1746 Lima–Callao earthquake

The 1746 Lima–Callao earthquake occurred at 22:30 local time on 28 October with a moment magnitude of 8.6–8.8 and a maximum Mercalli intensity of XI (Extreme). The epicenter was located about 90 km (56 mi) north-northwest of the capital Lima, which was almost completely destroyed, and the subsequent tsunami devastated the port city of Callao. It was the deadliest earthquake in Peru’s history prior to the 1970 earthquake.[3][4]

1746 Lima–Callao earthquake
1746 Lima–Callao earthquake is located in Peru
1746 Lima–Callao earthquake
Local date28 October 1746 (1746-10-28)
Local time22:30
Magnitude8.6–8.8 Mw[1]
Epicenter11°21′S 77°17′W / 11.35°S 77.28°W / -11.35; -77.28
Areas affectedColonial Peru
Max. intensityMMI XI (Extreme)

Tectonic setting edit

Peru lies above the convergent boundary where the Nazca Plate is subducting beneath the South American Plate at a rate of 61 mm per year. It has been the location for many large and damaging earthquakes since historical records began, most of which triggered devastating tsunamis. The southern segment of the Peruvian part of this plate boundary is affected by the presence of the Nazca aseismic ridge, on the downgoing plate. It also marks a major change in the subduction geometry between 'flat-slab' subduction to the northwest and normally dipping subduction to the southeast. The ridge appears to act as a barrier to rupture propagation, reducing the potential earthquake magnitude. The 1746 earthquake is interpreted to be a megathrust event that ruptured the whole of the northern segment of the plate interface within this zone.[5]

Earthquake edit

The earthquake, with an estimated magnitude of 8.6–8.8 Mw,[1] was the largest to strike central Peru in recorded history, and the second largest of all time, after the 1868 Arica earthquake in the south of the country. Significant damage from the earthquake affected an area of about 44,000 square kilometers and it was felt up to 750 km away.[2] The estimated rupture length was 350 km.[6] There were at least 200 aftershocks observed in the first 24 hours after the mainshock, out of a total of 1,700 recorded in the following 112 days, although they caused no further casualties or significant damage.[2]

Damage edit

Earthquake edit

The earthquake completely destroyed the city of Lima in 3–4 minutes, and also destroyed Callao and everything else along the central Peruvian coast from Chancay in the north to Cañete in the south.[1][2][7] In Lima, all offices and all 74 churches were either damaged or destroyed leaving just 25 of the original 3,000 houses standing. Only 1,141 out of the population of 60,000 died in Lima from the earthquake shaking, despite the amount of damage. This is attributed to the intensity of the shaking increasing as the earthquake went on, giving the inhabitants the chance to escape. The total number of casualties, including those from the tsunami, was almost 6,000, although some chroniclers give higher figures for Lima, partly due to the inclusion of the effects of subsequent epidemics.[2]

Tsunami edit

The earthquake triggered a tsunami, which reached the coast half an hour following the shock, causing great damage at all Peruvian ports. Callao was worst affected, with a 24-meter runup, and 5 kilometer inundation that destroyed all 23 vessels that were in its harbor. Callao's walls were destroyed and the city was inundated, killing most of the 5–6,000 inhabitants, leaving less than two hundred survivors.[8] Those that tried to escape inland were overtaken by the wave.[9] Eyewitness accounts indicate two waves, the first of which was up to 80 feet (24 m) high. Four of the boats were carried across the ruined port and thrown up to nearly a mile inland, including the warships Fermín and San Antonio.[8] The port city of Pisco was destroyed, despite having been rebuilt further inland after the devastating tsunami that accompanied the 1687 Peru earthquake.[10] The tsunami was also noticed at Acapulco, Mexico.[7] Other particularly devastating tsunamis have occurred in Peru in 1586, 1604, and 1868.[7]

Aftermath edit

The rebuilding of Lima was planned by Jose Antonio Manso de Velasco then the viceroy of Peru, with the help of the French mathematician Louis Godin. A key part of these proposals was to restrict buildings to a single storey and widen the roads, but the plans were diluted following opposition from groups within the city and second floors were allowed as long as they used bamboo in their construction rather than adobe bricks.[11]

In 1817, 70 years after the earthquake and the tsunami, the Russian-American Company employee, head of the Sitka office, Kiril Timofeevich Khlebnikov (1784–1838) visited Callao. His account of the events of what happened on 28 October 1746 may have slight factual mistakes, but he is generally considered a good witness of things he saw with his own eyes, and his attitude in writing history is characterised as sober and realistic. It is also known that he kept a diary.[12] Khlebnikov wrote in his memoirs:[13]

In Lima I saw… an extremely astonishing sight. There, near the village of Bellavista, are still the remains of a stone wall and a few cellars, which remained from the terrible earthquake of 1746. In connection of the quake, after a few powerful shocks, the ocean had first retreated and then flowed back with a terrible force and engulfed the town and the fortress of Callao, and 24 vessels which carried silver worth 300 million piasters, and the 4 000 inhabitants of the town. Some of the fort’s walls remained intact, and within these walls 22 persons survived these events. After this terrible devastation, bodies of the drowned were thrown to the beach by the waves of the ocean, and later they were collected and stacked in the cellars. In time the bodies decomposed, the cellars collapsed, and piles of skulls and bones came to the surface from the ruins. We stood for a long time in the Callao harbor in 1817, and we often took walks to the surrounding area, and with feelings of pity we looked upon the earthly remains of such a large group of people, people like us, scattered on the ground, to the shame of coming generations. When facing a sight such as this, views on the vanity of the world and all worldly things appear in our mind completely different from the views we earlier had when floating with the whirl of these vanities.

Remembrance edit

Because the mural of the Lord of Miracles survived the earthquake intact, it became a special object of veneration in the city. There is an annual procession in which the image is carried through the streets of Lima, and it is customary for the faithful to wear purple during the month of October in commemoration.[3][14]

See also edit

References edit

  1. ^ a b c Chlieh, M.; Perfettini H.; Tavera H.; Avouac J.-P., Remy D.; Nocquet J.M.; Rolandone F.; Bondoux F.; Gabalda G. & Bonvalot S. (2011). "Interseismic Coupling and Seismic Potential along the Central Andes Subduction Zone". Journal of Geophysical Research. 116 (B12): B12405. Bibcode:2011JGRB..11612405C. doi:10.1029/2010JB008166..
  2. ^ a b c d e National Geophysical Data Center / World Data Service (NGDC/WDS): NCEI/WDS Global Significant Earthquake Database. NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information (1972). "Significant Earthquake Information". NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information. doi:10.7289/V5TD9V7K. Retrieved 14 April 2022. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  3. ^ a b "Earthquakes of Peru". U.S. Geological Survey. Archived from the original on 2011-11-01. Retrieved 10 November 2011.
  4. ^ A contemporary description of the events by one of the few survivors, the Marqués de Ovando, is to be found here
  5. ^ Sladen, A.; Tavera H.; Simons M.; Avouac J.P.; Konca A.O.; Perfettini H.; Audin L.; Fielding E.J.; Ortega F. & Cavagnoud R. (2010). "Source model of the 2007 Mw 8.0 Pisco, Peru earthquake: Implications for seismogenic behavior of subduction megathrusts". Journal of Geophysical Research. 115 (B2): B02405. Bibcode:2010JGRB..115.2405S. doi:10.1029/2009JB006429.
  6. ^ Dorbath, L.; Cisternas A. & Dorbath C. (1990). "Assessment of the size of large and great historical earthquakes in Peru" (PDF). Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 80 (3): 551–576. Retrieved 2 November 2011.
  7. ^ a b c USC Tsunami Research Group. "Historical Tsunamis". Tsunamis From Peru. University of Southern California. Archived from the original on 2011-08-20. Retrieved 9 November 2011.
  8. ^ a b Walker, C.F. (2008). Shaky Colonialism: The 1746 Earthquake-Tsunami in Lima, Peru, and Its Long Aftermath. Duke University Press. p. 8. ISBN 978-0-8223-4189-5. Retrieved 3 November 2011.
  9. ^ National Geophysical Data Center. "Comments for the Tsunami Event". Retrieved 3 November 2011.
  10. ^ Okal, E.A.; Borrero J.C. & Synolakis C.E. (2006). "Evaluation of Tsunami Risk from Regional Earthquakes at Pisco, Peru" (PDF). Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 96 (5): 1634–1648. Bibcode:2006BuSSA..96.1634O. CiteSeerX doi:10.1785/0120050158. Retrieved 9 November 2011.
  11. ^ GAR (2011). "Box 1.1 A tale of two disasters" (PDF). 2011 Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction Revealing Risk, Redefining Development. p. 3. Retrieved 9 November 2011.
  12. ^ Svetlana G. Fedorova in Kiril Timofeevich Khlebnikov: Русская Америка в «записках» К. Т. Хлебникова: Ново-Архангельск. Наука, М., 1985, с. 7, 14. / Notes on Russian America. Part I: Novo-Arkhangel’sk, p. xvi, xxii. Edited with an introduction by Svetlana G. Fedorova. Translated from the Russian edition of 1985 by Serge Lecomte and Richard A. Pierce. The Limestone Press, 1994.
  13. ^ Кирилъ Тимоѳеевичъ Хлѣбниковъ: “Взглядъ на полвѣка моей жизни”, Сынъ отечества, 1836, часть CLXXV, p. 371–372.
  14. ^ Ferreira, C.; Dargent-Chamont, E. (2003). Culture and Customs of Peru. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 42. ISBN 978-0-313-30318-0. Retrieved 3 November 2011.