The Little Shop of Horrors edit

Famous and important cult film. Any thoughts on the article? (Ibaranoff24 07:20, 8 December 2006 (UTC))[reply]

  • Reception section? Cbrown1023 03:20, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguatrion issues? Too many references to "little shop of horrors" without being clear which version (1960, 1982 musical, 1986) is meant? FT2 (Talk | email) 02:03, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • You moved it, so I renamed the section... but we don't need to move this page too... Cbrown1023 04:19, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'd like to see the cite templates implemented, or at least the equivalent information. (Retrieved, work, etc.) The JPStalk to me 13:22, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Supernumerary edit

  • Less plot, more summary.
  • The lead is supposed to summarize the article, but this lead mentions the sequels, which never appear in the article proper.
  • The pictures really help the article, and they are properly licensed. Nice work there.
  • Standardize the cast section and move it up to after the plot per the style guidelines.
  • Use the cite web format for your sources.
  • Consider adding a "See also" section. (Roger Corman was the king of B-movies and should be put there.)
    • Um, try to avoid that... :) It's like a trivia section. A lot of people hate those (and trivia sections) and will be very sad to see it there. (by that I mean fail it for GA or not pass it on FA; they're real sticklers!!). Try to have all the links you need in the article itself. Cbrown1023 03:37, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • External links should be fleshed out with links to IMDB, rotten tomatoes, etc. Also, google video has the whole film uploaded, which definitely needs to be linked.
    • Make sure that you don't WP:SPAM either. None of the sites Supernumerary listed are "spam", but be aware of it. Cbrown1023 03:38, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Does the film really star the 15 actors listed in the infobox? The article even says that Nicholson only had a bit part.
    • Second that definately! Cbrown1023 03:38, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • I cut it down to four, if more should be there, re add them. Cbrown1023 03:40, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wikilink full dates.
  • I second the reception section.