Rudget RFA edit

You're right. Rudget. 17:30, 8 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

No, you weren't too harsh. I accepted your comments, because at least they were true and relevant. Thank you for taking the time to congratulate me. Best, Rudget. 08:45, 12 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XX - January 2008 edit

Archives  |  Tip Line  |  Editors

 
The Novels WikiProject Newsletter
Issue XX - January 2008
Project news
  • Welcome to a new calendar year (for most of us!)
  • During 2007 we have seen membership grow from just below 200 to just below 300. Also our tagged article count now runs at about 16,000 considerably up on this time last year. It highlights the message given from last year that there is much work to do improving and caring for this corner of our "wikiworld". Sadly our Auto-list editor moved on and we sorely need an able replacement. On a more positive note we have seen the establishment of task forces, style guidelines and peer review. Our latest outreach initiative is the Novels Job Centre.
Member news
  • The project has currently 299 members, 9 joined & 0 leavers since the start of November 2007
  • n.b. this graph copy has been included as a "one off" example just for this newsletter to let you see the addition to our membership page.
Other news
Task force news
  • The Australian task force (i.e. WikiProject Australian literature) is always welcoming new participants interested in Australian fiction.
Novel related news
Current debates
From the Members

Welcome to the Twentieth issue of the Novels WikiProject's newsletter! Use this newsletter as a mechanism to inform yourselves about progress at the project and please be inspired to take more active roles in what we do.

We would encourage all members to get more involved and if you are wondering what with, please ask.

Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk), Initiating Editor

Collaboration of the Month
Newsletter challenge

Last month's challenge (Belinda) was completed by new member User:Nick mallory.

  • The first person to start the article is mentioned in the next newsletter. This month's article is Beryl Bainbridge's award-winning Master Georgie.
  • All 2007 challenges were met, congratulations to all writers. Click show for the complete list.

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This is an automated delivery by KevinalewisBot -- 15:07, 9 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Happy (Old) New Year! edit

 

Two weeks too late, you say? Not in the Julian calendar!
Here's hoping the new year brings you nothing but the best ;) Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:45, 14 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

The design of this almost completely impersonal (yet hopefully uplifting) message was ripped from Riana (talk · contribs)

Rudget! edit

 
Dear Twooars, my sincere thanks for your participation in my second request for adminship (and later on, on my talk page after the closure), which ended with 113 supports, 11 opposes, and 4 neutral. I would especially like to thank my admin coach and nominator, Rlevse and Ryan Postlethwaite who in addition to Ioeth all inspired me to run for a second candidacy. I would also like to make a special mention to Phoenix-wiki, Dihyrdogen Monoxide and OhanaUnited who all offered to do co-nominations, but I unfortunately had to decline. I had all these funny ideas that it would fail again, and I was prepared for the worst, but at least it showed that the community really does have something other places don't. Who would have though Gmail would have been so effective? 32 emails in one week! (Even if it does classify some as junk :P) I'm glad that I've been appointed after a nail biting and some might call, decision changing RFA, but if you ever need anything, just get in touch. The very best of luck for 2008 and beyond, Rudget. 17:03, 15 January 2008 (UTC) Reply

My RfA edit

  Thank you for voting in my RfA, which closed unsuccessfully with 25 support, 18 oppose, and 6 neutral. Thanks for the support and I'll look forward working with you. --BritandBeyonce (talk) 06:38, 21 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

My Rfa edit

My effort to regain adminship was unsuccessful, But I wanted to thank you for taking some time out of your day to voice your opinion.--MONGO 19:16, 27 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

flower photographs edit

The orange flower is either a Hibiscus or a member of a related genus (it reminds me a little of Kosteletzkya); I'd guess a member of Hibiscus section Bombicella, but with 300 species of Hibiscus identifying a particular plant is a non-trivial task. If it was photographed in the wild the locality would help identification. Lavateraguy (talk) 11:13, 3 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

If it's from India I would go for Hibiscus hirtus. It's obviously malvaceous (stamens fused into a narrow tube). The capitate stigmas mean that it's not a member of Gossypieae, and the presence of an epicalyx that it's not a member of Abutilinae. Most Malvinae have three bracteoles (your plant has a least half-a-dozen), and the exceptions have more than five, and filiform, stigmas. That leaves Hibisceae, and not Pavonia and allies (ten stigmas), nor Decaschistia, nor Senra. Most of the other related genera are absent from India. A spreading corolla is right for Hibiscus hirtus, and flowers less than 2 inches in diameter is if anything too large - Hooker's Flora of British India says 1/2", but Drury's Handbook of the Indian Flora says middle sized. The flowers are variously described as white, pink and scarlet. Hibiscus micranthus is similar, and may not be specifically distinct. Lavateraguy (talk) 15:47, 3 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

See Bombicella Gallery Lavateraguy (talk) 15:49, 3 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

That's the problem with having 300 species of Hibiscus - one can get an idea of the bounds of the genus that is narrower than reality. I can't be sure of species identities, especially when I've only seen at best a score of species, and haven't been able to track down/compile a complete list of species, never mind descriptions. Hibiscus talbotti was segregated from Hibiscus hirtus a few decades back - but I wouldn't know how to distinguish them. Lavateraguy (talk) 23:10, 3 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

If you have one near you, see if you can take photos at a botanical garden (see List of botanical gardens) or somewhere else where someone who (presumably) knows what they are doing has made the identification already. I'm a little scared of almost-right identifications (who can really tell all the different species of Nicotiana from each other just based on a photo, for example?). But nice pictures (I especially liked the red berry one, for the lighting and composition). Kingdon (talk) 21:28, 3 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Unfortunately botanical gardens don't always have the right identifications. Lavateraguy (talk) 23:10, 3 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

I don't think that the blue flower is fabaceous, but I doubt that I could place it with any confidence even if more details were visible. My guess would be Solanaceae or some other Lamiid family. If it is fabaceous I'd suspect something basal in the family, rather than a member of Papilionaceae. Lavateraguy (talk) 23:23, 3 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

I didn't realize it would be this difficult :P... Thank you, Lavateraguy and Kingdon, for all your effort. :) - TwoOars 16:42, 5 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! edit

Hi, just dropping by to say thanks for supporting my RfA, I totally wasn't expecting to get so much support, it was a really pleasant surprise. Also, someone pointed out the force edit summary option to me, so I've turned that on now. Melesse (talk) 04:17, 4 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Your comments edit

Hey, I thought your comments at triona's RfA were very thoughtful and insightful!  :-) delldot talk 16:19, 4 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

You're probably right, but it's an interesting discussion that I think should be had somewhere. Maybe WT:VAN? I think it's easy to develop that sense of urgency when you're fighting vandals, especially when you're watching the edits scroll past in an IRC channel with bots reporting suspicious edits. On the other hand, I think we do miss a lot of vandalism. I find it hours old in my watchlist all the time, especially with pages like date articles. But I think we can probably come up with technical fixes for that kind of thing. Anyway, see you around. Peace, delldot talk 17:05, 5 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

My niece is dead. edit

AIDS finally claimed her.

In her will, she only stipulated that the following modification be made, then immediately undone.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mantis&oldid=190347899

Also, are you an admin yet? Cause you really should be, you do some good work.

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XXI - February 2008 edit

Archives  |  Tip Line  |  Editors

 
The Novels WikiProject Newsletter
Issue XXI - February 2008
Project news
  • We have had a solid month with an increase of project tagging work. We now have a bit of a backlog of assessments needed.
Member news
  • The project has currently 305 members, 6 joined & 0 leavers since the start of January 2008.
  • The member page has been reorganized with it being noted that many member are largely inactive. However this is not unusual for WikiProjects and we have a very loyal core of editors who work diligently away often without recognition.
Other news
  • Many book cover images were tagged for deletion because of missing or incorrect fair use rationales in January. Several notes on this subject were placed on the General Forum.
Task force news
Novel related news
Current debates
  • The short story taskforce talk page has a discussion relating to the (non)inclusion of articles on stories by well known authors. Find the debate here.
From the Members

Welcome to the Twenty First issue of the Novels WikiProject's newsletter! Use this newsletter as a mechanism to inform yourselves about progress at the project and please be inspired to take more active roles in what we do.

We would encourage all members to get more involved and if you are wondering what with, please ask.

Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk), Initiating Editor

Collaboration of the Month
Newsletter challenge

Last month's challenge (Master Georgie) was completed by member User:Nick mallory again. Although is worth mentioning that much of the current content is the work of User:Yllosubmarine.

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This is an automated delivery by KevinalewisBot --13:38, 11 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Recently uploaded images edit

I spotted Image:Gram-negative_cellwall-schematic.png and Image:Centriole3D.png, and just wanted to say how much I like them. The transparency in your centriole image works very nicely. You seem to be very skillful in using Inkscape. Do you still have the SVG versions of the images because if you wouldn't mind I would like to see the SVG components and how they are composited? Might you consider uploading the SVG versions as replacements for the PNG? The PNG images versions aren't scaling down very nicely, at least not on my low-res. display, whereas SVG usually does. Perhaps you could reply here to keep the thread of conversation in one place? Thanks, - Neparis (talk) 00:54, 14 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi Neparis, sorry I didn't reply earlier... and thanks for the kind words. :) But I haven't used Inkscape that often; in fact the cell wall images are the first two I made in Inkscape. And that's why I couldn't figure out how to make the svg images show up well on Firefox. The problem with Inkscape SVGs is that the image part shows up ok but the areas with text and textboxes show up as plain black boxes. (And of course, another problem is size... the Inkscape SVGs are ~4 to 8 times larger than the PNGs.) So I had to convert the SVGs to PNGs. :-/ So if you think this problem can be solved I will upload the svg images or if you want the svgs to modify them yourself, I can send the files by email. Image:Centriole3D.png on the other hand, was made in Google SketchUp.- TwoOars 06:42, 17 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
This is the problem with the Inkscape SVG images: (older version of Image:Centriole-schema.SVG)- TwoOars 06:57, 17 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
I see the problem, but I have no idea how to fix it. For some reason, the SVG file is missing the inkscape version. What version of inkscape did you use? A good place to ask for advice might be Wikiproject Graphics Lab. What about the SVG version of Image:Gram-negative_cellwall-schematic.png? Is it uploaded anywhere? Also, I'm not sure what you mean by the inkscape SVGs being ~4 to 8 times larger than the PNGs. (older version of Image:Centriole-schema.SVG) is only 14984 bytes, which is much smaller than the PNG at 371 kilobytes. - Neparis (talk) 20:23, 21 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

No, I did not upload the SVG versions of the cell wall images because I found that they too have the same problem when opened in Firefox. I used Inkscape 0.45. And yes, the centriole SVG image is smaller than the PNG but it's the other way round for the cell wall images... I guess the SVG size increases much more with increase in image complexity; the Gram negative-cell wall image has 6294 elements and the Inkscape SVG file size is ~6.5 MB whereas the PNG is only 815 KB.- TwoOars 03:00, 22 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

It is hard to know why that SVG image would be so large. I know I have created smaller SVG images with more elements. I think it should be possible to find a way to reduce the size of yours. Could you upload it on WP temporarily? I will have a look at it and try to find out what's causing the problem. - Neparis (talk) 17:31, 22 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Image:Cellwall-GN.svg -> done :) - TwoOars 17:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Unfortunately, I cannot look at it because inkscape seems to run out of memory while attempting to load it. However, from studying the SVG file by hand, I notice you have used lots of paths. Maybe that is the problem? Could you re-do it with fewer paths? - Neparis (talk) 19:38, 22 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
I posted a request for assistance at the Graphics Lab/Images - Neparis (talk) 05:29, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

<- ok, thanks Neparis. I think User:Jeff Dahl has given some sensible suggestions at Graphic_Lab/Images_to_improve. Let's see if that helps. :) - TwoOars 12:09, 28 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

I redrew the image and uploaded it: Image:Gram negative cell wall.svg. It is based on a number of different sources, and gives a different look. I'm happy to make alterations. I could try for a 3D look, but I'm not sure it whether it would be an improvement. Jeff Dahl (Talkcontribs) 04:12, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Photo IDs edit

I just noticed your request for photo IDS at the plant project page. The red fruit belongs to something in the genus Capsicum, which includes bell peppers and hot peppers. That one appears to be one of the newer ornamental varieties that's gaining in popularity. The orange flower is in the family Malvaceae and is almost definitely in the genus Hibiscus, but as these are very popular ornamentals, IDing it any further than that would be impossible from a photo (and with my limited knowledge). Hope that helps! DJLayton4 (talk) 02:39, 26 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

I just now noticed that someone already posted on this more extensively. Sorry about that... DJLayton4 (talk) 02:41, 26 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, apparently it's not as easy as I first thought. :-/ - TwoOars 12:11, 28 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Cellwall-GN.svg listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Cellwall-GN.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 04:30, 1 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XXII - March 2008 edit

Archives  |  Tip Line  |  Editors

 
The Novels WikiProject Newsletter
Issue XXII - March 2008
Project news
  • An election has been proposed to elect a council that will govern the whole project for a month or more, if you would like to debate this, go to the general discussion forum here
Member news
  • The project has currently 312 members, 7 joined & 0 leavers since the start of February 2008.
Other news
  • Last months collaboration brought few improvements it would be nice if more got involved with the one for this month.
Task force news
Novel related news
Current debates
  • The debate on "studying literature" is now taking place here. Please have a look and add to the debate.
From the Members

Welcome to the Twenty Second issue of the Novels WikiProject's newsletter! Use this newsletter as a mechanism to inform yourselves about progress at the project and please be inspired to take more active roles in what we do.

We would encourage all members to get more involved and if you are wondering what with, please ask.

Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk), Initiating Editor

Collaboration of the Month
Newsletter challenge

Last month's challenge (The Field of Vision) was completed by member User:Elizabennet as a fairly basic "stub" if anyone knows more to enhance it, please do.

  • The first person to start the article is mentioned in the next newsletter. This month's article is Norman Douglas' perhaps most famous work South Wind (LE).

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This is an automated delivery by KevinalewisBot -- 16:46, 7 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Novels - 1st Coordinators Election edit

An election has been proposed and has been set up for this project. Description of the roles etc., can be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Coordinators. If you wish to stand, enter your candidacy before the end of March and ask your questions of anyone already standing at Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Coordinators/May 2008. Voting will start on the 1st April and close at the end of April. The intention is for the appointments to last from May - November 2008. For other details check out the pages or ask. KevinalewisBot (talk) 14:15, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Archives  |  Tip Line  |  Editors

 
The Novels WikiProject Newsletter
Issue XXIII - April 2008
Project news
  • Elections are now taking place for coordinators of the project for the next three months. Any editors interested in seeking a coordinator position, or who want a say in who is selected, should indicate as much here.
Member news
  • The project has currently 381 members, 69 joined & 0 leavers since the start of March 2008.
Other news
  • The project's long-time lead coordinator, Kevinalewis, has announced he is not standing as a candidate for another term in that capacity. We would like to take this opportunity to express our gratitude to him for the extraordinary work he has done for this project.
  • To Kill a Mockingbird was promoted to Featured Article status on April 3. This brings our FA count to 13!
  • It has been suggested that WikiProject Sword of Truth be merged into WP:NOVELS, perhaps as a task force.
Task force news
Novel related news
Current debates
  • There is a discussion regarding further task forces for other genres of fiction now taking place here.
From the Members

Welcome to the Twenty Third issue of the Novels WikiProject's newsletter! Use this newsletter as a mechanism to inform yourselves about progress at the project and please be inspired to take more active roles in what we do.

We would encourage all members to get more involved and if you are wondering what with, please ask.

Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk), Initiating Editor

Collaboration of the Month
Newsletter challenge

Last month's challenge (South Wind) was completed by member User:Blathnaid with a nice starting stub.

  • The first person to start the article is mentioned in the next newsletter. This month's article is Kate Christensen's 2008 PEN/Faulkner award winner The Great Man.

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:46, 7 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

RfA vote edit

I would just like to thank you for your vote on Wisdom89's RfA, I thought I was the only one who used that line of reasoning. It's refreshing to see someone else who realizes that RfA votes are an excellent means of determining the worth of canidates before the process. RyanGerbil10(Kick 'em in the Dishpan!) 21:44, 21 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Lady Aleena's RfA edit

  Twooars...Thank you for supporting my nomination for adminship. Through it I have become aware of a great many people who can help me in my future editing endeavors. Even though I was not promoted, your support shows that I still have something to contribute to Wikipedia, even if it is minor edits to fix spelling and grammar to working in WikiProjects to help others make great articles. If you wish to further discuss the nomination, please use its talk page. Stop by my talk page anytime, even if it is just to say hello. Have a wonderful day! - LA @ 04:28, 30 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Backlog at Category:Wikipedians seeking to be adopted in Adopt-a-user edit

Archives  |  Tip Line  |  Editors

 
The Novels WikiProject Newsletter
Issue XXIV - May 2008
Project news
Member news
  • The project has currently 380 members, 1 joined & 2 leavers since the start of April 2008.
Other news
Task force news
Novel related news
Current debates
From the Members

Welcome to the Twenty Fourth issue of the Novels WikiProject's newsletter! Use this newsletter as a mechanism to inform yourselves about progress at the project and please be inspired to take more active roles in what we do.

We would encourage all members to get more involved and if you are wondering what with, please ask.

feydey (talk), Temporary Editor

Collaboration of the Month
Newsletter challenge

Last month's challenge (The Great Man) was completed by our member User:MeegsC .

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:51, 9 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XXIV - May 2008 edit

Archives  |  Tip Line  |  Editors

 
The Novels WikiProject Newsletter
Issue XXIV - May 2008
Project news
Member news
  • The project has currently 380 members, 1 joined & 2 leavers since the start of April 2008.
Other news
Task force news
Novel related news
Current debates
From the Members

Welcome to the Twenty Fourth issue of the Novels WikiProject's newsletter! Use this newsletter as a mechanism to inform yourselves about progress at the project and please be inspired to take more active roles in what we do.

We would encourage all members to get more involved and if you are wondering what with, please ask.

feydey (talk), Temporary Editor

Collaboration of the Month
Newsletter challenge

Last month's challenge (The Great Man) was completed by our member User:MeegsC .

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

SteveCrossinBot (talk) 08:32, 10 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

WP:Novels edit

Don't forget the roll call and to reactivate your membership. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 07:55, 17 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

AAU reminder notice edit

A friendly reminder from the Adopt-a-User project =)
 
Hey there Twooars! This is a friendly reminder to update your status at Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User/Adoptee's Area/Adopters whenever it is appropriate in order to provide new users with the most up-to-date information on available adopters. Also please note that we will be removing adopters who have not edited in 60 days. If you become active again (and we hope you do!) please feel free to re-add yourself. Cheers!

And now, for Fvasconcellos' traditional nonsectarian holiday greeting! edit

  Wherever you are, and whether you're celebrating something or not, there is always a reason to spread the holiday spirit! So, may you have a great day, and may all your wishes be fulfilled in 2009! Fvasconcellos (t·c) 14:49, 24 December 2008 (UTC)Reply
Is this a combination of my Christmas greeting from 2006 and my New Year's greeting from last year? Why, it most certainly is! Hey, if it ain't broke...

Hi, thanks for the Centriole3D image. How accurate are the dimensions as I would like to refer to it for an art project? MarkMarkkrom (talk) 10:04, 27 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Questions / request for advice edit

Hi,

I need help from an experienced Wikipedian, and I saw your name over at WP:ADOPT.

I need your advice concerning WP:WPOOK, which I've been coordinating. The set of pages the project concerns is listed at Portal:Contents/Outline of knowledge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Outline of knowledge#Projected outline, and has grown to about 500 articles in the encyclopedia.

The goals of the WikiProject are:

  1. Increase awareness of readers of the existence of the outlines on Wikipedia
  2. Complete the existing outlines
  3. Create an outline for every subject that is exensive enough to benefit from having an outline (core subjects and major or extensive fields). There are thousands of these.
  4. Recruit as many editors to work on these as possible (we need thousands of editors working on these)
  5. Surpass portals in number by the end of the summer, and leave them in the dust by the end of the year
  6. Get the major outline subject areas displayed on the Main Page (in place of or in addition to the portal links at the top of the page)
  7. Increase the OOK to higher quality than Britannica's Outline of Knowledge (published in its Propaedia volume).

I was hoping you could comment on how to achieve the goals above.

Also I'm interested in every possible way of reaching readers and editors of Wikipedia. How can I get the most eyes and typing fingers on Wikipedia's outlines? Contacting editors directly without a reason relevant to them is spam, which I'd like to avoid. There are 75,000 regular editors on Wikipedia, and I want to contact all of them. So how do I do it? Directly or indirectly, I don't care which, piecemeal or all-at-once, all methods are fine with me. But I've got to find ways. I need your help.

I would also like to know how to find or attract editors to create new outlines. And I need advice on finding editors to help write the new outline article mentioned above (it needs to be fleshed out, completely referenced, and brought to featured article status).

Can you recommend anyone in particular who might be interested in sinking their teeth into a project like this? Or ways to reach groups of editors? Or ways to reach all editors? I welcome any and all advice you might have.

I look forward to your reply on my talk page.

The Transhumanist 03:19, 1 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

The WikiProject Novels Newsletter - July 2009 edit

The July 2009 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Alan16(talk)

WikiProject Novels - August 2009 Newsletter edit

Alan16 (talk) 17:13, 22 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Novels December 2009 Newsletter edit

Alan16 (talk) 15:48, 17 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

And now, for FV's traditional last-minute nonsectarian holiday greeting! edit

  Here’s wishing you a happy end to the holiday season and a wonderful 2010.
Fvasconcellos (t·c) 15:44, 25 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

DNA Replication edit

I see you are/were a regular editor at the DNA Replication article, and I'd like it to be a Good Article on Wikipedia. Please comment [Talk:DNA_replication#WP:GA_Candidate|there]]. Thanks! --HarshAJ (Talk)(Contribs) 14:03, 13 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Notification of automated file description generation edit

Your upload of File:Blue flower - profile.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:47, 13 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

  • Another one of your uploads, File:Colored slinky.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:03, 18 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Twooars. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Alpha 9 (Robert Silverberg anthology)) has been reviewed! edit

Thanks for creating Alpha 9 (Robert Silverberg anthology), Twooars!

Wikipedia editor Mduvekot just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I am suggesting to merge the entire Alpha series into a single article. The proposal is here

To reply, leave a comment on Mduvekot's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Mduvekot (talk) 03:29, 7 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Twooars. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Blue flower - profile.jpg edit

 

The file File:Blue flower - profile.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused low quality photo of an unidentified flower

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 11:34, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply