October 25 edit

Template:Organize edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was redirect yo // Pilotguy (Cleared to land) 14:43, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Organize (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Redundant, badly worded cleanup template. There's already a {{Cleanup-restructure}} that goes with along the multitude of existant cleanup templates. Also, the related Category:Wikipedia organize is only populated through this template and should be deleted (csd c3) if the template goes. Bobet 18:33, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to {{Cleanup-restructure}}, speedy the cat once that's been done. --ais523 07:40, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
Redirect per above -- SilverStartalk 12:28, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per above --WikiSlasher 05:31, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Movetowiktionary edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete // Pilotguy (Cleared to land) 14:43, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Movetowiktionary (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

We don't need a spaceless redirect of a template. Brad Beattie (talk) 06:06, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy deleted as vandalism. (It only had an external link to an ms paint image). - Bobet 18:38, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:4x4 type square edit

Template:4x4 type square (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This template isn't what it claims to be. It's actually just spam as far as I can tell. --Brad Beattie (talk) 02:44, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:User fathers day edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was to keep... // Pilotguy (Cleared to land) 14:43, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User fathers day (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

this template promotes heteronormativity House Centipede 05:20, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Strong keep. If someone wants to wish someone else a happy father's day, by all means let them. User boxes have quite a strong precident for the bizzare (see Template:user metric-love for example). WP:BOX says that "Wikipedia is first and foremost an online encyclopedia, and as a means to that end, an online community." As such, I think this falls into the community building aspect of those means. --Brad Beattie (talk) 07:00, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per BradBeattie. I can't exactly see how this could promote heteronormativity, given that any parent or guardian can receive such a greeting - this nomination seems to err much too far on the side of political "correctness". Daveydweeb (chat/patch) 09:55, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong keep - see below. Grutness...wha? 05:25, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Gay men can have kids. Asarelah 22:41, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep more importantly, plenty of people—not just men—can be fathers! Xtifr tälk 08:51, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, not causing any harm. Please elaborate on how people who aren't men can be fathers, fathers are male by definition --WikiSlasher 09:54, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. It is not politically incorrect to be a father. The world is full of them. Valentinian (talk) / (contribs) 12:02, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:User mothers day edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was ...keep... // Pilotguy (Cleared to land) 14:43, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User mothers day (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

this template promotes heteronormativity House Centipede 05:20, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:User mothering sunday edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was ...*gasp* and keep! // Pilotguy (Cleared to land) 14:43, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User mothering sunday (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

this template promotes heteronormativity House Centipede 05:20, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.