Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 November 8

< November 7	November 9 >

November 8 edit

Template:Col-list edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:59, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Col-list (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

rarely used and generally redundant to more commonly used methods for generating multi-column output. for example, in Luxottica, could be replaced by {{columns-list}} or {{colbegin}}/{{colend}} or {{col-begin}}/{{col-end}}. for example, I replaced it here. Frietjes (talk) 23:11, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, provided that the ONE transclusion of this template in the article space gets resolved prior to this template's deletion. Steel1943 (talk) 04:04, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:The Human Abstract edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:24, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The Human Abstract (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

fails WP:NENAN with only four relevant links. This can be solved with normal wikilinking. The Banner talk 22:28, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

keep, has enough links. Frietjes (talk) 22:33, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox prepared food/cols edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:25, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox prepared food/cols (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused after a rewrite of template:Infobox prepared food. Frietjes (talk) 21:00, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Nice job on the rewrite, too.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 22:33, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Starbox 1 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:26, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Starbox 1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Previously transcluded in one article (Albireo); now replaced by Template:Starbox begin. eh bien mon prince (talk) 18:07, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete Frietjes (talk) 23:23, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Alex Kovacs edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:12, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Alex Kovacs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Wrong namespace, should be userified or deleted. eh bien mon prince (talk) 17:14, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete or userfy. Frietjes (talk) 22:33, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Did you know nominations/Mark John Tiranti Moody edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by NawlinWiki (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:04, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Did you know nominations/Mark John Tiranti Moody (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

While a sincere attempt at a DYK nomination, it is difficult to envisage how this page could be developed further, since there is currently no Mark John Tiranti Moody mainspace article on which to base the nomination. May even satisfy speedy deletion criterion G8 as a "page dependent on a non-existent page". Super Mario Man 16:08, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:EMF miniEURO edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:36, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:EMF miniEURO (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only one active link and transclusion - the EMF miniEURO article itself. Super Mario Man 15:03, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete Frietjes (talk) 22:32, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Actions edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:36, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Actions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The template is not employed on any pages, and several of the links are sysop options which are not generally applied from a template fixed to a page so are surplus to needs; all the other options are always accessible through Wiki's side and top bar, or Twinkle options when used. Last TFD to "keep" was in 2009, but I don't see that the template as becoming productive or widely-used since then. Ma®©usBritish^{chat} 09:35, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete Frietjes (talk) 22:32, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Heliotropes edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:45, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Heliotropes (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

With only one album and no other related links, there is no need for this navbox yet. Navigation between the artist and album is already only a click away. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 01:12, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete Frietjes (talk) 22:31, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.