Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 August 16

< August 15	August 17 >

August 16 edit

Template:Koreanruler edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Woohookitty^Woohoo! 05:23, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and effectively redundant to {{Koreanname}}. This infobox does contain a few extra parameters, however {{{temple}}} was only being used in one article, while {{{yob}}} and {{{yod}}} weren't being used at all. These features can be added to {{Koreanname}} if need be. PC78 22:57, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Andy Mabbett | Talk to Andy Mabbett 23:10, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Carlosguitar 09:53, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per additional suggestion 70.55.87.43 06:34, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Seoul Subway edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Mike Peel 09:33, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All are unused and have been replaced with {{Seoul Metropolitan Subway}}. PC78 22:41, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Andy Mabbett | Talk to Andy Mabbett 23:10, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Kent towns edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Woohookitty^Woohoo! 05:24, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Depreciated by Template:Kent which uses (or due to use eventually) a nationally consistent style. — Jza84 21:37, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Epbr123 21:50, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Andy Mabbett | Talk to Andy Mabbett 21:53, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. MJCdetroit 03:10, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Comment a) should you not notify Wikipedia:WikiProject Kent of this TfD and b) have you/will you replaced all incidents of this template with the new one? Pickle 05:57, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete replaceable by {{Kent}}. Carlosguitar 09:59, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Valencian municipality edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Mike Peel 09:31, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Such a specific infobox is not needed when a standard infobox will work. Therefore, all articles using this were standardized. No major content on the talk page either. — MJCdetroit 18:10, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom . Andy Mabbett | Talk to Andy Mabbett 19:05, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Deceased-indigenous edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Woohookitty^Woohoo! 05:26, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a much older template similar to the recently deleted Template:Indigenous Australians/deceased (TfD). In my opinion, the debate and closing rationale for that template apply precisely to this earlier attempt that happened to be overlooked. — Gavia immer (talk) 14:45, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per cited debate (speedy if possible). Andy Mabbett | Talk to Andy Mabbett 16:02, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - while I disagree with the previous deletion, this is basically the same thing. --Haemo 01:41, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.