Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2008 April 28

< Wikipedia:Files for deletion
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2008 April 28)
< April 27 April 29 >

April 28 edit

Images by User:PAROH edit

Orphaned, unencyclopedic, absent uploader -- Prince Kassad (talk) 20:48, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Julius_Wernher01.jpg edit

Image:Julius_Wernher01.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Paul_venter (notify | contribs).

Image:BLAZER.JPG edit

Image:BLAZER.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Young_sage18 (notify | contribs).
  • Orphaned, Unencyclopedic 'my car' pic, Absent uploader (only remaining contribution) BigrTex 00:43, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This picture doesn't even come close to being of use to the Wikipedia. Seems to be more like a self-promotion image than an encyclopedic image. It's kind of like a boast if you will; shouting out to other users, "Hey! Look at this car that I own!". The image description backs that up. Razorflame 02:47, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Cones.GIF edit

Image:Cones.GIF (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Nuklear (notify | contribs).
  • Orphaned, no context to determine encyclopedic value BigrTex 00:53, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Dolce_in_1994.jpg edit

Image:Dolce_in_1994.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Odiumvex (notify | contribs).

Image:CatchpennyLogo.png edit

Image:CatchpennyLogo.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Anthony5429 (notify | contribs).
  • Logo being used in the infobox. Also, nothing to explain why the logo is notable. Undeath (talk) 05:01, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:365 Success Quotes.pdf edit

Image:365 Success Quotes.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rajan311 (notify | contribs).
  • Unencyclopedic motivational book, copyvio. Orphaned. Hut 8.5 06:39, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:You can Win(Shiv Khera).pdf edit

Image:You can Win(Shiv Khera).pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rajan311 (notify | contribs).
  • Unencyclopedic motivational book. Orphaned. Hut 8.5 06:39, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:PR professionals.pdf edit

Image:PR professionals.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Idaananda (notify | contribs).
  • Not written in English, cannot be used in any article, seems to be WP:OR or advertising. Orphaned. Hut 8.5 06:43, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Tips belajar di Perguruan Tinggi.pdf edit

Image:Tips belajar di Perguruan Tinggi.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Idaananda (notify | contribs).
  • Not written in English, cannot be used in any article, seems to be a motivational guide or advertising and hence unencyclopedic. Orphaned. Hut 8.5 06:44, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Project plan.pdf edit

Image:Project plan.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by SJSU-networkers (notify | contribs).
  • Unencyclopedic class project. Orphaned. Hut 8.5 06:46, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:PressKit.pdf edit

Image:PressKit.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Lukemendes (notify | contribs).
  • Unencyclopedic press guide for a film. Orphaned. Hut 8.5 06:47, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Relloyd lopez.jpg edit

Image:Relloyd lopez.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Relloyd (notify | contribs).
  • Unencylopedic image that serves no useful purpose other than biographical. Image is likely to be orphaned except for the user page which is currently marked for Speedy deletion. Wisdom89 (T / C) 07:05, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Pompidou center.jpg edit

Image:Pompidou center.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Leland (notify | contribs).
  • No freedom of panorama in France see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Image:European-parliament-strasbourg.jpg for a similar case, building is copyrighted, the architects are still alive. Also note from WP:Copyright Regardless, according to Jimbo Wales, the founder of Wikipedia, Wikipedia contributors should respect the copyright law of these nations as best they can, the same as they do for other countries around the world Please only comment as is relevant to policy. Jackaranga (talk) 12:47, 28 April 2008 (UTC) Jackaranga (talk) 12:47, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I decided to be bold and change it to a non-free image since this image is unreplacable due to its nature. ViperSnake151 18:04, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • Image kept and tagged as fair use. -Nv8200p talk 23:24, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hope there is another photograph out there that is better, as this one does not seem to be the most flattering either of the building or of Renzo Piano's works. And it's at the top of the page in the featured section. Kristinwt (talk) 02:47, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Games.JPG edit

Image:Games.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by The_Ian (notify | contribs).
  • Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader MER-C 13:06, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete if I'm not mistaken, that's The Ian Green again. As per nom, delete. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:10, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and Protect. Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader, and the file name is generic enough that it should probably be protected against upload (per WP:IFN) Kesac (talk) 01:02, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unencyclopedic image. 99.230.152.143 (talk) 00:27, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Iangreen.jpg edit

Image:Iangreen.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by The_Ian (notify | contribs).
  • Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader MER-C 13:06, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - what, the Ian Green? Remove. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:09, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Mmodel.jpg edit

Discussion moved from April 16 to allow an editor time to address the problem -Nv8200p talk 14:40, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Mmodel.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Quantum bird (notify | contribs).
  • I do not want this image to be deleted, but I do want it to go through proper channels rather than underhanded as was being done. This image was put up for deletion today as "no rationale." Since the original uploader hasn't edited for two years, I put the rationale in myself, being a good sport. Within an hour the same deletionist again tagged this for deletion, under "non-free use rationale is disputed." I don't know what his agenda is, but this is a useful illustration and I think it should be saved. Can anyone help? Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 00:59, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as the rationale is valid and the two articles in which it is used are perfectly legitimate uses of the image as they discuss topic of the cover story of the issue featured in the image. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 03:22, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • But they don't discuss the issue or the story itself. That's what would be required for this image to be within policy. —Angr 05:49, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as neither of the articles where this image is used discusses the magazine in general or this issue of the magazine in particular, except in the caption of the image itself. Thus the image violates WP:NFCC#8 and its own licensing tag, and its rationale is invalid. Incidentally, the description of tagging an image "disputed fair use" as being "underhanded" is ridiculous, and the description of me as a "rabid deletionist" is an uncivil, and untrue, personal attack. —Angr 05:33, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Model minority is about certain minorities being recognized as successful, and having a cover story in a major magazine about that minority's success — the precise topic of the article — is certainly significant. Contrary to your assertion, I don't see where WP:NFCC#8 (or any other WP policy for that matter) requires that use of a magazine cover has to be only for illustrating the magazine itself. Are you disputing something else in the fair-use rationale, or is this your only bone of contention? Jpatokal (talk) 06:23, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • If the articles Model minority and Stereotypes of East and Southeast Asians in the United States actually discussed the Newsweek article, or the cover of Newsweek magazine, then NFCC#8 might be met. But they don't: neitzher article never discusses this issue of Newsweek, and the image's own tag says it can only be used "to illustrate the publication of the issue of the magazine in question". That is not being done in this case. —Angr 05:47, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      • The template does not assert that the image must be used to illustrate the magazine itself. The template asserts that the image must be used to illustrate the publication of the issue of the magazine in question. In Model minority, the image is captioned "April 1984 cover of Newsweek featuring an article on the success of Asian American students" — it's thus used to illustrate the publication of the issue, and the condition is met. Jpatokal (talk) 14:25, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
        • But the articles do not discuss the publication of the issue except in the caption to the image itself. Removing the image will not reduce understanding of the article, because there's nothing in the article referring to this issue of Newsweek. —Angr 23:26, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Meets NFCC#8 as improving reader's understanding of model minority. dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 09:39, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • See above: the image can only be used "to illustrate the publication of the issue of the magazine in question", and neither article where the image is used discusses this issue of Newsweek. —Angr 05:47, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep meets NFCC#8. Razorflame (talk) 14:40, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • See above: the image can only be used "to illustrate the publication of the issue of the magazine in question", and neither article where the image is used discusses this issue of Newsweek. —Angr 05:47, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. —Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 06:28, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. —Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 06:31, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Relunctantly, delete per Angr's justification. I don't see why this cover is particularly significant or necessary in either of the two articles in which it is used. And he's right in that the usage violates the instructions in {{non-free magazine cover}}. Kelly hi! 14:54, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails WP:NFC#10a Jackaranga (talk) 15:29, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Unfortunately, fails WP:NFC criteria 8. Does not significantly enhance the readers understanding due to tendentious placement. Wisdom89 (T / C) 17:21, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment NV8200 re-opened this after I noted that the image was neither tagged in-article nor on the article talk page. I hadn't intended for a re-opening, but simply wanted to remind closing admins that for a while, it seemed in vogue, if not in policy, to tag and/or note on talk pages that an image was of concern, and that sort of courtesy allows many problems to be sorted out. That said, in this particular case, I'm not sure there's a means to include more about the Newsweek material which would in itself justify the image, and I accept the deletion decision here without reservation. ThuranX (talk) 20:08, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Lutonbestxi.jpg edit

Image:Lutonbestxi.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mattyspringltfc (notify | contribs).
  • Not suitable under GFDL as little individual images are not free use. Can't roll back to previous version as that had the club crest in, which isn't free use either...... ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:24, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - pretty sure there's no GFDL agreement for each and every image in this collage. Certainly no evidence of such. And it's an abomination of nature (not sure which criteria that fits under though...) Yuck. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:08, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Longcat.JPG edit

Image:Longcat.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cream (notify | contribs).

Image:2007KapsMarketingPacket.pdf edit

Image:2007KapsMarketingPacket.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Seattlekaps (notify | contribs).
  • Unencyclopedic promotional leaflet. Orphaned. Hut 8.5 19:41, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:A Forde Thesis.pdf edit

Image:A Forde Thesis.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by AForde (notify | contribs).
  • Academic thesis = original research, text asserts it is copyrighted. Cannot be used in articles and is orphaned. Hut 8.5 19:43, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:A new dictionary.pdf edit

Image:A new dictionary.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ccamta (notify | contribs).

Image:About PEAS programme.pdf edit

Image:About PEAS programme.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Vishalarora2007 (notify | contribs).

Image:Press Kit - English 2006 no bio rev.pdf edit

Image:Press Kit - English 2006 no bio rev.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by JM2006 (notify | contribs).
  • Unencyclopedic press release. Orphaned. Hut 8.5 20:03, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Reorganizacija kao mera za sprecavanje stecaja vladimir malbasic.pdf edit

Image:Reorganizacija kao mera za sprecavanje stecaja vladimir malbasic.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Pinkfloyd789 (notify | contribs).
  • Serbian academic paper. Original research, cannot be used in any articles (and would have to be translated which would take a very long time), and quite possibly a copyright violation. Orphaned. Hut 8.5 20:06, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Profile of Syed Akbar Journalist.pdf edit

Image:Profile of Syed Akbar Journalist.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mehditanveer (notify | contribs).
  • Content available at Syed Akbar, this version cannot be displayed or used in articles. Orphaned. Hut 8.5 20:09, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Project1 Layout 1.pdf edit

Image:Project1 Layout 1.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Booskaboo (notify | contribs).
  • Unenyclopedic profile, can't be used in articles due to format, copyvio. Orphaned. Hut 8.5 20:09, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:PXI.pdf edit

Image:PXI.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ranjitnambiar1 (notify | contribs).
  • Original research, advertising, we do already have an article on the subject, this image cannot be used in articles due to its format. Orphaned. Hut 8.5 20:19, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Rush grace under pressure.jpg edit

Image:Rush grace under pressure.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jcmurphy (notify | contribs).
  • Was nominated for deletion in the past. Unfree image with fair use rationale that is linked to a single article History of Rush, however, it does not convey any significant understanding beyond what is presented to the reader in the text alone. Wisdom89 (T / C) 20:32, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Per nom. ALthough it's a 'nice' image, the article doesn't tie to it in a significant enough way to warrant its inclusion. ThuranX (talk) 23:26, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Denver Harbor Promo.jpg edit

Image:Denver Harbor Promo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by HarryCane (notify | contribs).
  • Non-free image purportedly of a famous music group that should therefore be easily replaced with a free image (concert or otherwise) Wisdom89 (T / C) 20:40, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Band split up, so a free image is unlikely to be created. --Fritz S. (Talk) 20:47, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Are we positively certain that there are no free images available. Surely band played shows or toured. Wisdom89 (T / C) 21:32, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image kept. No evidence of free images being available or that can be created now. -Nv8200p talk 23:27, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Hristo stoichkov.jpg edit

Image:Hristo stoichkov.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Gejoro (notify | contribs).
  • The image was obviously taken at a press conference, access to such events is usually restricted to professional photographers. Its uploaded under low resolution: 250x250 which is common for image thumbnails. No EXIF data, of course. However it is tagged as PD-Self. There are only 2 contributions of User:Gejoro: the image upload and adding the link in the article. I suppose he was just a novice who didnt care of licenses. The story however continues on Commons where this same image was uploaded by another user and again as PD-self :-D Sadly, I could not detect it via Google Images despite of the numerous searches. But I am sure this is a case of copyright violation. Spiritia (talk) 21:34, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Already deleted on Commons. --Spiritia (talk) 07:12, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2008_April_28&oldid=1136092519"