Pan Brerus
Welcome edit
|
June 2012 edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Red hair, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. NeilN talk to me 03:58, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
- A forum is not a reliable source. Please click the link to see what is acceptable. Thank you. --NeilN talk to me 12:51, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
Notability of Ludwig-Karl Ratschiller edit
I am glad you want to discuss it. My concern is that simply being a partisan does not make one a notable; there were over a million of partisans in WWII and most of them were not notable. And as currently written, the article does not imply that LKR did anything beyond, well, being a partisan. You say "Ratschiller is the only German WWII partisan in Italy". First, the article calls him Italian, not German; second, even if this is true - being the only Russian baker in the Czech republic does not make one notable. You write: "He should be in the Guinness Book of Records for deserting 3 times from 2 different armies". Is he? That would make him notable. Otherwise we veer towards WP:OR. I am sorry for being difficult, but the article needs help. The offline and non-English sources you cite may suggest he is notable due to coverage of him, but this is not discussed in the article. If the sources explain what makes him unique and remarkable, could you expand the article to make this clear? Did he inspire others during of after the war, perhaps? Was he seen as a hero afterwards and given honors? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 00:25, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
- Again, we have to respect WP:N. If you read German or Italian (you may want to add WP:BABEL userboxes to your userpage), please see if there is anything in those sources to help make the case he is notable. I expect there may be something in non-English sources, but unless you can write it out or find somebody who will, we have a problem that threatens the article with deletion. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 18:24, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 4 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brera (district of Milan), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lombard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
T-V distinction edit
You recently made this edit to T-V distinction. I did not roll these changes back but they are unsourced and need to be referenced. Could you add references to this? Thanks, Dave Dave (djkernen)|Talk to me|Please help! 21:19, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Message Waiting edit
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Disambiguation link notification for October 29 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Seborga, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lérins (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
February 2014 edit
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Untranslatability may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- However, though the words are the same, the concepts are distinguished, so when hearing about a ({{lang|it|''nipote''}} one is likely to ask whether a child's child or a sibling's child is meant.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:50, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- Error is now edited out. Thanks.Pan Brerus (talk) 23:39, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
March 2014 edit
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Italian Wars may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- (1495), according to Alessandro Beneditti|editorial=deremilitari.org|accession=22nd March 2014}}</ref> and could not prevent the French army crossing the Italian lands as it returned to France.<
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:03, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 24 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Milan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Visconti (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Re:Rome edit
Hallo,
and thanks for writing to my talk page! I found your edit problematic because you applied a concept ("urban area") to define another (the city): since Milan's urban area is larger than Rome's,than the city of Milan is larger than the city of Rome. But in Italy (and the wikipedia articles, also the one about Milan, reflect it), statistically a city is considered equivalent to a "comune", not to its urban or metropolitan area, which unfortunately have not been yet univocally defined in a statistical way (see the talk page of Roma (and its archives) on wiki:it about it. Rome is considered to be the largest city (as area and number of inhabitants), because it is the largest comune. You can check for example the "Calendario Atlante De Agostini", which is the best Italian reference about geography, about that. BTW, the same is largely valid also outside Italy (check here): the city of Paris has 2.2 millions inhabitants, not 12 millions, as its metropolitan area has (check [[1]]). Why in Italy (and abroad) do we consider significant the comune and not its urban area? I suppose because the latter is only (still) a fuzzy (look at the numerous lists of cities in wikipedia according to the different definitions about it) statistical concept, while the former is firmly rooted in 2-3000 years of history, is an administrative unit, has a flag, its soccer team(s), and so on.
About my revert, at Wikipedia there is the Bold, revert, discuss cycle. If someone reverts your edit, you have not to take it personally (I am reverted often too), but bring your opinion to the talk page, and starts a discussion (as you did). A greeting to Milan (a beautiful city, where I try to go at east once each year) from the Helvetia Felix :-) Alex2006 (talk) 05:47, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
Message Waiting edit
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Dusty|💬|You can help! 05:36, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit
Hello, Pan Brerus. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit
Hello, Pan Brerus. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit
Hello, Pan Brerus. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)