Saiff Naqiuddin

𝖜𝖊𝖑𝖈𝖔𝖒𝖊 𝖙𝖔 𝖒𝖞 𝖙𝖆𝖑𝖐 𝖕𝖆𝖌𝖊

Beyonce

You need to raise yourt massive proposed changes on the Talk page. We have a huge and long-term problem with people adding non-notable "awards" and other trivia to these list articles, and you seem to have no other are of interest. Guy (help! - typo?) 14:14, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

@JzG: I understand, I've just merged all her awards into one template–that's all and I still do not understand why you deleted all my works, very disappointed, yeah I understand about the non-notable awards, I used to do the same thing back in 2019 where I add all the non-notable awards into Britney Spears' awards page and when someone deleted it, I'm mad & kept defending myself but now I already understand about those non-notable awards, and the thing is I'm not even add non-notable awards into Beyonce, can you please give me at least one understandable reasons why you reverted. I stay awake 5 days straight to merged and find a reliable source and now you just deleted it, like w** ???????. Saiff Naqiuddin (talk) 17:09, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

@JzG: and plus if you want to delete some of the awards that you think "NON-NOTABLE", just delete it and no need to delete all my edits, nonsense. Saiff Naqiuddin (talk) 17:16, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

The issue here is that this is an article that is already 327,361 bytes long and it's just about awards. That's already hugely disproportionate. You, an editor with a very narrow editing focus, added another 73,184 bytes, which places it in the 100 longest articles on Wikipedia. That is beyond what any reasonable person could defend, IMO. Guy (help! - typo?) 18:22, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

@JzG: Okay so what the solutions are right now, the thing is Beyonce has been nominated and won too many awards, and what's wrong if this page listed in one of the 100 longest articles on Wikipedia, because it something that can't be prevented, I'm pretty sure she will win hundreds of the others new awards in the future. Saiff Naqiuddin (talk) 18:44, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Trim it down to the genuinely significant ones, remove the ones that are merely nominations. Guy (help! - typo?) 21:27, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

@JzG: So here's a list of awards that she merely nominations:

• All Africa Music Awards
• BBC Music Awards
• BBC Radio 1's Teen Awards
• Billboard Touring Awards
• Cinema Eye Honors
• Dorian Awards
• Emmy Awards
• Golden Globe Awards
• Guild of Music Supervisors Awards
• Hawaii Film Critics Society Awards
• iHeartRadio Music Awards
• MTV Africa Music Awards
• MTV Australia Awards
• MTV Millennial Awards
• MTV Video Music Brazil Awards
• Nickelodeon Australian Kids' Choice Awards
• Nickelodeon UK Kids' Choice Awards
• Satellite Awards
• Shorty Awards
• TEC Awards
• UK Music Video Awards

Are you kidding me, so now you telling me to remove those awards, such as Emmy? Golden Globe? Satellite Awards?? which is those three are the biggest awards in the world! I really don't understand why. Saiff Naqiuddin (talk) 10:18, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Saiff Naqiuddin, I am saying that the article is vastly oversized, and your edit made it worse. Beyoncé is not, contrary to popular belief, the most important phenomenon in the history of the universe. The Fandom wiki is over yonder ----> Guy (help! - typo?) 11:43, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of awards and nominations received by Beyoncé, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Columbia and Drake. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Christina Aguilera

Once again: stop undoing the edits and removing prizes based on your own opinion. Before giving your opinion or making an edit, open the source and make sure of what you doing. Top of the Pops, Smash Hits and Virgin Media recognize both second and third place, for this there are positions next to the names of the respective artists, as seen here (Smash Hits), here (Top of the Pops) and here (Virgin Media). In this edition of Smash Hits, even the tenth place was mentioned. This is not my opinion, it is the sources. Like this Top of the Pops source: RUNNER-UPS. They would not need to set up a podium if the award was given to just one artist. The same about the Virgin Media Music Awards, you said that they recognize only the winner, when the source itself clearly specifies "2nd" and "3rd" places. Come on! For what purpose do you think there is exactly a "note" about this on the awards lists? Read carefully the note: Certain award groups do not simply award one winner. They recognize several different recipients, have runners-up and have third place. Since this is a specific recognition and is different from losing an award, runner-up mentions are considered wins in this award tally.
I don't know what the reason your refusal to accept and understand something that is put into practice on other lists and, as I said on the talk page, the criterion must be the same on ALL artists' lists. For example, Kylie Minogue's is a featured list and no voting user was opposed to the method of recognizing second and third place in the awards. I am wrong? Do such awards only recognize a ONLY ONE winner? Ok, bring a source that says just that. As long as there is not, the method should continue. Again, it is precisely to avoid such confusions that the "Notes" section exists in the lists. So after you removed polls and online prizes that you judged to not be "a real award", and considered some of them "invalid" to Aguilera's list, but that yourself added to Britney Spears' list (as seen here and here), now will you want to get into an edit warring because you refuse to open the sources? Nyvak (talk) 21:06, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Copyright infringement

Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. You must not copy and paste text from sources you find on the web into articles as you did in the article Hammond Square Mall. The infringing text has been removed because the material you copied is subject to copyright, as is almost everything on the web. When creating or expanding articles, you should completely rewrite the information from the source using your own words. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:58, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Hammond Square Mall for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hammond Square Mall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hammond Square Mall until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

-- Asartea ^{Talk | Contribs} 09:32, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Nevada Childhood Cancer Foundation Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nevada Childhood Cancer Foundation Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Edit summary

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision diffs
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! KyleJoan^talk 03:11, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Freebritneymovement2020.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Freebritneymovement2020.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Free Britney movement

Please stop changing the photo and propose a change on the talk page. I trust that you're familiar with WP:BRD. Thanks. KyleJoan^talk 18:17, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to List of awards and nominations received by Britney Spears. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 09:00, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

"79th Golden Globe Awards" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 79th Golden Globe Awards. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 16#79th Golden Globe Awards until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Rickyurs (talk) 03:49, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Oscar’s edit

Hey thx for fixing my edit I saw it was in there twice and didn’t realize the one I was deleted had all the award tables. I think the other one had just the summary and I assumed both were the same. Eg224 (talk) 03:12, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Grammy Award for Best Song for Social Change

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Grammy Award for Best Song for Social Change requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – Pbrks ^(t • c) 04:45, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Glory (Britney Spears album) tracks

Template:Glory (Britney Spears album) tracks has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Muhandes (talk) 12:27, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Winona Ryder

Template:Winona Ryder has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:01, 14 June 2023 (UTC)