Welcome edit

Welcome!

Hello, Neil Clancy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

JamieS93 04:16, 20 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

re:Page Protection edit

Heh, I don't really mind.... not a bad idea through... Do you know where I'd request? All I can find is this, is that becuase I'm meant to go directly to an admin? Cheers - Kingpin13 (talk) 05:26, 1 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Re: SWAT edit

I left a note at Benny 919 (talk · contribs)'s talk page for now, as I trust they had a good reason for those edits. –Juliancolton | Talk 16:34, 23 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Talk:Mikaela Banes#Formatting for article edit

Hello, Neil Clancy. I was wondering if you would not mind weighing in on this discussion. Flyer22 (talk) 23:01, 3 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

m 4 article edit

Hi, Could I ask you to please be polite. Your comments on the M-4 page about the pictures was, in my opinion, rude. You said adding pictures was using the article as a picture dumping ground. You reverted my addition of the pictures. This is not an appropriate use of the revert feature. Using revert is for vandalism. The article is about the M4. I addded in M-4 pics, including an example of the M4 being used in a police context (the US Marshal at the door doing an arrest). OnBeyondZebrax (talk) 03:37, 25 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Firearms edit

Welcome to the WikiProject Firearms. I hope you enjoy being a member.--LWF (talk) 00:37, 3 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

image alt edit

There's software available that reads the text out loud to them, or that prints it in braille.—Kww(talk) 18:44, 10 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

You sound so skeptical. Browsealoud is just one. There are others.—Kww(talk) 02:45, 11 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Middle-earth character infoboxes edit

Hi there. You're signed up as a member of Wikiproject Middle-earth. There's a discussion on character infoboxes going on here. It's heading towards a fairly inconclusive 'no change' at present. If you're interested please express your views (for or against the proposal, or an alternative) at the WP:M-E talkpage. Cheers. 4u1e (talk) 20:44, 7 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Input request edit

Ancient Roman inquires edit

Your input would be appreciated at

Thanks.--Doug Coldwell talk 21:11, 9 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Additional input request edit

Your input would be appreciated at

Thanks.--Doug Coldwell talk 16:22, 11 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Tannhauser Gate edit

Please note that attempt is being made to redirect / delete Tannhauser Gate without reopening the AfD which closed with a consensus to keep...... --Michael C. Price talk 21:29, 9 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Dacia edit

 
Hi! From your edits, it looks like you might be interested in ancient Dacia. Would you like to join the WikiProject Dacia? It is a project aimed to better organize and improve the quality and accuracy of the articles related to these topics. We need help expanding and reviewing many articles, and we also need more images. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 05:12, 7 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Tannhauser Gate edit

There is a discussion here regarding Colonel Warden's decision to move Tannhauser Gate to Tears in rain (soliloquy) without discussion. As you took part in previous related discussions on this matter, I am informing you of the current discussion. ---RepublicanJacobiteTheFortyFive 15:57, 5 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Otium edit

How do I go about getting Otium reassessed to possible B-Class and getting a higher assessment of "importance"?--Doug Coldwell talk 16:25, 9 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Neil Clancy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey edit

 

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

  1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
  2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
  3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
  4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
  5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, SteviethemanDelivered: 01:12, 8 December 2016 (UTC)Reply