If you leave a new message on this page, I will reply on this page unless you ask me to reply elsewhere.

This page has been removed from search engines' indexes.

This is my talk page.

Please send me a message by clicking on the link directly above! Note: if you send me a message here, I will reply here, just below where you sent the message (unless you ask me to reply elsewhere), so check this page for an answer! You do not need to have an account or log in to leave a message, so feel free to get in touch!

vn-3This user talk page has been vandalized 3 times.

One Of Seven Billion, you are invited to the Teahouse edit

 

Hi One Of Seven Billion! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Theopolisme (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 24 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Removing broken links edit

Hi One Of Seven Billion, this is no big deal but I just wanted to suggest you use a different terminology in your edit summary when delinking redlinks. The convention here is that a "broken link" refers to a malformed or link-rotted URL. Redlinks are Wikilinks that are often intentionally set up as indicators that an article should be written on the topic. For example if I was writing an article on the history of Albania and I noticed that there was no article on one of the country's most prominent modern politicians then I might give a brief description of his influence on the country and leave a redlink to him in the article so that other editors might notice that there is no article on that notable figure and would then be encouraged to write one on that topic. By delinking redlinks you're essentially making the editorial decision that the redlinked target is not notable enough to support a stand-alone article. That's an OK position to take but I just wanted to warn you that using the phrase "removing broken link" might be considered misleading by some people who are used to Wikipedia's terminology conventions. So just a heads up. -Thibbs (talk) 17:48, 10 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

You can also read more on this topic (if you're interested) here. -Thibbs (talk) 17:50, 10 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

May 2013 edit

Welcome! edit

Hello, One Of Seven Billion, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! 7&6=thirteen () 18:02, 10 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

August 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm Auric. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Fornication without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Just a note that the link does work and Morocco is a real country. Auric talk 17:09, 20 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Mary Ann - Black Lace.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Mary Ann - Black Lace.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:56, 9 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

European Court of Human edit

You (Anglophone) are always so cool and skeptical. Rightshttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Court_of_Human_Rights

Look what beautiful statistics - Table has organized the German-speaking. I wanted to, yes, to improve. But, my powers are miser.195.244.180.59 (talk) 14:53, 7 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for September 25 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Eaton House Group of Schools, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kensington and Chelsea. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 25 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, One Of Seven Billion. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi One Of Seven Billion. Please do not unilaterally remove ongoing deletion discussions from FfD, like you did here. This is inappropriate conduct, and may result in a block. Thanks for your understanding. Kind Regards, FASTILY 19:36, 20 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Editor's Barnstar
Thank you for citing and improving the LDV Convoy article, I'm extremely impressed at the amount of content and cites you've added so thanks! :),

Happy editing, –Davey2010Talk 18:11, 20 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Rollback granted edit

 

Hi One Of Seven Billion. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war.
  • If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
  • Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Widr (talk) 20:57, 25 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to WP:STiki! edit

Hello, One Of Seven Billion, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Here are some pages which are a little more fun:

  • The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users!
  • Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes!

We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (talk) 15:38, 27 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

Note: Having a username change after you start using STiki will reset your classification count. Please let us know about such changes on the talk page page to avoid confusion in issuing milestone awards. You can also request for your previous STiki contributions to be reassigned to your new account name.

--Citationhelper (talk) 01:58, 28 August 2017 (UTC) Thank you for making me aware of your revision to my edit.Reply

Image without license edit

Unspecified source/license for File:Clapham, The Manor School - geograph.org.uk - 3423388.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Clapham, The Manor School - geograph.org.uk - 3423388.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 10:45, 3 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Pending changes reviewer granted edit

 

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Alex ShihTalk 12:25, 7 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, One Of Seven Billion. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, One Of Seven Billion. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Latest edit of Haydon School edit

Why did you delete the bit on the Interact CLub and the school tie colours. This was a constructive edit Thegr8creator (talk) 09:44, 31 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

it was fine edit

the mount Albert grammar school edit was correct me and my others in the student body would like it to be left as a protest to the fact that secular public education has been compromised — Preceding unsigned comment added by Enemy of the sate (talkcontribs) 11:11, 31 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reliable Sources edit

Hello !! I understand that you require my edit on Sport England to be verifiable by a reliable source. I understand that this is Wikipedia policy. I shall attempt to comply. What will be acceptable to you? Thank you for your time and interest.

(Btw. I was on the phone this morning to Sport England and I actually told them that I would deliberately write this up on their Wikipedia page. I have also had a discussion with a proper government department about this)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.101.233.181 (talk) 11:43, 31 May 2019 (UTC)Reply 

Message left on your talk page. One Of Seven Billion (talk) 12:11, 31 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

removal edit

wow talk about censorship. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TD4RKW0LF90 (talkcontribs) 12:56, 31 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Sample from The Carnival Is Over.ogg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Sample from The Carnival Is Over.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 28 November 2021 (UTC)Reply