Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Library of Congress
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WikiProject Library of Congress page. |
|
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days  |
 | Library of Congress Project‑class | ||||||
| |||||||
 | This page was nominated for deletion on 1 June 2013. The result of the discussion was keep. |
RFCs on citations templates and the flagging free-to-read sources edit
See
- Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Access locks: Visual Design RFC
- Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Access Locks: Citation Template Behaviour RFC
Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 16:55, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
Archive edit
Not sure why, but some contents have been archived to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Library of Congress/Archive 5 even though the link is not displayed in the header above. ---Another Believer (Talk) 13:46, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
Featured Pictures edit
There are multiple films that are Featured Pictures here but Category:FM-Class Library of Congress articles does not have them listed in the section. Not sure the problem with that. GamerPro64 22:40, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
User script to detect unreliable sources edit
I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like
- John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (
John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.)
and turns it into something like
- John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.
It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.
The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.
Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.
This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Memento (film) edit
Memento (film) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:52, 17 January 2024 (UTC)