Hello, Jfhutson,

I saw that you recently created this category and marked it as a "tracking category". If you anticipate that it will remain empty, could you add a {{emptycat}} tag to it? Otherwise, it is subject to deletion as a CSD C1 empty category. Liz Read! Talk! 01:33, 12 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Pages with links to the Bibleversefinder tool edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Pages with links to the Bibleversefinder tool requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:09, 12 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Pages with links to the Bibleversefinder tool edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Pages with links to the Bibleversefinder tool requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 01:27, 14 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Psalms edit

Sorry about reverting you on the article, - but can we find a better lead image than one suggesting a Baroque painting? We are fighting Christing bias, DYK. (I am Christian, but still.) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:24, 27 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Gerda Arendt: what image do you suggest? The current Hebrew text in the infobox isn't even Psalms, and I think something showing David has more value than words practically no one can read. Davidic authorship is a shared belief between Jews and Christians so I don't see the bias issue. But if you have an idea that's less "biased" go ahead and make the edit. --Jfhutson (talk) 12:53, 27 September 2019 (UTC)Reply
I am travelling, so have no time to even look. Feel to just revert me if you don't know something closer. You can refer to this thread. I was in a rush, sorry. How about a search for a good lead image on the article talk? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:15, 27 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks! edit

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your addition to article "Kippah" edit

Hello, Jfhutson!

I found a statement in the article Kippah that I questioned. It apparently was added by you on 29 October 2015, stating: "It is considered a sign of respect for anyone in a synagogue to wear a kippah," with a link to Bradley Shavit Artson's book Jewish Answers to Real-Life Questions.

I haven't seen the book you cite, but this sentence suggests to me that it's closer to required by etiquette or custom that even non-Jews wear a kippah. I would like to suggest some possible rewordings:

Some have stated that it is considered a sign of respect for anyone in a synagogue to wear a kippah.

Though not a requirement, it is considered a sign of respect for anyone in a synagogue to wear a kippah.

It is considered a display of respect when non-Jews in a synagogue wear a kippah.

Though not required, when a non-Jew wears a kippah in a synagogue, it is considered a sign of respect.

I'd be interested to know what you think about these potential modifications. For example, do they improperly change the sense of the citation? If I don't hear any feedback in two weeks, then I'll probably make a change along the lines of the ones I've suggested. Jkgree (talk) 21:59, 4 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Presbyterian Mission Agency.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Presbyterian Mission Agency.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:13, 7 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Presbyterian congregations by century of establishment requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 21:13, 30 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 9 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rowing (sport), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ergometer. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 9 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Archive sources edit

Hello, Thank you for your note. What i have added are archive sources. And for us it's a reliable source. Furthermore, the link we have added works. So why did you think that what i have added should be deleted ? Thanks for your reply.

Orphaned non-free image File:International Mission Board.gif edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:International Mission Board.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 19 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

IMPORTANT edit

Hey, this is me again (my IP got changed up)... I am wondering if you have had the chance to rewrite the contentious section on The Lord's Supper in Reformed theology? I believe you mentioned you had access to several Catholic scholars on Augustine, and we were talking about that. Let me know, since I am interested in seeing the article developed.

Thanks --70.24.87.56 (talk) 22:38, 7 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Presbytery of New Brunswick.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Presbytery of New Brunswick.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 21:49, 22 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Boys Hope Girls Hope.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Boys Hope Girls Hope.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 30 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:New Castle Presbytery.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:New Castle Presbytery.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:43, 12 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Reformed Church in the United States.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Reformed Church in the United States.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:01, 28 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:People from Guyenne edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:People from Guyenne indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 04:33, 9 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Martin Lloyd Jones edit

Looking at the edit history of the page it looks like I inadvertently added information I thought I was removing there. Thanks for taking it out. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 07:57, 19 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:07, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Academic staff of Carolinum, Zurich edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Academic staff of Carolinum, Zurich indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:18, 13 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Bibleverse being used as model. edit

Could you please comment at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Latter_Day_Saint_movement#Book_of_Mormon_citations at efforts to create a "mormonverse" with work at Template:Mormonverse and Module:Mormonverse?

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Pages with Bible version errors edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Pages with Bible version errors indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 02:13, 22 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Princeton Seminary seal.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Princeton Seminary seal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:54, 27 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Infinity of God" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  The redirect Infinity of God has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 25 § Infinity of God until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 01:29, 25 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Precious anniversary edit

Precious
 
Seven years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:43, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Nederduitse Gereformeerde Kerk.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Nederduitse Gereformeerde Kerk.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 28 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 September 1 § Hymns by language edit

 

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 September 1 § Hymns by language on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. + Qwerfjkltalk 09:48, 1 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:World Communion of Reformed Churches logo.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:World Communion of Reformed Churches logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:42, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Template editing edit

Just a notice that an edit of yours to {{WikiProject Christianity}} changing WikiProject banner to the sandbox version has lead to the automatic template-editor protection of Module:WikiProject banner/sandbox and Module:Pagetype/sandbox. I'm not sure why you've used the sandbox version, but could you revert this if/when possible? Thanks. Aidan9382 (talk) 18:30, 13 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

I’m really sorry that was a dumb mistake from copy pasting the sandbox where I was testing the change. I think you’ve fixed it, let me know if there’s anything else I need to do. — JFHutson (talk) 20:18, 13 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
If you are testing things properly you should not need to make 5 consecutive edits of highly used live code. Please take care with your template editing, thanks — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 22:35, 13 April 2024 (UTC)Reply