User talk:Wikid77

User_talk:Wikid77
This is the talk-page for User:Wikid77 (checked for messages every few days).
Archives: 1 (May06-Feb08) 2 (Mar08-) 3 (Oct08-) 4 (May08-) 5 (Oct09-) 6 (Jan11-) 7 (Jan12-)

Archived 2011

I archived 31 topics of 2011 in /Archive_6. -Wikid77 17:20, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

I archived 11 topics of 2011 in /Archive_6. -Wikid77 20:12, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

I archived 37 topics of 2011 in /Archive_6. -Wikid77 12:52, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

I archived 37 topics of 2011 in /Archive_6. -Wikid77 12:52, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

I archived 13 more topics of 2011 in /Archive_6. -Wikid77 13:10, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Archived 2012

I archived 50 topics of 2012 in /Archive_7. -Wikid77 05:36, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Your perspective would be of value

Hi there. I would appreciate it if you could visit Talk:Muhammad. The article, Muhammad, has changed significantly since it originally passed WP:GA several years ago. It now states in the opening paragraph that Mohammad is the Founder of Islam and has relegated to a note at the end of the article that Muslims, themselves don't believe this. I have started a discussion on the talk page concerning this and would value your input. Thanks so much. Veritycheck (talk) 01:01, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Your suggestions on Jimbo's page

Concerning your comments on Jimbo's talk page, I'm not sure that's the most effective place to express your suggestions. You may want to add your ideas and feedback here, where the actual development is taking place. – Confession0791 ^talk 03:34, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

ANI

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding This thread is for input about Fae's ability to serve as administrator. As you are involved, it is recommended that you recuse but do not have to. You are free to participate in discussions. Please keep them civil and constructive. The thread is User:Fae. Thank you.—cyberpower ^Chat_Online 01:30, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Re: Burnout and Meltdown of admins

Many will disagree, but I think that is one of your better ideas. How about creating a subpage and fleshing this out with the help of other editors and admins? Viriditas (talk) 07:08, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

My primary objection is the narrow scope. Burnout and meltdown affects all users, editor and admin alike. After all, admins are just editors with a few extra buttons. Your essay would reach a wider audience if you widened the scope. Viriditas (talk) 09:55, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

BTW, I want to congratulate you on your dedication to trying to solve problems on Wikipedia. You deserve an award. Viriditas (talk) 23:05, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	For your dedication in trying to solve problems and for presenting new ideas. Please keep up the fantastic work. Viriditas (talk) 23:07, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

How about a community-elected "Adminship Committee"?