Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Image:Emperor penguins.jpg

Emperor Penguins edit

Mature Emperor penguins. Unknown location

Reason: Below image size requirements (only 640x480), subjects cut off.
Nominator: Witty lama

Delist — Witty lama 03:35, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delist - size, lack of contrast, composition. --YFB ¿ 03:57, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Info. Original nomination here and previous delist attempt here. Pstuart84 Talk 08:48, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delist. Poor quality (low resolution and compression artifacts). Not one of Wikipedia's best images in my opinion. I think this is actually the third time this picture has been nominated for delisting (see Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Emperor penguins.jpg delist in addition to Pstuart84's link above). --KFP (talk | contribs) 10:08, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Compare it with other FPs. ^8thstar 14:06, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Subject cut off. Ishaana 16:47, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
comment I did not know about these previous failed attempts to delist! I'm very surprised to see it has managed to stay for this long, but nevertheless, there is obviously support for the pic. We had best make sure then that this nom is given its full run so as to not appear to have "rushed it through". Witty lama 19:43, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delist -- Moondigger 15:11, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - This is the third time this image has been nominated for delist. Looks like people opinion had changed at last. --Arad 15:19, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delist - Not because I think it's poor quality, but because it's not the BEST Wikipedia can offer. --Arad 15:18, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delist. Low resolution, blown highlights on penguins' bodies, unknown location. Pstuart84 Talk 18:05, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted. --KFP (talk | contribs) 07:24, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]