Open main menu

Coordinates: 50°49′43″N 5°37′06″E / 50.82861°N 5.61833°E / 50.82861; 5.61833

Battle of Lauffeld
Part of War of the Austrian Succession
Bataille de Lawfeld, 2 juillet 1747.jpeg
Louis XV with Maurice de Saxe at Lauffeld
Date2 July 1747
Location
Result French victory
Belligerents
 Great Britain
 Dutch Republic
Holy Roman Empire Habsburg Monarchy
Province of Hanover Hanover
 France
Commanders and leaders
Kingdom of Great Britain Duke of Cumberland
Kingdom of Great Britain John Ligonier
Dutch Republic Prince Waldeck
Holy Roman Empire Karl Josef Batthyány
Holy Roman Empire von Daun
Wappen-HK (1736-1804).svg Frederick of Hesse-Kassel
Kingdom of France Maurice de Saxe
Kingdom of France Louis XV
Kingdom of France Clermont-Tonnerre
Kingdom of France Count Löwendahl
Strength
60,000 80,000
Casualties and losses
6,000 dead, wounded and taken prisoner [1] 9,000 dead and wounded

The Battle of Lauffeld, also known as Lafelt, Laffeld, Lawfeld, Lawfeldt, Maastricht or Val, took place on 2 July 1747, during the War of the Austrian Succession. A French army of 80,000 commanded by Marshal Saxe faced a combined British, Dutch, German and Austrian force of 60,000, led by the Duke of Cumberland.

Under Saxe, arguably the most talented general of his generation, the French had conquered much of the Austrian Netherlands between 1744 to 1746. Cumberland intended to retake Antwerp in the spring of 1747 but failed to move quickly enough; Saxe then threatened to cut him off from his key supply base at Maastricht and the Allies were forced to defend it.

Saxe exploited a series of mistakes by Cumberland and only counterattacks by the Allied cavalry enabled the bulk of his army to withdraw in good order. Defeat ended Allied hopes of regaining lost ground and the French captured Bergen op Zoom in September, then Maastricht in May 1748.

However, the cost of the war meant France's financial system was on the verge of collapse, while the British naval blockade caused severe food shortages. Their position worsened in October 1747, when the British naval victory of Second Cape Finisterre left them unable to defend their merchant shipping or trade routes. Both sides now wanted peace, leading to the October 1748 Treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle.

BackgroundEdit

When the War of the Austrian Succession began in 1740, Britain was focused on the 1739-1748 War of Jenkins' Ear with Spain, fought mostly in the Caribbean. British and Dutch troops in Flanders initially did so as part of the army of Hanover; France only declared war on Britain in March 1744, the Dutch Republic remained neutral until 1747.

Supported by British financial subsidies, by the end of 1746 Austria had defeated Spanish efforts to regain possessions in Northern Italy lost in the 1713 Treaty of Utrecht. Austria acquired the Austrian Netherlands in 1713 only because neither the British or Dutch would allow the other to control it and retaining it was not a strategic priority. Maria Theresa now wanted peace in order to restructure her administration.[2]

 
British Prime Minister, Newcastle, main proponent of continuing the war

One reason France entered the war was to reduce the post-1713 expansion of British commercial strength, viewed as a threat to the European balance of power. By 1747, British trade had recovered from its post 1739 decline and was expanding once again, while the French economy was being strangled by their naval blockade.[3]

Victory at Rocoux in October 1746 confirmed French control of the Austrian Netherlands but failed to force Britain to end the war. Declaring war on the Dutch made the immediate situation worse, since their previous neutrality meant they were the main carriers of French imports and exports. By 1747, the French financial system was on the verge of collapse, accompanied by severe food shortages; ending the war had become imperative.[4]

France began bilateral negotiations with Britain at Breda in August 1746 but these proceeded slowly, since the British envoy Lord Sandwich was under instructions to delay, hoping their position in Flanders would improve.[5] The war continued only because the British were prepared to subsidise their Allies; in the January 1747 Hague Convention, Britain agreed to fund Austrian and Sardinian forces in Italy and an Allied army of 140,000 in Flanders, increasing to 192,000 in 1748.[6]

Although the British economy was also impacted by the cost of the war, the government was far better equipped to finance it.[7] The Duke of Newcastle wanted to continue the war and recover lost ground in the Austrian Netherlands. He also hoped the death of Philip V in July 1746 provided an opportunity for Britain to entice Spain to end their long-standing alliance with France; both proved incorrect.[8]

The battleEdit

 
 
Brussels
 
Bergen op zoom
 
Antwerp
 
Liege
 
Breda
 
Namur
 
Maastricht
The Austrian Netherlands and Southern Dutch Republic; key locations 1747-1748
 
Fort Liefkenshoek, near Antwerp (background); its capture by the French in April forced the Allies to abandon plans to retake the port

By minimising French forces elsewhere, Saxe was able to assemble a field army of 120,000 men for the 1747 campaign. The defeat of the Jacobite Rising allowed Cumberland to transfer troops back to Flanders and prepare for an offensive. The plan was to capture Antwerp in February but bad weather, lack of transport and war weariness meant the Allies were not ready to take the field until early May.

Meanwhile, Saxe sent a detachment under Contades to take Fort Liefkenhock, north of Antwerp, while a second under Count Löwendahl seized Sas van Gent, Ijzenijke and Eekels in the Dutch province of Zeeland.[9] The latter inspired an Orangist Coup in Zeeland, which eventually led to William IV being appointed first hereditary Stadtholder of all seven Dutch provinces.[10]

This meant Antwerp was now too well-defended to attack, while the move into Zeeland threatened Cumberland's supply lines, forcing him to protect the key Dutch city of Maastricht. A detachment under von Daun was instructed to advance towards Tongeren, held by a force under Clermont-Tonnerre. Ligonier and the Allied cavalry were sent to occupy the Tongeren-Maastricht road, which ran along a ridge parallel to the River Meuse, but found the French already in possession. The Allies halted and the infantry camped overnight in the villages of Vlytingen and Lauffeld.[11] As at Rocoux, the Austrians were on the right, holding the villages of Grote and Kleine Spouwen, now part of the Belgian town of Bilzen. A steep ravine immediately in front protected them from a direct assault.[12]

 
Earl Ligonier (1680-1770); his cavalry charges allowed the Allies to make an orderly retreat, although he was taken prisoner

The next day was overcast and it later began raining heavily, making movement slow and difficult. An exchange of artillery fire began at 6:00 am, which continued until 8:30. The British and German infantry left the villages where they had spent the night, having first set them on fire to prevent their use by the French, and formed up on open ground. Based on his experience at Fontenoy, Ligonier urged the villages be used as fortified positions; after some hesitation and conflicting orders, Cumberland finally agreed. Saxe interpreted this confusion as Cumberland ordering a general retreat across the Meuse and around 10:30 sent troops into what he assumed were now empty villages. While true of Vlytingen, Lauffeld had been re-occupied by troops under Frederick of Hesse-Kassel and the next four hours developed into a fierce struggle. The French finally captured Lauffeld around 12:30 pm, after taking heavy casualties in a series of frontal assaults.[13]

Cumberland ordered a counter-attack but as the infantry formed up, a Dutch cavalry unit to their front was routed by the French and fled, throwing those behind them into disorder and exposing the Allied centre.[14] At the same time, 150 squadrons of French cavalry were assembling around Wilre, preparing to attack Cumberland's flank; unaware Lauffeld had fallen and the Allies were falling back on Maastricht, Ligonier and 60 squadrons charged the French, taking them by surprise. One of the best known cavalry charges in British military history, Saxe later claimed only this prevented him destroying the Allied army. The French Irish Brigade suffered more than 1,400 casualties; at one point, the short-sighted Cumberland mistook the red-coated Irish for his own troops and barely escaped.[15]

To cover the retreating infantry, Ligonier obtained permission for another charge, this time with only three regiments. He was taken prisoner, while the Scots Greys, one of the units involved, lost nearly 40% of their strength.[16] However, this gave the Austrian commander Karl Josef Batthyány sufficient time to place his infantry between the French and the retreating Allied formations, allowing an orderly retreat.[17]

AftermathEdit

 
Bergen op Zoom; French troops enter the Dutch fortress, September 1747

Lauffeld was another French tactical victory that failed to achieve a decisive result, despite the capture of Bergen-op-Zoom in September and Maastricht in May 1748. Between 1746 to 1747, French customs receipts fell dramatically due to the British naval blockade, which also cut them off from the Newfoundland cod fisheries, a key food supply for the poor. Throughout 1747 and 1748, French Finance Minister Machault repeatedly warned Louis XV of the impending collapse of their financial system.[18]

Despite success in Flanders, the French strategic position continued to weaken in 1747 and became critical after the Royal Navy attacked a large convoy at Cape Finisterre in October. Most of the merchantmen escaped but at the cost of sacrificing their escort; combined with other losses, the French navy could no longer protect their colonies or trade routes.[19] In November, Britain and Russia signed a convention for the supply of additional troops and in February 1748, a Russian corps of 37,000 arrived in the Rhineland.[20]

By now, Britain was also ready to agree terms, although it has been argued Newcastle failed to appreciate the impact of the naval blockade. The terms of the Treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle were first agreed by Britain and France at Breda, then presented to their allies. These confirmed Prussian possession of Silesia and minor territorial adjustments in Italy, but essentially returned the situation to 1740, with France withdrawing from the Low Countries. Returning the territorial gains which had cost so much, in exchange for so little, led to the phrase "as stupid as the Peace".[21]

 
French battleship Intrépide, engaged at Second Cape Finisterre, October 1747

In the longer term, the war confirmed the decline of the Dutch Republic as a major power; Newcastle berated himself for his "ignorance, obstinacy and credulity" in believing otherwise.[22] Another was the breakdown of the Anglo-Austrian Alliance; Britain's acceptance of the Prussian conquest of Silesia meant Maria Theresa sought an alliance with France instead, leading to the Diplomatic Revolution of 1756.[23]

Lauffeld exposed Cumberland's weaknesses as a general, also factors in the May 1745 defeat at Fontenoy. They included inadequate reconnaissance, lack of strategic awareness and poor co-ordination with his senior commanders; Ligonier was unaware the infantry had withdrawn. Although he played a prominent role in enacting essential military reforms after 1748, his career ended with the 1757 Convention of Klosterzeven during the Seven Years' War. This resulted in Hanover being occupied by the French and his father George II never forgave him.[24]

ReferencesEdit

  1. ^ Grant 2011, p. 421.
  2. ^ Scott 2015, pp. 58-60.
  3. ^ McKay 1983, pp. 138-140.
  4. ^ Scott 2015, p. 61.
  5. ^ Rodger 1993, p. 42.
  6. ^ Hochedlinger 2003, p. 260.
  7. ^ Carlos & Neal 2006, p. 2.
  8. ^ Scott 2015, p. 62.
  9. ^ White 2011, p. 208.
  10. ^ Thompson 2012, p. 177.
  11. ^ "Battle of Lauffeldt". British Battles. Retrieved 2 July 2019.
  12. ^ Morris, Graham. "The Battle of Lauffeld". Battlefield Anomalies. Retrieved 8 July 2019.
  13. ^ De Périni 1896, pp. 335.
  14. ^ Smollett 1796, pp. 524.
  15. ^ McGarry 2014, pp. 134-135.
  16. ^ Oliphant 2015, p. 64.
  17. ^ Morris, Graham. "The Battle of Lauffeld". Battlefield Anomalies. Retrieved 8 July 2019.
  18. ^ McKay 1983, p. 169.
  19. ^ Black 1999, pp. 97-100.
  20. ^ Hochedlinger 2003, pp. 259.
  21. ^ McLynn 2008, p. 1.
  22. ^ Browning 1975, p. 150.
  23. ^ Ingrao 2000, pp. 157-177.
  24. ^ Anderson 2000, p. 211.

SourcesEdit

  • Anderson, Fred (2000). Crucible of War: The Seven Years' War and the Fate of Empire in British North America, 1754-1766. Faber and Faber. ISBN 978-0-571-20535-6.
  • Black, Jeremy (1998). America Or Europe?: British Foreign Policy, 1739-63. UCL Press Ltd. ISBN 1-85728-185-3.
  • Black, Jeremy (1999). Britain as a Military Power, 1688-1815. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-85728-772-1.
  • Browning, Reed (1975). The Duke of Newcastle. Yale University. ISBN 9780300017465.
  • Carlos, Ann (author) Neal, Larry (author), Wandschneider, Kirsten (author) (2006). "The Origins of National Debt: The Financing and Re-financing of the War of the Spanish Succession". International Economic History Association.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  • De Périni, Hardÿ (1896). Batailles françaises; Volume VI. Ernest Flammarion, Paris.
  • Grant, RG (editor) (2011). 1001 Battles That Changed the Course of History. Universe Publishing. ISBN 978-0789322333.CS1 maint: extra text: authors list (link)
  • Hochedlinger, Michael (2003). Austria's Wars of Emergence, 1683-1797. Routledge. ISBN 978-0582290846.
  • Ingrao, Charles (2000). The Habsburg Monarchy, 1618-1815 (New Approaches to European History) (2019 ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1108713337.
  • Langford, Paul (1998). A Polite and Commercial People: England 1727-1783. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-820733-7.
  • McGarry, Stephen (2013). Irish Brigades Abroad: From the Wild Geese to the Napoleonic Wars. History Press. ISBN 978-1845887995.
  • McKay, Derek (1983). The Rise of the Great Powers 1648–1815. Routledge. ISBN 978-0582485549.
  • McLynn, Frank (2008). 1759: The Year Britain Became Master of the World. Vintage. ISBN 978-0099526391.
  • Oliphant, John (2015). John Forbes: Scotland, Flanders and the Seven Years' War, 1707-1759. Bloomsbury Academic. ISBN 978-1472511188.
  • Scott, Hamish (2015). The Birth of a Great Power System, 1740-1815. Routledge. ISBN 978-1138134232.
  • Smollett, Tobias (1796). History of England, from the Revolution to the Death of George III: Volume III. T Capel.
  • Thompson, Andrew (2012). George II: King and Elector. Yale University Publishing. ISBN 978-0300187779.
  • White, Jon Manchip (1962). Marshal of France: The Life and Times of Maurice, Comte de Saxe, 1696-1750 (2012 ed.). Literary Licensing. ISBN 978-1258033590.

External linksEdit