related territories, wrote to Squier saying that he believed the document might be fraudulent.[39] In the 1950s, the Indiana Historical Society published a "retranslation" of the Walam Olum, as "a worthy subject for students of aboriginal culture".[40]

Since the late 20th century, studies especially in linguistic, ethnohistorical, archaeological, and textual analyses suggest that the Walam Olum account was largely or entirely a fabrication. Scholars have described its record of "authentic Lenape traditional migration stories" as spurious.[41] After the publication in 1995 of David Oestreicher's thesis, The Anatomy of the Walam Olum: A 19th Century Anthropological Hoax, many scholars concurred with his analysis. They concluded that Rafinesque had been either the perpetrator, or perhaps the victim, of a hoax.[41] Other scholars, writers, and some among the Lenape continue to find the account plausible and support its authenticity.[41]

Study of prehistoric cultures edit

Examples of calculating the value of Mayan numerals

Rafinesque made a notable contribution to North American prehistory with his studies of ancient earthworks of the Adena and Hopewell cultures, especially in the Ohio Valley. He was the first to identify these as the "Ancient Monuments of America". He listed more than 500 such archaeological sites in Ohio and Kentucky.[42] Rafinesque never excavated;[43] rather, he recorded the sites visited by careful measurements, sketches, and written descriptions. Only a few of his descriptions were published, with his friend John D. Clifford's series "Indian Antiquities", eight long letters in Lexington's short-lived Western Review and Miscellaneous Magazine (1819–1820).[44] Clifford died suddenly in 1820, ending his contributions.[citation needed]

Rafinesque's work was used by others. For instance, he identified 148 ancient earthworks sites in Kentucky. All sites in Kentucky that were included by E. G. Squier and Davis in their notable Ancient Monuments of the Mississippi Valley (1848), completed for the Smithsonian Institution, were first identified by Rafinesque in his manuscripts.[45]

Rafinesque also made contributions to Mesoamerican studies. The latter were based on linguistic data, which he extracted from printed sources, mostly those of travelers. He designated as Taino, the ancient language of the Caribbean island of Hispaniola.[46] Others later also used the term to identify the ethnicity of indigenous Caribbean peoples.[citation needed]

Although mistaken in his presumption that the ancient Maya script was alphabetical in nature, Rafinesque was probably first to insist that studying modern Mayan languages could lead to deciphering the ancient script. In 1832, he was the first to partly decipher ancient Maya. He explained that its bar-and-dot symbols represent fives and ones, respectively.[47][48][49]

The genus Rafinesquia was named in Rafinesque's honor.

Legacy edit

According to historian George Daniels, Rafinesque was a brilliant but erratic naturalist who roamed the American wilderness. His style was offputting to the emerging professionalization of science and achievements were controversial at the time and by historians ever since. By 1820 he was virtually an outcast in the scientific community as all the important publications rejected his submissions. The two leading American scientists of the day Benjamin Silliman and Asa Gray were harshly critical. Modern historians agree that Rafinesque was often hasty, and tried to claim credit properly due to other researchers. Scientists were troubled that his theory of evolution – long before Darwin – seemed to be based more on his speculation and exaggerations than on solid research. Despite all his faults, says Daniels, "he made enormous contributions to the natural history phase of American science...with the establishment of 34 genera and 24 species of American fishes." He was also a brilliant teacher at Transylvania University.[50]

Published works edit

Atlantic Journal (1832–1833)

In popular culture edit

John Jeremiah Sullivan's essay La-Hwi-Ne-Ski: Career of an Eccentric Naturalist, which appears in his 2011 collection, Pulphead, chronicles the life and times of Rafinesque.

Correspondence edit

See also edit

References edit

  1. ^ Flannery 1998
  2. ^ Long 2005
  3. ^ Gilbert 1999
  4. ^ Rafinesque 1833, p. 85.
  5. ^ a b Belyi 1997
  6. ^ a b c Fitzpatrick 1911, p. 11
  7. ^ a b c Wilson, J. G.; Fiske, J., eds. (1900). "Rafinesque, Constantine Samuel" . Appletons' Cyclopædia of American Biography. New York: D. Appleton.
  8. ^ Fitzpatrick 1911, p. 12
  9. ^ Discovering Lewis & Clark: biography of Rafinesque Archived 31 December 2013 at the Wayback Machine; accessed : 17 November 2010
  10. ^ "The oddest of characters" Archived 8 January 2009 at the Wayback Machine, American Heritage, April 1985; accessed 17 November 2010.
  11. ^ Fitzpatrick 1911, p. 13
  12. ^ Fitzpatrick 1911, pp. 15–17
  13. ^ a b Fitzpatrick 1911, p. 19
  14. ^ "Book of Members, 1780–2010: Chapter R" (PDF). American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Retrieved 9 September 2016.
  15. ^ Rafinesque, C. S. (1836). Life of Travels. pp. 46–49. Cited in Fitzpatrick 1911, pp. 21–22.
  16. ^ Fitzpatrick 1911, pp. 22–24
  17. ^ Rhodes 2004, pp. 133–135.
  18. ^ Fitzpatrick 1911, pp. 27–28
  19. ^ "MemberListR". Retrieved 17 September 2017.
  20. ^ Fitzpatrick 1911, p. 34
  21. ^ Fitzpatrick 1911, p. 38
  22. ^ a b Fitzpatrick 1911, p. 42
  23. ^ Ambrose 2010b
  24. ^ Boewe 1987
  25. ^ Barefoot 2004, p. 78
  26. ^ Boewe 2005, p. 1
  27. ^ Boewe 2005, p. 2
  28. ^ Payne, Ansel (7 April 2016). "Why Do Taxonomists Write the Meanest Obituaries?". Nautilus. Archived from the original on 2 November 2019. Retrieved 17 September 2017.
  29. ^ Warren 2004, p. 98
  30. ^ Örstan 2014.
  31. ^ Weslager 1989, p. 85.
  32. ^ Rothenberg 2012, p. 466.
  33. ^ Warren 2004, p. 31.
  34. ^ Darwin 1861, p. xv.
  35. ^ Ambrose 2010a.
  36. ^ Rafinesque, C.S. (Spring 1833). "Principles of the Philosophy of New Genera and new species of Plants and Animals". Atlantic Journal and Friend of Knowledge: 163–164.
  37. ^ Chambers 1992.
  38. ^ Rafinesque, C.S. (Summer 1833). "Complexions of Mankind &c." Atlantic Journal and Friend of Knowledge: 172–173.
  39. ^ Jackson & Rose 2009
  40. ^ Walam Olum: or, Red Score, The Migration Legend of the Lenni Lenape or Delaware Indians. See Voegelin 1954
  41. ^ a b c Oestreicher 2005
  42. ^ Warren 2004, p. 91
  43. ^ Boewe 2000, p. xxiii
  44. ^ Clifford & Rafinesque 2000.
  45. ^ Boewe 2000, p. xxv
  46. ^ Hulme 1993
  47. ^ Rafinesque 1832, pp. 42:"This page of Demotic has letters and numbers, these represented by strokes meaning 5 and dots meaning unities as the dots never exceed 4."
  48. ^ Houston, Stuart & Chinchilla Mazariegos 2001, p. 45
  49. ^ Chaddha 2008
  50. ^ George H. Daniels, "Rafinesque, Constantine Samuel" in John A. Garraty, Encyclopedia of American Biography (1974) pp 886–887.
  51. ^ Nations, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United (1 August 2020). Identification guide to the mesopelagic fishes of the central and south east Atlantic Ocean. Food & Agriculture Org. ISBN 9789251330944 – via Google Books.
  52. ^ Beidleman 2006, p. 139
  53. ^ Morhardt & Morhardt 2004, p. 71
  54. ^ Meyer & Davis 2009, p. 272
  55. ^ Fitzpatrick 1911, p. 158.
  56. ^ Fitzpatrick 1911, p. 197.
  57. ^ Fitzpatrick 1911, p. 200.

Bibliography edit

Further reading edit

External links edit