Retired
This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

Precious anniversary edit

Precious
 
Five years!

Miss you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:48, 11 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

... six years now, all the best with your studies! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:32, 11 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Dumb question.... edit

I might have asked you this before and forgotten. Why did you not push Lyra to GAN? Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 02:23, 23 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Casliber: Mainly just a lack of time to work on it. I was nearly there, but then sophomore year of college happened and my free time disappeared. I doubt I'll be back in any real capacity any time soon (and even if I were my enthusiasm for astronomy has waned), so if you want to push it to GAN I'd say go for it. It shouldn't take much work at all assuming standards haven't changed much over the past four years. StringTheory11 (t • c) 16:00, 23 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Precious anniversary edit

Precious
 
Seven years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:53, 11 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Gerda Arendt:, thank you. Hope all is well with you and everyone else here. Thought I might get back into Wikipedia during the pandemic, but instead I've been getting outside and exploring the mountains as much as I can. There's so much adventuring that I want to do while I'm still in my 20s and able to that there's no time for WP. StringTheory11 (t • c) 04:15, 13 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Precious anniversary edit

Precious
 
Eight years!

enjoy the mountains! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:03, 11 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Gerda Arendt:. Thank you! Trail running and skiing in the mountains are some of my favorite activities these days. Hope all is well. StringTheory11 (t • c) 16:27, 11 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

"Ḯ" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 24#Ḯ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 20:36, 24 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Periodic table by article work needed edit

 Template:Periodic table by article work needed has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 09:13, 26 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Good article reassessment for Temnospondyli edit

Temnospondyli has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:36, 1 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of V2295 Ophiuchi for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article V2295 Ophiuchi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/V2295 Ophiuchi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Lithopsian (talk) 18:07, 2 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Upsilon1 Cephei" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  The redirect Upsilon1 Cephei has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 3 § Upsilon1 Cephei until a consensus is reached. Astronomical Editor (talk) 08:23, 3 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

"O3o" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  The redirect O3o has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 11 § O3o until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 04:45, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply