Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 May 14

< May 13	May 15 >

May 14 edit

Template:SDMTS_Signs:Amtrak-20px edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was deletion of all. Non-free images are not allowed in the template namespace. RyanGerbil10(Kick 'em in the Dishpan!) 04:15, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seemingly unused templates made only of non-free images that can't be used in templates. BJBot just went and broke them all and I have no intention of fixing pointless templates. BJ^Talk 10:31, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all I am guessing they were used before when the images were there, but since the images are non-free, these templates lose their usefulness.--Crzy cheetah 22:04, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nabla (talk) 22:52, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

relisting not really for consensus but for completing the nomination by adding {{tfd}} to the templates. Nabla (talk) 22:52, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - if the images can't be used in templates, I fail to see how these templates could ever be useful. Terraxos (talk) 01:23, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all - these templates are now even more usless seeing that the images were removed due to being nonfree. RichardΩ612 Ɣ ɸ 09:03, May 18, 2008 (UTC)

KEEP: I made these templates for San Diego Trolley, and the images would fall under fair use. Thee templates were created to be used to signify that other lines run concurrent at the same station wit other lines.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Circle1 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Kick 'em in the Dishpan!) 04:31, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

These two templates seem rather odd. They are orphaned and only consist of a parameter with the name of the other template. RichardΩ612 Ɣ |ɸ 22:12, May 14, 2008 (UTC)

Delete as orphan. Weird but probably just an experiment. --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:09, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Test? CWii_{(Talk|Contribs)} 01:00, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a possible test. It doesn't seem to serve any purpose either. Midorihana^{contribs~ userpage} 06:42, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, seems like a test page / template. Cheers. _{Trance addict - Tiesto - Above and Beyond} 21:56, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Cariba Heine edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Kick 'em in the Dishpan!) 04:32, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

One line of article content about a NN subject. Not acceptable as an article, equally unacceptable here — RichardΩ612 Ɣ |ɸ 22:02, May 14, 2008 (UTC)

Delete as redundant to Template:Infobox actor.--Lenticel ^(talk) 00:14, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant. Cheers. _{Trance addict - Tiesto - Above and Beyond} 21:56, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:CRcolour edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was redirects are cheap. RyanGerbil10(Kick 'em in the Dishpan!) 04:33, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned template for a hex colour code that can be typed manually into articles getting the code from others on the subject. Standardisation is good, but templates for hex codes are overkill. RichardΩ612 Ɣ |ɸ 21:56, May 14, 2008 (UTC)

Redirect to operational template (Template:Caledonian colour) now provided. --Stewart^(talk) 05:29, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Beta Version 2.0 release edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Kick 'em in the Dishpan!) 04:33, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, and this is trivial to add into any articles that require it. This doesn't need a template.. RichardΩ612 Ɣ |ɸ 21:45, May 14, 2008 (UTC)

Delete Orphaned, useless. CWii_{(Talk|Contribs)} 01:02, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, orphan. Cheers. _{Trance addict - Tiesto - Above and Beyond} 21:56, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: the article is capable of stating this without the template restating it. Fails to add to the content of an article. Superfluous. -- Yellowdesk (talk) 04:09, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Rdt edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Kick 'em in the Dishpan!) 04:34, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anachronic template with a strange name. Not transcluded anywhere and not substed (I believe). It is a Wikipedia's self reference. — Kubanczyk (talk) 18:48, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unused, strange, and appears to be long since abandoned. JPG-GR (talk) 19:32, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the three best reasons to delete a template: redundant, unused and superceded. RichardΩ612 Ɣ |ɸ 21:33, May 14, 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Los Angeles Lakers franchise edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Kick 'em in the Dishpan!) 04:34, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The same template already exists; incorrect name for template. ● 8 ~Hype ^@ 16:51, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - practically an exact copy of an existing template. RichardΩ612 Ɣ |ɸ 17:25, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as redundant. JPG-GR (talk) 19:33, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, redundant. Cheers. _{Trance addict - Tiesto - Above and Beyond} 21:57, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as it is redundant, and the same, properly named template already exists. Vincent Valentine 16:05, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Warning4 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was userfied to User:Thatcher/Warning4. RyanGerbil10(Kick 'em in the Dishpan!) 04:37, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The template is apparently supposed to be used for warning vandals but it is not very well designed, it consists solely of an image of a stoplight with the text "Warning". It serves no purpose not better served by the standard warning templates. The template is sparsely used (only 4 translusions) so other than a minutes work its deletion will not have any negative externalities. -Icewedge (talk) 02:07, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I created the template because I prefer to write a custom warning reason (I rarely get involved in simple vandal patrol so my warnings tend to be toward long-term users with significant problems, see WP:DTTR) and I find the iconography of the usual warnings to be overly aggressive. To be honest, though, I use {{Warning5}} and {{Warning3}} much more than #4. Thatcher 11:04, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy MBisanz ^talk 18:53, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy to Thatcher's userspace. JPG-GR (talk) 19:33, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy CWii_{(Talk|Contribs)} 01:03, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy per above. Midorihana^{contribs~ userpage} 06:45, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy Cheers. _{Trance addict - Tiesto - Above and Beyond} 21:57, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:PageTabs/tabs edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Kick 'em in the Dishpan!) 04:38, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

sub page blank and not needed. – ThatWikiGuy (talk | life | I'm watching you!) 14:42, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

--
This page is not blank. It is used specifically to provide a working example for someone using the PageTabs macro to see exactly how the system is used. It provides a fully working and clear example of how to use the system. It is there because the PageTabs system is not necessarily easy to use. Paul Robinson (Rfc1394) (talk) 17:23, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you could have some information, instead of just the tabs, or even just latin text. – ThatWikiGuy (talk | life | I'm watching you!) 18:02, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RyanGerbil10(Kick 'em in the Dishpan!) 04:46, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.