If α is a nonnegative integer n, then the (n + 2)th term and all later terms in the series are 0, since each contains a factor (n − n); thus in this case the series is finite and gives the algebraic binomial formula.
The following variant holds for arbitrary complex β, but is especially useful for handling negative integer exponents in (1):
To prove it, substitute x = −z in (1) and apply a binomial coefficient identity, which is,
Conditions for convergenceEdit
Whether (1) converges depends on the values of the complex numbers α and x. More precisely:
- If |x| < 1, the series converges absolutely for any complex number α.
- If |x| = 1, the series converges absolutely if and only if either Re(α) > 0 or α = 0.
- If |x| = 1 and x ≠ −1, the series converges if and only if Re(α) > −1.
- If x = −1, the series converges if and only if either Re(α) > 0 or α = 0.
- If |x| > 1, the series diverges, unless α is a non-negative integer (in which case the series is a finite sum).
In particular, if is not a non-negative integer, the situation at the boundary of the disk of convergence, , is summarized as follows:
- If Re(α) > 0, the series converges absolutely.
- If −1 < Re(α) ≤ 0, the series converges conditionally if x ≠ −1 and diverges if x = −1.
- If Re(α) ≤ −1, the series diverges.
Identities to be used in the proofEdit
The following hold for any complex number α:
This is essentially equivalent to Euler's definition of the Gamma function:
and implies immediately the coarser bounds
for some positive constants m and M .
Using formula (2), it is easy to prove by induction that
To prove (i) and (v), apply the ratio test and use formula (2) above to show that whenever is not a nonnegative integer, the radius of convergence is exactly 1. Part (ii) follows from formula (5), by comparison with the p-series
with . To prove (iii), first use formula (3) to obtain
and then use (ii) and formula (5) again to prove convergence of the right-hand side when is assumed. On the other hand, the series does not converge if and , again by formula (5). Alternatively, we may observe that for all . Thus, by formula (6), for all . This completes the proof of (iii). Turning to (iv), we use identity (7) above with and in place of , along with formula (4), to obtain
as . Assertion (iv) now follows from the asymptotic behavior of the sequence . (Precisely, certainly converges to if and diverges to if . If , then converges if and only if the sequence converges , which is certainly true if but false if : in the latter case the sequence is dense , due to the fact that diverges and converges to zero).
Summation of the binomial seriesEdit
The usual argument to compute the sum of the binomial series goes as follows. Differentiating term-wise the binomial series within the convergence disk |x| < 1 and using formula (1), one has that the sum of the series is an analytic function solving the ordinary differential equation (1 + x)u'(x) = αu(x) with initial data u(0) = 1. The unique solution of this problem is the function u(x) = (1 + x)α, which is therefore the sum of the binomial series, at least for |x| < 1. The equality extends to |x| = 1 whenever the series converges, as a consequence of Abel's theorem and by continuity of (1 + x)α.
The first results concerning binomial series for other than positive-integer exponents were given by Sir Isaac Newton in the study of areas enclosed under certain curves. John Wallis built upon this work by considering expressions of the form y = (1 − x2)m where m is a fraction. He found that (written in modern terms) the successive coefficients ck of (−x2)k are to be found by multiplying the preceding coefficient by (as in the case of integer exponents), thereby implicitly giving a formula for these coefficients. He explicitly writes the following instances
The binomial series is therefore sometimes referred to as Newton's binomial theorem. Newton gives no proof and is not explicit about the nature of the series; most likely he verified instances treating the series as (again in modern terminology) formal power series. Later, Niels Henrik Abel discussed the subject in a memoir, treating notably questions of convergence.
- The Story of the Binomial Theorem, by J. L. Coolidge, The American Mathematical Monthly 56:3 (1949), pp. 147–157. In fact this source gives all non-constant terms with a negative sign, which is not correct for the second equation; one must assume this is an error of transcription.