Axial flux motor

An axial flux motor (also known as an axial gap motor, or pancake motor) is a geometry of electric motor construction where the gap between the rotor and stator, and therefore the direction of magnetic flux between the two, is aligned parallel with the axis of rotation, rather than radially as with the concentric cylindrical geometry of the more common radial gap motor.[1]

A miniature DC brushless axial motor showing the integration with PCB construction techniques. The rotor shown to the right is magnetized axially with alternating polarity.

Although this geometry has been used since the first electromagnetic motors were developed, its usage was rare until the widespread availability of strong permanent magnets and the development of brushless DC motors, which could better exploit this geometry's advantages.

Axial geometry can be applied to almost any operating principle (e.g. brushed DC, induction, stepper, reluctance) that can be used in a radial motor. Even within the same electrical operating principle, different application and design considerations can make one geometry more suitable than the other. Axial geometries allow some magnetic topologies that would not be practical in a radial geometry. Axial motors are typically shorter and wider than an equivalent radial motor.

Axial motors have been commonly used for low-power applications, especially in tightly integrated electronics since the motor can be built directly upon a printed circuit board (PCB), and can use PCB traces as the stator windings. High-power, brushless axial motors are more recent, but are beginning to see usage in some electric vehicles.[2] One of the longest produced axial motors is the brushed DC Lynch motor, where the rotor is almost entirely composed of flat copper strips with small iron cores inserted, allowing power-dense operation.

BenefitsEdit

  • A motor can be built upon any flat structure, such as a PCB, by adding coils and a bearing.
  • The coil winding process and the process of joining the coil and core may be simpler.
  • Since the coils are flat, rectangular copper strips can more easily be used simplifying high-current windings.
  • It is often possible to make the rotor significantly lighter.
  • Potentially shorter magnetic path length.
  • Most structural components are flat and can be produced without specialised casting or tooling.
  • Since the magnetic path through the windings is straight, grain-oriented electrical steel can be easily used, offering higher permeability and lower core losses.[3]

DetrimentsEdit

  • The rotor is typically much wider, causing increased rotational inertia, and the higher centrifugal forces can reduce the maximum rotational speed.
  • Uneven flux distribution due to wedge-shaped segments.
  • The segments narrow towards the centre, leaving less room to arrange windings and connections.

ReferencesEdit

  1. ^ Parviainen, Asko (April 2005). "Design of axial-flux permanent-magnet low-speed machines and performance comparison between radial-flux and axial-flux machines" (PDF). MIT.
  2. ^ Moreels, Daan; Leijnen, Peter (30 Sep 2019). "This Inside-Out Motor for EVs Is Power Dense and (Finally) Practical". IEEE. Retrieved 2 August 2020.
  3. ^ "Axial and Radial flux permanent magnet machines – What is the difference?". EMWorks Blog. 2020-10-12. Retrieved 2022-04-08.