- It can be used to describe the difference between two proportions as "small", "medium", or "large".
- It can be used to determine if the difference between two proportions is "meaningful".
- It can be used in calculating the sample size for a future study.
When measuring differences between proportions, Cohen's h can be used in conjunction with hypothesis testing. A "statistically significant" difference between two proportions is understood to mean that, given the data, it is likely that there is a difference in the population proportions. However, this difference might be too small to be meaningful—the statistically significant result does not tell us the size of the difference. Cohen's h, on the other hand, quantifies the size of the difference, allowing us to decide if the difference is meaningful.
Researchers have used Cohen's h as follows.
- Describe the differences in proportions using the rule of thumb criteria set out by Cohen. Namely, h = 0.2 is a "small" difference, h = 0.5 is a "medium" difference, and h = 0.8 is a "large" difference.
- Only discuss differences that have h greater than some threshold value, such as 0.2.
- When the sample size is so large that many differences are likely to be statistically significant, Cohen's h identifies "meaningful", "clinically meaningful", or "practically significant" differences.
Given a probability or proportion p, between 0 and 1, its "arcsine transformation" is
Given two proportions, and , h is defined as the difference between their arcsine transformations. Namely,
This is also sometimes called "directional h" because, in addition to showing the magnitude of the difference, it shows which of the two proportions is greater.
Often, researchers mean "nondirectional h", which is just the absolute value of the directional h:
- h = 0.20: "small effect size".
- h = 0.50: "medium effect size".
- h = 0.80: "large effect size".
Cohen cautions that:
As before, the reader is counseled to avoid the use of these conventions, if he can, in favor of exact values provided by theory or experience in the specific area in which he is working.
Nevertheless, many researchers do use these conventions as given.
Sample size calculationEdit
|This section is empty. You can help by adding to it. (June 2015)|
- Cohen, Jacob (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.).
- Yu, Xiaonan; et al. (2012). "The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for measuring depressive symptoms among the general population in Hong Kong". Comprehensive Psychiatry. 53: 95–102. doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2010.11.002.
- Titus, Janet C.; et al. (February 2008). "Characteristics of Youths With Hearing Loss Admitted to Substance Abuse Treatment". Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education. 13: 336–350. doi:10.1093/deafed/enm068.
- Reavley, Nicola J.; et al. (2012). "Stigmatising attitudes towards people with mental disorders: Changes in Australia over 8 years". Psychiatry Research. 197: 302–306. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2012.01.011.
- Yap, Marie Bee Hui; et al. (2012). "Intentions and helpfulness beliefs about first aid responses for young people with mental disorders: Findings from two Australian national surveys of youth". Journal of Affective Disorders. 136: 430–442. PMID 22137764. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2011.11.006.
- Champely, Stephane (2015). "pwr: Basic Functions for Power Analysis".