User talk:Lakun.patra/Archive 2014

Sacred Falcon

Hi. Why did you tag my userbox AdmireAbdusSalam for deletion? Aren't those exempt from the normal deletion guidelines? --Sacred Falcon (talk) 14:01, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Sufi Sayyed Abraar Hasan Shah Qibla

Hi this is in regard the page Sufi Sayyed Abraar Hasan Shah Qibla, please the reliable source as you stated in your last message. I am trying to find something about him over the news but unfortunately I could not get anything, I request if you can upto Feb 20 I would definitely be able to provide some as there would be an yearly congregation over the place and I am sure that will be in news.--Anasm100 (talk) 21:48, 3 January 2015 (UTC) C'est le zizi ca! On va le manger!

November 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Mindtree has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Mindtree was changed by Lakun.patra (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.860878 on 2013-11-12T19:56:01+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:56, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

over-tagging

Thanks for helping us deal with problems, but some of your recent tagging seems more enthusiastic than it is helpful. The tags on Blue Express just confused things, and A1 , which you used on Pipra Bidya is only for use when you cannot tell what the subject of the article is. Even "insufficient context", which you have used on several film articles, doesn't make much sense to me when an article is about a film, and the film has a specified (and notable) director and specified (and notable) actors. "News release" is appropriate for articles which come close to being advertisements, but not enough so for deletion, not for plain descriptions. Please concentrate ofn the major problems. DGG ( talk ) 01:21, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Foiwe

The subject article was PRODed by yourself - it has been restored as a contested PROD. You may wish to consider WP:AfD in the light of this result. - see also User_talk:Ronhjones#Deletion_of_Foiwe, a bit of an eye-opener... :-) Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 20:24, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Deletions

I have been looking at your recent deletion activity. I'm sorry but you seem to not be following notability guidelines or deletion guidelines. I suggest you stop all prods/nominations and familiarize yourself with the relevant guidelines. In ictu oculi (talk) 13:12, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

and at the very least, you need to make a thorough search for sources before nominating; the standard for deletion is that no referenes can be found to establish notability, not that there are no such references presently in the article. DGG ( talk ) 18:10, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

User:DGG, I just noticed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bachelor of Computer Application. The user does not seem to be responding to Talk page communication and is continuing to make no reference to notability or deletion guidelines. In ictu oculi (talk) 22:04, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

I stopped tagging xfd to articles after you posted this. But these 2 articles i have tagged might either need to be re written or deleted all together. And your query on why i had withdraw nominations for Beda People, I don't want to delete any article if it can be improved. I tagged those as they already had been tagged for many years. But once i tagged the creator of the article responded and made many requisite changes.Hence withdrew nomination. But the above 1 you have mentioned is not a case of notability.I have mentioned "IT NEEDS A REWRITE".I do make mistakes and i am sorry for that but do check all my XFDs. Why most of them are deleted if i am wrong in nominating them?

Along the same lines, please note:

Deletion review for Computer Economics

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Computer Economics. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Fscavo (talk) 18:19, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Merge

Hello Lakun.patra,
If you ever want to Merge just read all of this,
You don't need to come to AFD if you would rather Merge something :)
Thanks and Happy Editing - BTW Happy New Year :)
–Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 01:46, 30 December 2014 (UTC)