Supposed "Vandalism" by this bot edit

Dear User:Magioladitis, could you please have a look at this edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Odenbach_%28Glan%29&type=revision&diff=997650210&oldid=994164132 ? Before this edit, the article was readable, after that it is not. (I am not interested in the subject, i came to the article while repairing nbsp accidents, i.e. when "nbsp" is by accident displayed in the read view. I am de-N, en-2.) Himbeerbläuling (talk) 13:39, 11 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Dear User:Knightoften, i suppose my complaint against the bot is about the same issue as your êdit two sections above here. Do you know whether it had consequences? Thank you in advance. --Himbeerbläuling (talk) 18:11, 18 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Himbeerbläuling Hi! One of the sections was made entirely unreadable, with error messages visible when just viewing the page. After I undid the bot's edit, the text seems fine! I believe the bot is attempting to change "formatting blanks." The Odenbach (Glan) article you were looking at appears to have the same type of graphic as in the Bempflingen article. Knightoften (talk) 23:02, 21 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. --Himbeerbläuling (talk) 06:25, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Shailendra_Raj_Mehta edit

Hello @Yobot , in 2016, you have marked Shailendra Raj Mehta with "BLP" tag, I have reviewed the content and it seems updated with relevant references. Can you remove the tags or allow me to remove that? Njoy deep (talk) 10:34, 29 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Mass edits contrary to MoS edit

See Template talk:Em#Bad bot behavior. All that conversion of <em> element to <i> (with '' markup) needs to be undone.  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  21:55, 10 February 2023 (UTC)Reply