Open main menu

Wikipedia β

A large circular, white building; a slanted, glass overhang protects people walking around the plaza in front of the building's entrance below. A large banner above the entrance reads "ROAD TO THE NIPPON CHAMPIONS".
The Tokyo Dome, home of the Yomiuri Giants, was a host stadium for the inaugural Central League Climax Series.

The Climax Series (クライマックスシリーズ, Kuraimakkusu Shirīzu) is the annual playoff system employed by Japan's Nippon Professional Baseball (NPB). It determines which two teams from the Central League (CL) and the Pacific League (PL) will compete in the Japan Series for the national championship. Since the creation of the NPB's two-league system in 1950, the leagues have used several different methods to determine entry to the Japan Series. The current system has been used since the 2007 season.

Both leagues play a 143-game regular season, after which the top three teams in each league compete against one another in a two-stage playoff. In the First Stage, the teams that finish the regular season with the second- and third-best records play one another in a best-of-three series. The winners of these three-game series advance to the Final Stage to face each league's regular-season champion in a six-game series, which the regular-season champion starts with a one-game advantage. The winners of each league's Final Stage series compete against one another in that year's Japan Series.

Contents

HistoryEdit

Since the creation of the NPB's two-league system, the regular-season winner of the CL had always advanced to the Japan Series, where it competed against the PL champion. The PL used the same system until 1973, when the league created NPB's only postseason play prior to 2004 (other than the Japan Series). This system matched the team with the best first-half record against the team with the best second-half record. The winner of this best-of-five series advanced to the Japan Series, where they played against the CL champion.[1][2] This system proved problematic when the Hankyu Braves won both the first and second halves of the 1976 and 1978 seasons, making a playoff series unnecessary. The system was eliminated after the 1982 season.[2] Instead, the PL announced the following season that the first- and second-place teams would compete in a best-of-five playoff series after the 130-game regular season if five or fewer games separated the two teams. Unpopular with most baseball media and fans, the idea was scrapped after three seasons with a series never needing to be played.[2] The two leagues returned to sending the team with the best regular season record in their respective league to compete against each other in the championship series.[3]

Pacific League playoffsEdit

It's stupid for the other league to be operating under a different system. If we win the C.L. pennant next year, we'll boycott the [Japan] Series.
Tsuneo Watanabe, the owner of the Yomiuri Giants[2]

In February 2003, the PL board of directors agreed to reintroduce a playoff system to be used for the 2004 NPB season.[4] If a first-place team had a substantial lead in the standings nearing the end of the regular season, there was no pennant (league champion) race and little excitement until the Japan Series began.[3] The decision to add a PL playoff was an attempt to rectify this problem and increase the league's popularity.[4] The new postseason plan initiated a two-stage playoff in which the top three PL teams competed. In the First Stage, the teams that finished the newly shortened, 135-game regular season with the second- and third-best records played each other in a best-of-three series. The winner of this series faced the league's top finisher in the second final stage. The Final Stage winner advanced to the Japan Series, where they competed against the CL's Climax Series champion team.

Originally, the top finisher in the league at the end of the season was supposed to receive home-field advantage throughout the Final Stage, but in August 2003, PL officials announced that if the first-place team led the second-place team by more than five games at the end of the regular season, that team would also receive a one-game winning advantage in the Final Stage's best-of-five series.[5] For the 2006 season, PL officials removed the five-game lead requirement in favor of automatically awarding the first-place team the one-win advantage. In conjunction with this change, the first-place team no longer had home-field advantage for the entirety of the Final Stage; instead, the remaining four games were to be split evenly between both teams' stadiums.[6] This rule change became a non-factor after the eventual first-place Hokkaido Nippon-Ham Fighters clinched a Japan Series berth in two straight games.

During the three years of the PL's playoff system, the winner of the PL's postseason tournament competed against the CL team who finished the regular season with the best record.[7] The disparity between the two leagues' postseasons provoked some criticism from baseball analysts and insiders. During the 2005 Japan Series, The Japan Times' Stephen Ellsesser called NPB's unbalanced postseason a "bad system" and believed that the CL's decision to not implement a playoff system of their own was "foolish".[8] Citing the Hanshin Tigers' poor Japan Series performance, he speculated that the CL's lack of postseason play was a disadvantage. Ellsesser believed that the 17 days between their last regular-season game and the first Japan Series game did nothing to prepare the Tigers for the eventual championship series against the Chiba Lotte Marines, who had played continuously.[8] Like Ellsesser, after seeing the "excitement" that the 2004 PL Playoffs caused, then-Marines manager Bobby Valentine was "incredulous that the Central League didn’t follow suit" and create a playoff series of their own.[9]

Climax Series creationEdit

We stuck with the principle of not having playoffs for a long time, but it's true that the playoffs in the Pacific League have had positive effects. We've decided to add some thrills and excitement to the postseason.
—Hajime Toyokura, Central League President[1]

The CL had situational playoff scenarios written into its bylaws that required either a tie in the standings or a team with more wins finishing with a worse winning percentage than the top team, but a permanent playoff plan had never been created.[8] In March 2006, encouraged by the success of the PL's playoff series, CL officials announced their intention to introduce postseason playoffs for the 2007 season to help boost declining attendance.[1] During meetings held later that year, PL and CL officials disagreed over proposed plans detailing the new playoff system. Since the creation of the PL playoffs in 2004, the league awarded its pennant titles to the playoff winners rather than the team who finished the regular season with the best record.[10] The PL disapproved of the CL's intentions to continue awarding their league title to the first-place finisher in the regular season while using the playoffs to determine which team would compete against in the Japan Series, as the PL had been awarding its pennant to its playoff champion.[11]

In September 2006, both leagues agreed on a unified postseason system.[10] The CL implemented a playoff system identical to the PL's, and the entire playoff series was dubbed the "Climax Series".[3] The PL agreed to name the regular season first-place finishers league champions rather than the team that won the leagues' respective playoffs—a reversal from the previous three seasons.[10] It was decided that both leagues would play 144 regular-season games, the first time both leagues would play the same number of games since the PL introduced its playoff system in 2004.[12] The two leagues agreed that neither regular-season champion should receive a one-game advantage in the Final Stage of the Climax Series, claiming that it was unnecessary from a business point of view.[13] This decision was overturned when each league awarded its champion a one-win advantage in the Final Stage starting with the 2008 Climax Series. At the same time, the series changed from a best-of-five series and became a best-of-six series, where the first team to win four games advances to the Japan Series.[14]

Current formatEdit

Both leagues employ the same two-series playoff format, with the top three teams from each league participating in their own two-stage playoff. If two teams vying for a third Climax Series spot finish the regular season with identical records, the team that finished the previous season with a better record is allowed to advance to the playoffs, unless if both teams finished with the same previous season record.[15] The First Stage is a best-of-three series involving the regular season's second- and third-place finishers, with all games played at the second-place team's home field. The winner of this series goes on to face the league's pennant-winner in the Final Stage. This series is best-of-six. The league champion is awarded a one-win advantage as well as home field advantage for the entire series, unlike most professional leagues where a 5-game playoff series runs 2-2-1 or 2-3 or a 7-game playoff series that runs 2-3-2 with the higher seed receiving the extra game. The winning teams advance to the Japan Series, where they compete against one another. Unlike MLB, NPB games may end in a tie if there is no winner after 12 innings of play. If a Climax Series game results in a tie, the win is credited to neither team. If this causes the series to end in a tie, the team who finished higher in the regular-season standings advances, unless if both teams finished with the same regular-season record. If both teams finished with the same regular season record, the team who won the most matches against the other team will advance.[16]

First Stage Final Stage Japan Series


Central League  
CL first-place team  
CL second-place team  
Winner of CL First Stage    
CL third-place team  
  Winner of CL Final Stage
 
Pacific League   Winner of PL Final Stage
PL first-place team
PL second-place team  
Winner of PL First Stage  
PL third-place team  

ResultsEdit

First Stage
Year League Winning team Games Losing team Ref
2007 Central League Chunichi Dragons 2–0 Hanshin Tigers [17]
2007 Pacific League Chiba Lotte Marines 2–1 Fukuoka SoftBank Hawks [18]
2008 Central League Chunichi Dragons 2–1 Hanshin Tigers [19]
2008 Pacific League Hokkaido Nippon-Ham Fighters 2–0 Orix Buffaloes [20]
2009 Central League Chunichi Dragons 2–1 Tokyo Yakult Swallows [21]
2009 Pacific League Tohoku Rakuten Golden Eagles 2–0 Fukuoka SoftBank Hawks [22]
2010 Central League Yomiuri Giants 2–0 Hanshin Tigers
2010 Pacific League Chiba Lotte Marines 2–0 Saitama Seibu Lions
2011 Central League Tokyo Yakult Swallows 2–1 Yomiuri Giants
2011 Pacific League Saitama Seibu Lions 2–0 Hokkaido Nippon-Ham Fighters
2012 Central League Chunichi Dragons 2–1 Tokyo Yakult Swallows
2012 Pacific League Fukuoka SoftBank Hawks 2–1 Saitama Seibu Lions
2013 Central League Hiroshima Toyo Carp 2–0 Hanshin Tigers
2013 Pacific League Chiba Lotte Marines 2–1 Saitama Seibu Lions
2014 Central League Hanshin Tigers 1–0 Hiroshima Carp
2014 Pacific League Hokkaido Nippon-Ham Fighters 2–1 Orix Buffaloes
2015 Central League Yomiuri Giants 2–1 Hanshin Tigers
2015 Pacific League Chiba Lotte Marines 2–1 Hokkaido Nippon-Ham Fighters
2016 Central League Yokohama DeNA BayStars 2–1 Yomiuri Giants
2016 Pacific League Fukuoka SoftBank Hawks 2–0 Chiba Lotte Marines
2017 Central League Yokohama DeNA BayStars 2–1 Hanshin Tigers
2017 Pacific League Tohoku Rakuten Golden Eagles 2–1 Saitama Seibu Lions
Final Stage
Year League Winning team Games Losing team Ref
2007 Central League Chunichi Dragons 4–0 Yomiuri Giants [23]
2007 Pacific League Hokkaido Nippon-Ham Fighters 4–2 Chiba Lotte Marines [24]
2008 Central League Yomiuri Giants 4–1 Chunichi Dragons [25]
2008 Pacific League Saitama Seibu Lions 4–2 Hokkaido Nippon-Ham Fighters [26]
2009 Central League Yomiuri Giants 4–1 Chunichi Dragons [27]
2009 Pacific League Hokkaido Nippon-Ham Fighters 4–1 Tohoku Rakuten Golden Eagles [28]
2010 Central League Chunichi Dragons 4–1 Yomiuri Giants
2010 Pacific League Chiba Lotte Marines 4–3 Fukuoka SoftBank Hawks
2011 Central League Chunichi Dragons 4–2 Tokyo Yakult Swallows
2011 Pacific League Fukuoka SoftBank Hawks 4–0 Saitama Seibu Lions
2012 Central League Yomiuri Giants 4–3 Chunichi Dragons
2012 Pacific League Hokkaido Nippon-Ham Fighters 4–0 Fukuoka SoftBank Hawks
2013 Central League Yomiuri Giants 4–0 Hiroshima Toyo Carp
2013 Pacific League Tohoku Rakuten Golden Eagles 4–1 Chiba Lotte Marines
2014 Central League Hanshin Tigers 4–1 Yomiuri Giants
2014 Pacific League Fukuoka SoftBank Hawks 4–3 Hokkaido Nippon-Ham Fighters
2015 Central League Tokyo Yakult Swallows 4–1 Yomiuri Giants
2015 Pacific League Fukuoka SoftBank Hawks 4–0 Chiba Lotte Marines
2016 Central League Hiroshima Toyo Carp 4–1 Yokohama DeNA BayStars
2016 Pacific League Hokkaido Nippon-Ham Fighters 4–2 Fukuoka SoftBank Hawks
2017 Central League Yokohama DeNA BayStars 4–2 Hiroshima Toyo Carp
2017 Pacific League Fukuoka SoftBank Hawks 4–2 Tohoku Rakuten Golden Eagles

Reaction and receptionEdit

After being implemented for the 2007 season, the Climax Series drew mixed reviews.

The tiebreaker that determines which team moves on to the Climax Series in the event that two teams end the regular season with the same record has drawn criticism. Currently, the team that finished higher in the league standings the previous season holds the advantage. This contrasts with Major League Baseball (MLB), which employs a one-game playoff, or other professional leagues that may use head-to-head season records (and further tiebreakers such as non-interleague play records, second half records, et al.).[15] Former Hiroshima Carp bench coach Jeff Livesey explained that his team was actually a full game further behind the Hanshin Tigers than the standings showed because unlike the Tigers, the Carp could not enter the Climax Series in the event of a tie. Former player Scott McClain believes that "[the tiebreaker] should have nothing to do with last year," pointing out that players and managers change from year to year. The Japan Times columnist Wayne Graczyk has suggested that this format be scrapped in favor of MLB's one-game playoff.[29]

The most criticized aspect of the Climax Series is the one-game advantage that is awarded to the regular-season champions for the Final Stage. When the rule was implemented the for the 2008 Climax Series, many players reacted negatively with some describing the rule as "unfair", "bad", "bull" and "messed up". Former player and current manager Alex Ramírez, however, believed that the league champion deserves the advantage.[3] The Japan Times columnist Jason Coskrey believes that the "phantom win" gives the pennant winner too much of an advantage. According to him, the First Stage bye plus all home games during the Final Stage should be advantage enough for the top-seeded team.[30] He describes the situation as NPB "trying to have its cake and eat it too" by trying to reap the benefits of a playoff system while also trying to maintain the traditional showdown of pennant winners in the Japan Series.[31]

In 2017, the Series again drew criticism, this time for allowing games to be called early because of weather and treating them as official games. After the Yokohama BayStars lost a 5-inning game in the 2017 Central League Climax Series, Coskrey wrote that playoff games should never end like in that manner. He suggested that NPB could have easily suspended the game and resumed where it left off the next day or even postponed the game entirely until the next day.[32]

See alsoEdit

ReferencesEdit

  1. ^ a b c "Central League to add playoffs". The Japan Times. March 8, 2006. Retrieved November 11, 2009. 
  2. ^ a b c d Kuehnert, Marty (July 16, 2003). "Giants' owner should be more understanding of P.L". The Japan Times. Retrieved November 15, 2009. 
  3. ^ a b c d Graczyk, Wayne (October 26, 2008). "Taking a look at the one-game advantage in the Climax Series". The Japan Times. Retrieved November 11, 2009. 
  4. ^ a b "PL plans to bring back playoffs". Kyodo News. The Japan Times. February 20, 2003. Retrieved November 11, 2009. 
  5. ^ "PL announces format change". The Japan Times. August 8, 2003. Retrieved November 11, 2009. 
  6. ^ Graczyk, Wayne (October 1, 2006). "Clearing up any confusion about the Pa League playoffs". The Japan Times. Retrieved November 11, 2009. 
  7. ^ Ellsesser, Stephen (October 21, 2005). "Lotte Marines ready to tackle some unfinished business in Japan Series". The Japan Times. Retrieved November 11, 2009. 
  8. ^ a b c Ellsesser, Stephen (October 25, 2005). "Tigers learning a tough postseason lesson". The Japan Times. Retrieved November 11, 2009. 
  9. ^ "Agreeing to disagree". The Japan Times. March 25, 2005. Retrieved October 4, 2017. 
  10. ^ a b c "CL to follow PL playoff model". The Japan Times. September 5, 2006. Retrieved November 11, 2009. 
  11. ^ "PL officials frown at CL's playoff plan". The Japan Times. May 10, 2006. Retrieved November 11, 2009. 
  12. ^ "Interleague, playoff plans agreed". The Japan Times. August 25, 2006. Retrieved November 12, 2009. 
  13. ^ "CL, PL scupper one-game edge". Kyodo News. The Japan Times. December 22, 2006. Retrieved November 12, 2009. 
  14. ^ "Climax Series schedules announced". Kyodo News. The Japan Times. March 19, 2008. Retrieved November 13, 2009. 
  15. ^ a b Graczyk, Wayne (October 18, 2009). "Time for NPB to get its act together on regular-season schedule". The Japan Times. Retrieved November 12, 2009. 
  16. ^ "Giants, Dragons play to stalemate". Kyodo News. The Japan Times. October 25, 2008. Retrieved November 17, 2009. 
  17. ^ Odeven, Ed (October 16, 2007). "Woods: Dragons fire at perfect time". The Japan Times. Retrieved March 12, 2010. 
  18. ^ Coskrey, Jason (October 11, 2007). "Omura, Naruse lift Marines in series clincher". The Japan Times. Retrieved March 12, 2010. 
  19. ^ Coskrey, Jason (October 21, 2008). "Late Woods homer gives Dragons win". The Japan Times. Retrieved March 12, 2010. 
  20. ^ Coskrey, Jason (October 13, 2008). "Fighters sweep Orix". The Japan Times. Retrieved March 12, 2010. 
  21. ^ "Dragons advance to second stage". Kyodo News. The Japan Times. October 20, 2009. Retrieved March 12, 2010. 
  22. ^ Coskrey, Jason (October 18, 2008). "Eagles sweep Hawks". The Japan Times. Retrieved March 12, 2010. 
  23. ^ Coskrey, Jason (October 21, 2007). "Dragons earn return trip to Japan Series". The Japan Times. Retrieved March 12, 2010. 
  24. ^ Coskrey, Jason (October 19, 2007). "Fighters move to Japan Series". The Japan Times. Retrieved March 12, 2010. 
  25. ^ Coskrey, Jason (October 26, 2008). "Giants advance to Japan Series". The Japan Times. Retrieved March 12, 2010. 
  26. ^ Nagatsuka, Kaz (October 23, 2008). "Wakui-led Lions nab spot in Japan Series". The Japan Times. Retrieved March 12, 2010. 
  27. ^ Coskrey, Jason (October 25, 2009). "Giants crush Dragons in series finale". The Japan Times. Retrieved March 12, 2010. 
  28. ^ Nagatsuka, Kaz (October 25, 2009). "Sledge, Fighters end Rakuten's season". The Japan Times. Retrieved March 12, 2010. 
  29. ^ Graczyk, Wayne (October 8, 2009). "Time for NPB to get its act together on regular-season schedule". The Japan Times. Retrieved October 27, 2017. 
  30. ^ Coskrey, Jason (October 15, 2015). "Time for NPB to rethink senseless playoff format". The Japan Times. Retrieved October 27, 2017. 
  31. ^ Coskrey, Jason (October 21, 2013). "Lower seeds face stacked deck during NPB's Climax Series". The Japan Times. Retrieved October 27, 2017. 
  32. ^ Coskrey, Jason (October 19, 2017). "Farcical finish in Hiroshima robs BayStars of fair chance to compete". The Japan Times. Retrieved October 27, 2017.