Borsuk–Ulam theorem

In mathematics, the Borsuk–Ulam theorem states that every continuous function from an n-sphere into Euclidean n-space maps some pair of antipodal points to the same point. Here, two points on a sphere are called antipodal if they are in exactly opposite directions from the sphere's center.

Formally: if is continuous then there exists an such that: .

The case can be illustrated by saying that there always exist a pair of opposite points on the Earth's equator with the same temperature. The same is true for any circle. This assumes the temperature varies continuously in space.

The case is often illustrated by saying that at any moment, there is always a pair of antipodal points on the Earth's surface with equal temperatures and equal barometric pressures, assuming that both parameters vary continuously in space.

The Borsuk–Ulam theorem has several equivalent statements in terms of odd functions. Recall that is the n-sphere and is the n-ball:

  • If is a continuous odd function, then there exists an such that: .
  • If is a continuous function which is odd on (the boundary of ), then there exists an such that: .

HistoryEdit

According to Jiří Matoušek (2003, p. 25), the first historical mention of the statement of the Borsuk–Ulam theorem appears in Lyusternik & Shnirel'man (1930). The first proof was given by Karol Borsuk (1933), where the formulation of the problem was attributed to Stanislaw Ulam. Since then, many alternative proofs have been found by various authors, as collected by Steinlein (1985).

Equivalent statementsEdit

The following statements are equivalent to the Borsuk–Ulam theorem.[1]

With odd functionsEdit

A function   is called odd (aka antipodal or antipode-preserving) if for every  :  .

The Borsuk–Ulam theorem is equivalent to the following statement: A continuous odd function from an n-sphere into Euclidean n-space has a zero. PROOF:

  • If the theorem is correct, then it is specifically correct for odd functions, and for an odd function,   iff  . Hence every odd continuous function has a zero.
  • For every continuous function  , the following function is continuous and odd:  . If every odd continuous function has a zero, then   has a zero, and therefore,  . Hence the theorem is correct.

With retractionsEdit

Define a retraction as a function   The Borsuk–Ulam theorem is equivalent to the following claim: there is no continuous odd retraction.

Proof: If the theorem is correct, then every continuous odd function from   must include 0 in its range. However,   so there cannot be a continuous odd function whose range is  .

Conversely, if it is incorrect, then there is a continuous odd function   with no zeroes. Then we can construct another odd function   by:

 

since   has no zeroes,   is well-defined and continuous. Thus we have a continuous odd retraction.

ProofsEdit

1-dimensional caseEdit

The 1-dimensional case can easily be proved using the intermediate value theorem (IVT).

Let   be an odd real-valued continuous function on a circle. Pick an arbitrary  . If   then we are done. Otherwise, without loss of generality,   But   Hence, by the IVT, there is a point   between   and   at which  .

General case - algebraic topology proofEdit

Assume that   is an odd continuous function with   (the case   is treated above, the case   can be handled using basic covering theory). By passing to orbits under the antipodal action, we then get an induced continuous function   between real projective spaces, which induces an isomorphism on fundamental groups. By the Hurewicz theorem, the induced ring homomorphism on cohomology with   coefficients [where   denotes the field with two elements],

 

sends   to  . But then we get that   is sent to  , a contradiction.[2]

One can also show the stronger statement that any odd map   has odd degree and then deduce the theorem from this result.

General case - combinatorial proofEdit

The Borsuk–Ulam theorem can be proved from Tucker's lemma.[1][3][4]

Let   be a continuous odd function. Because g is continuous on a compact domain, it is uniformly continuous. Therefore, for every  , there is a   such that, for every two points of   which are within   of each other, their images under g are within   of each other.

Define a triangulation of   with edges of length at most  . Label each vertex   of the triangulation with a label   in the following way:

  • The absolute value of the label is the index of the coordinate with the highest absolute value of g:  .
  • The sign of the label is the sign of g, so that:  .

Because g is odd, the labeling is also odd:  . Hence, by Tucker's lemma, there are two adjacent vertices   with opposite labels. Assume w.l.o.g. that the labels are  . By the definition of l, this means that in both   and  , coordinate #1 is the largest coordinate: in   this coordinate is positive while in   it is negative. By the construction of the triangulation, the distance between   and   is at most  , so in particular   (since   and   have opposite signs) and so  . But since the largest coordinate of   is coordinate #1, this means that   for each  . So  , where   is some constant depending on   and the norm   which you have chosen.

The above is true for every  ; since   is compact there must hence be a point u in which  .

CorollariesEdit

  • No subset of   is homeomorphic to  
  • The ham sandwich theorem: For any compact sets A1, ..., An in   we can always find a hyperplane dividing each of them into two subsets of equal measure.

Equivalent resultsEdit

Above we showed how to prove the Borsuk–Ulam theorem from Tucker's lemma. The converse is also true: it is possible to prove Tucker's lemma from the Borsuk–Ulam theorem. Therefore, these two theorems are equivalent. There are several fixed-point theorems which come in three equivalent variants: an algebraic topology variant, a combinatorial variant and a set-covering variant. Each variant can be proved separately using totally different arguments, but each variant can also be reduced to the other variants in its row. Additionally, each result in the top row can be deduced from the one below it in the same column.[5]

Algebraic topology Combinatorics Set covering
Brouwer fixed-point theorem Sperner's lemma Knaster–Kuratowski–Mazurkiewicz lemma
Borsuk–Ulam theorem Tucker's lemma Lusternik–Schnirelmann theorem

GeneralizationsEdit

  • In the original theorem, the domain of the function f is the unit n-sphere (the boundary of the unit n-ball). In general, it is true also when the domain of f is the boundary of any open bounded symmetric subset of   containing the origin (Here, symmetric means that if x is in the subset then -x is also in the subset).[6]
  • Consider the function A which maps a point to its antipodal point:   Note that   The original theorem claims that there is a point x in which   In general, this is true also for every function A for which  [7] However, in general this is not true for other functions A.[8]

See alsoEdit

NotesEdit

  1. ^ a b Prescott, Timothy (2002). "Extensions of the Borsuk–Ulam Theorem (Thesis)". Harvey Mudd College. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.124.4120. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  2. ^ Joseph J. Rotman, An Introduction to Algebraic Topology (1988) Springer-Verlag ISBN 0-387-96678-1 (See Chapter 12 for a full exposition.)
  3. ^ Freund, Robert M; Todd, Michael J (1982). "A constructive proof of Tucker's combinatorial lemma". Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A. 30 (3): 321–325. doi:10.1016/0097-3165(81)90027-3.
  4. ^ Simmons, Forest W.; Su, Francis Edward (2003). "Consensus-halving via theorems of Borsuk–Ulam and Tucker". Mathematical Social Sciences. 45: 15–25. doi:10.1016/s0165-4896(02)00087-2. hdl:10419/94656.
  5. ^ Nyman, Kathryn L.; Su, Francis Edward (2013), "A Borsuk–Ulam equivalent that directly implies Sperner's lemma", American Mathematical Monthly, 120 (4): 346–354, doi:10.4169/amer.math.monthly.120.04.346, MR 3035127
  6. ^ "Borsuk fixed-point theorem", Encyclopedia of Mathematics, EMS Press, 2001 [1994]
  7. ^ Yang, Chung-Tao (1954). "On Theorems of Borsuk-Ulam, Kakutani-Yamabe-Yujobo and Dyson, I". Annals of Mathematics. 60 (2): 262–282. doi:10.2307/1969632. JSTOR 1969632.
  8. ^ Jens Reinhold, Faisal; Sergei Ivanov. "Generalization of Borsuk-Ulam". Math Overflow. Retrieved 18 May 2015.

ReferencesEdit

External linksEdit