Climate-related security risks have far-reaching implications for the way the world manages peace and security. Climate security is a concept that summons the idea that climate-related change amplifies existing risks in society that endangers the security of humans, ecosystems, economy, infrastructure and societies. Also climate actions to adapt and mitigate impacts can have a negative effect on human security if mishandled.
- 1 General
- 2 Academia
- 3 Climate change
- 4 Adaptation
- 5 Political discourse
- 6 Culture
- 7 See also
- 8 References
- 9 External links
Climate security refers to the security risks induced, directly or indirectly, by changes in climate patterns. The Global Risks Report 2019 by the World Economic Forum, cited climate change among the most concerning issues. As part of the report a survey cited extreme weather, lack of climate action and natural disasters as the main three problems. The 2017 Global Catastrophic Risks report, issued by the Global Challenges Foundation, highlighted a broad range of security-related topics, among them climate change, and concluded that global warming has a high likelihood to end civilization. The Global Security Defense Index on climate change evaluates the extents of governments in considering climate change to be a national security issue. Policy interest in climate security risks has grown rapidly and affects the policy agenda in relation to, among other questions, food and energy security, migration policy, and diplomatic efforts. Recognizing that the impact of climate change is spread unevenly across different regions, it remains clear that this is a global challenge which will affect all countries in the long-term. However, there may a disproportional effect in fragile contexts and/or socially vulnerable and marginalized groups.
The 2018 Worldwide Threat Assessment report states:
The past 115 years have been the warmest period in the history of modern civilization, and the past few years have been the warmest years on record. Extreme weather events in a warmer world have the potential for greater impacts and can compound with other drivers to raise the risk of humanitarian disasters, conflict, water and food shortages, population migration, labor shortfalls, price shocks, and power outages. Research has not identified indicators of tipping points in climate-linked Earth systems, suggesting a possibility of abrupt climate change.
Within academia, climate security is part of environmental security and was first mentioned in the Brundtland Report in 1987. Thirty years later, experts and scientists in fields as politics, diplomacy, environment and security have used this concept in an increasing frequency. Climate security refers to the security risks induced, directly or indirectly, by changes in the natural climate. There is high agreement that climate change intimidates security where the term ‘security’ can refer to a broad range of securities involving national, international and Human Security. Human Security is the most fragile as it can be compromised in order to protect national or international security.
Scholars analysing conflicts with a climate security rendering have long argued that climate change can adversely affect security and international stability. Research has examined ‘indirect pathways between climate stress and conflict’ — through factors like economic growth, food price shock and forced displacement apart from other types of shock such as: income and livelihood shock (with the accompanying caveats in the table). Climate change can threaten human security by impacting economic growth, food price stock, undermining livelihoods, and prompting displacement. Moreover, there has been reports of collapse of pastoral societies, terrorist groups seeking recruits in dehydrated lands, and flooding ultimately feeding anti-government sentiments. Unstable regions appear to be incapable of surviving climate change-related stresses; instead creating fertile soil for radicalisation, poverty and violent conflict. Scholars of climate security can analyse the chronological order of an escalation, where a changing environment or climate change can be an underlying variable. It is a complex interplay of many political and socio-economical factors where climate change is considered a risk- or threat-multiplier.
During the 70's and 80's the Jason advisory group, concerned with security, conducted research on climate change. Climate change has been identified as a threat multiplier, which can exacerbate existing threats. A 2013 meta-analysis of 60 previous peer-reviewed studies, and 45 data sets concluded that, "climate change intensifies natural resource stresses in a way that can increase the likelihood of livelihood devastation, state fragility, human displacement, and mass death."
In the 2014 Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR), The Pentagon stated: "The QDR will set a long-term course for DOD as it assesses the threats and challenges that the nation faces and re-balances DOD’s strategies, capabilities, and forces to address today’s conflicts and tomorrow’s threats." and " "As greenhouse gas emissions increase, sea levels are rising, average global temperatures are increasing, and severe weather patterns are accelerating [...] Climate change may exacerbate water scarcity and lead to sharp increases in food costs. The pressures caused by climate change will influence resource competition while placing additional burdens on economies, societies, and governance institutions around the world. These effects are threat multipliers that will aggravate stressors abroad such as poverty, environmental degradation, political instability, and social tensions – conditions that can enable terrorist activity and other forms of violence."  Climate scientist Michael E. Mann stated in his commentary to the 2018 global heat wave that climate change is a national security nightmare.
A report in 2003 by Peter Schwartz and Doug Randall, looked at potential implications from climate-related scenarios for the national security of the United States, and concluded, "We have created a climate change scenario that although not the most likely, is plausible, and would challenge United States national security in ways that should be considered immediately." Among the findings were:
"There is a possibility that this gradual global warming could lead to a relatively abrupt slowing of the ocean's thermohaline conveyor, which could lead to harsher winter weather conditions, sharply reduced soil moisture, and more intense winds in certain regions that currently provide a significant fraction of the world's food production. With inadequate preparation, the result could be a significant drop in the human carrying capacity of the Earth's environment."
Researchers studying ancient climate patterns (paleoclimatology) noted in a 2007 study:
We show that long-term fluctuations of war frequency and population changes followed the cycles of temperature change. Further analyses show that cooling impeded agricultural production, which brought about a series of serious social problems, including price inflation, then successively war outbreak, famine, and population decline.
A 2013 review by the U.S. National Research Council assessed the implications of abrupt climate change, including implications for the physical climate system, natural systems, or human systems. The authors noted, "A key characteristic of these changes is that they can come faster than expected, planned, or budgeted for, forcing more reactive, rather than proactive, modes of behavior." A 2018 meta study cited cascading tipping elements, which could trigger self-reinforcing feedbacks that progress even when man-made emissions are reduced, and which could eventually establish a new hothouse climate state. The authors noted, "If the threshold is crossed, the resulting trajectory would likely cause serious disruptions to ecosystems, society, and economies." 
Studies identified uptake in mortality due to extreme heat waves. Extreme heat conditions can overcome the human capacity to thermo regulate; future scenarios with rising emissions could expose about 74% of the world population for at least twenty days per year to lethal heat events.
- Direct - "Acute or traumatic effects of extreme weather events and a changed environment"
- Indirect - "Threats to emotional well-being based on observation of impacts and concern or uncertainty about future risks"
- Psychosocial - "Chronic social and community effects of heat, drought, migrations, and climate-related conflicts, and postdisaster adjustment"
Consequences of psychosocial impacts caused by climate change include: increase in violence, intergroup conflict, displacement and relocation and socioeconomic disparities. Based on research, there is a causal relationship between heat and violence and that any increase in average global temperature is likely to be accompanied by an increase in violent aggression.
Since climate change has serious and broad implications for societies and human livelihoods, the potential security consequences are far-reaching and complex. The topic started to receive major attention in 2007 when the Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to Al Gore and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) for their efforts to mitigate climate change. In the same year, the UN Security Council held its first debate on climate change and security, with follow-up debates on the topic in 2012, 2018 and 2019. In an early study on the topic, the German Advisory Council on Global Change identified four pathways potentially connecting climate change to conflict: degradation of freshwater resources, food insecurity, an increasing frequency and intensity of natural disasters, and increasing or changing migration patterns. These factors can increase the risk of violent conflict either by changing opportunity structures for violence (e.g., when states are weakened or deprived individuals can be recruited by armed groups more easily) or by raising grievances of the affected populations.
In a 2016 article, published by the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, the author suggested that conflict over climate-related water issues could lead to nuclear conflict, involving Kashmir, India and Pakistan. However, the large majority of researchers consider an impact of climate change on interstate wars highly unlikely, but are more concerned about civil wars and especially communal conflicts. Based on a meta-analysis of 60 studies, Hsiang, Burke and Miguel conclude that warmer temperatures and more extreme rainfall could increase interpersonal violence by 4%, and intergroup conflict by 14% (median estimates). However, their results have been strongly disputed by other researchers and are not sufficiently robust to alternative model specifications. Recent studies have been more careful and agree that climate-related disasters (including heatwaves, droughts, storms and floods) modestly increase armed conflict risks, but only in the presence of contextual factors like agricultural dependence, insufficient infrastructure or ethnic heterogeneity. Climate change is therefore rather a "risk multiplier" that amplifies existing risks of conflict. In line with this and other reviews of the topic, an expert assessment published 2019 in Nature concludes that between 3% and 20% of intrastate, armed conflict risks in the previous century were affected by climate-related factors, but that other drivers of conflict are far more important.
The expert assessment itself notes that major knowledge gaps and uncertainties continue to exist in the research field, especially regarding the pathways connecting climate change to conflict risk. Selby argues that the assessment ignores critical or constructivist approaches. Indeed, several studies criticize that climate-conflict research is based on a deterministic and conflict-oriented worldview (which is especially problematic if such logic diffuses into wider discourses) and that findings of statistical studies on the topic are based on problematic models and biased datasets. Existing research also predominantly focuses on a few, well accessible and already conflict ridden world regions, such as Sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle East. This raises questions about sampling biases, while regions like Latin America and the Pacific as well as topics like peaceful adaptation remain understudied. The latter concern is addressed by research on environmental peacebuilding. The IPCC's Fifth Assessment Report also notes that several factors that increase general conflict risk are sensitive to climate change, but there is no direct and simple causal association between nature and society.
Several case studies have linked climate change to increased violent conflicts between farmers and herders in Kenya, Nigeria and Sudan, but found mixed results for Mali and Tanzania. Despite earlier critiques, the general existence of a nexus between climate change, natural resource scarcity and conflict risk is increasingly accepted for communal violence, although this link is not deterministic, but strongly context dependent (and hence does not occur in many cases). Evidence is much more ambiguous and contested for high-intensity conflicts such as civil wars. Claims have been put forward that climate change-related droughts, in combination with other factors, facilitated the civil war in Darfur, the Arab Spring in Egypt, the Syrian civil war, the Islamist insurgency in Nigeria, and the Somali civil war. Other studies, by contrast, find very little evidence for such a causal link, including for the cases of Darfur, Egypt, Ghana and Syria.
At least since 2010, the U.S. military begun to push aggressively to develop, evaluate and deploy renewable energy to decrease its need to transport fossil fuels. Based on the 2015 annual report from NATO, the alliance plans investments in renewables and energy efficiency to reduce risks to soldiers, and cites the impacts from climate change on security as a reason.
The transnational character of climate-related security risks often goes beyond the capacity of national governments to respond adequately. Many parts of governments or state leaders acknowledge climate change as an issue for human security, national or regional security:
Although climate change is first and foremost dealt within the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and now also under the Paris agreement, the security implications of climate change do not have an institutional home within the United Nations system, and hence remain largely unaddressed, in spite of the urgency of the threat it poses to peace and security in several regions. The UN, through its COP - The Conference of the Parties - is the supreme body to negotiate climate frameworks under the UNFCCC Convention. It consists of the representatives of the Parties to the Convention and holds its sessions every year, and takes decisions which are necessary to ensure the effective implementation of the provisions of the Convention and regularly reviews the implementation of these provisions.Preventing “dangerous” human interference with the climate system is the ultimate aim of the UNFCCC. The UNFCCC is a “Rio Convention”, one of three adopted at the “Rio Earth Summit” in 1992. The UNFCCC entered into force on 21 March 1994. Today, it has near-universal membership. The COP has discussed Climate Security during panels, workshops as session, but not as a programmatic track. The greater focus on this topic by the UN has led to the launch in October 2018 of the inter-agency DPPA-UNDP-UN Environment cooperation called the ‘Climate Security Mechanism’.
United Nations Security CouncilEdit
The UN Security Council first debated climate security and energy in 2007 and in 2011 issued a presidential statement expressing concern at the possible adverse security effects of climate change. There has been a series of informal Arria-Formula meetings on issues related to climate change. In July 2018, Sweden initiated a debate on Climate and Security in the United Nations Security Council. Climate change grew beyond its categorisation as a hypothetical, existential risk and became an operational concern of relevance to other peace and security practitioners beyond the diplomats in the Security Council.
European Union (EU)Edit
The European Council’s conclusions on climate diplomacy state that "Climate change is a decisive global challenge which, if not urgently managed, will put at risk ... peace, stability and security."  The Intelligence on European Pensions and Institutional Investment think-tank published a 2018 report with the key point, "Climate change is an existential risk whose elimination must become a corporate objective". In June 2018 European External Action Service (EEAS) High-Level Event hosted an event themed "Climate, Peace and Security: The Time for Action". The EU's comprehensive approach to security would suggest that the EU is well placed to respond to climate-related security risks. However, recent scientific research shows that the European Union has not yet developed a fully coherent policy.
US intelligence analysts have expressed concern about the "serious security risks" of climate change since the 1980s. In 2007, the Council on Foreign Relations released a report titled, Climate Change and National Security: An Agenda for Action, stating that "Climate change presents a serious threat to the security and prosperity of the United States and other countries." A 2012 report published by the Joint Global Change Research Institute indicated that second and third order impacts of climate change, such as migration and state stability, are of concern for the US defense and intelligence communities. A 2015 report published by the White House found that climate change puts coastal areas at risk, that a changing Arctic poses risks to other parts of the country, risk for infrastructure, and increases demands on military resources. In 2016, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper noted: "Unpredictable instability has become the “new normal,” and this trend will continue for the foreseeable future…Extreme weather, climate change, environmental degradation, rising demand for food and water, poor policy decisions and inadequate infrastructure will magnify this instability."
A 2015 Pentagon report pointed out how climate denial threatens national security. In 2017, the Trump administration removed climate change from its national security strategy. But in January 2019 the Pentagon released a report stating that climate change is a national security threat to USA. In June 2019, in the course of House Select Committee on Intelligence hearings on the national security implications of climate change, the White House blocked the submission of a statement by the State Department's Bureau of Intelligence and Research Office, and the analyst who wrote the statement resigned. The idea of creating a presidential committee on climate security has been proposed. As part of the United States National Defense Authorization Act the U.S. Congress asked the Department of Defense for a report on climate matters. The report was published in 2019, and notes, "The effects of a changing climate are a national security issue with potential impacts to Department of Defense (DoD or the Department) missions, operational plans, and installations."
A 2018 published report by the Australian Senate noted, "climate change as a current and existential national security risk… defined as one that threatens the premature extinction of Earth-originating intelligent life or the permanent and drastic destruction of its potential for desirable future development." 
In 2014, David Cameron noted, "Climate change is one of the most serious threats facing our world", A 2018 article in UK's The Independent argues that the U.S. Trump administration is ‘putting British national security at risk’, according to over 100 climate scientists.
The 2010 documentary, Carbon Nation explores climate change solutions. The Guardian noted about Carbon Nation, "The take-home message is that what's good for the climate is also good for the economy, for national security, for health, for nature – and for America." The documentary The Burden presents the argument for a switch from fossil fuel reliance to clean energy from a military perspective. Bob Inglis is quoted, "I see incredible opportunity.... We improve our national security. We create jobs and we clean up the air."
In 2014, Leonardo DiCaprio stated during a United Nations conference, "The time to answer the greatest challenge of our existence on this planet is now. You can make history or be vilified by it." At a 2015 security conference, Arnold Schwarzenegger called climate change the issue of our time.
- Chris Mooney (February 1, 2016). "Why the U.S. East Coast could be a major 'hotspot' for rising seas". The Washington Post.
- Joshua W. Busby (2007). Climate Change and National Security. Council on Foreign Relations. ISBN 978-087609-413-6. Archived from the original on May 9, 2017. Retrieved January 25, 2016.
- Chloe Taylor (January 16, 2019). "Global tension is hampering our ability to fight climate change, Davos survey warns". CNBC. Retrieved January 18, 2019.
- Ian Johnston (May 24, 2017). "Seven in 10 Brits support 'world government' to protect humanity from global catastrophes". The Independent.
- "The Global Security Defense Index on Climate Change". ASP. American Security Project. September 22, 2014.
- Justin Gillis (February 15, 2018). "A Spy's Guide to Climate Change". The New York Times.
- Visser, Wayne; Brundtland, Gro Harlem (December 13, 2009). "Our Common Future ('The Brundtland Report'): World Commission on Environment and Development". The Top 50 Sustainability Books. Greenleaf Publishing Limited: 52–55. doi:10.9774/gleaf.978-1-907643-44-6_12. ISBN 978-1-907643-44-6.
- Matthew, Richard A.; Barnett, Jon; McDonald, Bryan; O'Brien, Karen L., eds. (2009). Global Environmental Change and Human Security. Revista Internacional Interdisciplinar Interthesis. 7. pp. 351–357. doi:10.7551/mitpress/8210.001.0001. ISBN 9780262259057.
- Malin Mobjörk; Maria-Therese Gustafsson; Hannes Sonnsjö; Sebastian van Baalen; Lisa Maria Dellmuth; Niklas Bremberg (October 2016). Climate-Related Security Risks: Towards an Integrated Approach (PDF) (Report). Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). Retrieved July 9, 2019.
- Salehyan, Idean (November 2014). "Climate change and conflict: Making sense of disparate findings". Political Geography. 43: 1–5. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2014.10.004. ISSN 0962-6298.
- Gleick, Peter H. (July 2014). "Water, Drought, Climate Change, and Conflict in Syria". Weather, Climate, and Society. 6 (3): 331–340. doi:10.1175/wcas-d-13-00059.1. ISSN 1948-8327.
- Homer-Dixon, Thomas F. (1994). "Environmental Scarcities and Violent Conflict: Evidence from Cases". International Security. 19 (1): 5–40. doi:10.2307/2539147. hdl:10535/2855. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2539147.
- "Climate change likely drove ancient African megaherbivores to extinction". doi:10.1036/1097-8542.br0302191. Cite journal requires
- Krampe, Florian; Mobjörk, Malin (October 20, 2018). "Responding to Climate-Related Security Risks: Reviewing Regional Organizations in Asia and Africa". Current Climate Change Reports. 4 (4): 330–337. doi:10.1007/s40641-018-0118-x. ISSN 2198-6061.
- "Losing Earth: The Decade We Almost Stopped Climate Change". The New York TImes. 2018.
- "National Security and the Threat of Climate Change" (PDF). CNA. 2007.
- "Climate Change, Conflict and Certainty: New Research in Context" (PDF). The Center for Climate and Security. 2013.
- "QDR – the national security challenge of climate change". ASP. 2014.
- "Expert: Climate Change is a National Security Nightmare". Climate State. 2018.
- Peter Schwartz & Doug Randall (2003). "An Abrupt Climate Change Scenario and its Implications for United States National Security" (PDF). Climate.gov. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 20, 2009.
- Zhang, D.; Brecke, P.; Lee, H.; He, Y.; Zhang, J. (2007). "Global climate change, war, and population decline in recent human history". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 104 (49): 19214–19219. Bibcode:2007PNAS..10419214Z. doi:10.1073/pnas.0703073104. PMC 2148270. PMID 18048343.
- Abrupt Impacts of Climate Change: Anticipating Surprises. The National Academies Press. 2013. doi:10.17226/18373. ISBN 978-0-309-28773-9.
- Steffen, Will; et al. (2018). "Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene". PNAS. 115 (33): 8252–8259. Bibcode:2018PNAS..115.8252S. doi:10.1073/pnas.1810141115. PMC 6099852. PMID 30082409.
- Mora, Camilio; et al. (2017). "Global risk of deadly heat". Nature Climate Change. 7 (7): 501–506. Bibcode:2017NatCC...7..501M. doi:10.1038/nclimate3322.
- Doherty, Thomas J.; Clayton, Susan (2011). "The psychological impacts of global climate change". American Psychologist. 66 (4): 265–276. doi:10.1037/a0023141. PMID 21553952.
- Conca, Ken (January 2, 2019). "Is There a Role for the UN Security Council on Climate Change?". Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development. 61 (1): 4–15. doi:10.1080/00139157.2019.1540811. ISSN 0013-9157.
- "To Address Climate Risks, Advance Climate Security in the United Nations". New Security Beat. Retrieved December 20, 2019.
- WBGU (2007). World in Transition: Climate Change as a Security Risk. Berlin: Springer.
- Ide, Tobias; Michael Link, P.; Scheffran, Jürgen; Schilling, Janpeter (2016), Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Grin, John; Scheffran, Jürgen (eds.), "The Climate-Conflict Nexus: Pathways, Regional Links, and Case Studies", Handbook on Sustainability Transition and Sustainable Peace, Hexagon Series on Human and Environmental Security and Peace, Springer International Publishing, pp. 285–304, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-43884-9_12, ISBN 978-3-319-43884-9
- Barnett, Jon; Adger, W. Neil (2007). "Climate change, human security and violent conflict". Political Geography. 26 (6): 639–655. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2007.03.003.
- Zia Mian (December 7, 2016). "Kashmir, climate change, and nuclear war". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.
- Ide, Tobias; Scheffran, Jürgen (September 2, 2014). "On climate, conflict and cumulation: suggestions for integrative cumulation of knowledge in the research on climate change and violent conflict". Global Change, Peace & Security. 26 (3): 263–279. doi:10.1080/14781158.2014.924917. ISSN 1478-1158.
- Mach, Katharine J.; Kraan, Caroline M.; Adger, W. Neil; Buhaug, Halvard; Burke, Marshall; Fearon, James D.; Field, Christopher B.; Hendrix, Cullen S.; Maystadt, Jean-Francois; O’Loughlin, John; Roessler, Philip (2019). "Climate as a risk factor for armed conflict". Nature. 571 (7764): 193–197. Bibcode:2019Natur.571..193M. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1300-6. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 31189956.
- Solomon M. Hsiang; Marshall Burke; Edward Miguel (2013). "Quantifying the Influence of Climate on Human Conflict". Science. 341 (6151): 1235367. doi:10.1126/science.1235367. PMID 24031020.
- Buhaug, H.; Nordkvelle, J.; Bernauer, T.; Böhmelt, T.; Brzoska, M.; Busby, J. W.; Ciccone, A.; Fjelde, H.; Gartzke, E.; Gleditsch, N. P.; Goldstone, J. A. (December 1, 2014). "One effect to rule them all? A comment on climate and conflict". Climatic Change. 127 (3): 391–397. Bibcode:2014ClCh..127..391B. doi:10.1007/s10584-014-1266-1. ISSN 1573-1480.
- Raleigh, Clionadh; Linke, Andrew; O'Loughlin, John (2014). "Extreme temperatures and violence". Nature Climate Change. 4 (2): 76–77. Bibcode:2014NatCC...4...76R. doi:10.1038/nclimate2101. ISSN 1758-6798.
- von Uexkull, Nina; Croicu, Mihai; Fjelde, Hanne; Buhaug, Halvard (November 1, 2016). "Civil conflict sensitivity to growing-season drought". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 113 (44): 12391–12396. doi:10.1073/pnas.1607542113. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 5098672. PMID 27791091.
- Detges, Adrien (September 2016). "Local conditions of drought-related violence in sub-Saharan Africa: The role of road and water infrastructures". Journal of Peace Research. 53 (5): 696–710. doi:10.1177/0022343316651922. ISSN 0022-3433.
- Schleussner, Carl-Friedrich; Donges, Jonathan F.; Donner, Reik V.; Schellnhuber, Hans Joachim (August 16, 2016). "Armed-conflict risks enhanced by climate-related disasters in ethnically fractionalized countries". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 113 (33): 9216–9221. Bibcode:2016PNAS..113.9216S. doi:10.1073/pnas.1601611113. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 4995947. PMID 27457927.
- Scheffran, Jürgen; Link, Peter Michael; Schilling, Janpeter (April 26, 2019), "Climate and Conflict in Africa", Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science, Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.557, ISBN 978-0-19-022862-0
- Koubi, Vally (May 11, 2019). "Climate Change and Conflict". Annual Review of Political Science. 22 (1): 343–360. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-050317-070830. ISSN 1094-2939.
- janselbyblog (July 12, 2019). "Comments on Mach et al, 'Climate as a risk factor for armed conflict', Nature (2019)". Politics, Ecology, Security. Retrieved December 20, 2019.
- Ide, Tobias (January 2, 2016). "Toward a constructivist understanding of socio-environmental conflicts". Civil Wars. 18 (1): 69–90. doi:10.1080/13698249.2016.1144496. ISSN 1369-8249.
- Barnett, Jon (2019). "Global environmental change I: Climate resilient peace?". Progress in Human Geography. 43 (5): 927–936. doi:10.1177/0309132518798077. ISSN 0309-1325.
- Hartmann, Betsy (October 2, 2014). "Converging on Disaster: Climate Security and the Malthusian Anticipatory Regime for Africa". Geopolitics. 19 (4): 757–783. doi:10.1080/14650045.2013.847433. ISSN 1465-0045.
- Ide, Tobias (2016). "Critical geopolitics and school textbooks: The case of environment-conflict links in Germany". Political Geography. 55: 60–71. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2016.07.002.
- Ide, Tobias (2017). "Research methods for exploring the links between climate change and conflict: Research methods for exploring the links between climate change and conflict". Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change. 8 (3): e456. doi:10.1002/wcc.456.
- Selby, Jan (October 2, 2014). "Positivist Climate Conflict Research: A Critique". Geopolitics. 19 (4): 829–856. doi:10.1080/14650045.2014.964865. ISSN 1465-0045.
- Adams, Courtland; Ide, Tobias; Barnett, Jon; Detges, Adrien (2018). "Sampling bias in climate–conflict research". Nature Climate Change. 8 (3): 200–203. Bibcode:2018NatCC...8..200A. doi:10.1038/s41558-018-0068-2. ISSN 1758-6798.
- Ide, Tobias (September 1, 2019). "The Impact of Environmental Cooperation on Peacemaking: Definitions, Mechanisms, and Empirical Evidence". International Studies Review. 21 (3): 327–346. doi:10.1093/isr/viy014. ISSN 1521-9488.
- Holmberg, Kim; Hellsten, Iina (August 18, 2016). "Integrating and differentiating meanings in tweeting about the fifth Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report" (PDF). First Monday. 21 (9). doi:10.5210/fm.v21i9.6603. ISSN 1396-0466.
- Omolo, N. A. (January 1, 2010). "Gender and climate change-induced conflict in pastoral communities: Case study of Turkana in northwestern Kenya". African Journal on Conflict Resolution. 10 (2). doi:10.4314/ajcr.v10i2.63312. ISSN 1562-6997.
- Obioha, Emeka E. (April 2008). "Climate Change, Population Drift and Violent Conflict over Land Resources in Northeastern Nigeria". Journal of Human Ecology. 23 (4): 311–324. doi:10.1080/09709274.2008.11906084. ISSN 0970-9274.
- Juliana Nnoko-Mewanu (August 6, 2018). "Farmer-Herder Conflicts on the Rise in Africa". ReliefWeb.
- Benjaminsen, Tor A; Alinon, Koffi; Buhaug, Halvard; Buseth, Jill Tove (January 2012). "Does climate change drive land-use conflicts in the Sahel?". Journal of Peace Research. 49 (1): 97–111. doi:10.1177/0022343311427343. ISSN 0022-3433.
- Benjaminsen, Tor A.; Maganga, Faustin P.; Abdallah, Jumanne Moshi (2009). "The Kilosa Killings: Political Ecology of a Farmer–Herder Conflict in Tanzania". Development and Change. 40 (3): 423–445. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.2009.01558.x. ISSN 1467-7660.
- Adano, Wario R; Dietz, Ton; Witsenburg, Karen; Zaal, Fred (2012). "Climate change, violent conflict and local institutions in Kenya's drylands". Journal of Peace Research. 49 (1): 65–80. doi:10.1177/0022343311427344. hdl:1887/18493. ISSN 0022-3433.
- Ide, Tobias (2015). "Why do conflicts over scarce renewable resources turn violent? A qualitative comparative analysis". Global Environmental Change. 33: 61–70. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.04.008.
- De Juan, Alexander (2015). "Long-term environmental change and geographical patterns of violence in Darfur, 2003–2005". Political Geography. 45: 22–33. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2014.09.001.
- Sternberg, Troy (2012). "Chinese drought, bread and the Arab Spring". Applied Geography. 34: 519–524. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.02.004.
- Sayne, Aaron (2011). "Climate Change Adaptation and Conflict in Nigeria" (PDF). United States Institute of Peace.
- Maystadt, Jean-François; Ecker, Olivier (October 2014). "Extreme Weather and Civil War: Does Drought Fuel Conflict in Somalia through Livestock Price Shocks?". American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 96 (5): 1157–1182. doi:10.1093/ajae/aau010.
- Selby, Jan; Hoffmann, Clemens (2014). "Beyond scarcity: Rethinking water, climate change and conflict in the Sudans". Global Environmental Change. 29: 360–370. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.01.008. hdl:11693/26445.
- "Overstating Climate Change in Egypt's Uprising - Egypt". ReliefWeb. Retrieved December 20, 2019.
- Bukari, Kaderi Noagah; Sow, Papa; Scheffran, Jürgen (July 2018). "Cooperation and Co-Existence Between Farmers and Herders in the Midst of Violent Farmer-Herder Conflicts in Ghana". African Studies Review. 61 (2): 78–102. doi:10.1017/asr.2017.124. ISSN 0002-0206.
- Ide, Tobias (December 1, 2018). "Climate War in the Middle East? Drought, the Syrian Civil War and the State of Climate-Conflict Research". Current Climate Change Reports. 4 (4): 347–354. doi:10.1007/s40641-018-0115-0. ISSN 2198-6061.
- Elisabeth Rosenthal (October 4, 2010). "U.S. Military Orders Less Dependence on Fossil Fuels". The New York Times. Retrieved July 9, 2019.
- Cole Mellino (February 1, 2016). "NATO: Renewable Energy Can Save Soldiers' Lives". EcoWatch. Retrieved July 9, 2019.
- Born, Camilla (January 2017). "A RESOLUTION FOR A PEACEFUL CLIMATE: OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE UN SECURITY COUNCIL" (PDF). SIPRI.ORG.
- "What is COP24?". COP 24 Katowice 2018. Retrieved July 29, 2019.
- "Conference of the Parties (COP) | UNFCCC". unfccc.int. Retrieved July 29, 2019.
- Smith, D., Mobjörk, M., Krampe, F., Eklöw, K., ‘Climate Security Making it #Doable’, Clingendael report (Feb. 2019), p. 14.
- "Council Conclusions on Climate Diplomacy". Council of the European Union. July 20, 2015. Retrieved July 9, 2019.
- David Murray; Thomas Murtha (April 2018). "Climate risk: Running out of time". IPE. Retrieved July 9, 2019.
- "Political Leaders Urge More Climate Action and Strong Outcome in Katowice | UNFCCC". unfccc.int. Retrieved August 5, 2019.
- Bremberg, Niklas; Sonnsjö, Hannes; Mobjörk, Malin (November 23, 2018). "The EU and climate-related security risks: a community of practice in the making?". Journal of European Integration. 41 (5): 623–639. doi:10.1080/07036337.2018.1546301. ISSN 0703-6337.
- Guest Contributor (October 12, 2015). "NATO: Climate Change Is Significant Security Threat and 'Its Bite Is Already Being Felt'". EcoWatch. Retrieved July 9, 2019.
- Nuccitelli, Dana (April 8, 2019). "The long history of climate change security risks". Yale Climate Connections. Retrieved July 16, 2019.
- Busby, Joshua (2007). "Climate Change and National Security". Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved July 16, 2019.
- Malone, Elizabeth L. (October 17, 2012). "Climate Change and National Security". Weather, Climate, and Society. 5 (1): 93–95. doi:10.1175/WCAS-D-12-00016.1. ISSN 1948-8327.
- Reynard Loki (May 20, 2015). "4 Reasons Climate Change Affects National Security". AlterNet. Retrieved July 9, 2019.
- "Worldwide Threat Assessment: Climate Magnifying Instability". The Center for Climate and Security. 2016.
- "The Pentagon & Climate Change: How Deniers Put National Security at Risk". Rolling Stone. 2015.
- Justine Calma (August 2, 2018). "Trump's national security agenda to have big environmental impacts on both borders". Grist. Retrieved July 9, 2019.
- Lorraine Chow, Lorraine (January 18, 2018). "Pentagon: Climate Change Is Real and a 'National Security Issue'". Ecowatch. Retrieved January 20, 2019.
- Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment (January 2019). "Report on Effects of a Changing Climate to the Department of Defense" (PDF). Retrieved July 16, 2019.
- Capaccio, Anthony (January 18, 2019). "Pentagon Warns of Dire Risk to Bases, Troops From Climate Change". Bloomberg. Retrieved July 16, 2019.
- Eilperin, Juliet (July 10, 2019). "Intelligence aide, blocked from submitting written testimony on climate change, resigns from State Dept. Rod Schoonover's decision to leave was voluntary, according to individuals familiar with the matter". Washington Post. Retrieved July 16, 2019.
- "White House edits of intelligence agency's testimony. This document shows White House officials' comments on the State Department's Bureau of Intelligence and Research climate testimony, which they ultimately blocked from being submitted to Congress". Washington Post. June 14, 2019. Retrieved July 16, 2019.
- "Does the U.S. need a 'presidential climate security committee'?". Environment. February 22, 2019. Retrieved July 9, 2019.
- "New Pentagon Report: "The effects of a changing climate are a national security issue"". January 18, 2019. Retrieved January 18, 2019.
- "Implications of climate change for Australia's national security". Australian Senate. 2018. pp. Chapter 2.
- "David Cameron: 'Climate change is one of the most serious threats facing our world'". businessGreen. 2014.
- "Donald Trump UK visit: US president is 'putting British national security at risk', say over 100 top climate scientists". The Independent. 2018.
- "Will Carbon Nation succeed where An Inconvenient Truth failed?". The Guardian. 2011.
- "The Burden: New Documentary Illustrates Impacts of Fossil Fuels on the U.S. Military". NRDC. 2015. Archived from the original on March 16, 2016. Retrieved February 3, 2016.
- "Leonardo DiCaprio at the UN: 'Climate change is not hysteria – it's a fact'". The Guardian. 2014.
- "Schwarzenegger: Climate change is 'the issue of our time'". MSNBC. 2015.