Wikipedia:WikiProject Philippine History

      Participants

      Please feel free to add your name in the list if you want to participate. Place your name after the last entry. If you are from the Philippines, you can add this userbox in your userpage:

      Flag of the Philippines.svg This user is a native of the Philippines



      1. . User:Arius1998 (talk)
      2. . User:Alternativity (talk)
      ↑Jump back a section

      Userbox

      Feel free to add our userbox in your userpage:

      Flag of the Philippines.svg This user is a member of the WikiProject Philippine History.



      ↑Jump back a section

      Statistics

      What is "WikiWork" (ω)?

      WikiWork is a concept originally developed in April 2007 that approximates how many classes or "steps" a project's articles need to ascend for all of the project's articles to reach Featured status. You can read about it in detail in this Signpost article.

      What is the "Ω"?

      The omega represents "relative WikiWork" or the average workload per article. This involves adding up the number of steps all of the project's articles must pass to reach Featured status (with A-class articles considered one step, Good Articles two steps, B-class three steps, etc.) and then dividing this number by the total number of articles under the project's scope, including articles that have already reached Featured status. The resultant number will be between zero and six with lower numbers considered more desirable. For example, the relative WikiWork for WikiProject Aircraft is 4.693, meaning that the average article about aircraft is between C-class and start-class. By comparison, WikiProject Elements has a less daunting workload with a relative WikiWork rating of 3.600 while WikiProject Olympics is bogged down with relative WikiWork of 5.829.

      ↑Jump back a section

      Tasks to do

      The following would be articles that are in need of attention, as well as achievements that need to be known.

      Main article: History of the Philippines

      Auxiliary: National hero of the Philippines to B-class

      ↑Jump back a section

      Quality Scale

      The quality scale is used to assess the quality of an individual article.

      While much of the quality rating system is comparable across projects, Philippine History articles have additional criteria as to content. What is rated higher class article by general Wikipedia or other projects' standards will be undoubtedly be well written and encyclopedic, but may miss a item considered key to Philippine History. If it is missing key content or style, give it a lower rating. If in doubt, leave it unrated.

      Class Criteria Formal process Example
      Featured article FA Reserved for articles that meet the featured article criteria and have received featured article status after community review. Featured article candidates
      A-Class article A Reserved for articles that have received A-Class status after review by the project. Such articles are expected to largely meet the featured article criteria, and must be comprehensive, accurate, well-sourced, and decently-written; however, they may require some further copyediting. A-Class review
      GA Reserved for articles that meet the good article criteria and have received good article status. Good article nominations
      B The article meets the following five criteria:
      1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations.
      2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies.
      3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content.
      4. It is free from major grammatical errors.
      5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams.
      C The article meets criteria three, four and five of the five B-Class criteria. Criteria one and two are not required for a C-Class rating:
      1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations. (not required)
      2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. (not required)
      3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. (required)
      4. It is free from major grammatical errors. (required)
      5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. (required)
      Start The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas, and may lack a key element; it has at least one serious element of gathered materials, including any one of the following:
      • A particularly useful picture or graphic
      • Multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic
      • A subheading that fully treats an element of the topic
      • Multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article
      May be assigned by any reviewer
      Stub The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to bring it to A-Class level. It is usually very short, but can be of any length if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible. May be assigned by any reviewer
      ??? Unassessed This article is of unknown class to this project. There are currently 0 articles that remain to be analyzed.

      Any reviewer may use the WikiProject assessment template. Read the full instructions to be better guided.

      WikiProject Philippine History  
      WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philippine History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of History of the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
       ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
       ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
       
      ↑Jump back a section

      Tools

      These are some tools that might just help you in editing.

      Main tool page: toolserver.org
      • Reflinks - Edits bare references - adds title/dates etc. to bare references
      • Checklinks - Edit and repair external links
      • Dab solver - Quickly resolve ambiguous links.
      • Peer reviewer - Provides hints and suggestion to improving articles.

      Directory Directory of WikiProjects

       

      Council WikiProject Council

       

      Guide Guide to WikiProjects

      ↑Jump back a section
      Last modified on 8 June 2013, at 04:18